A case history: 3-D gravity modeling using hexahedral element in Kinigi geothermal field, Rwanda

  • Jean d’Amour Uwiduhaye
  • Hideki Mizunaga
  • Hakim SaibiEmail author
Original Paper


It is important for geothermal exploration to know regional subsurface structures. The gravity survey is often used to narrow down the promising area at the early stage of geothermal exploration. The gravity survey was carried out to estimate subsurface density structure in the Kinigi geothermal field, Rwanda, in September 2015. In order to interpret the gravity anomaly distribution, 3-D gravity modeling was done by using the new program based on Gauss-Legendre integration using hexahedral elements. As the result, the computed gravity anomalies showed high gravity anomalies in northwest, the northeast, and east-southeast of the studied field and low anomalies in the southwest side of the studied field as Bouguer anomalies. The area was characterized by normal contacts with main boundary trending NW-SE direction. This boundary was estimated as main fault in Kinigi geothermal field, Rwanda. The detected fault could be a better place for installing geothermal wells for future geothermal development in the region.


Gravity modeling Hexahedral element Gauss-Legendre quadrature Kinigi geothermal field Rwanda 



First author expresses his gratitude to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for financial support for the field work at Kinigi geothermal field through the KIZUNA program.


  1. Barnett CT (1976) Theoretical modeling of the magnetic and gravitational fields of an arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional body. Geophysics 41:1353–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharyya BK (1978) Computer modeling in gravity and magnetic interpretation. Geophysics 43:912–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyya BK, Chan KC (1977) Computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies due to inhomogeneous distribution of magnetization and density in a localized region. Geophysics 42:602–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya BK, Navolio ME (1976) A fast Fourier transform method for rapid computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies due to arbitrary bodies. Geophysical Prospecting 24:633–649.
  5. Blakely RJ (1996) Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai Y, Wang C (2005) Fast finite-element calculation of gravity anomaly in complex geological regions. Geophys J Int 162:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coggon JH (1976) Magnetic and gravity anomalies of polyhedral. Geoexploration 14:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EPD (2017) Energy private developers, energy in Rwanda. Accessed on May 2017
  9. Götze HJ, Lahmeyer B (1988) Application of three-dimensional interactive modeling in gravity and magnetics. Geophysics 53:1096–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hildebrand FB (1987) Introduction to numerical analysis (2nd Edition). Dover Publications, Inc, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Hinze WJ, Von Frese RRB, Saad AH (2013) Gravity and magnetic exploration. Principles, practices, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Hubbert MK (1948) A line integral method of computing the gravimetric effects of two-dimensional masses. Geophysics 13:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hughes TJR (1987) The finite element method, linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. In: Prentice-Hall Inc, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Jahandari H, Farquharson CG (2013) Forward modeling of gravity data using finite-volume and finite-element methods on unstructured grids. Geophysics 78:G69–G80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luo Y, Yao C (2007) Forward modeling of gravity, gravity gradients, and magnetic anomalies due to complex bodies. J China Univ Geosci 18:280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nagy D (1966) The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism. Geophysics 31:362–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Okabe M (1979) Analytical expressions for gravity anomalies due to homogeneous polyhedral bodies and translations into magnetic anomalies. Geophysics 44:730–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Plouff D (1976) Gravity and magnetic fields of polygonal prisms and application to magnetic terrain corrections. Geophysics 41:727–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pohánka V (1988) Optimum expressions for computation of the gravity field of a homogeneous polyhedral body. Geophys Prospect 36:733–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reynolds JM (1997) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogers NW, James D, Kelley S, De Mulder M (1998) The generation of Potassic lavas from the eastern Virunga Province, Rwanda. J Petrol 39:1223–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rutagarama U (2013) Geothermal exploration and development in Rwanda. Short course VIII on exploration for geothermal resources, organized by UNU-GTP, GDC and KenGen, Lake Bogoria and Lake Naivasha, Kenya, Oct 31-Nov 22, 2013, p 7Google Scholar
  23. Shalev E, Browne P, Wameyo P, Palmer J, Hochstein M, Fenton R (2012) Geoscientific surveys of the Rwandan Kalisimbi, Gisenyi, and Kinigi Geothermal Prospects. Institute of Earth Science and Engineering (IESE) Report for Rwanda, p 214Google Scholar
  24. Talwani M, Ewing M (1960) Rapid computation of gravitational attraction of three-dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape. Geophysics 25:203–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Theunissen K, Hanon M, Fernandez-Alonso M (1991) Carte Géologique du Rwanda (in French); Service Géologique, Ministère de l’Industrie et de l’Artisanat, République Rwandaise: Tervuren, Belgium, 1:250000Google Scholar
  26. Uwiduhaye JA, Mizunaga H, Saibi H (2018) Geophysical investigation using gravity data in Kinigi geothermal field, Northwest Rwanda. J Afr Earth Sci 139:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean d’Amour Uwiduhaye
    • 1
  • Hideki Mizunaga
    • 2
  • Hakim Saibi
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Rwanda Energy Group LimitedKigaliRwanda
  2. 2.Department of Earth Resources Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Geology, College of ScienceUnited Arab Emirates UniversityAl-AinUAE

Personalised recommendations