Advertisement

Effect of abrasive type on marble cutting performance of abrasive waterjet

  • Gokhan AydinEmail author
  • Serkan Kaya
  • Izzet Karakurt
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Abrasives play a critical role in the erosion process of abrasive waterjet (AWJ). Therefore, they can significantly affect the performance and profitability of cutting. In the relevant literature, there is no comprehensive study investigating the effect of abrasive type on the rock cutting performance. The current study aims to fill this gap. Various abrasives (garnet, white fused alumina, brown fused alumina, silicon carbide, glass beads, and emery powder) are used on this basis. Marble samples are cut in the tests in which the cutting parameters are kept constant. Cutting performances of the abrasives are investigated based on some performance outputs (the cutting width, cutting depth, kerf angle, and surface roughness). The study revealed that the silicon carbide and fused alumina (brown and white) present higher cutting performances in terms of the cutting depth and kerf angle. It is also concluded that the abrasives produce similar cutting widths and the glass bead produces smoother cutting surfaces. Additionally, it is demonstrated that cutting performance of the AWJ is highly affected by abrasive density and hardness.

Keywords

Cutting Abrasive waterjet Abrasives Marble 

References

  1. Alsoufi SM, Suker KD, Alhazmi WM, Azam S (2017) Influence of abrasive waterjet machining parameters on the surface texture quality of Carrara marble. J Sur Eng Mater Advan Tech 7:25–37Google Scholar
  2. Arab PB (2017) Rock cutting by abrasive water jet: an energy approach. Doctoral Thesis, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos, Brazil, 176 pagesGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM designation: ASTM C170/C170M-16 (2016). Standard test method for compressive strength of dimension stoneGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM designation: ASTM C880/C880M-15 (2016). Standard test method for flexural strength of dimension stoneGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM designation: ASTM C97/C97M-15 (2016). Standard test methods for absorption and bulk specific gravity of dimension stoneGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM designation: ASTM D854–14 (2016). Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometerGoogle Scholar
  7. Aswathy K, Govindan P (2015) Modeling of abrasive water jet machining process. Int J Rec Adv Mech Eng 4(3):59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aydin G (2014) Recycling of abrasives in abrasive water jet cutting with different types of granite. Arab J Geosci 7(10):4425–4435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aydin G (2015) Performance of recycling abrasives in rock cutting by abrasive waterjet. J Cent South Univ 22(3):1055–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K (2011) An investigation on the surface roughness of the granite machined by abrasive waterjet. Bull Mater Sci 34(4):985–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K (2012) Performance of abrasive waterjet in granite cutting: influence of the textural properties. J Mater Civ Eng 24(7):944–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K (2013a) Investigation of the surface roughness of rocks sawn by diamond sawblades. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K (2013b) Prediction of cut depth of the granitic rocks machined by abrasive waterjet (AWJ). Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(5):1223–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Aydin G, Karakurt I, Hamzacebi C (2014) Artificial neural network and regression models for performance prediction of abrasive waterjet in rock cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:1321–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Aydin G, Kaya S, Karakurt I (2017) Utilization of solid-cutting waste of granite as an alternative abrasive in abrasive waterjet cutting of marble. J Clean Prod 159:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dani DN, Shah HN, Prajapati HB (2016) An experimental investigation of abrasive water jet machining on granite. Int J Innov Res Sci Technol 3(5):26–31Google Scholar
  17. Engin IC (2012) A correlation for predicting the abrasive water jet cutting depth for natural stones. S Afr J Sci 108(9/10):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fowler G, Pashby IR, Shipway PH (2009) The effect of particle hardness and shape when abrasive water jet milling titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Wear 266:613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gryc R, Hlavac LM, Mikolas M, Sancer J, Danek T (2014) Correlation of pure and abrasive water jet cutting of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 65:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta V, Garg PM, Batra KM, Khanna R (2013) Analysis of kerf taper angle in abrasive water jet cutting of Makrana White marble. Asian J Eng Appl Tech 2(2):35–39Google Scholar
  21. Hlavac LM, Hlavacova IM, Gembalova L, Kalicinsky J, Fabian S (2009) Experimental method for the investigation of the abrasive water jet cutting quality. J Mater Process Technol 209(20):6190–6195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang ZC, Hou GR, Wang J, Feng XY (2006) The effect of high pressure abrasive water jet cutting parameters on cutting performance of granite. Key Eng Mater 304-305:560–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karakurt İ, Aydın G, Aydıner K (2011) Analysis of the kerf angle of the granite machined by abrasive waterjet (AWJ). Indian J Eng Mater Sci 18(6):435–442Google Scholar
  24. Karakurt İ, Aydın G, Aydıner K (2012a) An experimental study on the cut depth of the granite in abrasive waterjet cutting. Mater Manuf Process 27(5):538–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karakurt İ, Aydın G, Aydıner K (2012b) A study on the prediction of kerf angle in abrasive waterjet machining of rocks. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226:1489–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karakurt I, Aydin G, Aydiner K (2014) An investigation on the kerf width in abrasive waterjet cutting of granitic rocks. Arab J Geosci 7(7):2923–2932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan AA, Haque MM (2007) Performance of different abrasive materials during abrasive water jet machining of glass. J Mater Process Technol 191:404–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Konig W, Wulf C (1984) The influence of the cutting parameters on jet forces and the geometry of the kerf. The Seventh International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, Ottawa, Canada, BHRA, 179–191Google Scholar
  29. Long X, Ruan X, Liua Q, Chen Z, Xue S, Wu Z (2017) Numerical investigation on the internal flow and the particle movement in the abrasive waterjet nozzle. Powder Technol 314:635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ludema KC, Meng HC (1995) Wear models and predictive equations: Their form and content. Wear, 181-183(2):1201–1206Google Scholar
  31. Miranda MR, Lousa P, Miranda MJA, Kim T (1993) Abrasive waterjet cutting of Portuguese Marbles. Proceedings of 7th American Water jet Conference, Seattle, Washington, pp 443–457Google Scholar
  32. Mıynarczuk M, Skiba M, Sitek L, Hlavac P, Hlavacek P, Kozusnikova A (2014) The research into the quality of rock surfaces obtained by abrasive water jet cutting. Arch Min Sci 59(4):925–940Google Scholar
  33. Oh T, Cho G (2011) Energy loss from an abrasive waterjet for rock cutting. 2011 WJTA-IMCA Conference and Expo, September 19–21, 2011, Houston, TexasGoogle Scholar
  34. Oh T, Cho G (2016) Rock cutting depth model based on kinetic energy of abrasive waterjet. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:1059–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ojmertz KMC (1993) Abrasive water jet milling: an experimental investigation, in: M. Hashish (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th US Water Jet Conference, Water Jet Technology Association, St. Louis, pp. 777–791Google Scholar
  36. Srinivasu DS, Axinte DA, Shipway PH, Folkes J (2009) Influence of kinematic operating parameters on kerf geometry in abrasive waterjet machining of silicon carbide ceramics. Int J Mach Tool Manu 49:1077–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang J, Guo DM (2003) The cutting performance in multipass abrasive waterjet machining of industrial ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 133:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang J, Wong WCK (1999) A study of abrasive water jet cutting of metallic coated sheet steel. Int J Mach Tool Manu 39:855–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu S (2005) Modelling the cutting process and cutting performance in abrasive waterjet machining with controlled nozzle oscillation. PhD Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, School of Engineering Systems, 205 pagesGoogle Scholar
  40. Zaremba D, Heese P, Bauer M, Maier HJ, Hassel T (2015) Particle disintegration in the abrasive water injection jet. WJTA-IMCA Conference and Expo, November 2–4, New Orleans, LouisianaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining EngineeringKaradeniz Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey

Personalised recommendations