Advertisement

Monthly streamflow estimation in ungauged catchments of northern Algeria using regionalization of conceptual model parameters

  • S. Zamoum
  • D. Souag-GamaneEmail author
Original Paper
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins is considered as a real challenge worldwide. Considerable efforts have been devoted to tackle this issue. However, no single method can be considered as the best solution and employed everywhere. So, the main objective sought for this work is to provide continuous monthly streamflow information in ungauged catchments in northern Algeria, needed for planning and water resources management. Thus, the first part of this work is devoted to the evaluation of the performance of a monthly water balance‑based rainfall-runoff model, namely GR2M, in gauged catchments in northern Algeria. The rainfall-runoff modeling step allowed the delineation of the zones, within the study area, where the GR2M model is suitable. In order to delineate homogeneous regions, prior to regionalization of the GR2M model’s parameters, two classification techniques have been assessed (principal component analysis (PCA) and self-organization maps (SOM)). Regional models between the model’s parameters and features of the catchments have been derived. The rainfall-runoff modeling results show that the water balance‑based GR2M model is not recommended for semi-arid regions. On the other hand, the regionalization results show that the regionalized models, based on the SOM classification technique, led to better performances than those obtained by PCA. For most of the catchments, considered as ungauged, the monthly and annual streamflow values estimated using the SOM-regionalised models are very promising.

Keywords

Ungauged catchment Rainfall-runoff modeling Self organizing map Principal component analysis Regionalization North Algeria 

References

  1. Acreman MC, Sinclair CD (1986) Classification of drainage basins according to their physical characteristics; an application for flood frequency analysis in Scotland. J Hydrol 84:365–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews DF (1972) Plots of high-dimensional data. Biometrics 28:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson SE, Woods RA, Sivapalan M (2002) Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales. Water Resour Res 38:50–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai P, Liu X, Liang K, Liu C (2015) Comparison of performance of twelve monthly water balance models in different climatic catchments of China. J Hydrol 529:1030–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beven KJ, Wood EF, Sivapalan M (1988) On hydrological heterogeneity—catchment morphology and catchment response. J Hydrol 100:353–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blöschl G (2006) Rainfall-runoff modeling of ungauged catchments. In: Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, pp 2061–280Google Scholar
  7. Burn DH, Boorman DB (1992) Catchment classification applied to the estimation of hydrological parameters at ungauged catchments. Institute of Hydrology, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Coulibaly P, Burn DH (2005) Spatial and temporal variability of Canadian seasonal streamflows. J Clim 18:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Farias CAS, Santos CAG, Lourenço AMG, Carneiro TC (2013) Kohonen neural networks for rainfall-runoff modeling: case study of Piancó River Basin. J Urban Environ Engng 7:176–182.  https://doi.org/10.4090/juee.2013.v7n1.176182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dile YT, Srinivasan R (2014) Evaluation of CFSR climate data for hydrologic prediction in data-scarce watersheds: an application in the Blue Nile River Basin. J Am Water Resour As 50:1226–1241.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farmer D, Sivapalan M, Jothityangkoon C (2003) Climate, soil, and vegetation controls upon the variability of water balance in temperate and semiarid landscapes: downward approach to water balance analysis: water balance variability using downward approach. Water Resour Res 39.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000328
  12. Faye C (2014) Méthode d’analyse statistique de données morphométriques: corrélation de paramètres morphométriques et influence sur l’écoulement des sous-bassins du fleuve Sénégal. Cinq Continents 4(10):80–108Google Scholar
  13. Grehys (1996) Presentation and review of some methods for regional flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 186:63–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03042-9
  14. Haberlandt U, Klöcking B, Krysanova V and Becker A (2001) Regionalisation of the base flow index from dynamically simulated flow components—a case study in the Elbe River Basin. J Hydrol 248(1–4):35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall MJ andMinns AW (1999) The classification of hydrologically homogeneous regions. Hydrolog Sci J 44(5):693–704Google Scholar
  16. He Y, Bárdossy A, Zehe E (2011) A review of regionalisation for continuous streamflow simulation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:3539–3553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howard AD (1990) Role of hypsometry and planform in basin hydrologic response. Hydrol Process 4:373–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalteh AM, Hjorth P, Berndtsson R (2008) Review of the self-organizing map (SOM) approach in water resources: analysis, modelling and application. Environ Model Softw 23:835–845.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klemeš V (1983) Conceptualization and scale in hydrology. J Hydrol 65:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90208-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lespinas F, Ludwig W, Heussner S (2014) Hydrological and climatic uncertainties associated with modeling the impact of climate change on water resources of small Mediterranean coastal rivers. J Hydrol 511:403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lidén R, Harlin J (2000) Analysis of conceptual rainfall–runoff modelling performance in different climates. J Hydrol 238:231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merz R, Blöschl G (2004) Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. J Hydrol 287:95–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mouelhi S, Michel C, Perrin C, Andréassian V (2006) Stepwise development of a two-parameter monthly water balance model. J Hydrol 318:200–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nathan RJ, McMahon TA (1990) Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalisation. J Hydrol 121:217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parajka J, Merz R, Blöschl G (2005) A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patil SD, Wigington PJ, Leibowitz SG, Comeleo RL (2014) Use of hydrologic landscape classification to diagnose streamflow predictability in Oregon. J Am Water Resour As 50:762–776.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paturel J-E, Barrau C, Mahé G et al (2007) Modelling the impact of climatic variability on water resources in West and Central Africa from a non-calibrated hydrological model. Hydrol Sci J 52:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2001) Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J Hydrol 242:275–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pilgrim DH, Chapman TG, Doran DG (1988) Problems of rainfall-runoff modelling in arid and semiarid regions. Hydrol Sci J 33:379–400.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668809491261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Razavi T, Coulibaly P (2013) Classification of Ontario watersheds based on physical attributes and streamflow series. J Hydrol 493:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richman MB (1986) Rotation of principal components. J Climatol 6:293–335.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370060305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh R, Archfield SA, Wagener T (2014) Identifying dominant controls on hydrologic parameter transfer from gauged to ungauged catchments–a comparative hydrology approach. J Hydrol 517:985–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sivapalan M, Takeuchi K, Franks SW et al (2003) IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrol Sci J 48:857–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Toth E (2013) Catchment classification based on characterisation of streamflow and precipitation time series. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:1149–1159.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1149-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vaezi AR, Bahrami HA, Sadeghi SHR, Mahdian MH (2010) Modeling relationship between runoff and soil properties in dry-farming lands, NW Iran. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 7:2577–2607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch P, Woods R (2007) Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity. Geogr Compass 1:901–931.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00039.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wallner M, Haberlandt U, Dietrich J (2013) A one-step similarity approach for the regionalization of hydrological model parameters based on self-organizing maps. J Hydrol 494:59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yatheendradas S, Wagener T, Gupta H, Unkrich C, Goodrich D, Schaffner M, Stewart A (2008) Understanding uncertainty in distributed flash flood forecasting for semiarid regions: semiarid flash floods. Water Resour Res 44.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005940
  40. Young AR, Gustard A, Bullock A et al (2000) A river network based hydrological model for predicting natural and influenced flow statistics at ungauged sites: micro low flows. Sci Total Environ 251:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEGHYD Laboratory, Department of Civil engineeringUniversity of Science and Technology Houari BoumedieneAlgiersAlgeria

Personalised recommendations