Advertisement

Assessment of land use/land cover changes induced by Jizan Dam, Saudi Arabia, and their effect on soil organic carbon

  • Samy AbdallahEmail author
  • Mostafa Abd elmohemen
  • Said Hemdan
  • Khalid Ibrahem
Original Paper
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Land use change has been influenced by human activity and has altered an enormous part of the natural landscapes of developing countries. Meanwhile, as the largest pool of terrestrial organic carbon, soils interact strongly with atmospheric composition, climate, and land cover change. The objectives of this study were to assess the land cover and existing land use changes in Jizan Basin, Jizan Province, Saudi Arabia, as an aftermath when Jizan Dam started working, and, subsequently, to assess soil organic carbon distribution in different land uses in the study area. Three cloud-free Landsat MSS, ETM+, and OLI images covering the study area were employed for analysis. Images were acquired in years 1972, 2000, and 2017, respectively. All images were manipulated using ERDAS Imagine 10 software to achieve the aims of this study. The final output maps have been produced using Arc GIS 10.1. Different methods of data transformation and analysis were applied including normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). A supervised classification approach was applied to categorize the images in different land cover classes. Five land use/land cover classes were identified: vegetation, bare soil (sand), bare soil (rocks), urban area, and water bodies. The results show that the vegetation of Jizan Basin increased between 1972 and 2017. The area increased 4% of its total area between 1972 and 2000 with an average annual increment of 0.45%. This annual rate increased to 1.05% during the period of 2000–2017. The major change has been found in the bare area (sand) cover which decreased during the period of 2000–2017 to about 42 km2 (9%). The results prevail that there is a significant increase in vegetated land in Jizan Basin which could be connected to Jizan Dam construction. It is important to mention that in conducting the present study, actual clear land cover changes took place as the result of agricultural land development. These changes in land cover influenced soil organic carbon sequestration.

Keywords

Jizan Dam Land use/land cover Remote sensing and GIS Soil organic carbon 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is part of the project funded by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, under number AT-34 – 94. The author would like to express their sincere gratitude to King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for supplying all the research needs to achieve the research goals. Also, special thanks is given to Dr. Mohammed Saifeldeen Abd-Elwahed, Associate Professor, Soil Sci. Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt, for his great effort in this research especially in the part of satellite images and GIS.

Funding information

King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, funded this research.

References

  1. Ahl DE, Gower ST, Burrows SN, Shabanov NV, Myneni RB, Knyazikhin Y (2006) Monitoring spring canopy phenology of a deciduous broadleaf forest using MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 104:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alhamid AA (2004) Achievements of the custodian of the two holy mosques in water sector, PSIPW. King Saud University. Retrieved 30 March 2014Google Scholar
  3. Al-Harbi KM (2003) Discovering and detecting agricultural change in eastern Tabuk—Saudi Arabia, using remote sensing technique (in Arabic). Kuwaiti Geographic society: Kuwait City, KuwaitGoogle Scholar
  4. Alqurashi AF, Kuma L (2014) Land use and land cover change detection in the Saudi Arabian desert cities of Makkah and Al-Taif using satellite data. Advances in Remote Sensing 3:106–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aspinal RJ, Hill MJ (eds) (2008) Land use change: science, policy and management. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, I8, (7987) Introduction to remote sensing. The Guilford Press, New York. p 551Google Scholar
  7. Campbell JB (2007) Introduction to remote sensing, 4th edn. The Builford press, New York, p 625Google Scholar
  8. Chapman HD (1965) Cation-exchange capacity 1. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, (methodsofsoilanb), pp 891–901Google Scholar
  9. Chen LD, Gong J, Fu BJ, Huang ZL, Huang YL, Gui LD (2007) Effect of land use conversion on soil organic carbon sequestration in the loess hilly area, Loess Plateau of China. Ecol Res 22:641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chilar J (2000) Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: status and research priorities. Int J Remote Sens 21:1093–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung H, Grove JH, Six J (2008) Indications for soil carbon saturation in a temperate agroecosystem. Soil Sci. “soil organic carbon”. Am J 72:1132–1139Google Scholar
  12. Cicuzza D, De Nicola C, Testi A, Pignatti S, Zanella A (2015) Which is the contribution to the carbon sequestration of the forest ecosystems in the Castelporziano Reserve? Evidences from an integrated study on humus and vegetation. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 26:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Boer ME (2000) Landcover monitoring: an approach towards pan European land covers classification and change detection. Scientific report. Delft, Beleids Commissie Remote Sensing (BCRS)Google Scholar
  15. Di Gregorio A, Jansen LJM (2005) Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): classification concepts and user manual. FAO, RomGoogle Scholar
  16. Dreimanis A (1962) Quantitative gasometric determination of calcite and dolomite by using Chittick apparatus. J Sediment Petrol 32(3):520–529Google Scholar
  17. Fallahzade J, Hajabbasi M (2012) The effects of irrigation and cultivation on the quality of desert soil in Central Iran. Land Degrad Dev 23:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang X, Xue Z, Li B, An S (2012) Soil organic carbon distribution in relation to land use and its storage in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 88:6–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forkel M, Carvalhais N, Verbesselt J, Mahecha MD, Neigh CSR, Reichstein M (2013) Trend change detection in NDVI time series: effects of inter-annual variability and methodology. Remote Sens 5:2113–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Girmay G, Singh BR (2012) Changes in soil organic carbon stocks and soil quality: land-use system effects in northern Ethiopia. Acta Agric Scand Sect B 62:519–530Google Scholar
  21. Greve MH, Greve MB, Bou Kheir R, Bøcher PK, Larsen R, McCloy K (2009) Comparing decision tree modeling and indicator Kriging for mapping the extent of organic soils in Denmark. In: Boettinger JL, Howell DW, Moore AC, Hartemink AE, Kienast-Brown S (eds) Digital soil mapping bridging research, environmental application, and operation. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang S, Siegert F (2006) Land cover classification optimized to detect areas at risk of desertification in North China based on SPOT VEGETATION imagery. J Arid Environ 67:308–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IGU (1986) World land use survey. Report of the commission to the general assembly of the international geographic union. Geographica Helvetica 1, IGU, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10(2):423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luo Z, Wang E, Sun OJ (2010) Soil carbon change and its responses to agricultural practices in Australian agro-ecosystems: a reviewand synthesis. Geoderma 155:211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manisha BP, Chitra G, Umrikar N (2012) Image classification tool for land use/ land cover analysis: a comparative study of maximum likelihood and minimum distance method. Int J Geo Earth Environ 6:189–196Google Scholar
  27. Meersmans J, van Wesemael B, De Ridder F, Dotti MF, De Baets S, van Molle M (2009) Changes in organic carbon distribution with depth in agricultural soils in northern Belgium, 1960–2006. Glob Change Biol 15:2739–2750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mi AN, Wang S, Liu J, Yu G, Zhang W, Jobbagy E (2008) Soil inorganic carbon storage pattern in China. Glob Chang Biol 14:2380–2387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mondini C, Sequi P (2008) Implication of soil C sequestration on sustainable agriculture and environment. Waste Manag 28(4):678–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Munoz-Rojas M, Jordan A, Zavala LM, De la Rosa D, Abd-Elmabod SK, Anaya-Romero M (2012) Organic carbon stocks in Mediterranean soil types under different land uses (Southern Spain). Solid Earth 3:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ozesmi SL, Bauer ME (2002) Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetl Ecol Manag 10:381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Page AL, Miller RH, Baker DE (1982) Methods of soil analysis – part 2 – chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahman MT (2016) Detection of land use/land cover changes and urban sprawl in Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia: an analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing data. Int J Geo-Inf 5:15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rawat JS, Kumar M (2015) Monitoring land use/cover change using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Hawalbagh block, district Almora, Uttarakhand, India. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 18:77–84Google Scholar
  35. Reddy AS, Reddy MJ (2013) NDVI based assessment of land use land cover dynamics in a rainfed watershed using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Sci Eng Res 4:87–93Google Scholar
  36. Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: Freden SC, Mercanti EP, Becker M (eds) Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite–1 Symposium. Volume I: Technical Presentations, NASA SP-351. NASA, Washington, D.C., pp 309–317Google Scholar
  37. Selçuk REIS, Nisanci R, Uzun B, Yalcin A, Inan H, Yomralioglu T (2003) Monitoring land-use changes by GIS and remote sensing techniques: case study of Trabzon. In: Proceedings of 2nd FIG Regional Conference, Morocco, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  38. Shalaby A, Tateishi R (2007) Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use changes in the northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Appl Geogr 27:28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United States Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Handbook 60. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Vanguelova EI, Bonifacio E, De Vos B, Hoosbeek MR, Berger TW, Vesterdal L, Armolaitis K, Celi L, Dinca L, Kjonaas OJ, Pavlenda P (2016) Sources of errors and uncertainties in the assessment of forest soil carbon stocks at different scales—review and recommendations. Environ Monit Assess 188(11):630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yimer F, Ledin S, Abdelkadir A (2006) Soil property variations in relation to topographic aspect and vegetation community in the south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia. For Ecol Manag 232(1–3):90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuan B, Li Z, Liu H, Gaob M, Zhang Y (2007) Microbial biomass and activity in salt affected soils under arid conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 35(2):319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zaitunah A, Ahmad AG, Safitri RA (2018) Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) analysis for land cover types using landsat 8 oli in besitang watershed, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 126:012112.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang C, Liu G, Xue S, Sun C (2013) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen storage as affected by land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Eur J Soil Biol 54:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Biology Department, Prince Sultan Bin-Abdul-Aziz Center for Environment and Tourism Studies and ResearchesKing Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Soils and Water, Faculty of AgricultureAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
  3. 3.Faculty of EngineeringKing Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.Social Studies CenterKing Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia
  5. 5.Faculty of ScienceKing Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations