Advertisement

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, 11:564 | Cite as

Influence of physico-mechanical properties of Indian dimension stones on cutting rate of diamond wire saw

  • Sohan Singh Rajpurohit
  • Rabindra Kumar Sinha
  • Phalguni Sen
  • Sahendra Singh
Original Paper
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Cutting performance of diamond wire saw is a key factor influencing mine planning, production scheduling, and equipment selection for dimension stone quarries. It is normally measured in terms of cutting rate. Rock samples collected from various granite and marble quarries in India were tested in laboratory to determine their physico-mechanical properties. Cutting rate of diamond wire saw was measured in the field studies during the actual cutting process in quarries. Using these laboratory determined properties and the cutting rate, a multiple linear regression model has been developed to predict the cutting rate of diamond wire saw. Physico-mechanical properties of rocks determined in laboratory are used as independent variables and cutting rate as predictor variable in the regression model. The study indicates that the cutting rate increases with a decrease in most of the hardness and strength parameters of rock. The final model is tested for its goodness of fit indicating a significant linear relation between cutting rate and physico-mechanical properties, namely tensile strength, slake durability index, and Cerchar hardness index with regression coefficient of 94%. The resulting model can be used suitably for different types of hard to medium hard and soft dimension stones. The generalized model for estimating the cutting rate becomes a handy tool for mining engineers to work out operating efficiency, expenses, planning etc. of the dimension stone block cutting.

Keywords

Dimension stone Diamond wire saw Cutting rate Marble Granite 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the management of various quarry owners of dimension stone quarries who provided logistic supports and necessary information for conducting the field studies and collection of various rock samples. The authors are also thankful to the M.Tech Students, Mr. Saichand, and Mr. Sopan Dev for the assistance provided by them in field and laboratory studies. This study forms a part of the ongoing doctoral research of the first author. Assistance provided by the concerned personnel of various laboratories in IIT (ISM) Dhanbad is highly acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily of the organization to which they belong.

References

  1. Almasi SN, Bagherpour R, Mikaeil R, Ozcelik Y, Kalhori H (2017) Predicting the building stone cutting rate based on rock properties and device pullback amperage in quarries using M5P model tree. Geotech Geol Eng 35:1311–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0177-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayram F (2013) Prediction of sawing performance based on index properties of rocks. Arab J Geosci 6:4357–4362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0668-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ersoy A, Atici U (2004) Performance characteristics of circular diamond saws in cutting different types of rocks. Diam Relat Mater 13:22–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2003.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harrell Jr FE, with contributions from Charles Dupont, et al (2016) Hmisc: Harrell MiscellaneousGoogle Scholar
  5. Heron MA (1953) The geology of central Rajasthan; Meomoirs of the the Geological Survey of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Jain SC, Rathore SS (2011) Prediction of cutting performance of diamond wire saw machine in quarrying of marble: a neural network approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:367–371.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0137-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning. Springer New York, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Käsling H, Thuro K (2010) Determining rock abrasivity in the laboratory. Proc Eur Rock Mech Symp (EUROCK 2010) 1–4Google Scholar
  9. Khademian A, Bagherpour R, Almasi SN, Alaei M (2015) Optimum distance between cutting machine and working face in travertine exploitation with diamond wire cutting method. In: Proceedings of 24th International Mining Congress and Exhibition of Turkey. pp 1103–1110Google Scholar
  10. Mikaeil R, Ozcelik Y, Ataei M, Shaffiee Haghshenas S (2016) Application of harmony search algorithm to evaluate performance of diamond wire saw. J Min Environ.  https://doi.org/10.22044/jme.2016.723
  11. Najmedin Almasi S, Bagherpour R, Mikaeil R, Ozcelik Y (2017) Analysis of bead wear in diamond wire sawing considering the rock properties and production rate. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76:1593–1607.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1057-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ozcelik Y, Yilmazkaya E (2011) The effect of the rock anisotropy on the efficiency of diamond wire cutting machines. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:626–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Özçelik Y, Kulaksız S, Çetin MC et al (2002) Assessment of the wear of diamond beads in the cutting of different rock types by the ridge regression. J Mater Process Technol 127:392–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00429-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ozcelik Y, Polat E, Bayram F, Ay AM (2004) Investigation of the effects of textural properties on marble cutting with diamond wire. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.03.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computingGoogle Scholar
  16. RStudio Team (2016) RStudio: integrated development environment for RGoogle Scholar
  17. Sadegheslam G, Mikaeil R, Rooki R, Ghadernejad S, Ataei M (2013) Predicting the production rate of diamond wire saws using multiple nonlinear regression analysis. Geosystem Eng 16:275–285.  https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2013.856276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simpson, Edward H (1951) The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J R Stat Soc 238–241Google Scholar
  19. Tönshoff HK, Hillmann-Apmann H (2002) Diamond tools for wire sawing metal components. Diam Relat Mater 11:742–748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-9635(01)00727-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yavuz H, Ugur I, Demirdag S (2008) Abrasion resistance of carbonate rocks used in dimension stone industry and correlations between abrasion and rock properties. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:260–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yilmazkaya E, Ozcelik Y (2015a) Development of cuttability chart for a limestone cutting with monowire cutting machine. In: 49th U.S. rock mechanics/Geomechanics symposium, 28 June-1 July, San Francisco, California. American Rock Mechanics AssociationGoogle Scholar
  22. Yilmazkaya E, Ozcelik Y (2015b) Development of cuttability chart for a marble cutting with monowire cutting machine. In: International Conference on Stone and Concrete Machining (ICSCM). pp 73–85Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (ISM)DhanbadIndia
  2. 2.Department of Applied GeologyIndian Institute of Technology (ISM)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations