Advertisement

Re-evaluation of area reduction factors and their impact on floods in South Africa

  • Jakobus Andries Du PlessisEmail author
  • Wynand Loots
ICWEES2018 & IWFC2018
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Geo-environmental integration for sustainable development of water, energy, environment and society

Abstract

The hydraulic design of structures depends on rainfall and runoff records to model and predict flood frequency for design purposes. The amount of runoff (and consequently flooding) from a catchment area has a direct relationship to the amount of rainfall in that catchment area, but as the point rainfall in any given area is likely to be more than the representative average rainfall over the entire area, a factor needs to be derived to transform point rainfall to representative areal rainfall. This factor is known as the Area Reduction Factor (ARF) and has been calculated and researched in many previous independent studies. The traditional methods for estimating ARFs are empirical in nature and include methods such as the UK Flood Studies Report (NERC 1975), the US Weather Bureau (USWB 1957), and Alexander (1990). The research presented in this paper focuses on re-evaluating ARF’s estimates using the UK Flood Studies Report (NERC 1975) and Alexander’s method (Alexander 1990) by following an analytical approach based on Bell’s method (Bell 1976). This research uses statistical methods to evaluate the validity of previously published ARFs. The results presented in this paper indicate that the empirical methods currently in use (specifically Bell’s nomogram) to derive ARFs may result in conservative estimates of flood peaks. There is ample evidence to suggest that modern analytical techniques can be applied to longer rainfall records in order to make a more accurate estimate of the ARFs.

Keywords

Floods Areal reduction factors Storm rainfall Areal rainfall 

References

  1. Adamson P (1981) Technical report TR 102 - southern African storm rainfall. S.l.: Department of Water AffairsGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander W (1990) Flood hydrology for southern Africa. SANCOLD, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander W (2001) Flood risk reduction measures. University of Pretoria, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander W (2002) The standard design flood. South Afr Instit Civil Eng 44(1):26–30Google Scholar
  5. Allen R, DeGaetano A (2005) Considerations for the use of radar-derived precipitation estimates in determining return intervals for extreme areal precipitation amounts. J Hydrol 315:203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asquith W, Famiglietti J (2000) Precipitation areal-reduction factor estimation using an annual-maxima centered approach. J Hydrol 230:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bacchi B, Ranzi R (1996) On the derivation of the areal reduction factor of storms. Atmos Res 42:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell FC (1976) The areal reduction factor in rainfall frequency estimation, s.l.: Institute of HydrologyGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengtsson, L & Niemczynowicz, J 1986. Areal reduction factors from rain movement. Nordic Hydrology, 17(2):65–82.Google Scholar
  10. Cunnane C (1989) Statistical distributions for flood frequency analysis. In: Operational Hydrology Report no. 33. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  11. de Michéle, C, Kottegoda, N T & Rosso, R 2001. The derivation of areal reduction factor of storm rainfall from its scaling properties. Water Resour Res 37(12):3247–3252.Google Scholar
  12. Desbordes, M, Raous, P & Trévisiol, Y 1984. Areal reduction factors on short time and space intervals. Water Science Technology, (16):189–198.Google Scholar
  13. Durrans SR, Julian LT, Yekta M (2002) Estimation of depth-area relationships using radar-rainfall data. J Hydrol Eng 7:356–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill TD (2005) Transformation of point rainfall to areal rainfall by estimating areal reduction factors using radar data for Texas. Dissertation, Texas A&M UniversityGoogle Scholar
  15. Görgens A (2007) Joint peak-volume (JPV) design flood hydrographs for South Africa., s.l.: WRCGoogle Scholar
  16. Hershfield D (1962) An empirical comparison of predictive values of three extreme value procedures. J Geophys Res 68(4):1177–1179Google Scholar
  17. Holland D (1967) The Cardington rainfall experiment. Meteorol Mag 96:193–202Google Scholar
  18. Lombardo, F, Napoletano, F & Russo, F 2006. On the use of radar reflectivity for estimation of the areal reduction factor. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6:377–386.Google Scholar
  19. Middleton B and Bailey A (2008) Water resources of South Africa, 2005 study (WR2005). S.l. Water Research CommissionGoogle Scholar
  20. Myers VA and Zehr RM (1980) A methodology for point-to-area rainfall frequency ratiosGoogle Scholar
  21. NERC (1975) Flood studies report, II edn. Natural Environment Research Council, U.K.Google Scholar
  22. Omolayo, A S 1989. Relationships between point and areal rainfall for flood and drought assessments. Unpublished PhD thesis, Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  23. Omolayo A (1993) On the transposition of areal reduction factors for rainfall frequency estimation. J Hydrol 145:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Mejía JM (1974) On the transformation of point rainfall to areal rainfall. Water Resour Res 10(4):729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. SANRAL (2006) Drainage manual, 5th edn. South African National Roads Agency Ltd, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  26. Shaw EM, Beven KJ, Chappel NA, Lamb R (2011) Hydrology in practise, 4th edn. Spon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Sivapalan M, Blöschl G (1998) Transformation of point rainfall to areal rainfall: intensity-duration-frequency curves. J Hydrol 204:150–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smithers JC (1996) Short-duration rainfall frequency model selection in southern Africa. Water SA 22(3):211–217Google Scholar
  29. Smithers JC and Schulze R (2000) Long duration design rainfall estimates for South Africa, s.l. Water Research CommissionGoogle Scholar
  30. Smithers JC, Schulze R (2004) The estimation of design rainfalls for South Africa using a regional scale invariant approach. Water SA 30(4):435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Svensson C, Jones D (2010) Review of methods for deriving areal reduction factors. J Flood Risk Manag 3:232–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. USWB (United States Weather Bureau) (1957) Rainfall intensity-frequency regime, the Ohio Valley. Technical paper 29, United States Department of Commerce. Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Van der Spuy, Rademeyer P (2010) Flood frequency estimation methods as applied in the Department of Water Affairs. Department of Water Affairs, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Wageningen A, Du Plessis JA (2007) Are rainfall intensities changing, could climate change be blamed and what could be the impact for hydrologists? Water SA 33(4):571–574Google Scholar
  35. Veneziano D and Langousis A (2005) The areal reduction factor: a multifractal analysis. Water Resour Res, 41(7)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil EngineeringStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations