Advertisement

Influence of hydro-geochemical processes on groundwater quality through geostatistical techniques in Kadava River basin, Western India

  • Vasant Madhav Wagh
  • Dipak Baburao Panaskar
  • James A. Jacobs
  • Shrikant Vitthal Mukate
  • Aniket Avinash Muley
  • Ajaykumar Krushna Kadam
Original Paper
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Hydrogeochemistry and groundwater quality of the Kadava River Basin have been performed by analyzing 40 groundwater samples for pre- and post-monsoon seasons of 2011 through different geostatistical techniques. Analyses showed that the concentrations of Mg2+ exceeded Ca2+ in both the seasons suggesting silicate weathering as a source of ions. Average Ca + Mg values contribute 73.53% of total cations and signify the major supply of mafic minerals. Elevated TDS and TH limit drinking potential and other beneficial uses indicate permanently hard water. The average concentrations of the anions were found within Indian PL except NO3, attributed to use of fertilizers. The spatial distribution maps show the EC, Mg, Na, Cl, and SO4 to be generally higher for both the seasons in flood plain deposits than denuded landforms and middle-level/high-level plateaus containing fractured basalt aquifers. It is confirmed that silicate weathering is the dominant process followed by carbonate weathering. Inputs of TDS, Cl, SO4, Mg, Na, and NO3 are influenced by rainfall and human activities. Groundwater sample numbers 20, 37, and 38 have been severely impacted from agricultural runoff as these samples are located along the surface water flow path. The high loading of TDS and TH is controlled by the Mg, Na, Cl, and SO4 ions. Elevated concentration of Na over Ca represents the ion exchange between Ca and Na. High contents of Mg, Na, Cl, and SO4 corroborate that the groundwater is influenced by anthropogenic sources. This study is an insight for water managers to address groundwater pollution problems.

Keywords

Groundwater Hydrogeochemistry Kadava River India 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express sincere gratitude to the Director, School of Earth Sciences, SRTM University, Nanded for providing necessary facilities to carry out the present research work. Also, authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their meticulous assessment and significant comments which are helpful to strengthen the manuscript quality.

References

  1. APHA A (2005) WPCF, standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbieri M, Sappa G, Vitale S, Parisse B, Battistel M (2014) Soil control of trace metals concentrations in landfills: a case study of the largest landfill in Europe, Malagrotta, Rome. J Geochem Explor 143:146–154Google Scholar
  3. Barbieri M, Nigro A, Petitta M (2017) Groundwater mixing in the discharge area of san Vittorino plain (Central Italy): geochemical characterization and implication for drinking uses. Environ Earth Sci 76(11):393Google Scholar
  4. Beane JE, Turner CA, Hooper PR, Subbarao KV, Walsh JN (1986) Stratigraphy, composition and form of the Deccan basalts, Western Ghats, India. Bull Volcanol 48(1):61–83Google Scholar
  5. Berner EK, Berner RA (1987) Global water cycle: geochemistry and environment. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhardwaj V, Singh DS, Singh AK (2010) Water quality of the Chhoti Gandak River using principal component analysis, ganga plain, India. J Earth Syst Sci 119(1):117–127Google Scholar
  7. BIS (2012) Indian standards specification for drinking water, BIS: 10500: 2012. http://www.cgwb.gov.in/ Documents/WQ-standards.pdf
  8. Box GE (1978) Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to desing, data analysis, and model building. Probability and mathematical statisticsGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerling TE, Pederson BL, Von Damm KL (1989) Sodium-calcium ion exchange in the weathering of shales: implications for global weathering budgets. Geology 17(6):552–554Google Scholar
  10. CGWB (2006) Central ground water board. Dynamic ground water resources of India –As on March 2004:1–120Google Scholar
  11. CGWB (2014) Central Groundwater Board. http://cgwb.gov.in/district_profile/maharashtra/nashik.pdf
  12. Chapman D (Ed) (1996) On the behalf of UNESCO, WHO. UXEP. Water quality assessments-a guide to use biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring. F & F Spoil, London, Chapter 9Google Scholar
  13. Danielsson Å, Cato I, Carman R, Rahm L (1999) Spatial clustering of metals in the sediments of the Skagerrak/Kattegat. Appl Geochem 14(6):689–706Google Scholar
  14. Datta PS, Tyagi SK (1996) Major ion chemistry of groundwater in Delhi area: chemical weathering processes and groundwater flow regime. J Geol Soc India 47:179–188Google Scholar
  15. Davies SN, DeWiest RJ (1966) Hydrogeology. Wiley, New York, pp 1–463Google Scholar
  16. Dessai AG, Warrier S (1987) Mineralogy and geochemistry of the calcretes in alluvial sediments from Pune, India. J Geol Soc India 29(6):584–593Google Scholar
  17. Devic G, Djordjevic D, Sakan S (2014) Natural and anthropogenic factors affecting the groundwater quality in Serbia. Sci Total Environ 468:933–942Google Scholar
  18. Drever JI (1988) The geochemistry of natural waters. Prentice hall, Englewood cliffs, NJ. The geochemistry of natural waters, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  19. Edmond JM, Palmer MR, Grant B, Stallard RF (1995) The fluvial geochemistry and denudation rate of the Guayana shield in Venezuela, Colombia, and Brazil. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59(16):3301–3325Google Scholar
  20. Fisher RS, Mullican WF III (1997) Hydrochemical evolution of sodium-sulfate and sodium-chloride groundwater beneath the northern Chihuahuan Desert, trans-Pecos, Texas, USA. Hydrogeol J 5(2):4–16Google Scholar
  21. Frate C (2007) Nitrogen transformation in soil University of California Cooperative Extension, Tulare County http://cdrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/11.7_Nitrogen_Transformations-final.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2014
  22. Gaillardet J, Dupré B, Louvat P, Allegre CJ (1999) Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers. Chem Geol 159(1–4):3–30Google Scholar
  23. Garrels RM and Christ CL (1967) Equilibres des minéraux et de leurs solutions aqueuses. Gauthier-VillarsGoogle Scholar
  24. Geological Survey of India (GSI) (2001) District resource map. GSI, Nashik DistrictGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibbs RJ (1970) Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry. Science 170(3962):1088–1090Google Scholar
  26. Hem JD (1985). Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water (Vol. 2254). Department of the Interior, US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  27. Hounslow A (2018) Water quality data: analysis and interpretation. CRC press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. Houzim V, Vavra J, Fuska J, Pekny V, Vrba J, Stibral J (1986) Impact of Fertilizers and Pesticides on Groundwater Quality. In: Gastany G, Groba E, Rominj (eds) Impact of Agricultural Activities on Groundwater. IAH Publ., Hannover 332 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Islam ARMT, Ahmed N, Bodrud-Doza M, Chu R (2017) Characterizing groundwater quality ranks for drinking purposes in Sylhet district, Bangladesh, using entropy method, spatial autocorrelation index, and geostatistics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(34):26350–26374Google Scholar
  30. Jankowski J, Acworth RI and Shekarforoush S (1998) Reverse ion exchange in a deeply weathered porphyritic dacite fractured aquifer system, Yass. In New South Wales Australia. In: GB Arehart, JR Hulston (eds) Proceedings of 9th international symposium on water–rock interaction, Taupo, New Zealand, Vol 30, pp 243–246Google Scholar
  31. Kale SS, Pawar N (2012) Origin of salinity in the groundwater of semi-arid Karha Basin, Maharashtra. Memoir Geol Soc India 80:145–166Google Scholar
  32. Karanth KR (1987) Ground water assessment: development and management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  33. Karroum M, Elgettafi M, Elmandour A, Wilske C, Himi M, Casas A (2017) Geochemical processes controlling groundwater quality under semi arid environment: a case study in Central Morocco. Sci Total Environ 609:1140–1151Google Scholar
  34. Kortatsi BK (2006) Hydrochemical characterization of groundwater in the Accra plains of Ghana. Environ Geol 50(3):299–311Google Scholar
  35. Kortatsi BK (2007) Hydrochemical framework of groundwater in the Ankobra Basin, Ghana. Aquat Geochem 13(1):41–74Google Scholar
  36. Krishnan MS (1982) Geology of India and Burma, 6th edn. CBS publisher and distributors, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  37. Krumbein WC, Graybill FA (1965) An introduction to statistical models in geology. McGraw-Hill, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumar R, Singh RD, Sharma KD (2005) Water resources of India. Curr Sci:794–811Google Scholar
  39. Lattin JM, Carroll JD, Green PE (2003) Analyzing multivariate data. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CAGoogle Scholar
  40. Loizidou M, Kapetanios EG (1993) Effect of leachate from landfills on underground water quality. Sci Total Environ 128(1):69–81Google Scholar
  41. Mahato MK, Singh PK, Tiwari AK, Singh AK (2016) Risk assessment due to intake of metals in groundwater of east Bokaro coalfield, Jharkhand, India. Exposure and Health 8(2):265–275Google Scholar
  42. Mertler CA and Vannatta RA (2005) Advanced and multivariate statistical methods. GlendaleGoogle Scholar
  43. Morrison G, Fatoki OS, Persson L, Ekberg A (2001) Assessment of the impact of point source pollution from the Keiskammahoek sewage treatment plant on the Keiskamma River-pH, electrical conductivity, oxygen-demanding substance (COD) and nutrients. Water SA 27(4):475–480Google Scholar
  44. Mukate SV, Panaskar DB, Wagh VM, Pawar RS (2015) Assessment of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purpose: a case study of Chincholikati MIDC area, Solapur (MS), India. SRTMUs J Sci 4(1):58–69Google Scholar
  45. Mukate S, Panaskar D, Wagh V, Muley A, Jangam C, Pawar R (2017) Impact of anthropogenic inputs on water quality in Chincholi industrial area of Solapur, Maharashtra, India. Groundw Sustain Dev:359–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.11.001
  46. Naik PK, Tambe JA, Dehury BN, Tiwari AN (2008) Impact of urbanization on the groundwater regime in a fast growing city in Central India. Environ Monit Assess 146(1–3):339–373Google Scholar
  47. Naik PK, Awasthi AK, Anand AVSS, Behera PN (2009) Hydrogeochemistry of the Koyna River basin, India. Environ Earth Sci 59(3):613–629Google Scholar
  48. Panaskar DB, Wagh VM, Muley AA, Mukate SV, Pawar RS, Aamalawar ML (2016) Evaluating groundwater suitability for the domestic, irrigation, and industrial purposes in Nanded tehsil, Maharashtra, India, using GIS and statistics. Arab J Geosci 9(13):615Google Scholar
  49. Pandith M, Kaplay RD, Potdar SS, Sangnor H, Rao AD (2017) Impact of urbanization coupled with drought situations on groundwater quality in shallow (basalt) and deeper (granite) aquifers with special reference to fluoride in Nanded-Waghala municipal corporation, Nanded District, Maharashtra (India). Environ Monit Assess 189(9):428Google Scholar
  50. Pawar NJ, Kale VS (2006) Waterfall tufa deposits from the Deccan Basalt Province, India: implications for weathering of basalts in the semi-arid tropics. Z Geomorph NF 145:17–36Google Scholar
  51. Pawar NJ, Nikumbh JD (1999) Trace element geochemistry of groundwater from Behedi basin, Nasik district, Maharashtra. J Geol Soc India 54:501–514Google Scholar
  52. Pawar NJ, Pawar JB, Kumar S, Supekar A (2008) Geochemical eccentricity of ground water allied to weathering of basalts from the Deccan Volcanic Province, India: insinuation on CO 2 consumption. Aquat Geochem 14(1):41–71Google Scholar
  53. Pawar RS, Panaskar DB, Wagh VM (2014) Characterization of groundwater using groundwater quality index of Solapur industrial belt, Maharashtra, India. Int J Res Eng Technol 2(4):31–36Google Scholar
  54. Pearson K (1896) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers Of A Mathematical Or Physical Character 187:253–318Google Scholar
  55. Peng ZX, Mahoney J, Hooper P, Harris C, Beane J (1994) A role for lower continental crust in flood basalt genesis? Isotopic and incompatible element study of the lower six formations of the western Deccan traps. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58(1):267–288Google Scholar
  56. Piper, A.M., (1944). A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses Eos, Transactions. Am Geophys Union 25(6):914–928Google Scholar
  57. Prasanth SS, Magesh NS, Jitheshlal KV, Chandrasekar N, Gangadhar K (2012) Evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in the coastal stretch of Alappuzha District, Kerala, India. Appl Water Sci 2(3):165–175Google Scholar
  58. Rabemanana V, Violette S, De Marsily G, Robain H, Deffontaines B, Andrieux P, Bensimon M, Parriaux A (2005) Origin of the high variability of water mineral content in the bedrock aquifers of southern Madagascar. J Hydrol 310(1–4):143–156Google Scholar
  59. Rajmohan N, Elango L (2004) Identification and evolution of hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment in an area of the Palar and Cheyyar River basins, Southern India. Environ Geol 46(1):47–61Google Scholar
  60. Raju NJ, Patel P, Reddy BSR, Suresh U, Reddy TVK (2016) Identifying source and evaluation of hydrogeochemical processes in the hard rock aquifer system: geostatistical analysis and geochemical modeling techniques. Environ Earth Sci 75(16):1157Google Scholar
  61. Ramakrishnan M and Vaidyanadhan R (2008) Geology of India (Vol. 1). Geological society of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  62. Rao NS (2014) Spatial control of groundwater contamination, using principal component analysis. J Earth Syst Sci 123(4):715–728Google Scholar
  63. Rao NS, Marghade D, Dinakar A, Chandana I, Sunitha B, Ravindra B, Balaji T (2017) Geochemical characteristics and controlling factors of chemical composition of groundwater in a part of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Earth Sci 76(21):747Google Scholar
  64. Rezaei A, Hassani H (2018) Hydrogeochemistry study and groundwater quality assessment in the north of Isfahan, Iran. Environ Geochem Health 40(2):583–608Google Scholar
  65. Saager R, Sinclair AJ (1974) Factor analysis of stream sediment geochemical data from the mount Nansen area, Yukon territory, Canada. Mineralium Deposita 9(3):243–252Google Scholar
  66. Sami K (1992) Recharge mechanisms and geochemical processes in a semi-arid sedimentary basin, eastern cape, South Africa. J Hydrol 139(1–4):27–48Google Scholar
  67. Sarin MM, Krishnaswami S, Dilli K, Somayajulu BLK, Moore WS (1989) Major ion chemistry of the ganga-Brahmaputra river system: weathering processes and fluxes to the bay of Bengal. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 53(5):997–1009Google Scholar
  68. Sefie A, Aris AZ, Ramli MF, Narany TS, Shamsuddin MKN, Saadudin SB, Zali MA (2018) Hydrogeochemistry and groundwater quality assessment of the multilayered aquifer in Lower Kelantan Basin, Kelantan, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 77(397).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7561-9
  69. SERI (2009) State of Environment Report India (SERI). Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, p 179Google Scholar
  70. Singh AK, Mondal GC, Singh PK, Singh S, Singh TB, Tewary BK (2005) Hydrochemistry of reservoirs of Damodar River basin, India: weathering processes and water quality assessment. Environ Geol 48(8):1014–1028Google Scholar
  71. Singh KP, Malik A, Mohan D, Singh VK, Sinha S (2006) Evaluation of groundwater quality in northern indo-Gangetic alluvium region. Environ Monit Assess 112(1–3):211–230Google Scholar
  72. Spears DA (1986) Mineralogical control of the chemical evolution of groundwater. Solute processes. Wiley, Chichester, p 512Google Scholar
  73. Stallard RF, Edmond JM (1983) Geochemistry of the Amazon: 2. The influence of geology and weathering environment on the dissolved load. J Geophys Res Oceans 88(C14):9671–9688Google Scholar
  74. Tiwari AK, Singh AK (2014) Hydrogeochemical investigation and groundwater quality assessment of Pratapgarh district, Uttar Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 83(3):329–343Google Scholar
  75. Todd DK (1980) Groundwater hydrology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Tóth J (1999) Groundwater as a geologic agent: an overview of the causes, processes, and manifestations. Hydrogeol J 7(1):1–14Google Scholar
  77. Varade AM, Yenkie R, Shende R, Kodate J (2014) Drinking water quality assessment studies for an urbanized part of the Nagpur District, Central India. J Environ Sci Eng 56(1):53–64Google Scholar
  78. Vasant W, Dipak P, Aniket M, Ranjitsinh P, Shrikant M, Nitin D, Manesh A and Abhay V (2016) GIS and statistical approach to assess the groundwater quality of Nanded tehsil,(MS) India. In Proceedings of first international conference on information and communication Technology for Intelligent Systems: volume 1. Springer, Cham, pp 409–417Google Scholar
  79. Wagh VM, Panaskar DB, Varade AM, Mukate SV, Gaikwad SK, Pawar RS, Muley AA, Aamalawar ML (2016a) Major ion chemistry and quality assessment of the groundwater resources of Nanded tehsil, a part of Southeast Deccan Volcanic Province, Maharashtra, India. Environ Earth Sci 75(21):1418Google Scholar
  80. Wagh VM, Panaskar DB, Muley AA, Mukate SV, Lolage YP, Aamalawar ML (2016b) Prediction of groundwater suitability for irrigation using artificial neural network model: a case study of Nanded tehsil, Maharashtra, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 2(4):196Google Scholar
  81. Wagh, V.M., Panaskar, D.B. and Muley, A.A., (2017a). Estimation of nitrate concentration in groundwater of Kadava river basin-Nashik district, Maharashtra, India by using artificial neural network model. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(1):36Google Scholar
  82. Wagh VM, Panaskar DB, Muley AA, Mukate SV (2017b) Groundwater suitability evaluation by CCME WQI model for Kadava River basin, Nashik, Maharashtra, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(2):557–565Google Scholar
  83. Wagh V, Panaskar D, Muley A, Mukate S, Gaikwad S (2018a) Neural network modelling for nitrate concentration in groundwater of Kadava River basin, Nashik, Maharashtra, India. Groundw Sustain Dev 7:436–445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.12.012 Google Scholar
  84. Wagh VM, Panaskar DB, Mukate SV, Gaikwad SK, Muley AA, Varade AM (2018b) Health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in groundwater of Kadava River basin, Nashik, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 4(3):969–980Google Scholar
  85. World Health Organization (WHO) (2011) Guidelines for drinking water quality, library cataloguing-in-publication data, 4th ed. NLM classification: WA. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 675Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasant Madhav Wagh
    • 1
  • Dipak Baburao Panaskar
    • 1
  • James A. Jacobs
    • 2
  • Shrikant Vitthal Mukate
    • 1
  • Aniket Avinash Muley
    • 3
  • Ajaykumar Krushna Kadam
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Earth SciencesSwami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada UniversityNandedIndia
  2. 2.Clearwater GroupPt. RichmondUSA
  3. 3.School of Mathematical SciencesSwami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada UniversityNandedIndia
  4. 4.Department of Environmental ScienceSavitribai Phule Pune UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations