Advertisement

Evaluation of the engineering geological investigation of the Ayvali dam site (NE Turkey)

  • Mustafa KanikEmail author
  • Hakan Ersoy
Original Paper
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

This paper dealt with the geotechnical characterization of the andesitic rock mass cropped out at the Ayvali Dam Site (NE, Turkey) and aimed to determine how well the obtained results corresponded to the situations that emerged after the dam construction was completed. Scan-line surveys, boreholes, and the related field tests were conducted and the laboratory tests were carried out for determination of index, strength, and deformation characteristics of the rock mass. The excavation class of the rock mass was defined as hard ripping, and according to limit equilibrium (LE) and kinematical analyses, the risk of wedge failure could possibly occur at the rock slopes. Additionally, shear strength reduction (SSR) analysis was carried out using finite element (FE) methods to determine whether a circular failure on the right and left slopes could arise or not, and strength reduction factor (SRF) for the rock slopes were determined as 3.4 and 4.9. The different empirical equations pointed out that the ultimate bearing capacity was in the range of 1.4 to 5.8 MPa. Thus, water absorption tests pointed out that permeability of the rock mass is about 10−6 m/s. Based on the results of the numerical analyses, grout curtain depth was assumed to be maximum 60 m and 40 m at the river bed and the abutments, respectively. The data obtained from the numerical seepage analyses were compared to the conditions showed up after the construction completed, and the applied injection depths showed similarity to those obtained from the numerical analyses.

Keywords

Bearing capacity Excavatability Limit equilibrium Rock slope stability Numerical analysis Finite element method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the efforts of the geology and geodesy engineers from an anonym firm. The authors appreciate Prof. Dr. Fikri Bulut, Prof. Dr. Mehmet Arslan from Department of Geological Engineering in Karadeniz Technical University.

References

  1. Abdullatif OM, Cruden DM (1983) The relationship between rock mass quality and ease of excavation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 28(1):183–187Google Scholar
  2. Alejano LR, Gonzalez J, Muralha J (2012) Comparison of different techniques of tilt testing and basic friction angle variability assessment. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:1023–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arslan M, Tuysuz N, Korkmaz S, Kurt H (1997) Geochemistry and petrogenesis of the eastern Pontide volcanic rocks, Northeast Turkey. Chem Erde-Geochem 57(2–3):157–187Google Scholar
  4. Barton N, (2004a) The theory behind high pressure grouting—Part 1. Tunnels and Tunnelling International, September, pp. 28–30.Google Scholar
  5. Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the Design of Tunnel Support. Rock Mech 6:189–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bektas O, Yılmaz C, Taslı K, Akdağ K, Özgür S (1995) Cretaceous rifting of the eastern Pontide carbonate platform (NE Turkey): the formation of carbonates breccias and turbidites as evidences of a drowned platform. Geologia 57:233–244Google Scholar
  7. Beynen PE (2011) Karst management. Springer Science and Business Media, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Transactions of the South African Institution of Civil Engineers 5(12):335–344Google Scholar
  9. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classification. Mc-Graw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Coli N, Pranzini G, Alfi A, Boerio V (2008) Evaluation of rock-mass permeability tensor and prediction of tunnel inflows by means of geo-structural surveys and finite element seepage analysis. Eng Geol 10:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deere DU (1964) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 1:17–22Google Scholar
  12. El-Naqa A, Kuisi MA (2002) Engineering geological characterisation of the rock masses at Tannur Dam site, South Jordan. Environ Geol 42:817–826Google Scholar
  13. Ersoy H, Gelişli K, Bayraktar A, Öztürk HH, Seşkin AC, Karaibrahimoğlu G, Sağır G, Özen M, Tezel K, Yüregir B, Kul Yahşi B (2015) Havuzlu Paleo-Heyelanının (Yusufeli, Artvin) Mühendislik Jeolojisi Açısından İncelenmesi, MÜHJEO’2015: Ulusal Mühendislik Jeolojisi Sempozyumu, Trabzon, 90–97 (in Turkish with English Abstract)Google Scholar
  14. Ertunç A, Çetin H (2007) Bulletin of Engineering Geology and The Environment 66(3):335–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-006-0081-y
  15. Foyo A, Sanchez MA, Tomillo C (2005) A proposal for a secondary permeability index obtained from water pressure tests in dam foundations. Eng Geol 77:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gelişli K, Ersoy H (2017) Landslide Investigation with the Use of Geophysical Methods: A Case Study In Northeastern Turkey. Adv Biol Earth Sci 2:52–64Google Scholar
  17. Gökçeoğlu C (1997) Killi, Yoğun Süreksizlik İçeren ve Zayıf Kaya Kütlelerinin Mühendislik Sınıflamalarında Karşılaşılan Güçlüklerin Giderilmesine Yönelik Yaklaşımlar. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonzalez J, Gonzalez-Pastoriza N, Castro U, Alejano LR, Muralha J (2014) Considerations on the laboratory estimate of the basic friction angle of rock joints. In: Alejano LR, Perucho A, Olalla C, Jimenez R (eds) Rock mechanics and rock engineering: structures on and in rock masses, EUROCK 2014. Balkema, Vigo, pp 98–99Google Scholar
  19. Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman R, Moye D, Shalkwyk A, Javandel I (1965) Groundwater inflow during tunnel driving. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 2:39–56Google Scholar
  21. Gurocak Z, Alemdag S (2012) Assessment of permeability and injection depth at the Atasu dam site (Turkey) based on experimental and numerical analyses. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurocak Z, Alemdag S, Zaman MM (2008) Rock slope stability and excavatability assessment of rocks at the Kapikaya dam site, Turkey. Eng Geol 96:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammah RE, Curran JH, Yacoub TE, Corkum BC (2004) Stability analysis of rock slope using the finite element method. In: Proceedings of the ISRM regional symposium EUROCK 2004 & 53rd geomechanics colloquium, SalzburgGoogle Scholar
  24. Heuer R (1995) A quantitative, empirical and theoretical approach on water flow into tunnels. Rapid excavation and tunneling conference, San Francisco CA, June 18–21Google Scholar
  25. Hoek E (1983) 23rd Rankine lecture, strength of jointed rock masses. Geotechnique 33(3):187–223Google Scholar
  26. Hoek E, Bray JW (1981) Rock slope engineering, 3rd edn. Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. In: Proceedings of NARMSTAC 2002, Mining Innovation And Technology, Toronto, 10 July 2002. University of Toronto, 267–273Google Scholar
  28. UNESCO (1976) Engineering geological maps: a guide to their preparation. Unesco Press, Paris, pp 79Google Scholar
  29. ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics) (2007) In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring. Kazan Offset Pres, Ankara 628 sGoogle Scholar
  30. Kandemir R, Yilmaz C (2009) Lithostratigraphy, facies and deposition environment of the lower Jurassic Ammonitico Rosso type sediments (ARTS) in the Gumushane area, NE Turkey: implications for the opening of the northern branch of the Neo-Tethys Ocean. J Asia Earth Sci 34:586–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kanik M (2009) Investigation of geotechnical properties of andesitic rock masses at Ayvalı dam site (Olur, Erzurum, NE Turkey). Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Natural Sciences, Master Thesis, 95 pp. (in Turkish with English abstract)Google Scholar
  32. Karaguzel R, Kilic R (2000) The effect of the alteration degree of ophiolitic melange on permeability and grouting. Eng Geol 57:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kiraly L (2002) Karstification and groundwater flow. In: Gabrovšek F (ed) Evolution of karst from prekarst to cessation. Zalozba ZRC, Postojna-Ljubljana, pp 155–190Google Scholar
  34. Kirsten HAD (1982) A classification system for excavation in natural materials. Civ Eng S Afr 24:293–308Google Scholar
  35. Kocbay A, Kilic R (2006) Engineering geology assessment of the Obruk dam site. Eng Geol 87:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kroeger EB (1999) Wedge Failure Analysis version 2.0Google Scholar
  37. Kulhawy FH, Carter JP (1992) Settlement and bearing capacity of foundations on rock masses and socketed foundations in rock masses. In: Bell FG (ed) Engineering in rock masses. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lashkaripour GR, Ghafoori M (2002) The engineering geology of the Tabarak Abad dam. Eng Geol 66:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li P, Lu W, Long Y, Yang Z, Li J (2008) Seepage analysis in a fractured rock mass: the upper reservoir of Pushihe pumpedstorage power station in China. Eng Geol 97(1–2):53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lugeon M (1933) Barrages et geologic methods de recherche terrasement et un permeabilisation. Litrairedes Universite, ParisGoogle Scholar
  41. Marinos P, Hoek E (2000) GSI: a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. In: Proceedings of the GeoEng2000 at the international conference on geotechnical and geological engineering, Melbourne. Technomic Publishers, Lancaster, 1422–1446Google Scholar
  42. Merifield RS, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2006) Limit analysis solutions for the bearing capacity of rock masses using the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:920–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ozsayar T, Pelin S, Gedikoglu A (1981) Cretaceous in the eastern Pontides, Karadeniz Technical University. J Earth Sci 1:65–74 (in Turkish with English abstract)Google Scholar
  44. Palmström A (1996) RMi—a system for characterizing rock mass strength for use in rock engineering. J Rock Mech Tunn Technol 1(2):69–108Google Scholar
  45. Pearson R (1999) Geology and safety of dams case histories in gypsum karst for Horsetooth Dam and Reservoir and Carter Lake Dam no. 2, Colorado Big Thompson Project, Ft. Collins and Loveland, Colorado. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. USBR Technical Service Center D-8321, DenverGoogle Scholar
  46. Peck RB, Hanson WE, Thornburn TH (1974) Foundation engineering, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Pettifer GS, Fookes PG (1994) A revision of the graphical method for assessing the excavatability of rock. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 27:145–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rocscience (1999) Dips v5.0 Graphical and Statistical Analysis of Orientation Data. Rocscience Inc., TorontoGoogle Scholar
  49. Rocscience (2002) Roclab v1.0 Rock Mass Strength Analysis Using the Generalized HoekBrown Failure Criterion. Rocscience Inc., TorontoGoogle Scholar
  50. Rocscience (2006) A 2D finite element program for calculating stresses and estimating support around the underground excavations, Geomechanics software and research. Rocscience Inc., TorontoGoogle Scholar
  51. Serrano, Olalla (1994) Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 31:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh RN, Denby B, Egretli I (1987) Development of a new rippability index for coal measures excavations. Proceedings of The 28th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Tuscon, Arizona, Balkema, Boston, 935-943Google Scholar
  53. Smith HJ (1986) Estimating rippability by rock mass classification. Proceedings of the 27th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, AIME, N Y, 443-448Google Scholar
  54. Tezel K (2015) Havuzlu heyelanının (Yusufeli, Artvin) mühendislik jeolojisi açısından incelenmesi. Dissertation, Karadeniz Technical UniversityGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsiambaos G, Saroglou H (2010) Excavatability assessment of rock masses using the geological strength index (GSI). Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turner AK, Schuster RL (1996) Landslides investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, special report, vol. 247. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 673Google Scholar
  57. Wang JSY, Trautz RC, Cook PJ, Finsterle S, James AL, Birkholzer J (1999) Field tests and model analyses of seepage into drift. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 38(1–3):323–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weaver JM (1975) Geological factors significant in the assessment of rippability. Civil Eng S Afr 17:313–316Google Scholar
  59. Wyllie DC (1992) Foundation on rock. E and FN Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Yoon WS, Jeong UJ, Kim JH (2002) Kinematic analysis for sliding failure of multi-faced rock slopes. Eng Geol 67(1–2):51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological EngineeringFirat UniversityElazigTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Geological EngineeringKaradeniz Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey

Personalised recommendations