Advertisement

Study on microscopic flow mechanism of polymer flooding

  • Huiying ZhongEmail author
  • Yuanyuan Li
  • Weidong Zhang
  • Dan Li
Original Paper
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Polymer flooding plays an important role in chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods, and has been widely used in oilfields, particularly Daqing, the largest oilfield in China. However, our understanding of the mechanism of polymer flooding is not very clear. The mechanism of a two-phase micro-flow remains a challenge to researchers, because the structural complexity of a porous medium and the rheological property of a non-Newtonian fluid can increase the difficulty in such research. Computational fluid dynamics provides a numerical simulation method for further investigating the mechanism of polymer flooding at the micro-scale. In this study, OpenFOAM was used to study the two-phase micro-flow of both water and polymer flooding. Based on a micro-physical model of a complex pore structure, the continuity equation, momentum equation, and non-Newtonian fluid constitutive equations of a two-phase flow are established, and the phase equation of the two-phase interface is then developed using the volume of fluid methodology. These equations are solved using the InterFoam solver in OpenFOAM. The saturation, pressure, and velocity distribution characteristics of water and polymer flooding were obtained. The results show that the high viscosity of a polymer solution improves the mobility ratio, inhibits the fingering phenomena, increases the displacement area, and improves the displacement efficiency. The breakthrough time of polymer flooding under a Newtonian rheological property occurs 0.3 s later than that of water flooding, and the displacement pressure drop is higher. When the flow reaches a steady state, the displacement pressure drop of polymer flooding under a Newtonian rheological property is five times that of water flooding, and the displacement efficiency increases by 8–20%. In non-Newtonian fluids with a shear thinning characteristic, where the viscosity of the polymer solution is reduced as compared with polymer flooding under a Newtonian rheological property, polymer flooding under a non-Newtonian rheological property occurs 0.1 s earlier, the displacement pressure drop is reduced by 300 Pa, and the displacement efficiency decreases 4%. These research results will provide a theoretical foundation for a micro-flow mechanism of a two-phase flow in a complex pore structure.

Keywords

Polymer flooding Complex pore model Two-phase micro-flow OpenFOAM 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work presented in this paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Funds for Young Scholars of China (Grant no. 51604079) and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant no. E2017012). The Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant no. E2016015) and the University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province (Grant no. UNPYSCT-2016126) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Afsharpoor A, Balhoff MT, Bonnecaze R, Huh C (2012) CFD modeling of the effect of polymer elasticity on residual oil saturation at the pore-scale. J Pet Sci Eng 94-95:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Shalabi EW, Ghosh B (2016) Effect of pore-scale heterogeneity and capillary-viscous fingering on commingled waterflood oil recovery in stratified porous media. J Petrol Eng 2016:1708929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakke S, Øren PE (1997) 3-D pore-scale modelling of sandstones and flow simulations in the pore networks. SPE J 2(2):136–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Békri S, Laroche C, Vizika O (2005) Pore network models to calculate transport and electrical properties of single or dual-porosity rocks. In: SCA2005–35, Proceedings of the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg S, van Wunnik J (2017) Shear rate determination from pore-scale flow fields. Transport Porous Med 117(2):229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brackbill JU, Kothe DB, Zemach C (1992) A continuum method for modelling surface tension. J Comput Phys 100(2):335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchgraber M, Clemens T, Castanier LM, Kovscek A (2011) A microvisual study of the displacement of viscous oil by polymer solutions. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 14(3):269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen S, Qin F, Kim K-H, Watson AT (1993) NMR imaging of multiphase flow in porous media. AICHE J 39(6):925–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De S, Kuipers JAM, Peters EAJF, Padding JT (2017) Viscoelastic flow simulations in random porous media. J Non-Newton Fluid 248:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong M, Foraie J, Huang S, Chatzis I (2005) Analysis of immiscible water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection using micromodel tests. J Can Pet Technol 44(2):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doorwar S, Mohanty KK (2011) Viscous fingering during non-thermal heavy oil recovery. In: SPE-146841-MS, Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Holmes LT, Favero J, Osswald T (2012) Numerical simulation of three-dimensional viscoelastic planar contraction flow using the software OpenFOAM. Comput Chem Eng 37:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hornbrook JW, Castanier LM, Pettit PA (1991) Observation of foam/oil interactions in a new, high-resolution micromodel. In: SPE-22631-MS, Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Hou J (2007) Network modeling of residual oil displacement after polymer flooding. J Pet Sci Eng 59(3–4):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jamaloei BY, Asghari K, Kharrat R, Ahmadloo F (2010) Pore-scale two-phase filtration in imbibition process through porous media at high- and low-interfacial tension flow conditions. J Pet Sci Eng 72(3–4):251–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jettestuen E, Helland JO, Prodanović M (2013) A level set method for simulating capillary-controlled displacements at the pore scale with nonzero contact angles. Water Resour Res 49(8):4645–4661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koroteev DA, Dinariev O, Evseev N, Klemin DV, Safonov S, Gurpinar OM, Berg S, van Kruijsdijk C, Myers M, Hathon L, de Jong H, Armstrong R (2013) Application of digital rock technology for chemical EOR screening. In: SPE-165258-MS, Proceedings of the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Lafaurie B, Nardone C, Scardovelli R, Zanetti G, Zaleski S (1994) Modeling merging and fragmentation in multiphase flows with SURFER. J Comput Phys 113(1):134–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li X, Novotny RJ (2006) Study on cement displacement by Lattice-Boltzmann method. In: SPE-102979-MS, Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y (2011) Exact solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equation with variable coefficients. Appl Math Comput 217(12):5866–5869Google Scholar
  21. Liu Y, Chen G (1999) Optimal parameters design of oilfield surface pipeline systems using fuzzy models. Inf Sci 120(1):13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu Y, Wang Z, Zhuge X, Pang R (2014) Distribution of sulfide in an oil-water treatment system and a field test of treatment technology in Daqing oilfield. Pet Sci Technol 32(4):462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Y, Li JX, Wang Z, Wang S, Dong Y (2015) The role of surface and subsurface integration in the development of a high-pressure and low-production gas field. Environ Earth Sci 73:5891–5904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu H, Kang Q, Leonardi CR, Schmieschek S, Narváez A, Jones BD, Williams JR, Valocchi AJ, Harting J (2016) Multiphase lattice Boltzmann simulations for porous media applications. Comput Geosci 20(4):777–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu Z, Yang Y, Yao J, Zhang Q, Ma J, Qian Q (2017) Pore-scale remaining oil distribution under different pore volume water injection based on CT technology. Adv Geo-energ Res 1(3):171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell J, Chandrasekera TC, Holland DJ, Gladden LF, Fordham EJ (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging in laboratory petrophysical core analysis. Phys Rep 526(3):165–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nordhaug HF, Celia M, Dahle HK (2003) A pore network model for calculation of interfacial velocities. Adv Water Resour 26(10):1061–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prodanović M, Bryant SL (2006) A level set method for determining critical curvatures for drainage and imbibition. J Colloid Interface Sci 304(2):442–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raeini AQ, Blunt MJ, Bijeljic B (2014) Direct simulations of two-phase flow on micro-CT images of porous media and upscaling of pore-scale forces. Adv Water Resour 74:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rui Z, Peng F, Ling K, Chang H, Chen G, Zhou X (2017) Investigation into the performance of oil and gas projects. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 38:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rui Z, Wang X, Zhang Z, Lu J, Chen G, Zhou X, Patil S (2018) A realistic and integrated model for evaluating oil sands development with steam assisted gravity drainage technology in Canada. Appl Energy 213:76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shahsavari AA, Khodaei K, Hatefi R, Asadian F, Zamanzadeh SM (2014) Distribution of total petroleum hydrocarbons in Dezful aquifer, Southwest of Iran. Arab J Geosci 7(6):2367–2375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharma J, Inwood SB, Kovscek A (2012) Experiments and analysis of multiscale viscous fingering during forced imbibition. SPE J 17(4):1142–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheng JJ, Leonhardt B, Azri N (2015) Status of polymer-flooding technology. J Can Pet Technol 54(2):116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shiran BS, Skauge A (2015) Wettability and oil recovery by polymer and polymer particles. In: SPE-174568-MS, Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  36. Simjoo M, Dong Y, Andrianov A, Talanana M, Zitha PLJ (2013) CT scan study of immiscible foam flow in porous media for enhancing oil recovery. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(18):6221–6233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tetteh JT, Rankey E, Barati R (2017) Low salinity waterflooding effect: Crude oil/brine interactions as a recovery mechanism in carbonate rocks. In: OTC-28023-MS, Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang D, Cheng J, Yang Q, Guo W, Li Q, Chen F (2000) Visco-elastic polymer can increase microscale displacement efficiency in cores. In: SPE-63227-MS, Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang Z, Le X, Feng Y, Zhang C (2013) The role of matching relationship between polymer injection parameters and reservoirs in enhanced oil recovery. J Pet Sci Eng 111:139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang Z, Liu Y, Le X, Yu H (2014) The effects and control of viscosity loss of polymer solution compounded by produced water in oilfield development. Int J Oil Gas Coal Technol 7(3):298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang L, Yue X (2008) Displacement of polymer solution on residual oil trapped in dead ends. J Cent S Univ Technol 15(Suppl 1):84–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang L, Yue X, Guo F (2008) Micro-mechanisms of residual oil mobilization by viscoealstic fluids. Pet Sci 5(1):56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhong H, Zhang W, Yin H, Liu H (2017) Study on mechanism of viscoelastic polymer transient flow in porous media. Geofluids 2017:8763951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhong H, Li Y, Zhang W, Yin H, Lu J, Guo D (2018) Microflow mechanism of oil displacement by viscoelastic hydrophobically associating water-soluble polymers in enhanced oil recovery. Polymers 10(6):628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhu Y (2015) Current developments and remaining challenges of chemical flooding EOR techniques in China. In: SPE-174566-MS, Proceedings of the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huiying Zhong
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yuanyuan Li
    • 1
  • Weidong Zhang
    • 1
  • Dan Li
    • 2
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Enhanced Oil &Gas Recovery of the Ministry of EducationNortheast Petroleum UniversityDaqingChina
  2. 2.Daqing Oilfield Company LimitedExploration and Development Research InstituteDaqingChina

Personalised recommendations