Advertisement

Using tritium and radiocarbon to determine groundwater age and delineate the flow regime in the Taiyuan Basin, China

  • Chunyan Guo
  • Jiansheng Shi
  • Zhaoji Zhang
  • Fenge ZhangEmail author
Original Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Tritium (3H) and radiocarbon (14C) were used to determine the age, to delineate a flow regime, and to estimate flow velocity of medium-depth groundwater (50–200 m) from a Middle and Upper Pleistocene confined aquifer. Young groundwater age was determined using 3H and an exponential piston-flow model (EPM). Three correction models (Tamers, Pearson, and Fontes and Garnier) were chosen to date the 14C age of old groundwater. Groundwater ages of the medium-depth groundwater ranged from 3.5–25,790 a. Groundwater is relatively young in most of the piedmont area, although two high-age zones (with ages > 20,000 a) exist in the center of the plain. Groundwater age distribution characteristics indicated that groundwater flows from the mountain area to the basin area, and that the oldest groundwater in each high-age zone flows toward the depression cones. Two large local flow systems were formed because of overexploitation, and the regional flow system from north to south no longer exists. This study delineated the age of medium-depth groundwater in the entire Taiyuan Basin for the first time. The results can help promote the sustainable use of groundwater in the Taiyuan Basin.

Keywords

Tritium Radiocarbon Age dating Flow regime 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding information

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41502254) and the China Geological Survey project (No.12120114086401).

References

  1. Aravena R, Warner BG, Macdonald GM, Hanf KI (1992) Carbon isotope composition of lake sediments in relation to lake productivity and radiocarbon dating. Quat Res 37(3):333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cao W, Yang H, Liu C, Li Y, Bai H (2018) Hydrogeochemical characteristics and evolution of the aquifer systems of Gonghe Basin, Northern China. Geosci Front 9:907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cartwright I, Morgenstern U (2016) Using tritium to document the mean transit time and sources of water contributing to a chain-of-ponds river system: implications for resource protection. Appl Geochem 75:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatterjee S, Sinha UK, Ansari MA, Mohokar HV, Dash A (2018) Application of lumped parameter model to estimate mean transit time (MTT) of the thermal water using environmental tracer (3H): insight from Uttarakhand geothermal area (India). Appl Geochem 94:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Z, Wei W, Liu J, Wang Y, Chen J (2011) Identifying the recharge sources and age of groundwater in the Songnen plain (northeast China) using environmental isotopes. Hydrogeol J 19(1):163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doney SC, Glover DM, Jenkins WJ (1992) A model function of the global bomb tritium distribution in precipitation, 1960–1986. J Geophys Res Oceans 97(C4):5481–5492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fontes JC, Garnier JM (1979) Determination of the initial 14 C activity of the total dissolved carbon: a review of the existing models and a new approach. Water Resour Res 15(2):399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardner PM, Heilweil VM (2014) A multiple-tracer approach to understanding regional groundwater flow in the snake valley area of the eastern great basin, USA. Appl Geochem 45(3):33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geyh MA (2000) An overview of 14C analysis in the study of groundwater. Radiocarbon 42(1):99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo Q, Wang Y, Ma T, Ma R (2007a) Geochemical processes controlling the elevated fluoride concentrations in groundwater of the Taiyuan basin, northern China. J Geochem Explor 93(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo Q, Wang Y, Gao X, Ma T (2007b) A new model (DRARCH) for assessing groundwater vulnerability to arsenic contamination at basin scale: a case study in Taiyuan basin, northern China. Environ Geol 52(5):923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagedorn B, Clarke N, Ruane M, Faulkner K (2018) Assessing aquifer vulnerability from lumped parameter modeling of modern water proportions in groundwater mixtures: application to California’s south coast range. Sci Total Environ 624:1550–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han L, Plummer LN (2016) A review of single-sample-based models and other approaches for radiocarbon dating of dissolved inorganic carbon in groundwater. Earth Sci Rev 152:119–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang T, Pang Z, Li J, Xiang Y, Zhao Z (2017) Mapping groundwater renewability using age data in the Baiyang alluvial fan, NW China. Hydrogeol J 25(3):743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jurgens BC, Böhlke JK, Kauffman LJ, Belitz K, Esser BK (2016) A partial exponential lumped parameter model to evaluate groundwater age distributions and nitrate trends in long-screened wells. J Hydrol 543:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalin RM (2000) Radiocarbon dating of groundwater systems. In: Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. Springer US, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Kamtchueng BT, Fantong WY, Wirmvem MJ, Tiodjio RE, Takounjou AF, Asai K et al (2015) A multi-tracer approach for assessing the origin, apparent age and recharge mechanism of shallow groundwater in the lake Nyos catchment, northwest, Cameroon. J Hydrol 523:790–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li X, Hou X, Zhang H, Zhang L (2006) Study on the geochemistry-isotope characteristics of the groundwater systems in Taiyuan basin. J Arid Land Resour Environ 20(5):109–114 (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  19. Li X, Hou X, Zhou Z, Liu L (2011) Geochemical provenance and spatial distribution of fluoride in groundwater of Taiyuan basin, China. Environ Earth Sci 62(8):1635–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liao Y, Ma T, Cui Y, Qi Z (2014) Spatial distribution characteristics of volatile halogenated hydrocarbons in unsaturated zone of Xiaodian sewage irrigation area, Taiyuan, China. Ecotoxicology 23(10):1951–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Chen Z, Wei W, Zhang Y, Li Z, Liu F, Guo H (2014) Using chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and tritium (3h) to estimate groundwater age and flow velocity in Hohhot basin, China. Hydrol Process 28(3):1372–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma R, Wang Y, Sun Z, Zheng C, Ma T, Prommer H (2011) Geochemical evolution of groundwater in carbonate aquifers in Taiyuan, northern China. Appl Geochem 26(5):884–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maloszewski P, Zuber A (1982) Determining the turnover time of groundwater systems with the aid of environmental tracers: 1. Models and their applicability. J Hydrol 57:207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maloszewski P, Zuber A (1996) Lumped parameter models for the interpretation of environmental tracer data, chap. 2 in International Atomic Energy Agency. In: Manual on Mathematical Models in Isotope Hydrogeology, TECDOC-910Google Scholar
  25. Mcmahon PB, Carney CP, Poeter EP, Peterson SM (2010) Use of geochemical, isotopic, and age tracer data to develop models of groundwater flow for the purpose of water management, northern high plains aquifer, USA. Appl Geochem 25(6):910–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mook WG (1976) The dissolution-exchange model for dating ground water with carbon-14. In: Interpretation of environmental isotope and hydrochemical data in ground water hydrology. IAEA, Vienna, pp 213–225Google Scholar
  27. Pearson FJ, Hanshaw BB (1970) Sources of dissolved carbonate species in groundwater and their effects on carbon-14 dating. In: Isotope hydrology. IAEA, Vienna, pp 271–286Google Scholar
  28. Qiao X, Li G, Li Y, Liu K (2015) Influences of heterogeneity on three-dimensional groundwater flow simulation and wellhead protection area delineation in karst groundwater system, Taiyuan city, northern China. Environ Earth Sci 73(10):6705–6717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stadler S, Osenbrück K, Suckow AO, Himmelsbach T, Hötzl H (2010) Groundwater flow regime, recharge and regional-scale solute transport in the semi-arid Kalahari of Botswana derived from isotope hydrology and hydrochemistry. J Hydrol 388(3–4):291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun Z, Ma R, Wang Y, Ma T, Liu Y (2016) Using isotopic, hydrogeochemical-tracer and temperature data to characterize recharge and flow paths in a complex karst groundwater flow system in northern China. Hydrogeol J 24(6):1–20Google Scholar
  31. Tamers MA (1975) Validity of radiocarbon dates on ground water. Surv Geophys 2(2):217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tang Q, Xu Q, Zhang F, Huang Y, Liu J, Wang X, Yang Y, Liu X (2013) Geochemistry of iodine-rich groundwater in the Taiyuan basin of central Shanxi province, north China. J Geochem Explor 135(6):117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vogel JC (1970) Carbon-14 dating of groundwater. In: Isotope hydrology. IAEA, Vienna, pp 225–239Google Scholar
  34. Wu S (2018) Analysis on the evolution situation of the deep groundwater level drawdown funnel in the meantime of the recent 25 years in Taiyuan. Shanxi Hydrotechnics 1:68–70 (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  35. Zhai Y, Wang J, Huan H, Zhou J, Wei W (2013) Characterizing the groundwater renewability and evolution of the strongly exploited aquifers of the north China plain by major ions and environmental tracers. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 296(3):1263–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang Y (2009) Environmental impacts of groundwater utilization in Taiyuan basin. Shanxi Water Resources 6:5–6 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Zhang J, Ma X, Qiang M, Huang X, Li S, Guo X, Henderson ACG, Holmes JA, Chen F (2016) Developing inorganic carbon-based radiocarbon chronologies for Holocene lake sediments in arid NW China. Quaternary Science Reviews 144:66–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang B, Song X, Zhang Y, Han D, Tang C, Yang L et al (2017) The renewability and quality of shallow groundwater in Sanjiang and Songnen plain, northeast China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16(1):229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunyan Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiansheng Shi
    • 1
  • Zhaoji Zhang
    • 1
  • Fenge Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental GeologyChinese Academy of Geological SciencesShijiazhuangChina
  2. 2.China University of Geosciences (Beijing)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations