Advertisement

Biochar as a potential soil additive for improving soil physical properties—a review

  • Abdulaziz G. Alghamdi
S. I. BIOCHAR
  • 100 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Implications of Biochar Application to Soil Environment under Arid Conditions

Abstract

Biochar, a solid product produced from biomass pyrolysis under low oxygen conditions, has gained wide acknowledgment in its usage as a means for carbon sequestration as well as improving the soil chemical and physical properties of the soil. Although the effects of biochar application on chemical characteristics and fertility of soils have been intensively investigated, there is little information on its role in improving soil physical characteristics. Therefore, this review aimed to (i) summarize the impact of biochar application on soil physical properties, (ii) discuss the factors and mechanisms influencing biochar performance on soil physical properties, and (iii) identify future research priorities. This review concluded that the improved impact of biochar application on soil physical characteristics is dependent upon feedstock and pyrolyetic conditions of biochars, application rate of biochar, biochar particle size, and soil type and texture. Pyrolysis temperature is the main factor controlling biochar properties such as porosity and surface area, which reflect their effects on soil physical characteristics. For the same feedstock, the temperature will control the properties of resulting biochars. But, the biochar properties greatly depend on the properties of feedstock. For example, manure-derived biochars contain a large amount of ash, but biochars from cellulose-lignin biomass mainly consist of the carbon fraction. Despite the profound effect of biochar in improving the physical properties of soil, the economic impact of its implementation in large-scale farming has not been established. Therefore, there is need for its economic evaluation.

Keywords

Carbonaceous recalcitrant product Hydraulic properties Particle size Soil additives Soil physical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Dr. M.B. Kirkham, University Distinguished Professor, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA, for editorial help with the paper.

References

  1. Abbas Z, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zaheer IE, Malik A, Riaz MA, Shahid MR, Rehman MZ, Al-Wabel MI (2018) A critical review of mechanisms involved in the adsorption of organic and inorganic contaminants through biochar. Arab J Geosci 11(448).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3790-1
  2. Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G (2013) Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202–203:183–191Google Scholar
  3. Aharoni C (1997) The solid–liquid interface in capillary condensation. Sorption of water by active carbons. Langmuir 13:1270–1273Google Scholar
  4. Ajayi A, Horn R (2016) Modification of chemical and hydrophysical properties of two texturally differentiated soils due to varying magnitudes of added biochar. Soil Tillage Res 164:34–44Google Scholar
  5. Ali S, Rizwan M, Qayyum MF, Ok YS, Ibrahim M, Riaz M, Arif MS, Hafeez F, Al-Wabel MI, Shahzad AN (2017) Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:12700–12712.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8904-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aller D, Rathke S, Laird D, Cruse R, Hatfield J (2017) Impacts of fresh and aged biochars on plant available water and water use efficiency. Geoderma 307:114–121Google Scholar
  7. Al-Wabel MI, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar AH, Nadeem M, Usman ARA (2013) Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus waste. Bioresour Technol 131:374–379Google Scholar
  8. Angın D (2013) Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on biochar obtained from pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake. Bioresour Technol 128:593–597Google Scholar
  9. Arshad MA, Coen GM (1992) Characterization of soil quality: physical and chemical criteria. Am J Altern Agric 7:25–32Google Scholar
  10. Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res 111:81–84Google Scholar
  11. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18Google Scholar
  12. Augustenborg CA, Hepp S, Kammann C, Hagan D, Schmidt O, Muller C (2012) Biochar and earthworm effects on soil nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions. J Environ Qual 41:1203–1209Google Scholar
  13. Ball BC, Smith KA (1991) Gas movement. In: Smith KA, Mullins C (eds) Soil analysis: physical methods. Marcel Dekker, Madison, pp 511–549Google Scholar
  14. Baronti S, Vaccari F, Miglietta F, Calzolari C, Lugato E, Orlandini S, Pini R, Zulian C, Genesio L (2014) Impact of biochar application on plant water relations in Vitis vinifera (L.). Eur J Agron 53:38–44Google Scholar
  15. Barrow CJ (2012) Biochar: potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture. Appl Geogr 34:21–28Google Scholar
  16. Bayabil HK, Stoof CR, Lehmann JC, Yitaferu B, Steenhuis TS (2015) Assessing the potential of biochar and charcoal to improve soil hydraulic properties in the humid Ethiopian highlands: the Anjeni watershed. Geoderma 243-244:115–123Google Scholar
  17. Bearden BN, Petersen L (2000) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil structure and aggregate stability of a vertisol. Plant Soil 218:173–183Google Scholar
  18. Bhogal A, Nicholson FA, Chambers BJ (2009) Organic carbon additions: effects on soil bio-physical and physico-chemical properties. Eur J Soil Sci 60(2):276–286Google Scholar
  19. Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5:202–214Google Scholar
  20. Brady NC, Weil RR (1984) The nature and properties of soils. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Briggs C, Breiner JM, Graham RC (2012) Physical and chemical properties of Pinus ponderosa charcoal: implications for soil modification. Soil Sci 177:263–268Google Scholar
  22. Burrell LD, Zehetner F, Rampazzo N, Wimmer B, Soja G (2016) Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties. Geoderma 282:96–102Google Scholar
  23. Busscher WJ, Novak JM, Evans DE, Watts DW, Niandou MAS, Ahmedna M (2010) Influence of pecan biochar on physical properties of a Norfolk loamy sand. Soil Sci 175:10–14Google Scholar
  24. Canasveras JC, Barron V, Del Campillo MC, Torrent J, Gomez JA (2010) Estimation of aggregate stability indices in Mediterranean soils by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma 158:78–84Google Scholar
  25. Castellinia M, Giglio L, Niedda M, Palumbo AD, Ventrella D (2015) Impact of biochar addition on the physical and hydraulic properties of a clay soil. Soil Tillage Res 154:1–13Google Scholar
  26. Crabbe MJC (2009) Modelling effects of geoengineering options in response to climate change and global warming: implications for coral reefs. Comput Biol Chem 33(6):415–420Google Scholar
  27. de Melo Carvalho MT, de Holanda Nunes Maia A, Madari BE, Bastiaans L, van Oort PAJ, Heinemann AB, de Silva S, Petter FA, Marimon Jr, Meinke H (2014) Biochar increases plant available water in a sandy soil under an aerobic rice cropping system. Solid Earth 6:887–917Google Scholar
  28. Dekker LW, Jungerius PD (1990) Water repellency in the dunes with special reference to the Netherlands. Catena 18:173–183Google Scholar
  29. Dempster DN, Gleeson DB, Solaiman ZM, Jones DL, Murphy DV (2012) Decreased soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralisation with eucalyptus biochar addition to a coarse textured soil. Plant Soil 354(1–2):311–324Google Scholar
  30. Doerr SH, Thomas AD (2000) The role of soil moisture in controlling water repellency: new evidence from forest soils in Portugal. J Hydrol 231-232:134–147Google Scholar
  31. Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P (2009) Physical properties of biochar. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management — science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 227–249Google Scholar
  32. Du Z, Chen X, Qi X, Li Z, Nan J, Deng J (2016) The effects of biochar and hoggery biogas slurry on fluvo-aquic soil physical and hydraulic properties: a field study of four consecutive wheat–maize rotations. J Soils Sediments 16:2050–2058Google Scholar
  33. Eibisch N, Durner W, Bechtold M, Fu. R, Mikutta R, Woche SK, Helfrich M (2015) Does water repellency of pyrochars and hydrochars counter their positive effects on soil hydraulic properties? Geoderma 245-246:31–39Google Scholar
  34. El-Naggar A, Lee SS, Awad YM, Yang X, Ryu C, Rizwan M, Rinklebe J, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2018) Influence of soil properties and feedstocks on biochar potential for carbon mineralization and improvement of infertile soils. Geoderma 332:100–108Google Scholar
  35. Esmaeelnejad L, Shorafa M, Gorji M, Hosseini SM (2016) Enhancement of physical and hydrological properties of a sandy loam soil via application of different biochar particle sizes during incubation period. Span J Agric Res 14(2):e1103Google Scholar
  36. Githinji L (2014) Effect of biochar application rate on soil physical and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:457–470Google Scholar
  37. Głąb T, Palmowska J, Zaleski T, Gondek K (2016) Effect of biochar application on soil hydrological properties and physical quality of sandy soil. Geoderma 281:11–20Google Scholar
  38. Graber ER, Tsechansky L, Gerstl Z, Lew B (2012) High surface area biochar negatively impacts herbicide efficacy. Plant Soil 353:95–106Google Scholar
  39. Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy 61:196–205Google Scholar
  40. Hallin IL, Douglas P, Doerr SH, Bryant R (2015) The effect of addition of awettable biochar on soil water repellency. Eur J Soil Sci 66(6):1063–1073Google Scholar
  41. Hammer EC, Balogh-Brunstad Z, Jakobsen I, Olsson PA, Stipp SLS, Rillig MC (2014) A mycorrhizal fungus grows on biochar and captures phosphorus from its surfaces. Soil Biol Biochem 77:252–260Google Scholar
  42. Hardie M, Clothier B, Bound S, Oliver G, Close D (2014) Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant Soil 376:347–361Google Scholar
  43. Hartge KH, Horn R (2014) Einführung in die Bodenphysik 4. Aufl. Schweizerbart Verl.Google Scholar
  44. Hati KM, Swarup A, Dwivedi AK, Misra AK, Bandyopadhyay KK (2007) Changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon status at the topsoil horizon of a vertisol of Central India after 28 years of continuous cropping, fertilization and manuring. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119(1–2):127–134Google Scholar
  45. Herath HMSK, Arbestain MC, Hedley M (2013) Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: an alfisol and an andisol. Geoderma 209–210:188–197Google Scholar
  46. Herbrich M, Zönnchen C, Schaaf W (2015) Short-term effects of plant litter addition on mineral surface characteristics of young sandy soils. Geoderma 239–240:206–212Google Scholar
  47. Hina K, Bishop P, Arbestain MC, Calvelo-Pereira R, Macia-Agullo JA, Hindmarsh J, Hanly JA, Macias F, Hedley MJ (2010) Producing biochars with enhanced surface activity through alkaline pretreatment of feedstocks. Aust J Soil Res 48(6–7):606–617Google Scholar
  48. Hortensius D, Welling R (1996) International standardization of soil quality measurements. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 27:387–402Google Scholar
  49. House MG (1991) Select Committee Enquiry into Land Conservation, Legislative Assembly, Perth, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  50. Huang H, Yang T, Lai F, Wu G (2017) Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and sawdust/rice straw for the production of biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 125:61–68Google Scholar
  51. Igalavithana AD, Ok YS, Niazi NK, Rizwan M, Al-Wabel MI, Usman ARA, Moon DH, Lee SS (2017) Effect of corn residue biochar on the hydraulic properties of sandy loam soil. Sustainability 9(2):266–276Google Scholar
  52. Imeson AC, Verstraten JM, Van Mullingen EJ, Sevink J (1992) The effects of fire and water repellency on infiltration and runoff under Mediterranean type forests. Catena 19:345–361Google Scholar
  53. Ippolito JA, Laird DA, Busscher WJ (2012) Environmental benefits of biochar. J Environ Qual 41:967–972Google Scholar
  54. Jaafar NM, Clode PL, Abbott LK (2014) Microscopy observations of habitable space in biochar for colonization by fungal hyphae from soil. J Integr Agric 13(3):483–490Google Scholar
  55. Jien SH, Wang CS (2013) Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena 110:225–233Google Scholar
  56. Joseph S, Graber ER, Chia C, Munroe P, Donne S, Thomas T, Nielsen S, Marjo C, Rutlidge H, Pan GX, Li L, Taylor P, Rawal A, Hook J (2013) Shifting paradigms: development of high-efficiency biochar based fertilizers based on nano-structures and soluble components. Carbon Manag 4:323–343Google Scholar
  57. Kameyama K, Miyamoto T, Iwata Y, Shiono T (2016) Effects of biochar produced from sugarcane bagasse at different pyrolysis temperatures on water retention of a calcaric dark red soil. Soil Sci 181:20–28Google Scholar
  58. Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253Google Scholar
  59. King PM (1981) Comparison of methods for measuring severity of water repellence of sandy soils and assessment of some factors that affect its measurement. Aust J Soil Res 19:275–285Google Scholar
  60. Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT (2012) Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenergy 41:34–43Google Scholar
  61. Kishimoto S, Sugiura G (1985) Charcoal as a soil conditioner, symposium on forest products research. International Achievements for the Future 12–23Google Scholar
  62. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology, first edn. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11:403–427Google Scholar
  64. Lehmann J, Czimczik CI, Laird DA, Sohi SP (2009) Stability of biochar in the soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836Google Scholar
  66. Lentz RD, Ippolito JA, Spokas KA (2014) Biochar and manure effects on net N mineralization and greenhouse gas emissions from calcareous soil under corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1641–1655Google Scholar
  67. Li J, Cao L, Yuan Y, Wang R, Wen Y, Man J (2018) Comparative study for microcystin-LR sorption onto biochars produced from various plant- and animal-wastes at different pyrolysis temperatures: influencing mechanisms of biochar properties. Bioresour Technol 247:794–803Google Scholar
  68. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjem stad JO, Thies J Luizao FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006a) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils, soil. Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730Google Scholar
  69. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O'Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizão FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006b) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(5):1719–1730Google Scholar
  70. Liang B, Lehmann J, Sohi SP, Thies JE, O'Neill B, Trujillo L, Gaunt J, Solomon D, Grossman J, Neves EG, Luizão FJ (2010) Black carbon affects the cycling of nonblack carbon in soil. Org Geochem 41(2):206–213Google Scholar
  71. Lim TJ, Spokas KA, Feyereisen G, Novak JM (2016) Predicting the impact of biochar additions on soil hydraulic properties. Chemosphere 142:136–144Google Scholar
  72. Liu Z, Zhang FS, Wu J (2010) Characterization and application of chars produced from pinewood pyrolysis and hydrothermal treatment. Fuel 89(2):510–514Google Scholar
  73. Liu XH, Han FP, Zhang XC (2012) Effect of biochar on soil aggregates in the loess plateau: results from incubation experiments. Int J Agric Biol 14:975–979Google Scholar
  74. Liu C, Tang HLX, Guan Z, Reid BJ, Upamali A, Yong R, Ok S, Sun H (2016) Biochar increased water holding capacity but accelerated organic carbon leaching from a sloping farmland soil in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:995–1006Google Scholar
  75. Lu S, Sun F, Zong Y (2014) Effect of rice husk biochar and coal fly ash on some physical properties of expansive clayey soil (vertisol). Catena 114:37–44Google Scholar
  76. Luo Y, Durenkamp M, De Nobili M, Lin Q, Devonshire BJ, Brookes PC (2013) Microbial biomass growth, following incorporation of biochars produced at 350°C or 700°C, in a silty-clay loam soil of high and low pH. Soil Biol Biochem 57:513–523Google Scholar
  77. Malik Z, Yutong Z, ShengGao L, Abassi GH, Ali S, Khan MI, Kamran M, Jamil M, Al-Wabel MI, Rizwan M (2018) Effect of biochar and quicklime on growth of wheat and physicochemical properties of Ultisols. Arab J Geosci 11(496).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3863-1
  78. Méndez A, Terradillos AM, Gascó G (2013) Physicochemical and agronomic properties of biochar from sewage sludge pyrolysed at different temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 102:124–130Google Scholar
  79. Meng J, Wang L, Liu X, Wu J, Brookes PC, Xu J (2013) Physicochemical properties of biochar produced from aerobically composted swine manure and its potential use as an environmental amendment. Bioresour Technol 142:641–646Google Scholar
  80. Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Chintala R (2015) Influence of feedstocks, and pyrolysis on biochar capacity to modify water retention characteristics. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 114:100–108Google Scholar
  81. Moragues-Saitua L, Arias-González A, Gartzia-Bengoetxea N (2017) Effects of biochar and wood ash on soil hydraulic properties: a field experiment involving contrasting temperate soils. Geoderma 305:144–152Google Scholar
  82. Mubarak I, Mailhol JC, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Ruelle P, Boivin P, Khaledian M (2009) Temporal variability in soil hydraulic properties under drip irrigation. Geoderma 150:158–165Google Scholar
  83. Mukherjee A, Lal R (2013) Biochar impacts on soil physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions. Agronomy 3:313–339Google Scholar
  84. Mukherjee A, Lal R (2014) The biochar dilemma. Soil Res 52(3):217–230Google Scholar
  85. Mukherjee A, Lal R, Zimmerman AR (2014) Impacts of 1.5-year field aging on biochar, humic acid, and water treatment residual amended soil. Soil Sci 179:333–339Google Scholar
  86. Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Schomberg H (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci 3:195–206Google Scholar
  87. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Amonette JE, Ippolito JA, Lima IM, Gaskin J, Das KC, Steiner C, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Schomberg H (2012) Biochars impact on soil-moisture storage in an Ultisol and two Aridisols. Soil Sci 177:310–320Google Scholar
  88. Novak J, Sigua G, Watts D, Cantrell K, Shumaker P, Szogi A, Johnson MG, Spokas K (2016) Biochars impact on water infiltration and water quality through a compacted subsoil layer. Chemosphere 142:160–167Google Scholar
  89. Ogawa M, Okimori Y, Takahashi F (2006) Carbon sequestration by carbonization of biomass and forestation: three case studies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11(2):421–436Google Scholar
  90. Park J, Hung I, Gan Z, Rojas OJ, Lim KH, Park S (2013) Activated carbon from biochar: influence of its physicochemical properties on the sorption characteristics of phenanthrene. Bioresour Technol 149:383–389Google Scholar
  91. Peng X, Ye LL, Wang CH, Zhou H, Sun B (2011) Temperature- and durationdependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Res 112(2):159–166Google Scholar
  92. Prober SM, Stol J, Piper M, Gupta V, Cunningham SA (2014) Enhancing soil biophysical condition for climate-resilient restoration in Mesic woodlands. Ecol Eng 71:246–255Google Scholar
  93. Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Zhang M, Ahmad M, Mohan D, Chang SX, Ok YS (2014) Pyrolysis condition affected sulfamethazine sorption by tea waste biochars. Bioresour Technol 166:303–308Google Scholar
  94. Ren X, Wang F, Zhang P, Guo J, Sun H (2018) Aging effect of minerals on biochar properties and sorption capacities for atrazine and phenanthrene. Chemosphere 206:51–58Google Scholar
  95. Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW, Hendrickx JMH, Hamminga W (1993) Preferential flow mechanism in a water repellent sandy soil. Water Resour Res 29:2183–2193Google Scholar
  96. Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW, van den Elsen EGM, Oostindie K, Nieber JL (1997) Recurring fingered flow pathways in a water repellent sandy field soil. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 4:777–786Google Scholar
  97. Sandhu SS, Ussiri AND, Kumar S, Chintala R, Papiernik KS, Malo DD, Schumacher ET (2017) Analyzing the impacts of three types of biochar on soil carbon fractions and physiochemical properties in a corn-soybean rotation. Chemosphere 184:473–481Google Scholar
  98. Schimmelpfennig S, Glaser B (2011) One step forward toward characterization: some important material properties to distinguish biochars. J Environ Qual 41:1001–1013Google Scholar
  99. Schjønning P, Lamande M, Berisso FE, Simojoki A, Alakukku L, Andreasen RR (2013) Gas diffusion, non-darcy air permeability, and computed tomography images of a clay subsoil affected by compaction. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1977–1990Google Scholar
  100. Shakesby RA, Coelho COA, Ferreira AD, Terry JP, Walsh RPD (1993) Wildfire impacts on soil erosion and hydrology in wet Mediterranean forest, Portugal. Int J Wildland Fire 3:95–110Google Scholar
  101. Soane BD (1990) The role of organic matter in soil compactibility: a review of some practical aspects. Soil Tillage Res 16(1–2):179–201Google Scholar
  102. Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, Boateng AA, Lima IM, Lamb MC, McAloon AJ, Lentz RD, Nichols KA (2012) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41:973–989Google Scholar
  103. Spokas KA, Novak JM, Masiello CA, Johnson MG, Colosky EC, Ippolito JA, Trigo C (2014) Physical disintegration of biochar: an overlooked process. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:326–332Google Scholar
  104. Steinbeiss S, Gleixner G, Antonietti M (2009) Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1301–1310Google Scholar
  105. Steiner C, Melear N, Harris K, Das KC (2011) Biochar as bulking agent for poultry litter composting. Carbon Manag 2(3):227–230Google Scholar
  106. Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna A, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass Bioenergy 84:37–48Google Scholar
  107. Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Pérez M (2017) The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci Total Environ 574:139–147Google Scholar
  108. Sun F, Lu S (2013) Biochars improve aggregate stability, water retention, and porespace properties of clayey soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:26–33Google Scholar
  109. Tsai W, Liu S, Chen H, Chang Y, Tsai Y (2012) Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment. Chemosphere 89(2):198–203Google Scholar
  110. Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J. Food. Agric Environ 9:1137–1143Google Scholar
  111. Van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Joseph S, Kimber S, Cowie A, Chan KY (2009) Biochar reduces emissions of non-CO2 GHG from soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, London, pp 227–249Google Scholar
  112. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327(1–2):235–246Google Scholar
  113. Verheijen FG, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, van der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils. EUR 24099 EN. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg  https://doi.org/10.2788/472
  114. Vithanage M, Rajapaksha AU, Zhang M, Thiele-Bruhn S, Lee SS, Ok YS (2015) Acid-activated biochar increased sulfamethazine retention in soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(3):2175–2186Google Scholar
  115. Wang D, Fonte JS, Parikh JS, Six J, Scow MK (2017) Biochar additions can enhance soil structure and the physical stabilization of C in aggregates. Geoderma 303:110–117Google Scholar
  116. Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1:56Google Scholar
  117. Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, Anshori S, Ogawa M (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52(4):489–495Google Scholar
  118. Yan FL, Shi ZH, Li ZX, Cai CF (2008) Estimating interrill soil erosion from aggregate stability of Ultisols in subtropical China. Soil Tillage Res 100:34–41Google Scholar
  119. York CA (1993) A questionnaire survey of dry patch on golf courses in the United Kingdom. J Sports Turf Res 69:20–26Google Scholar
  120. Yuan H, Lu T, Wang Y, Huang H, Chen Y (2014) Influence of pyrolysis temperature and holding time on properties ofbiochar derived from medicinal herb (radix isatidis) residue and itseffect on soil CO2emission. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 110:277–284Google Scholar
  121. Yuan H, Lu T, Huang H, Zhao D, Kobayashi N, Chen Y (2015) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physical and chemical properties of biochar made from sewage sludge. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 112:284–289Google Scholar
  122. Yue Y, Lin Q, Xu Y, Li G, Zhaoa X (2017) Slow pyrolysis as a measure for rapidly treating cow manure and the biochar characteristics. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 124:355–361Google Scholar
  123. Zhang P, Sun HW, Yu L, Sun TH (2013) Adsorption and catalytic hydrolysis of carbaryl andatrazine on pig manure-derived biochars: impact of structural properties of biochars. J Hazard Mater 244–245:217–224Google Scholar
  124. Zhao L, Cao X, Mašek O, Zimmerman A (2013) Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater 256–257:1–9Google Scholar
  125. Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Holmes DE, Dang Y, Woodard TL, Nevin KP, Lovley DR (2016) Potential enhancement of direct interspecies electron transfer for syntrophic metabolism of propionate and butyrate with biochar in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Bioresour Technol 209:148–156Google Scholar
  126. Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1295–1301Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil Science Department, College of Food and Agricultural SciencesKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations