Advertisement

Effect of tunnel overburden stress on the rock brittle failure depth

  • Heyam H. Shaalan
  • Mohd Ashraf Mohamad IsmailEmail author
  • Romziah Azit
Original Paper
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Tunneling under high overburden stresses results in many tunnel instability problems due to the rock overstressing. Understanding and simulating the rock failure process is the major issue of a deep excavation to achieve an appropriate rock support system that provides possible cost-effective and stable construction. The excavation of the Pahang Selangor Raw Water Transfer Tunnel is considered in this paper. Three critical cases of the project are analyzed. A possible rock brittle failure was predictable at the tunnel sidewalls under a depth of more than 500 m. The rock overstressing is analyzed based on the in situ stress conditions, intact rock strength, and actual failure depth observed at the site. Failure zones are simulated using the cohesion softening–friction hardening model and compared with the site observed failures. A review of underground openings excavated in different rock mass conditions showed that the ratio of the maximum boundary stress to the uniaxial compressive strength (σθmax/σci) is suggested as the key parameter to determine the tunnel instability problems. In this study, an attempt is made to investigate the influence of the maximum tangential boundary stress to the uniaxial compressive strength ratio(σθmax/σci) on the rock brittle failure depth, stress distribution, and displacement of the rock mass around the tunnel. A parametric study is implemented using different tunnel depths including the actual tunnel depths. The results show that with increasing tunnel depth or (σθmax/σci) ratio, the risk of spalling, rock burst, and other tunnel instabilities are increasing.

Keywords

Rock spalling Cohesion softening–friction hardening model Tunnel stability Shotcrete lining Numerical modeling 

References

  1. ACI 318-08 (2008) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American concrete institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson CJ (2007) Rock mass response to coupled mechanical thermal loading. Ȁspö Pillar Stability Experiment. PHD Thesis, KTH, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  3. Azit R, Ismail MAM (2016) Modeling stress-induced failure for deep tunnel excavation of Pahang-Selangor raw water transfer project. 9thAsian Rock Mechanics Symposium. Bali, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  4. Azit R, Ismail MAM, Syed Zainal SF, Mahmood N (2015) Rock overstressing in deep tunnel excavation of Pahang-Selangor raw water transfer project. Appl Mech Mater.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.802.16
  5. Cai M, Kaiser P (2014) In-situ rock spalling strength near excavation boundaries. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:659–675.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0437-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diederichs MS (2007) Mechanistic interpretation and practical application of damage and spalling prediction criteria for deep tunnelling. Can Geotech J.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-033
  7. Diederichs MS, Kaiser PK, Eberhardt E (2004) Damage initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunnelling and the influence of near-face stress rotation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:785–812.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edelbro C (2008) Strength, fallouts and numerical modelling of hard rock masses. PHD thesis, Lulea University of Technology Luleå, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  9. Edelbro C (2010) Different approaches for simulating failure in two hard rock mass cases a parametric study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:151–165.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-008-0025-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gong Q, Yin L, Wu S, Zhao J, Ting Y (2012) Rock burst and slabbing failure and its influence on TBM excavation at headrace tunnels in Jinping II hydropower station. Eng Geol 124:98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to Rock Mechanics, 2nd edition.. pp 225Google Scholar
  12. Hajiabdolmajid V, Kaiser PK, Martin CD (2002) Modelling brittle failure of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:731–741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00051-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamdi P, Stead D, Elmo D (2015) Characterizing the influence of stress-induced microcracks on the laboratory strength and fracture development in brittle rocks using a finite-discrete element method-micro discrete fracture network FDEM- μ DFN approach. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.07.005
  14. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavations in rock. London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoek E, Marinos P (2009) In: Vrkljan I (ed) Tunnelling in overstressed rock. Rock engineering in difficult ground conditions - soft rocks and karst. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 49–60Google Scholar
  16. Hoek E, Wood D, Shah S (1992) A modified Hoek–Brown criterion for jointed rock masses. In: Hudson JA (ed) Rock characterization: ISRM Symposium, Eurock ‘92, Chester, UK. Thomas Telford, London, pp 209–213Google Scholar
  17. Hoek E, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF (1995) Support of underground excavation in hard rock, vol 1995. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion – 2002 Edition. Proc. North American Rock Mechanics Society meeting in Toronto in July 2002Google Scholar
  19. Hoek E, Carter TG, Diederichs MS (2013) Quantification of the Geological Strength Index chart. 47th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium held in San Francisco, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobi O (1966) Occurrence, causes and control of rock dursts in the Ruhr district. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 3:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawata T, Nakano Y, Matsumoto T, Mito A, Pittard F, Azman AAS (2014) The relationship between TBM data and rockburst in long-distance tunnel, Pahang-Selangor raw water transfer tunnel, Malaysia. 8th Asian rock mechanics symposium. Sapporo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirsch (1898) Die Theorie der Elastizität und dieBedürfnisse der Festigkeitslehre. Z Ver Deutsch Ing 42(28):797–807Google Scholar
  23. Martin CD, Read RS, Martino JB (1997) Observation of brittle failure around a circular test tunnel. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:1065–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin CD, Kaiser PK, McCreath DR (1999) Hoek-Brown parameters for predicting the depth of brittle failure around tunnels. Can Geotech J 36:136–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ortlepp W (2001) The behaviour of tunnels at great depth under large static and dynamic pressures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rocscience Inc., (2012) Phase2©, version 8.012. http://www.rocscience.com. Accessed 2019
  27. Saurer E, Marcher T, Schaedlich B, Schweiger HF (2014) Validation of a novel constitutive model for shotcrete using data from an executed tunnel. Geomech Tunn 7(4):353–336.  https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201400023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaalan H, Ismail MAM, Azit R (2017) Evaluation of TBM tunnels with respect to stability against spalling. AIP Conference ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  29. Sulem J, Panet M, Guenot A (1987) Closure analysis in deep tunnels. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 24:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vandewalle M (1998) The use of steel fibre reinforced shotcrete for the support of mine openings. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 98(3):113–120Google Scholar
  31. Yu ZH, Kulatilake PHSW, Jiang FX (2012) Effect of tunnel shape and support system on stability of a tunnel in a deep coal mine in China. Geotech Geol Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9475-0

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heyam H. Shaalan
    • 1
  • Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
    • 1
    Email author
  • Romziah Azit
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia
  2. 2.Centre of Excellence for Technology and Engineering (CREaTE)Jabatan Kerja RayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations