Advertisement

Application of catastrophe theory to fracability evaluation of deep shale reservoir

  • Wenbao Zhai
  • Jun LiEmail author
  • Yingcao Zhou
ICCESEN 2017
  • 59 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Geo-Resources-Earth-Environmental Sciences

Abstract

Fracability evaluation is one of the great challenges during the shale gas development, which has become a hotspot for the exploration of unconventional oil and gas. Although much research work was conducted and some evaluation models were developed, most of them could not be applied to practical engineering operations for deep shale gas development. In this paper, a multi-level sub-system was developed based on the analytic hierarchy process, and then, a catastrophe evaluation model, avoiding over-subjective in defining the weighting coefficient of factors, was proposed to evaluate deep shale reservoirs’ fracability by using the catastrophe theory. Finally, the model was verified by using engineering data in five deep shale gas wells. The analytic results showed that the calculated results of the catastrophe evaluation model are in good agreement with the facts compared with the analytic hierarchy process. Moreover, the general expression for the potential function and its normalization formula of the common catastrophe model with arbitrary dimensions could also be derived recursively to meet practical applications. Therefore, the catastrophe evaluation model was simple and suitable for the wide application, which provides new sights for the pre-fracturing prediction and post-fracturing evaluation during deep shale reservoirs development.

Keywords

Deep shale reservoir Catastrophe theory Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) Weighting coefficient Multi-level sub-system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work of this paper has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51674272), the National Science and Technology Major projects of China (No.2017ZX05009-003), and the key project of jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1762211). At the same time, I am very grateful for the support of CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company Limited and the authors of the references in this article. If you have any problems, I am pleased to welcome e-feedback to zhaiwbdrilling@hotmail.com.

References

  1. Bathrellos GD, Karymbalis E, Skilodimou HD, Gaki-Papanastassiou K, Baltas EA (2016) Urban flood hazard assessment in the basin of Athens Metropolitan city, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 75:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5157-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD, Chousianitis K, Youssef AM, Pradhan B (2017) Suitability estimation for urban development using multi-hazard assessment map. Sci Total Environ 575:119–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belton V, Gear T (1985) The legitimacy of rank reversal—a comment. Omega 13(3):143–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(85)90052-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burrough P, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Fang C, Amro M (2014) Influence factors of fracability in nonmarine shale. SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria 25–27 February 2014.  https://doi.org/10.2118/167803-MS
  6. Heinrich T (2015) A discontinuity model of technological change: catastrophe theory and network structure. Comput Econ 51:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-016-9609-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jahandideh A, Jafarpour B (2016) Optimization of hydraulic fracturing design under spatially variable shale fracability. J Pet Sci Eng 138:174–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.11.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jin X, Shah SN, Roegiers JC, Zhang B (2015) An integrated petrophysics and geomechanics approach for fracability evaluation in shale reservoirs. SPE J 20:518–526.  https://doi.org/10.2118/168589-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li Z, Guo C, Wang J, Li Y (2010) Generalized expression of potential function in catastrophe model and its application in eutrophication evaluation. Adv Water Sci 21:101–106. (In Chinese with English abstract).  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199909)59:13.0.CO;2-A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meng Y, Li X, Jiang M, Feng D, Zhang T, Zhang Z (2018) Experimental research on three dimensional flow characteristics of multiple horizontal fractures utilizing an innovative experiment apparatus. Arab J Geosci 11(243).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3589-0
  11. Merli M, Pavese A (2018) Electron-density critical points analysis and catastrophe theory to forecast structure instability in periodic solids. Acta Crystallogr Sect A 74:102–111.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273317018381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peng Z, Li X (2018) Improvements of the permeability experiment in coalbed methane. Arab J Geosci 11:259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3608-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Poston T, Stewart I, Plaut RH (1978) Catastrophe theory and its applications. Pitman, Pitman.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3424591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sima L, Wen D, Yan J, Tan M, Deng H (2015) Fracturing hierarchy analysis and fracturing height prediction method in shale reservoirs. Well Logging Technol 39(5):622–639. (In Chinese with English abstract).  https://doi.org/10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2015.05.17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Su S, Li D, Yu X, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Xiao R, Zhi J, Wu J (2011) Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory. Stoch Environ Res Risk A 25:737–746.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0457-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Su S, Zhang Z, Xiao R, Jiang Z, Chen T, Zhang L, Wu J (2012) Geospatial assessment of agroecosystem health: development of an integrated index based on catastrophe theory. Stoch Environ Res Risk A 26:321–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0551-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sui L, Ju Y, Yang Y, Yang Y, Li A (2016) A quantification method for shale fracability based on analytic hierarchy process. Energy 115:637–645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tang Y, Xing Y, Li L (2012) Influence factors and evaluation methods of the gas shale fracability. Earth Sci Front 19:356–363 (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  19. Thom R (1972) Stabilité structurelle et morphogénèse. Benjamin, New York (English version by D. H. Fowler (1975) Structural stability and morphogenesys. Addison Wesley, New York)Google Scholar
  20. Wang X, Zhang J, Shahid S, Xia X, He R, Shang M (2014) Catastrophe theory to assess water security and adaptation strategy in the context of environmental change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 19:463–477.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9443-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeeman EC (1976) Catastrophe theory. Sci Am 234(4):65–83.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0476-65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhai W, Li J, Zhou Y, Liu G, Huang T, Song X (2018a) New evaluation method of shale reservoir fracability based on logging data. Lithologic Reservoirs 30(3):112–123. (In Chinese with English abstract).  https://doi.org/10.12108/yxyqc.20180313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhai W, Li J, Zhou Y, Liu G, Yu Y (2018b) Application of catastrophe theory to fracability evaluation of shale reservoir. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field 25(1):76–79. (In Chinese with English abstract).  https://doi.org/10.6056/dkyqt201801016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhao T, Li X, Ning Z, Zhao H, Zhang J, Zhao W (2018) Pore structure and adsorption behavior of shale gas reservoir with influence of maturity: a case study of Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation in China. Arab J Geosci 11(353).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3673-5

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Petroleum EngineeringChina University of Petroleum (Beijing)BeijingChina
  2. 2.CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company LimitedBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations