Advertisement

The comparison of the performance of ELM, BRNN, and SVM methods for the prediction of compression index of clays

  • Talas Fikret KurnazEmail author
  • Yilmaz Kaya
Original Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

The compression index (Cc) is a necessary parameter for the settlement calculation of clays. However, determination of the compression index from oedometer tests takes a relatively long time and leads to a very demanding experimental working program in the laboratory. Therefore, geotechnical engineering literature involves many studies based on indirect methods such as multiple regression analysis (MLR) and soft computing methods to determine the compression index. This study is aimed to predict the compression index by using extreme learning machine (ELM), Bayesian regularization neural network (BRNN), and support vector machine (SVM) methods. The selected variables for each method are the natural water content (wn), initial void ratio (e0), liquid limit (LL), and plasticity index (PI) of clay samples. Many trials were carried out in order to get the best prediction performance with each model. The application results obtained from the models were also compared based on the correlation coefficient (R), coefficient of efficiency (E), and mean squared error (MSE). The results indicate that the BRNN method has better success on estimation of the compression index compared to the ELM and SVM methods.

Keywords

Compression index Extreme learning machine Bayesian regularization neural network Support vector machine 

References

  1. Abasi HM, Shooshpasha I, Ebrahimi A (2016) Prediction of the compression index of saturated clays (Cc) using polynomial models. Scientia Iran 23(2):500–507Google Scholar
  2. Abdalla JA, Attom MF, Hawileh R (2015) Prediction of minimum factor of safety against slope failure in clayey soils using artificial neural network. Environ Earth Sci 73(9):5463–5477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azzous AS, Krizek RJ, Corotis RB (1976) Regression Analysis of Soil Compressibility. Soils Found 16(2):19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balbay A, Kaya Y, Sahin O (2012) Drying of black cumin (Nigella sativa) in a microwave assisted drying system and modeling using extreme learning machine. Energy, Elsevier 44(1):352–357Google Scholar
  5. Bowles JE (1989) Physical and geotechnical properties of soils. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: a comparison of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks. Geomorphology 171:12–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burden F, Winkler D (2008) Bayesian regularization of neural networks. In: Livingstone DJ (ed) Artificial neural network: method and application. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 25–44Google Scholar
  8. Caballero J, Fernández M (2006) Linear and nonlinear modeling of antifungal activity of some heterocyclic ring derivatives using multiple linear regression and Bayesian-regularized neural networks. J Mol Model 12(2):168–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chik Z, Aljanabi QA, Kasa A, Taha MR (2014) Tenfold cross validation artificial neural network modeling of the settlement behavior of a stone column under a highway embankment. Arab J Geosci 7(11):4877–4887.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1128-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297Google Scholar
  11. Cozzolino VM (1961) Statistical Forecasting of Compression Index, Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Paris, 1, pp 51–53Google Scholar
  12. Cristianini N, Shaw-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Das SK, Biswal RK, Sivakugan N, Das B (2011) Classification of slopes and prediction of fact or of safety using differential evolution neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 64(1):201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demir A (2015) New computational network models for better predictions of the soil compression index. Acta Geotech Slov 12(1):59–69Google Scholar
  15. Dibike YB, Velikov S, Solomatine D, Abbott MB (2001) Model induction with support vector machines: introduction and applications. J Comput Civ Eng ASCE 15(3):208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dipova N, Cangir B (2010) Determination of Compaction Properties of Clay-Silt Soils by Regression and Artificial Neural Networks. Tech J 332(1):5069–5086Google Scholar
  17. Feizizadeh B, Roodposhti MS, Blaschke T, Aryal J (2017) Comparing GIS-based support vector machine kernel functions for landslide susceptibility mapping. Arab J Geosci 10(122).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-2918-z
  18. Fletcher R (2000) Practical methods of optimization, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hai-Jun R, Yew-Soon O, Ah-Hwee T, Zhu Z (2008) A fast pruned-extreme learning machine for classification problem. Neurocomputing 72:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrero OR (1983) Universal compression index equation; Closure. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109(5):755–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirschen K, Schäfer M (2006) Bayesian regularization neural networks for optimizing fluid flow processes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(7–8):481–500.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holtz RD, Kovacs WD (1981) An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs 733ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Hough BK (1957) Basic Soils Engineering. The Ronald Press Company, New York, pp 114–115Google Scholar
  25. Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70:489e501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang F, Huang J, Jiang S, Zhou C (2017a) Landslide displacement prediction based on multivariate chaotic model and extreme learning machine. Eng Geol 218:173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang F, Yin K, Huang J, Gui L, Wang P (2017b) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on self-organizing-map network and extreme learning machine. Eng Geol 223:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jalalifara H, Mojedifar S, Sahebi AA, Nezamabadi-pour H (2011) Application of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of a rock engineering classification system. Comput Geotech 38(6):783–790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalantary F, Kordnaeij A (2012) Prediction of compression index using artificial neural network. Sci Res Essays 7(31):2835–2848.  https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE12.297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaya Y, Kayci L, Tekin R, Ertuğrul ÖM (2014) Evaluation of texture features for automatic detecting butterfly species using extreme learning machine. J of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intell 26(2():267–281Google Scholar
  31. Kohestani VR, Hassanlourad M (2016) Modeling the mechanical behavior of carbonate sands using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Int J of Geomechanics 16(1).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000509
  32. Koppula SD (1981) Statistical estimation of compression index. Geotech Test J 4(2):68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kordjazi A, Nejad FP, Jaksa MB (2014) Prediction of ultimate axial load-carrying capacity of piles using a support vector machine based on CPT data. Comput Geotech 55:91–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levasseur S, Malecot Y, Boulon M, Flavigny E (2008) Soil parameter identification using a genetic algorithm. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:189–213.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li W, Mei S, Zai S, Zhao S, Liang X (2006) Fuzzy models for analysis of rock mass displacements due to underground mining in mountainous areas. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(4):503–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li AJ, Khoo S, Lyamin AV, Wang Y (2016) Rock slope stability analyses using extreme learning neural network and terminal steepest descent algorithm. Autom Constr 65:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu Z, Shao J, Xu W, Chen H, Zhang Y (2014) An extreme learning machine approach for slope stability evaluation and prediction. Nat Hazards 73(2):787–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu Z, Shao J, Xu W, Wu Q (2015) Indirect estimation of unconfined compressive strength of carbonate rocks using extreme learning machine. Acta Geotech 10(5):651–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacKay DJC (1991) Bayesian methods for adaptive models. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  40. McCombie P, Wilkinson P (2002) The use of the simple genetic algorithm in finding the critical factor of safety in slope stability analysis. Comput Geotech 29(8):699–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(02)00027-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muduli PK, Das SK, Das MJ (2013) Prediction of lateral load capacity of piles using extreme learning machine. Int J Geotech Eng 7(4):388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Muduli PK, Das SK, Samui P, Sahoo R (2015) Prediction of uplift capacity of suction caisson in clay using extreme learning machine. Ocean Sys Eng An Int J 5(1):41–54.  https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2015.5.1.041
  43. Nacci VA, Wang MC, Demars KR (1975) Engineering behavior of calcareous soils. In: Proceedings of Civil Engineering in the Oceans III, ASCE Specialty Conference, Newark, Del., 9– 12 June 1975, vol 1. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 380–400Google Scholar
  44. Nagaraj TS, Murthy BRS (1985) A critical reappraisal of compression index equations. Geotechnique 36(1):27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Namdarvand F, Jafarnejadi A, Sayyad G (2013) Estimation of soil compression coefficient using artificial neural network and multiple regressions. Int Research J of App and Basic Sci 4(10):3232–3236Google Scholar
  46. Nejad FP, Jaksa MB, Kakhi M, McCabe BA (2009) Prediction of pile settlement using artificial neural networks based on standard penetration test data. Comput Geotech 36(7):1125–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nishida Y (1956) A brief note on compression index of soil. J Soil Mech Found Eng ASCE 82(3):1–14Google Scholar
  48. Oh HJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 37(9):1264–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Okut H (2016) Bayesian regularized neural networks for small n big p Data. In Artificial neural networks-models and applications. InTechGoogle Scholar
  50. Padmini D, Ilamparuthi K, Sudheer KP (2008) Ultimate bearing capacity prediction of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils using neurofuzzy models. Comput Geotech 35(1):33–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Park HI, Lee SR (2011) Evaluation of the compression index of soils using an artificial neural network. Comput Geotech 38(4):472–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saboya F, Alves MG, Pinto WD (2006) Assessment of failure susceptibility of soil slopes using fuzzy logic. Eng Geol 86(4):211–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Samui P (2008) Support vector machine applied to settlement of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils. Comput Geotech 35(3):419–427.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Samui P, Kothari DP (2011) Utilization of a least square support vector machine (LSSVM) for slope stability analysis. Scientia Iran 18(1):53–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.03.007
  55. Samui P, Sitharam TG, Kurup PU (2008) OCR prediction using support vector machine based on piezocone data. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134(6):894–898.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(894) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shouka H (1964) Relationship of compression index and liquid limit of alluvial clay. In: Proceedings of the 19th Japan Civil Engineering Conference, Touhoku. vol. 4, pp. 40.1–40.2Google Scholar
  57. Skempton AW (1944) Notes on the Compressibility of Clays. Q J Geol Soc Lond 100:119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smola AJ, Schölkopf B (1998) A tutorial on support vector regression. Rep No. NC2-TR-1998-030. NeuroCOLT2 Tech Rep SerGoogle Scholar
  59. Song O, Hu W, Xie W (2002) Robust support vector machine with bullet hole image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 32(4):440–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sowers GB (1970) Introductory soil mechanics and foundations, 3rd edn. The Macmillan Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Sulewska MJ (2011) Applying artificial neural networks for analysis of geotechnical problems. Comput Assist Mech Eng Sci 18:231–241Google Scholar
  62. Sun Z, Chen Y, Li X, Qin X, Wang H (2017) A Bayesian regularized artificial neural network for adaptive optics forecasting. Opt Commun 382:519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Suresh S, Saraswathi S, Sundararajan N (2010) Performance enhancement of extreme learning machine for multi-category sparse data classification problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:1149–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1967) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  65. Xue X, Xiao M (2016) Application of genetic algorithm-based support vector machines for prediction of soil liquefaction. Environ Earth Sci 75(874).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5673-7
  66. Yoon GL, Kim BT, Jeon SS (2004) Empirical correlations of compression index for marine clay from regression analysis. Can Geotech J 41:1213–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Department of Transportation ServicesMersin UniversityMersinTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureSiirt UniversitySiirtTurkey

Personalised recommendations