Advertisement

Structural characterization of soil biochar amendments and their comparative performance under moisture deficit regimes

  • Summera Jahan
  • Sumera IqbalEmail author
  • Fahd Rasul
  • Khajista Jabeen
S. I. BIOCHAR
  • 45 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Implications of Biochar Application to Soil Environment under Arid Conditions

Abstract

Biochar has a propitious role in the agricultural lands as a sustainable soil management and drought mitigation approach. The present research work aims at evaluating the structural characteristics of wheat straw, rice straw, sugarcane bagasse, and wood shaving biochar in clay loam and sandy loam soil at a rate of 0, 10, and 20 tons ha−1 and their comparative role for improving soybean growth, biomass water content, apparent water productivity, Zn, Mn, and Fe status under three moisture conditions (75%, 50%, and 40% of field capacity). Wood shaving and sugarcane bagasse biochar amendments in sandy loam soils caused favorable adjustments in the BET surface area, pore surface area, pore volume, pore radius, water-holding capacity, EC, and pH. However, in clay loam soil, there was traced a decline in BET (N2) surface area and other pore properties, while the highest soybean shoot and leaf fresh and dry biomass were recorded with 10 tons ha−1 wood biochar in both types of soils under optimum and moisture-deficit conditions. Apparent water productivity with 10 tons ha−1 wood biochar in soybean plants under 75%, 50%, and 40% moisture was 77%, 137%, and 157% higher, respectively, than that in control in the clay loam soil, while 153%, 149% and 135% higher, respectively, than that in control in the sandy loam soil. In both types of soils, soybean leaves with 10 tons ha−1 sugarcane bagasse biochar under all three moisture regimes had the highest Zn concentration. Under deficit moisture leaf, Mn concentration was found to be increased in wood biochar amendments and the highest Fe concentration was found with 20 tons ha−1 rice straw biochar amendments in both types of soils, while under 40% moisture with most biochar treatments, leaves had high Fe concentration.

Keywords

Surface area Pore volume Pore radius Micronutrients Apparent water productivity 

Supplementary material

12517_2019_4363_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 12 kb)
12517_2019_4363_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.4 mb)
ESM 2 (PDF 1452 kb)

References

  1. Adrias PJ, del Rosario MR (2017) Soil properties and response of spring onion to different levels of biochar. Int J Agric Technol 13(1):131–137Google Scholar
  2. Akhtar SS, Li G, Andersen MN, Liu F (2014) Biochar enhances yield and quality of tomato under reduced irrigation. Agric Water Manag 138:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alburquerque JA, Calero JM, Barrón V, Torrent J, Campillo MC, Gallardo A, Villar R (2014) Effects of biochars produced from different feedstocks on soil properties and sunflower growth. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 177:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altaf R, Hussain K, Maryam U, Nawaz K, Siddiqi EH (2015) Effect of different levels of drought on growth, morphology and photosynthetic pigments of lady finger (Abelmoschus esculentus). World J Agri Sci 11:198–201Google Scholar
  5. Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in northern Laos, soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res 111:81–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aslam Z, Khalid M, Aon M (2014) Impact of biochar on soil physical properties. Scholar J Agric Sci 4(5):280–284Google Scholar
  7. AOAC (2012) Official Methods of Analysis, 19th edn, Vol 2. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. ASTM (1990) Standard method for chemical analysis of wood charcoal. D-1762-84. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). International, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnes RT, Gallagher ME, Masiello CA, Liu Z, Dugan B (2014) Biochar-induced changes in soil hydraulic conductivity and dissolved nutrient fluxes constrained by laboratory experiments. PLoS One 9:0108340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrett EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP (1951) The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J Am Chem Soc 73(1):373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5(2):202–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braida WJ, Pignatello JJ, Lu Y, Ravikovitch PI, Neimark AV, Xing B (2003) Sorption hysteresis of benzene in charcoal particles. Environ Sci Technol 37:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brewer CE, Unger R, Schmidt-Rohr K, Brown RC (2011) Criteria to select biochars for field studies based on biochar chemical properties. Bioenergy Res 4:312–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60(2):309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchanan B, Grusen W, Jones R (2000) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists Maryland 1367Google Scholar
  16. Case SDC, Mc-Namara NP, Reay DS, Whitaker J (2012) The effect of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil—the role of soil aeration. Soil Biol Biochem 51:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan K, Xu Z (2009) Biochar: nutrient properties and their enhancement. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, London, pp 67–84Google Scholar
  18. Chan KL, Van Zwieten I, Meszaros A, Downie and Joseph (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45: 629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chapman HD, Pratt PF (1961) Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Riverside, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Devereux RC, Sturrock CJ, Mooney SJ (2012) The effects of biochar on soil physical properties and winter wheat growth. Earth Environ Sci Trans R Soc 103(1):13–18Google Scholar
  21. Domingues RR, Trugilho PF, Silva CA, de Melo IC, Melo LC, Magriotis ZM, Sánchez-Monedero MA (2017) Properties of biochar derived from wood and high-nutrient biomasses with the aim of agronomic and environmental benefits. PLoS One 12(5):0176884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Downie A (2011) Biochar production and use: environmental risks and rewards. PhD Thesis, School of Materials Sciences and Engineering, The University of New South Wales, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  23. El-Beltagy A (2000) Strategic options for alleviating conflicts over water in dry areas. Paper presented at the Crawford Fund Sixth Conference on: “Food, Water and Wars: Security in a World of Conflict,” 15 August 2000, Canberra, Australia. ICARDA, Aleppo, SyriaGoogle Scholar
  24. Farias JRB, Nepomuceno AL, Neumaier N (2007) Ecofisiologia da soja. Londrina: EMBRAPA-CNPSo, pp 99 (EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Circular técnica, 48)Google Scholar
  25. Farooq M, Kobayashi N, Ito O, Wahid A, Serraj (2010) Broader leaves result in better performance of indica rice under drought stress. J Plant Physiol 167:1066–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forouzani M, Karami E (2011) Agricultural water poverty and sustainability. Agron Sustain Dev 31:415.  https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foth HD, Ellis BG (1996) Soil fertility, 2nd edn. Lewis Pub, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Gamage DV, Mapa RB, Dharmakeerthi RS, Biswas A (2016) Effect of rice-husk biochar on selected soil properties in tropical Alfisols. Soil Res 54(3):302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerard G, Merckx R, Wesemael BV, Oost KV (2017) Soil conservation in the 21st century: why we need smart intensification. Soil 3:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ghasemian V, Ghalavand A (2010) The effect of iron, zinc and manganese on quality and quantity of soybean seed. J Phytol 2(11):73–79Google Scholar
  31. GHosH AK, Ishijiki K, Toyota M, Kusutani A, Asanuma K (2000) Water potential, stomatal dimension and leaf gas exchange in soybean plants under long-term moisture deficit. Jpn J Trop Agric 44(1):30–37Google Scholar
  32. Głąb T, Palmowska J, Zaleski T, Gondek K (2016) Effect of biochar application on soil hydrological properties and physical quality of sandy soil. Geoderma 281:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–a review. Biol Fert Soils 35(4):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gosling P, Hodge A, Goodlass G, Bending GD (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113(1–4):17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graham RD, Ascher JS, Hynes SC (1992) Selecting zinc-efficient genotypes for soils of low zinc status. Plant Soil 146:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gray M, Johnson MJ, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy 61:196–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gul S, Whalen JK, Thomas BW, Sachdeva V, Deng H (2015) Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: mechanisms and future directions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 206:46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gundale MJ, DeLuca TH (2006) Temperature and source material influence ecological attributes of Ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir charcoal. Forest Ecol Manag 231:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hafeez Y, Iqbal S, Jabeen K, Shahzad S, Jahan S, Rasul F (2017) Effect of biochar application on seed germination and seedling growth of Glycine max (l.) Merr. Under drought stress. Pak J Bot 49:7–13Google Scholar
  40. Hamayun M, Khan SA, Shinwari ZK, Khan AL, Ahmad N, Lee I (2010) Effect of polyethylene glycol induced drought stress on physiohormonal attributes of soybean. Pak J Bot 42:977–986Google Scholar
  41. Hardie M, Clothier B, Bound S, Oliver G, Close D (2014) Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant Soil 376:347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hussain M, Malik MA, Farooq M, Khan MB, Akram M, Saleem MF (2009) Exogenous glycinebetaine and salicylic acid application improves water relations, allometry and quality of hybrid sunflower under water deficit conditions. J Agron Crop Sci 195:98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jindo K, Sonoki T, Matsumoto K, Canellas L, Roig A, Sanchez-Monedero MA (2016) Influence of biochar addition on the humic substances of composting manures. Waste Manag 49:545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kameyama K, Miyamoto T, Shinogi Y (2010) Increase in available water content of soils by applying bagasse-charcoals. Proceedings of the 19th world congress of soil science, soil solutions for changing world. Brisbane, 1-6 August 2010 pp 0155Google Scholar
  45. Kammann CI, Linsel S, Gößling JW, Koyro HW (2011) Influence of biochar on drought tolerance of chenopodium quinoa Willd and on soil–plant relations. Plant Soil 345:195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Karaosmanoglu F, Isigigur-Ergundenler A, Sever A (2000) Biochar from the straw-stalk of rapeseed plant. Energy Fuel 14:336–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1247–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es9031419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khan HR, McDonald GK, Rengel Z (2003) Zn fertilization improves water use efficiency, grain yield and seed Zn content in chickpea. Plant Soil 249:389–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Khan HR, McDonald GK, Rengel Z (2004) Zinc fertilization and water stress affects plant water relations, stomatal conductance and osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). Plant Soil 267(1–2):271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Khan S, Chao C, Waqas M, Arp HPH, Zhu YG (2013) Sewage sludge biochar influence upon rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield, metal bioaccumulation and greenhouse gas emissions from acidic paddy soil. Environ Sci Technol 47:8624–8632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kiani SP, Talia P, Maury P, Grieu P, Heinz R, Perrault A, Nishinakamasu V, Hopp E, Gentzbittel L, Paniego N, Sarrafi A (2007) Genetic analysis of plant water status and osmotic adjustment in recombinant inbred lines of sunflower under two water treatments. Plant Sci 172:773–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kumudini S (2010) Soybean growth and development. In: Singh B (ed) The soybean: botany, production and uses. CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp 48–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Laird D, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lee Y, Park J, Gang KS, Ryu C, Yang W, Jung JH, Hyun S (2013) Production and characterization of biochar from various biomass materials by slow pyrolysis. Techn Bulletin 197. Food Fertilizer Technology Centre. TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  55. Lehman J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. VA Earthscan, London, Sterling, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  56. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems – a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11:395–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lei O, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures on soil physical and hydraulic properties. Soil Sedment 13(9):1561–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu F, Anderson MN, Jacobson SE, Jensen CR (2005) Stomatal control and water use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying. Environ Exp Bot 54:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu HX, Wang D, Zou WZ, Liang Z (2011) Effect of drought stress on growth and accumulation of active constituents in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Ind Crop Prod 33:84–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Liu X, Zhang A, Ji C, Joseph S, Bian R, Li L, Pan G, Paz-Ferreiro J (2013) Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions—a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant Soil 373(1–2):583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mannan MA, Halder E, Karim MA, Ahmed JU (2016) Alleviation of adverse effect of drought stress on soybean (Glycine max. L.) by using poultry litter biochar. Bangladesh Agron J 19(2):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McClellan T, Deenik J, Uehara G, Antal M (2007) Effects of flashed carbonized macadamia nutshell charcoal on plant growth and soil chemical properties.6 November, SSA, ASA, CSSA, International Annual Meetings, Louisiana, New Orleans. http://ac-s.confex.com/crops/2007am/techprogram/P35834.HTM
  64. Mohamed I, El-Meihy R, Ali M, Chen F, Raleve D (2017) Interactive effects of biochar and micronutrients on faba bean growth, symbiotic performance, and soil properties. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 180(6):729–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Hamdan R, Cooper WT (2014) Physicochemical changes in pyrogenic organic matter (biochar) after 15 months of field aging. Solid Earth 5(2):693–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Harris WG (2011) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 163:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mundstock CM, Thomas LA (2005) Soybeans: factors affecting the growth and yield. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul 31Google Scholar
  68. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Amonette JE, Ippolito JA, Lima IM, Gaskin J, Das KC, Steiner C, Ahmedna M (2012) Biochars impact on soil-moisture storage in an ultisol and two aridisols. Soil Sci 177:310–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Obia A, Mulder J, Martinsen V, Cornelissen G, Borresen T (2016) In situ effects of biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in light-textured tropical soils. Soil Tillage Res 155:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Paetsch L, Mueller CW, Kögel-Knabner I, Lützow M, Girardin C, Rumpel C (2018) Effect of in-situ aged and fresh biochar on soil hydraulic conditions and microbial C use under drought conditions. Sci Rep 8(1):6852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pandey A (2009) Handbook of plant-based biofuels. CRC Press, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  72. Pirzad A, Shokrani F (2012) Effects of iron application on growth characters and flower yield of calendula officinalis L. under water stress. World Appl Sci J 18(9):1203–1208Google Scholar
  73. Prost K, Borchard N, Siemens J, Kautz T, Séquaris JM, Möller A, Amelung W (2013) Biochar affected by composting with farmyard manure. J Environ Qual 42(1):164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods, Melbourne, Inkata Press. (Australian Soil and Land Survey Handbooks, vol (3)Google Scholar
  75. Riaz ATIF, Younis A, Taj AR, Karim A, Tariq U, Munir S, Riaz SITWAT (2013) Effect of drought stress on growth and flowering of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Pak J Bot 45(S1):123–131Google Scholar
  76. Rillig MC, Wagner M, Salem M, Antunes PM, George C, Ramke HG, Antonietti M (2010) Material derived from hydrothermal carbonization: effects on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Appl Soil Ecol 45(3):238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rutherford DW, Wershaw RL, Cox LG (2004) Changes in composition and Porosity occurring during the thermal degradation of wood and wood components. 2004–5292, vol 88. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, DenverGoogle Scholar
  78. Sakthivelu G, Devi MKA, Giridhar P, Rajasekaran T, Ravishankar GA, Nedev T, Kosturkova G (2008) Drought induced alterations in growth, osmotic potential and in vitro regeneration of soybean cultivars. Gen Appl Plant Physiol 34:103–112Google Scholar
  79. Salim BBM (2016) Influence of biochar and seaweed extract applications on growth, yield and mineral composition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under sandy soil conditions. Ann Agric Sci 61(2):257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Salinger MVK, Sivakumar R, Motha (2005) Reducing vulnerability of agriculture and forestry to climate variability and change: workshop summary and recommendations. Clim Chang 70:341–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-5954-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Samarah NH (2005) Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley. Agron Sust Dev 25(1):145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sharma PN, Kumar N, Bisht SS (1994) Effect of zinc deficiency on chlorophyll contents, photosynthesis and water relations of cauliflower plants. Photosynthetica 30:353–359Google Scholar
  83. Singh B, Singh G (2004) Influence of soil water regime on nutrient mobility and uptake by Dalbergia sissoo seedlings. Trop Ecol 45(2):337–340Google Scholar
  84. Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 48:516e25Google Scholar
  85. Sivakumar MVK, Raymond PM, Donald AW, Deborah A (2011) Agricultural drought indices. Proceedings of the WMO/UNISDR expert group meeting on agricultural drought Indices, 2–4 June 2010, Murcia, Spain: Geneva, Switzerland: In: Wood (ed) World Meteorological Organization. AGM-11,WMO/TD No. 1572; WAOB -2011. 197.Google Scholar
  86. Song W, Guo M (2012) Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrol 94:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Soyder V, Schmidt RE (1974) Nitrogen and iron fertilization on bentgrass. In the Proceeding of 2nd International Turfgrass Research conference, VPI Blacksburg pp 176-185Google Scholar
  88. Suárez-Hernández L, Barrera-Zapata R (2017) Morphological and physicochemical characterization of biochar produced by gasification of selected forestry species. Facultad de Ingeniería 26(46):123–130Google Scholar
  89. Tammeorg P, Simojoki A, Mäkelä P, Stoddard FL, Alakukku L, Helenius J (2014) Short-term effects of biochar on soil properties and wheat yield formation with meat bone meal and inorganic fertiliser on a boreal loamy sand. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Turner NC, Begg JE (1978) Responses of pasture plants to water deficits. In: Wilson JR (ed) Plant relations in pastures. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 50–66Google Scholar
  91. Ulyett J, Sakrabani R, Kibblewhite M, Hann M (2014) Impact of biochar addition on water retention, nitrification and carbon dioxide evolution from two sandy loam soils. Eur J Soil Sci 65:96–104.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Usman M (2012) Apparent and real water productivity for cotton-wheat zone of Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Agric Sci 49(3):357–363Google Scholar
  93. Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J Food Agric Environ 9:1137–1143Google Scholar
  94. Van Zwieten L, Singh B, Joseph S, Kimber S, Cowie A, Yin Chan K (2009) Biochar and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases from soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, London SterlingGoogle Scholar
  95. Verheijen FGA, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, van der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils, a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions. Italy: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for environment and sustainability.  https://doi.org/10.2788/472
  96. Voogd P, Scholten JJ, Van Bekkum H (1991) Use of the t-plot—de Boer method in pore volume determinations of ZSM-5 type zeolites. Colloids Surf 55:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wardle DA, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson (2008) Fire derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science 320:629–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wilhite DA (2005) The role of disaster preparedness in national planning with specific reference to drought. In: Impacts of natural disasters in agriculture, rangeland and forestry: an overview. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Yu O, Raichle B, Sink S (2013) Impact of biochar on the water holding capacity of loamy sand soil. Int J Energy Environ Engin 4:44.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1295–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Summera Jahan
    • 1
  • Sumera Iqbal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fahd Rasul
    • 2
  • Khajista Jabeen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyLahore College for Women UniversityLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations