Effectiveness of reinforcing a low-height sandy slope with geosynthetic reinforcement for landscape development

  • Emmanuel Baah-FrempongEmail author
  • Sanjay Kumar Shukla
Original Paper


Landscape projects often require steep sandy slopes of low height, say 1–3 m, in many parts of the world, including Australia. Geosynthetic reinforcements may greatly help in constructing such steep slopes. In this paper, an attempt has been made to analyze the stability of a low-height medium dense sandy slope, reinforced with geosynthetic layers, so that this sustainable construction practice may be routinely adopted worldwide. The slope stability analysis was carried out using the limit equilibrium method as available in a commercial software, Slope/W. The slope angle was varied from 40° to 60°, and the effect of the following factors was investigated on the stability of the slope: depth, length, tensile strength and number of reinforcement layers, and soil-reinforcement interfacial friction coefficient. The analysis shows that installing a single geosynthetic reinforcement layer within the 40° slope at the optimum embedment depth (u) to slope height (H) ratio, u/H = 0.5, results in a stable slope with a factor of safety Fr(max) of 1.61, but this depth is not suitable for stabilizing the 50° and 60° slopes. Reinforcing the 50° and 60° slopes with two geosynthetic reinforcement layers at the optimum embedment depth of u/H = 0.14  and 0.5 in the 50° slope and u/H = 0.19 and  0.5 in the 60° slope improves the factor of safety over the unreinforced case, by 57% and 86%, to Fr(max) = 1.46 and Fr(max) = 1.36, respectively. An illustrative example has been provided to demonstrate the practical application of the developed graphical presentations, as the design charts, to practising engineers involved in landscape development.


Geosynthetic Reinforcement Slope stability Landscape development Limit equilibrium 


  1. Abramson LW, Lee TS, Sharma S, Boyce GM (2002) Slope stabilization and stabilization methods, 2nd edn. John Willey and Sons Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Alamshahi S, Hataf N (2009) Bearing capacity of strip footings on sand slopes reinforced with geogrid and grid-anchor. Geotext Geomembr 27(3):217–226. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altalhe EB, Taha MR, Abdrabbo FM (2015) Behavior of strip footing on reinforced sand slope. J Civ Eng Manag 21(3):376–383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aryal K (2006) Slope stability evaluation by LE and FE methods. Ph D thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.Google Scholar
  5. Berg R, Christopher B, Samtani N (2009) Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes - Volume I. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC USA. Publication NC. FHWA-NHI-10-024Google Scholar
  6. Bhattacherjee D, Viswanadham BVS (2015) Numerical studies on the performance of hybrid-geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes subjected to rainfall. Geosynth Int 22(6):411–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choudhary AK, Jha JN, Gill KS (2010) Laboratory investigation of bearing capacity behavior of strip footing on reinforced flyash slope. Geotext Geomembr 28(4):393–402. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan M (1996) State of the art: limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes. J Geotech Eng 122(7):577–596. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan JM, Wright SG (1980) The accuracy of equilibrium methods of slope stability analysis. Eng Geol 16(1–2):5–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duncan JM, Wright SG, Drandon TL (2014) Soil strength and slope stability. John Wiley and Sons Inc., HobokenGoogle Scholar
  11. El Sawwaf MA (2007) Behavior of strip footing on geogrid-reinforced sand over a soft clay slope. Geotext Geomembr 25(1):50–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elias V, Christopher BR, Berg RR (2001) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes design and construction guidelines. Report No. FHWA-NHI-00-043, National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Ferreira FB, Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Carlos DM (2016) Experimental investigation on the pullout behavior of geosynthetics embedded in a granite residual soil. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 20(9):1147–1180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredlund DG, Krahn J (1977) Comparison of slope stability methods of analysis. Can Geotech J 14(3):429–439. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geoslope International (2012) Stability modeling with SLOPE/W. Engineering Methodology, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghosh P, Biswas A (2012) Effect of reinforcement on stability of slopes using geoslope. Proceedings of International Conference on Benchmarks in Engineering Science and Technology, India, pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
  17. Gill KS, Shukla SK, Jha JN, Choudhary AK (2013) Experimental and numerical studies of loaded strip footing resting on reinforced fly ash slope. Geosynth Int 20(1):13–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han J, Leshchinsky D, Shao Y (2002) Influence of tensile stiffness of geosynthetic reinforcements on performance of reinforced slopes. Proceedings on Geosynthetics-7 ICG, Delmas, (eds. Gourc and Girard), Nice, France, pp. 197–200.Google Scholar
  19. Hu Y, Zhang G, Zhang JM, Lee CF (2010) Centrifuge modeling of geotextile-reinforced cohesive slopes. Geotext Geomembr 28(1):12–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Javankhoshdel S, Bathurst RJ (2017) Deterministic and probabilistic failure analysis of simple geosynthetic reinforced soil slopes. Geosynth Int 24(1):14–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanjanakul C, Chub-uppakarn T, Chalermyanont T (2016) Rainfall thresholds for landslide early warning system in Nakhon Si Thammarat. Arab J Geosci 9:584. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) An improved method to increase the load-bearing capacity of strip footing resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Indian Geotechnical Journal 45(1):98–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keskin MS, Laman M (2014) Experimental and numerical studies of strip footings on geogrid-reinforced sand slope. Arab J Sci Eng 39(3):1607–1619. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koerner R (2005) Designing with geosynthetics, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  25. Latha G, Garaga A (2010) Stability analysis of a rock in Himalayas. Geomechanics and Engineering 2(2):125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Latha G, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2006) Experimental and theoretical Investigations on geocell-supported embankments. Int J Geomech 6(1):30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee KM, Manjunath VR (2000a) Experimental and numerical studies of geosynthetic-reinforced sand slopes loaded with a footing. Can Geotech J 37(4):828–842. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee KM, Manjunath VR (2000b) Soil-geotextile interface friction by direct shear tests. Can Geotech J 37(1):238–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matteo LD, Valigi D, Ricco R (2013) Laboratory shear strength parameters of cohesive soils: Variability and potential effects on slope stability. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(1):101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mehdipour I, Ghazavi M, Moayed RZ (2013) Numerical study on stability analysis of geocell reinforced slopes by considering the bending effect. Geotext Geomembr 37:23–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mehdipour I, Ghazavi M, Moayed RZ (2017) Stability analysis of geocell-reinforced slopes using the limit equilibrium horizontal slice method. Int J Geomech 17(1):1–15Google Scholar
  32. Mehrjardi GT, Ghanbari A, Mehdizadeh H (2016) Experimental study on the behaviour of geogrid-reinforced slopes with respect to aggregate size. Geotext Geomembr 44(6):862–871. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michalowski RL (1997) Stability of uniformly reinforced slopes. J Geotech Eng 126(3):546–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noorzad R, Manavirad E (2014) Bearing capacity of two close strip footings on soft clay reinforced with geotextile. Arab J Geosci 7(2):623–639. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pasternack SC, Gao S (1988) Numerical methods in the stability analysis of slopes. Comput Struct 30(3):573–579. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rawat S, Gupta AK (2016) Analysis of a nailed soil slope using limit equilibrium and finite element methods. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 2(34).
  37. Shukla SK (2015) Core concepts of geotechnical engineering. ICE Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Shukla SK (2016) An introduction to geosynthetic engineering. CRS Press, Francis and Taylor, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  39. Shukla SK, Sivakugan N, Das BM (2009) Fundamental concepts of soil reinforcement—an overview. Int J Geotech Eng 3(3):329–342. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sommers AN, Viswanadham BVS (2009) Centrifuge model tests on the behavior of strip footing on geotextile-reinforced slopes. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):497–505. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tiwari G, Samadhiya NK (2016) Factors Influencing the distribution of peak tension in geosynthetic reinforced soil slopes. Indian Geotechnical Journal 46(1):34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wright SG, Duncan JM (1991) Limit equilibrium stability analyses for reinforced slopes. Transportation Research Record 1330, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC. 40–46Google Scholar
  43. Yu Y, Bathurst RJ (2017) Influence of selection of soil and interface properties on numerical results of two soil–geosynthetic interaction problems. Int J Geomech 17(6).
  44. Zornberg JG, Sitar N, Mitchell JK (1998a) Limit equilibrium as a basis for design of geosynthetic reinforced slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron 124(8):684–698. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zornberg JG, Sitar N, Mitchell JK (1998b) Performance of geosynthetic reinforced slopes at failure. J Geotech Geoenviron 124(8):670–683. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringEdith Cowan UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations