Advertisement

Characterization of nodular structure in shale with a proposed growth model in the Sitakund anticline, Bengal basin, Bangladesh

  • Md. Yousuf Gazi
  • Badrul Imam
  • S.M. Mainul Kabir
  • Subrota Kumar Saha
Original Paper
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Nodular shales commonly occur in silty shales near the axial (proximity to core) regions of anticlinal structures (Sitakund anticline, Sitapahar anticline, Patharia structure, and Mirinja anticline) of eastern fold belt of Bangladesh. Stratigraphically, they are pronounced in the Surma group of Neogene succession. In many outcrops, these are found in the incompetent beds bounded by the competent ones. An initial investigation has been followed by comprehensive petrographical and geochemical studies including thin section microscopy, laser particle size analyses, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to characterize the nodular shale of Sitakund structure. From laser diffraction analysis, it is evident that nodular shales are silty in nature containing approximately 60% silt (mainly quartz). XRD pattern shows that nodular shale contains quartz, feldspar, illite, kaolinite, chlorite, and expandable mixed layer clay mineral including minor amount of calcite and siderite. Geochemical analysis shows that there is no significant variation from host rocks in context of major and trace element concentration. Microcracks within the quartz grains and squeezed clay minerals were observed in some nodular shale samples correlating the influence of regional tectonics and local structural dynamics in the axial regime of the anticline. Projection of 15 nodular shale long axes in outcrop shows their orientation in NNW-SSE that is parallel to the fold axis. The study suggests a new name of conventionally called nodular shales based on their origin, composition, and occurrence. The proposed name is “Clay Cabbage”. Diagenesis involving the conversion of montmorillonite to illite clay through a mixed layer illite/montmorillonite along with the regional and local tectonics is responsible for the formation of nodular shale. A new model naming as “Tectono-Diagenetic (TD) Model” is proposed in this study concerning the origin of nodular shale. Fluid pressure during diagenesis along with axial deformation due to folding produces hemispherical bodies by brittle and plastic flow that initiates the core of nodular shale at greater depth. Spiral geometry of the body is attained through several deformation stages with the evolution of the folded pattern.

Keywords

Nodular structure Shale Growth model Sitakund anticline Bengal basin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We deeply acknowledge Institute of Mining, Mineralogy and Metallurgy (IMMM), BCSIR, Joypurhat for the preparation of thin section and X-ray fluorescence study. Appreciation goes to Centre for Advanced Research in Sciences (CARS), university of Dhaka for SEM study. A special debt of gratitude and deepest thanks to Geological Survey of Bangladesh (GSB) for XRD analysis. We thank Dr. Anwar Hossain Bhuiyan for his supports throughout the study and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Abdullah R, Yeasmin R, Ameen SM, Khanam F, Bari Z (2015) 2D structural modelling and hydrocarbon potentiality of the Sitakund structure, Chittagong Tripura Fold Belt, Bengal Basin, Bangladesh. J Geol Soc India 85(6):697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aerden DG (1995) Porphyroblast non-rotation during crustal extension in the Variscan Lys-Caillaouas massif, Pyrenees. J Struct Geol 17(5):709–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alam M, Alam MM, Curray JR, Chowdhury MLR, Gani MR (2003) An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin in relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history. Sediment Geol 155(3–4):179–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amrouch K, Lacombe O, Bellahsen N, Daniel JM, Callot JP (2010) Stress and strain patterns, kinematics and deformation mechanisms in a basement-cored anticline: Sheep Mountain anticline, Wyoming. Tectonics 29:TC1005.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009TC002525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur MA, Sageman BB (1994) Marine black shales: depositional mechanisms and environments of ancient deposits. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 22(1):499–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakhtine MI (1966) Major tectonic features in Pakistan, part II, Eastern Province. Science and Industry 4(2):89–100Google Scholar
  7. Banerji RK (1984) Post-Eocene biofacies, palaeoenvironments and palaeogeography of the Bengal Basin, India. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 45(1):49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell TE (1986) Microstructure in mixed-layer illite/smectite and its relationship to the reaction of smectite to illite. Clays clay miner. Clay Clay Miner 34(2):146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatia MR (1983) Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of sandstones. J Geol 91(6):611–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boggs SJ (2006) Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy. Pearson Education. Inc., Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  11. Boggs SJ (2009) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 600 pp. ISBN 978-0-521-89716-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borah C, Das M (2017) Petrography and provenance study of Neogene sandstones of a part of Tripura fold belt, India. J Appl Geochem 19(2):221Google Scholar
  13. Burst JF (1969) Diagenesis of Gulf Coast clayey sediments and its possible relation to petroleum migration. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 53:73–93Google Scholar
  14. Calvert SE, Price NB (1970) Composition of manganese nodules and manganese carbonates from loch Fyne, Scotland. Contrib Mineral Petrol 29(3):215–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chowdhury SQ, Haq TMF, Khan MSH, Zaher MA (1991) Origin and mode of formation of nodular shale: a case study from the Patharia structure, Surma basin, Bangladesh. Dhaka University studies, B 39(2):179–186Google Scholar
  16. Cripps JC, Taylor RK (1987) Engineering characteristics of British over-consolidated clays and mudrocks, II. Mesozoic deposits. Eng Geol 23(3–4):213–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curray JR, Emmel FJ, Moore DG, Raitt RW (1982) Structure, tectonics, and geological history of the northeastern Indian Ocean. In: Nairn AEM, Stehli FG (eds) The ocean basins and margins. Plenum, New York 6:399–450Google Scholar
  18. Dabard MP (1990) Lower Brioverian formations (upper Proterozoic) of the Armorican massif (France): geodynamic evolution of source areas revealed by sandstone petrography and geochemistry. Sediment Geol 69(1–2):45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawson WC (2000) Shale microfacies: eagle ford group (Cenomanian-Turonian) north-Central Texas outcrops and subsurface equivalents, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, v. L, p. 607–622Google Scholar
  20. Davies C, Best J, Collier R (2003) Sedimentology of the Bengal shelf, Bangladesh: comparison of late Miocene sediments, Sitakund anticline, with the modern, tidally dominated shelf. Sediment Geol 155(3-4):271–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Segonzac GD (1970) The transformation of clay minerals during diagenesis and low-grade metamorphism: a review. Sedimentology 15(3–4):281–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunoyer DSG (1970) The transformation of clay minerals during diagenesis and low-grade metamorphism: a review. Sedimentology 15:281–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durand N, Monger HC, Canti MG, Verrecchia EP (2018) Calcium carbonate features. In interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths, In: Elsevier (ed) pp 205–258Google Scholar
  24. Farrimond P, Naidu BS, Burley SD, Dolson J, Whiteley N, Kothari V (2015) Geochemical characterization of oils and their source rocks in the Barmer Basin, Rajasthan. Petroleum Geoscience, Rajasthan, India 21:301–321Google Scholar
  25. Fay C, Bell TH, Hobbs BE (2008) Porphyroblast rotation versus nonrotation: conflict resolution! Geology 36(4):307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gazi MY, Kabir SM, Imam MB (2017a) Silt content approximation of Neogene Surma group mudrocks, Sitakund anticline, Bengal basin. Bangladesh J Sci Res 30(1–2):35–43Google Scholar
  27. Gazi MY, Kabir SM, Imam MB, Rahman A, Islam MA (2017b) Geochemistry of Neogene Mudrocks from Sitakund anticline, Bengal Basin: implications for provenance, weathering, tectonic setting and depositional environment. J Geosci Environ Prot 5(06):147–171Google Scholar
  28. Gogoi BK, Sarmah RK (2013) Evaluation of geochemical characteristics of shale of Disang group in a part of Assam-Arakan basin in perspective of its hydrocarbon potential. Sci Vis 13(3):103–112Google Scholar
  29. Goto A, Tatsumi Y (1994) Quantitative analysis of rock samples by an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (I). Rigaku J 11(1):40–59Google Scholar
  30. Griera A, Llorens MG, Gomez-Rivas E, Bons PD, Jessell MW, Evans LA, Lebensohn R (2013) Numerical modelling of porphyroclast and porphyroblast rotation in anisotropic rocks. Tectonophysics 587:4–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griggs DT (1967) Hydrologic weakening of quartz and other silicates. Geophys J R Astron Soc 14:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harbor RL (2011) Facies characterization and stratigraphic architecture of organic-rich mudrocks, upper cretaceous eagle ford formation, South Texas (Doctoral dissertation)Google Scholar
  33. Hardy S, Ford M (1997) Numerical modeling of trishear fault propagation folding. Tectonics 16(5):841–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hardy R, Tucker ME (1988) Techniques in sedimentology. Blackwell Scientific Publications 484:191–228Google Scholar
  35. Hayward N (1990) Determination of early fold axis orientations in multiply deformed rocks using porphyroblast inclusion trails. Tectonophysics 179(3–4):353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heling D (1974) Diagenetic alteration of smectite in argillaceous sediments of the Rhinegraben (SW Germany). Sedimentology 21(3):463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ho NC, Peacor DR, Van der Pluijm BA (1999) Preferred orientation of phyllosilicates in Gulf Coast mudstones and relation to the smectite-illite transition. Clay Clay Miner 47(4):495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hofmann A, Dirks PH, Jelsma HA (2001) Horizontal tectonic deformation geometries in a late Archaean sedimentary sequence, Belingwe greenstone belt, Zimbabwe. Tectonics 20(6):909–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holtrop JF, Keizer J (1970) Some aspects of the stratigraphy and correlation of the Surma Basin wells, East Pakistan. ECAFE Mineral Resources Development Series 36:143–154Google Scholar
  40. Hossain HMZ, Roser BP, Kimura JI (2010) Petrography and whole-rock geochemistry of the tertiary Sylhet succession, northeastern Bengal Basin, Bangladesh: provenance and source area weathering. Sediment Geol 228(3–4):171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hower J, Eslrnger EV, Hower ME, Perry EA (1976) Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediments: 1. Mineralogical and chemical evidence. Geol Soc Am Bull 87:725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huang WL, Longo JM, Pevear DR (1993) An experimentally derived kinetic model for smectite-to-illite conversion and its use as a geothermometer. Clay Clay Miner 41:162–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hudson JD (1978) Concretions, isotopes, and the diagenetic history of the Oxford clay (Jurassic) of Central England. Sedimentology 25(3):339–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Imam B (1987) Implication of shale diagenesis on cementation of reservoir sandstone in Neogene Surma group. J Geol Soc India 4:103–111Google Scholar
  45. Imam B (1994) X-ray diffraction study on Neogene shales from the Patharia anticline, eastern Bangladesh with emphasis on smectite clay dehydration and implications. J Geol Soc India 44:547–561Google Scholar
  46. Kessler L, Ramasamy N (2012) A semi-quantitative assessment of clay content in sedimentary rocks using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Int J Earth Sci Eng 5(2):363–364Google Scholar
  47. Kühn P, Aguilar J, Miedema R, Bronnikova M (2018) Textural pedofeatures and related horizons. In: interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 217–250Google Scholar
  48. Leeder M (1987) Sediment deformation structures and the palaeotectonic analysis of sedimentary basins, with a case-study from the carboniferous of northern England. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 29(1):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li B (2015) Effect of clay fraction on thermal-hydro-mechanical responses of soft Mudrocks (Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary)Google Scholar
  50. Li B, Wong RCK (2016) Quantifying structural states of soft mudrocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(5):3324–3347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lindsay JF, Holliday DW, Hulbert AG (1991) Sequence stratigraphy and the evolution of the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta complex (1). AAPG Bull 75(7):1233–1254Google Scholar
  52. Loucks RG, Ruppel SC (2007) Mississippian Barnett shale: Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bull 91(4):579–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mannan A (2002) Stratigraphic evolution and geochemistry of the neogene Surma group, Surma basin, Sylhet, Bangladesh. University of Oulu, pp. 1-190Google Scholar
  54. McDonough WF, Sun SS (1995) The composition of the Earth. Chem Geol 120(3-4):223–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McKelvey VE (1986) Subsea mineral resources. Dept. of the interior, US Geological Survey, Bull 1689-A:106Google Scholar
  56. Morad S, Ismail HB, Ros LD, Al-Aasm IS, Serrhini NE (1994) Diagenesis and formation water chemistry of Triassic reservoir sandstones from southern Tunisia. Sedimentology 41(6):1253–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morley CK, Crevello P, Ahmad ZH (1998) Shale tectonics and deformation associated with active diapirism: the Jerudong anticline, Brunei Darussalam. J Geol Soc 155(3):475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Muller J, Fabricius F (2009) Magnesian-ealcite nodules in the Ionian deep sea: an actualistic model for the formation. Pelagic Sediments: on Land and under the Sea 70:235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Najman YM, Pringle MS, Johnson MRW, Robertson AHF, Wijbrans JR (1997) Laser 40Ar/39Ar dating of single detrital muscovite grains from early foreland-basin sedimentary deposits in India: implications for early Himalayan evolution. Geology 25(6):535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oertel G, Curtis CD (1972) Clay-ironstone concretion preserving fabrics due to progressive compaction. Geol Soc Am Bull 83(9):2597–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Olgaard DL, Urai J, Dell'Angelo LN, Nüesch R, Ingram G (1997) The influence of swelling clays on the deformation of mudrocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4):235–2e1Google Scholar
  62. Olusola J, Adepoju SA, Alhassan N (2014) Geochemical and mineralogical studies of kaolinitic clays in parts of Ilorin, southwestern basement rock area, Nigeria. Universal Journal of Geoscience 2(7):212–221Google Scholar
  63. Pantin HM (1958) Rate of formation of a diagenetic calcareous concretion. J Sediment Res 28(3):366–371Google Scholar
  64. Perry E, Hower J (1970) Burial diagenesis in Gulf Coast pelitic sediments. Clay Clay Miner 18(3):165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pinyol Puigmartí NM, Vaunat J, Alonso Pérez de Agreda E (2007) A constitutive model for soft clayey rocks that includes weathering effects. Géotechnique 57(2):137–151Google Scholar
  66. Powers MC (1967) Fluid-release mechanisms in compacting marine mudrocks and their importance in oil exploration. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 51:1240–1254Google Scholar
  67. Pratt BR (1998) Syneresis cracks: subaqueous shrinkage in argillaceous sediments caused by earthquake-induced dewatering. Sediment Geol 117(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rahman MJJ, Faupl P (2003) The composition of the subsurface Neogene shales of the Surma group from the Sylhet trough, Bengal Basin, Bangladesh. Sediment Geol 155(3–4):407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rahman MJJ, Suzuki S (2007) Geochemistry of sandstones from the Miocene Surma group, Bengal Basin, Bangladesh: implications for provenance, tectonic setting and weathering. Geochem J 41(6):415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rahman MJJ, Yeasmin R, McCann T (2016) Mineralogy and chemical composition of the clay fraction of Neogene shales from the Surma Group in the Bengal basin, Bangladesh. J Geol Soc India 88(6):705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rahman MJJ, Xiao W, McCann T, Songjian A (2017) Provenance of the Neogene Surma group from the Chittagong Tripura Fold Belt, Southeast Bengal Basin, Bangladesh: constraints from whole-rock geochemistry and detrital zircon U-Pb ages. J Asian Earth Sci 148:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reimann KU (1993) Geology of Bangladesh. Gebruder Borntrager, Berlin 160 ppGoogle Scholar
  73. Roy MK, Moniruzzaman M, Alam AKM, Kabir MR, Chaudhuri S, Mahmud S, Roy PJ (2007) Turbidites in the upper Bhuban member of the Sitakund anticline, Chittagong, southeastern Bangladesh. J Life Earth Sci 2(2):1–16Google Scholar
  74. Ruidas DK, Paul S, Gangopadhyay TK (2018) A reappraisal of stratigraphy of Bagh Group of Rocks in Dhar District, Madhya Pradesh with an outline of origin of nodularity of nodular limestone formation. J Geol Soc India 92(1):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schlische RW (1995) Geometry and origin of fault-related folds in extensional settings. AAPG Bull 79(11):1661–1678Google Scholar
  76. Schultz C, Grundl T (2004) pH dependence of ferrous sorption onto two smectite clays. Chemosphere 57(10):1301–1306 Sedimentology 21,463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Selles-Martinez J (1996) Concretion morphology, classification and genesis. Earth Sci Rev 41(3–4):177–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shamsuddin AHM, Abdullah SKM (1997) Geologic evolution of the Bengal Basin and its implication in hydrocarbon exploration in Bangladesh. Indian J Geol 69:93–121Google Scholar
  79. Simpson C, De Paor DG (1993) Strain and kinematic analysis in general shear zones. J Struct Geol 15(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Starkey HC, Blackmon PD, Hauff PL (1984) The routine mineralogical analysis of clay-bearing samples, vol 1563. Geological Survey bulletin, USAGoogle Scholar
  81. Strakhovenko VD, Shkol’nik SI, Danilenko IV (2018) Ferromanganese nodules of freshwater reservoirs of Ol’khon island (Baikal) and the Kulunda plain (West Siberia). Russ Geol Geophys 59(2):123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1948) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Uddin A, Lundberg N (1999) A paleo-Brahmaputra? Subsurface lithofacies analysis of Miocene deltaic sediments in the Himalayan–Bengal system, Bangladesh. Sediment Geol 123(3–4):239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Varma AK, Hazra B, Mendhe VA, Chinara I, Dayal AM (2015) Assessment of organic richness and hydrocarbon generation potential of Raniganj basin shales, West Bengal, India. Mar Pet Geol 59:480–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wild KM (2016) Evaluation of the hydro-mechanical properties and behaviour of Opalinus clay (Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich)Google Scholar
  86. Zahid KM, Uddin A (2005) Influence of overpressure on formation velocity evaluation of Neogene strata from the eastern Bengal Basin, Bangladesh. J Asian Earth Sci 25(3):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang L, He C (2016) Frictional properties of phyllosilicate-rich mylonite and conditions for the brittle-ductile transition. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(4):3017–3047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhang C, Gamage RP, Perera MSA, Zhao J (2017) Characteristics of clay-abundant shale formations: use of CO2 for production enhancement. Energies 10(11):1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Yousuf Gazi
    • 1
  • Badrul Imam
    • 1
  • S.M. Mainul Kabir
    • 1
  • Subrota Kumar Saha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of DhakaDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations