Advertisement

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, 11:544 | Cite as

Geological and hydrogeological environment with geohazards during underground construction in Hangzhou: a review

  • Ye-Shuang Xu
  • Jack Shuilong Shen
  • An-Nan Zhou
  • Arul Arulrajah
Original Paper
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

The urban area of Hangzhou is located in the northeast region of the Hangzhou Bay, beside the estuary of the Qiantang River. Three main ancient rivers are present in the case study area. The ancient rivers, together with the influence of three transgressions, influence the geological and hydrogeological formations of the urban area of Hangzhou. Soft clay is widely deposited in the study area and the Quaternary strata are rich in pore water, karst water, and bedrock fissure water. Confined aquifers located in the case study area have high pressure, high permeability, and rich water, and their levels fluctuate with tide. Karst strata, soft clay, ancient confined aquifer, and shallow gas deposits are potential geological features, which may threaten underground construction in the urban area of Hangzhou. As such, corresponding pre-treatments should be adopted to control the potential geohazards. Karst caves are proposed be infilled or reinforced before the commencement of underground construction works. Ground improvement methods can be adopted to enhance the strength of soft soil. Foundation dewatering in foundation pits with pensile curtains can be adopted to control ancient confined aquifers. Pre-exhaustion of shallow gas prior to commencement of construction works is an effective measure to control shallow gas with high pressure. Moreover, the impacts of the Qiantang River tide on the groundwater level and the deformation of underground structures should be considered.

Keywords

Quaternary sediments Geohazards Soft soil Shallow gas Karst Ancient river aquifer 

Notes

Funding

The research work described herein was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 41472252). These financial supports are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Chen RP, Li ZC, Chen YM, Ou CY, Hu Q, Rao M (2015) Failure investigation at a collapsed deep excavation in very sensitive organic soft clay. J Perform Constr Facil 29(3):04014078.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng GH, Zhai GY, Zhuang YX (2014) Geological survey achievement and application in China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. China University of Geosciences (CUG) (2008) Survey report on environmental geochemistry for the urban geology survey project of Hangzhou. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Conte E, Troncone A (2006) One-dimensional consolidation under general time-dependent loading. Can Geotech J 43(11):1107–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conte E, Troncone A (2009) Radial consolidation with vertical drains and general time-dependent loading. Can Geotech J 46(1):25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t08-101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui QL, Shen SL, Xu YS, Wu HN, Yin ZY (2015a) Mitigation of geohazards during deep excavations in karst regions with caverns: a case study. Eng Geol 195:16–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui QL, Wu HN, Shen SL, Xu YS, Ye GL (2015b) Chinese karst geology and measures to prevent geohazards during shield tunnelling in karst region with caves. Nat Hazards 77:129–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1585-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng JL, Shen SL, Xu YS (2016) Investigation into pluvial flooding hazards caused by heavy rain and protection measures in Shanghai, China. Nat Hazards 83(2):1301–1320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2369-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding Z, Cheng WF, Hu ZY, Zhang SM, Yu XF (2014) Research on water reduction technology for deep foundation pit of People’s Square Station of Hangzhou Metro. J Rail Eng Soc 1:89–94 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Du YJ, Jiang NJ, Liu SY, Jin F, Singh DN, Pulppara A (2014a) Engineering properties and microstructural characteristics of cement solidified zinc-contaminated kaolin clay. Can Geotech J 51:289–302.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Du YJ, Wei ML, Reddy KR, Liu ZP, Jin F (2014b) Effect of acid rain pH on leaching behavior of cement stabilized lead-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 271:131–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan DD, Tu JB, Shang S, Cai GF (2014) Characteristics of tidal-bore deposits and facies associations in the Qiantang Estuary, China, Mar Geol 348(2014):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2013.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gu MG, Wang QH, Lv CZ, Qin XX, Yu GC (2008) Method for the investigation of 3D Quaternary structure in the plain region of Hangzhou City. Geol China 35(2):232–238 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Guo AG, Kong LW, Shen LC, Zhang JR, Wang Y, Qin JS, Huang XF (2013) Study of disaster countermeasures of shallow gas in metro construction. Rock Soil Mech 34(3):769–775 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Guriérrez F, Parise M, Waele JD, Jourde H (2014) A reviewon natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst. Earth Sci Rev 138:61–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hangzhou Chronicles Editorial Board (HCEB) (1995) Hangzhou chronicles. Zhonghua book company press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Hangzhou Chronicles of Water Conservancy Editorial Board (HCWCEB) (2009) Hangzhou chronicles of water conservancy. Zhonghua book company press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Hangzhou Civil Air Defense Office (HCADO) (2011) Underground space development and utilization plan in Hangzhou (2011–2020). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Hangzhou Hydrological Information Network (HHIN) (2017). http://www.hz-sw.cn/cxrb.aspx?date=-1 (in Chinese)
  20. Hong ZS, Yin J, Cui YJ (2010) Compression behaviour of reconstituted soils at high initial water contents. Géotechnique 60(9):691–700.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.09.p.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hong ZS, Zeng LL, Cui YJ, Cai YQ, Lin C (2012) Compression behaviour of natural and reconstituted clays. Géotechnique 62(4):291–301.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.p.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu J, Ma FH (2018) Failure investigation at a collapsed deep open cut slope excavation in soft clay. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):665–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang J, Xie X, Li J, Wang W (2014) Experimental study of micro behavior of Hangzhou soft clay. Electron J Geotech Eng 19(2014):6105–6120Google Scholar
  24. Jin YF, Yin ZY (2018) ErosLab: a modelling tool for soil tests. Adv Eng Softw 121:84–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jin ZF, Chen YX, Wang FE, Ogura N (2004) Detection of nitrate sources in urban groundwater by isotopic and chemical indicators, Hangzhou City, China. Environ Geol 45(7):1017–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-0962-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jin YF, Yin ZY, Wu ZX, Zhou WH (2018a) Identifying parameters of easily crushable sand and application to offshore pile driving. Ocean Eng 154:416–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jin YF, Yin ZY, Wu ZX, Daouadji A (2018b) Numerical modeling of pile penetration in silica sands considering the effect of grain breakage. Finite Elem Anal Des 144:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenneth KE (2001) Technical measures for the investigation and mitigation of fugitive methane hazards in areas of coal mining. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Appalachian Regional Coordinating Centre, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  29. Likitlersuang S, Surarak C, Wanatowski D, Oh E, Balasubramaniam A (2013) Finite element analysis of a deep excavation: a case study from the Bangkok MRT. Soils Found 53:756–773.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin CG, Wu SM, Xia TD (2015) Design of shield tunnel lining taking fluctuations of river stage into account. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 45(2015):107–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu SX (2000) A preliminary study on the karst collapse and underground water utilization in the western hills, Hangzhou. J Geol Hazards Environ Preserv 11(1):11–20 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Liu G, Li Z, Wu S, Yu L (2012) Monitoring of large section tunnel crossing Qiantang River during operation period. Appl Mech Mater 226-228:1517–1523.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.226-228.1517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu J, Liu D, Song K (2015) Evaluation of the influence caused by tunnel construction on groundwater environment: a case study of Tongluoshan tunnel, China. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015(149265):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/149265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu X-X, Shen S-L, Xu Y-S, Yin Z-Y (2018) Analytical approach for time-dependent groundwater inflow into shield tunnel face in confined aquifer. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 42(4):655–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu XL, Zhou YC, Huang MS, Li FD (2017) Computation of the minimum limit support pressure for the shield tunnel face stability under seepage condition. Int J Civil Eng 15(6):849–863.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0116-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luo YD, Liang H, Gao HF, Qin XX (2009) A tentative discussion on methods for urban karst geological survey and evaluation: a case study of Hangzhou City in Zhenjiang Province. Geol China 36(5):1187–1193 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Lyu HM, Wang GF, Shen JS, Lu LH, Wang GQ (2016) Analysis and GIS mapping of flooding hazards on 10 May 2016 Guangzhou, China. Water 8(10):447(1–17).  https://doi.org/10.3390/w8100447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lyu HM, Wang GF, Cheng WC, Shen SL (2017) Tornado hazards on June 23rd in Jiangsu Province, China: preliminary investigation and analysis. Nat Hazards 85(1):597–604.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2588-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lyu HM, Sun WJ, Shen SL, Arulrajah A (2018a) Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach. Sci Total Environ 626:1012–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lyu HM, Shen JS, Arulrajah A (2018b) Assessment of geohazards and preventative countermeasures using AHP incorporated with GIS in Lanzhou, China. Sustainability 10(2):304.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ma YC, Jong MD, Koppenjan J, Xi B, Mu R (2012) Explaining the organizational and contractual context of subway construction disasters in China: the case of Hangzhou. Polic Soc 31(2012):87–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mabrouk A, Rowe RK (2011) Effect of gassy sand lenses on a deep excavation in a clayey soil. Eng Geol 122:292–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mazumdar A, Peketi A, Dewangan P, Badesab F, Ramprasad T (2009) Shallow gas charged sediments off the Indian west coast: genesis and distribution. Mar Geol 267(1):71–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2009.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pujades E, López A, Carrera J, Vázquez-Suñé E, Jurado A (2012) Barrier effect of underground structures on aquifers. Eng Geol 145-146(2012):41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pujades E, Vázquez-Suñé E, Carrera J, Vilarrasa V, De Simone S, Jurado A, Ledesma A, Ramos G, Lloret A (2014) Deep enclosures versus pumping to reduce settlements during shaft excavations. Eng Geol 169(4):100–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pujades E, Vázquez-Suñé E, Culí L, Carrera J, Ledesma A, Jurado A (2015) Hydrogeological impact assessment by tunnelling at sites of high sensitivity. Eng Geol 193:421–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pujades E, Jurado A, Carrera J, Vázquez-Suñé E, Dassargues A (2016) Hydrogeological assessment of non-linear underground enclosures. Eng Geol 207:91–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pujades E, De Simone S, Carrera J, Vázquez-Suñé E, Jurado A (2017) Settlements around pumping wells: analysis of influential factors and a simple calculation procedure. J Hydrol 548:225–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rebata-Landa V, Santamarina J (2012) Mechanical effects of biogenic nitrogen gas bubbles in soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 138(2):128–137.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ren DJ, Shen SL, Arulrajah A, Cheng WC (2018a) Prediction model of TBM disc cutter wear during tunnelling in heterogeous ground. Rock Mech Rock Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1549-3
  51. Ren DJ, Shen SL, Arulrajah A, Wu HN (2018b) Evaluation of ground loss ratio with moving trajectories induced in double-O-tube (DOT) tunnelling. Can Geotech J 55(6):894–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ren D-J, Shen S-L, Zhou A, Chai J-C (2018c) Prediction of lateral continuous wear of cutter ring in soft ground with quartz sand. Comput Geotech 103:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schotte K, Nuttens T, Wulf AD, Bogaert PV (2016) Monitoring the structural response of the Liefkenshoek Rail Tunnel to tidal level fluctuations. J Perform Constr Facil 30(5):04016007.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schotte K, Nagy W, Nuttens T, Wulf AD, Bogaert PV, Backer HD (2017) Impact of tidal level fluctuations on the structural behaviour of a segmental tunnel lining. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 64:184–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shen M (2010) Analysis and study of numerical model set up in crossing-river tunnel Jiangbei shaft dewatering enginering practice of Hangzhou Metor No.1 Line. Urban Roads, Bridges & Flood Control (10):193–195. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  56. Shen SL, Xu YS (2011) Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can Geotech J 48(9):1378–1392.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shen S-L, Horpibulsuk S, Liao S-M, Peng F-L (2009) Analysis of the behavior of DOT tunnel lining caused by rolling correction operation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24(1):84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shen S-L, Du Y-J, Luo C-Y (2010) Evaluation of the effect of rolling correction of double-o-tunnel shields via one-side loading. Can Geotech J 47(10):1060–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shen LC, Zhou SH, Zhang JR, Liu XH, Wang HQ (2012) Theory and practice of the project across Qiangtang River in Hongzhou Metro Line No. 1. China Communications Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  60. Shen SL, Ma L, Xu YS, Yin ZY (2013a) Interpretation of increased deformation rate in aquifer IV due to groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can Geotech J 50(11):1129–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shen SL, Wang ZF, Yang J, Ho CE (2013b) Generalized approach for prediction of jet grout column diameter. J Geotech Geoenviron 139(12):2060–2069.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shen SL, Wu HN, Cui YJ, Yin ZY (2014) Long-term settlement behavior of the metro tunnel in Shanghai. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 40(2014):309–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shen SL, Wang JP, Wu HN, Xu YS, Ye GL, Yin ZY (2015a) Evaluation of hydraulic conductivity for both marine and deltaic deposit based on piezocone test. Ocean Eng 110(2015):174–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shen SL, Wu YX, Xu YS, Hino T, Wu HN (2015b). Evaluation of hydraulic parameters from pumping tests of multi-aquifers with vertical leakage in Tianjin. Comput Geotech, 68(2015), 196–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shen SL, Wang ZF, Cheng WC (2017a) Estimation of lateral displacement induced by jet grouting in clayey soils. Geotechnique, ICE 167(7):621–630.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.p.159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shen SL, Wu YX, Misra A (2017b) Calculation of head difference at two sides of a cut-off barrier during excavation dewatering. Comput Geotech 91:192–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Song KI, Cho GC, Chang SB (2012) Identification, remediation, and analysis of karst sinkholes in the longest railroad tunnel in South Korea. Eng Geol 135-136:92–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.02.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sultan N, Garziglia S (2014) Mechanical behaviour of gas-charged fine sediments: model formulation and calibration. Géotechnique 64(11):851–886.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.13.P.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tan Y, Lu Y (2017a) Forensic diagnosis of a leaking accident during excavation. J Perform Constr Facil, ASCE 31(5):04017061.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tan Y, Lu Y (2017b) Why excavation of a small air shaft caused excessively large displacements: forensic investigation. J Perform Constr Facil, ASCE 31(2):04016083.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tan Y, Jiang WZ, Luo WJ, Lu Y, Xu CJ (2018) Longitudinal sliding event during excavation of feng-qi station of Hangzhou metro line 1: postfailure investigation. J Perform Constr Facil 2018, 32(4): 04018039.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tu JB, Fan DD (2017) Flow and turbulence structure in a hupertidal estuary with the world’s biggest tidal bore. J Geophys Res Oceans 122:3417–3433.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jc012120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Udomchai A, Hoy M, Horpibulsuk S, Chinkulkijniwat A, Arulrajah A (2018) Failure of riverbank protection structure and remedial approach: a case study in Suraburi province, Thailand. Eng Fail Anal 91:243–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang YC (2010) Technical guide for deep foundation pit in Qianjiang tunnel. China Building Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  75. Wang Y (2012) Discussion and study on confined water treatment technology of over-deep foundation pit at bank of Qiangtang River. Urban Roads Bridges Flood Control 7:350–354 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  76. Wang JB, Si XJ, Hua XH, Hu GX, Zhang GG (2011a) Introduction on 3D urban geological structure in Hangzhou. Land Resour 11:51–54 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  77. Wang Y, Kong LW, Guo AG (2011b) Effects of shallow gas on diaphragm wall trenching construction of Hangzhou metro. Adv Mater Res 255-260:3993–3997.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.255-260.3993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang JX, Wang P, Sui DC (2012) Numerical simulation of pumping well-underground concrete wall-recharging well in dewatering of deep foundation pit. Adv Mater Res 446-449:1764–1768.  https://doi.org/10.4028/scientific5/amr.446-449.1764 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang JX, Feng B, Guo TP, Wu LG, Lou RX, Zhou Z (2013) Using partial penetrating wells and curtains to lower the water level of confined aquifer of gravel. Eng Geol 161:16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang GF, Lyu HM, Shen JS, Lu LH, Li G, Arulrajah A (2017a) Evaluation of environmental risk due to metro system construction in Jinan, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(10):1114.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang JX, Liu XT, Wu YB, Liu S, Wu LG, Lou RX, Lu JS, Yin Y (2017b) Field experiment and numerical simulation of coupling non-Darcy flow caused by curtain and pumping well in foundation pit dewatering. J Hydrol 549:277–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wang Y, Kong LW, Wang YL, Wang M, Cai KJ (2018a) Deformation analysis of shallow gas-bearing ground from controlled gas release in Hangzhou Bay of China. Int J Geomech 18(1):04017122.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang ZF, Cheng WC, Wang YQ (2018b) Investigation into geohazards during urbanization process of Xi’an, China. Nat Hazards 92(3):1937–1953.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3280-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wei G, Lu SJ, Wang Z, Huang X (2018) A theoretical model for the circumferential strain of immersed tunnel elements under tidal load. Geotech Geol Eng 36(3):1633–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0419-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu HN, Huang RQ, Sun WJ, Shen SL, Xu YS, Liu YB, Du SJ (2014) Leaking behaviour of shield tunnels under the Huangpu River of Shanghai with induced hazards. Nat Hazards 70(2):1115–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0863-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wu, HN, Shen SL, Liao SM, Yin ZY (2015a) Longitudinal structural modelling of shield tunnels considering shearing dislocation between segmental rings. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 50(2015):317–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wu YX, Shen SL, Xu YS, Yin ZY (2015b) Characteristics of groundwater seepage with cut-off wall in gravel aquifer. I: field observations. Can Geotech J 52(10):1526–1538.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wu YX, Shen SL, Yin ZY, Xu YS (2015c) Characteristics of groundwater seepage with cut-off wall in gravel aquifer. II: numerical analysis. Can Geotech J 52(10):1539–1549.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wu LG, Zhu YF, Lou RX, Wang JX (2016a) Comprehensive treatment of damages caused by confined water in deep excavation engineering. China Communications Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  90. Wu YX, Shen SL, Yuan DJ (2016b) Characteristics of dewatering induced drawdown curve under barrier effect of retaining wall in aquifer. J Hydrol 539(2016):554–566.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wu HN, Shen SL, Yang J (2017a) Identification of tunnel settlement caused by land subsidence in soft deposit of Shanghai. J Perform Constr Facil, ASCE 31(6), 04017092.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wu YX, Shen JS, Cheng WC, Hino T (2017b) Semi-analytical solution to pumping test data with barrier, wellbore storage, and partial penetration effects. Eng Geol 226:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Xu YS, Shen SL, Du YJ (2009) Geological and hydrogeological environment in Shanghai with geohazards to construction and maintenance of infrastructures. Eng Geol 109(3–4):241–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Xu K, Kong CF, Li JF, Zhang LQ (2012) Geo-environmental suitability evaluation of land for urban construction based on a back-propagation neural network and GIS: a case study of Hangzhou. Phys Geogr 33(5):457–472.  https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.33.5.457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Xu YS, Shen SL, Du YJ, Chai JC, Horpibulsuk S (2013) Modelling the cutoff behavior of underground structure in multi-aquifer-aquitard groundwater system. Nat Hazards 66(2):731–748.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0512-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Xu YS, Shen SL, Ma L, Sun WJ, Yin ZY (2014) Evaluation of the blocking effect of retaining walls on groundwater seepage in aquifers with different insertion depths. Eng Geol 183:254–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Xu YS, Shen SL, Ren DJ, Wu HN (2016) Factor analysis of land subsidence in shanghai: a view based on strategic environmental assessment. Sustainability 8(2016):573.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Xu YS, Wu HN, Shen JS, Zhang N (2017a) Risk and impacts on the environment of free-phase biogas in quaternary deposits along the Coastal Region of Shanghai. Ocean Eng 137(2017):129–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Xu YS, Wu HN, Wang BZ, Yang TL (2017b) Dewatering induced subsidence during excavation in a Shanghai soft deposit. Environ Earth Sci 76:51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6685-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Xu YS, Shen SL, Lai Y, Zhou AN (2018) Design of sponge city: lessons learnt from an ancient drainage system in Ganzhou, China. J Hydrol 2018:900–908.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yang YL, Reddy KR, Du YJ, Fan RD (2018) SHMP amended calcium bentonite for slurry trench cutoff walls: workability and microstructure characteristics. Can Geotech J 55(4):528–537.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yao YP, Hou W, Zhou AN (2009) UH model: three-dimensional unified hardening model for overconsolidated clays. Géotechnique 59:451–469.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.00029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yin ZY, Hicher PY, Dano C, Jin YF (2017) Modeling the mechanical behavior of very coarse granular materials. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 143(1):C401600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Yin ZY, Wu ZY, Hicher PY (2018a) Modeling the monotonic and cyclic behavior of granular materials by an exponential constitutive function. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 144(4):04018014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yin ZY, Jin YF, Shen JS, Hicher PY (2018b) Optimization techniques for identifying soil parameters in geotechnical engineering: comparative study and enhancement. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 42:70–94.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. You AJ, Zhu JZ, Tian XD, Xin FY, Shi QP (2010) Current situation of water environment and protection countermeasures on the estuary of Qiantang River. Environ Pollut Control 32(5):92–96 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  107. Yuan Y, Xu YS, Arulrajah A (2017) Sustainable measures for mitigation of flooding hazards: a case study in Shanghai, China. Water 9(5):310.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w9050310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zeng LL, Hong ZS (2015) Experimental study of primary consolidation time for structured and destructured clays. Appl Clay Sci 116-117:141–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.08.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zhang J (2012) Study on technology and environmental effect of pressure-relief of confined water in Hangzhou deep pit. Doctoral dissertation, Zhejiang University. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  110. Zhang LQ, Li JF, Kong CF, Qu LP, Zhu JH, Chen ZD, Luo YD (2009) BPNN and GIS based construction land geo-environment suitability evaluation: case from Hangzhou, China. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cise.2009.5365296
  111. Zhejiang Institute of Construction (ZIC) (2009) Engineering construction code for investigation of geotechnical engineering (DB33/T 1065–2009). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  112. Zhejiang Institute of Geological Survey (ZIGS) (1987) Comprehensive survey report on urban geology (Hangzhou City -Linpu Town). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  113. Zhejiang Institute of Geological Survey (ZIGS) (2007) Urban geology investigation report on base rock and Quaternary deposits in Hangzhou. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  114. Zhejiang Institute of Geological Survey (ZIGS) (2009) Urban geology investigation report in Hangzhou. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  115. Zhou Y, Chai JC (2017) Equivalent “smear” effect due to non-uniform consolidation surrounding a PVD. Géotechnique 67(5):410–419.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ye-Shuang Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jack Shuilong Shen
    • 3
  • An-Nan Zhou
    • 4
  • Arul Arulrajah
    • 3
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean, and Civil EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration (CISSE), Department of Civil EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Construction EngineeringSwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia
  4. 4.School of EngineeringRoyal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT)MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations