Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, 11:555 | Cite as

Usage of chromite wastes as aggregate in foam concrete production

  • Şemsettin KilinçarslanEmail author
  • Zehra Rüya Kaya
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Geo-Resources-Earth-Environmental Sciences


The rapidly developing mining sector in recent years has also brought environmental problems together. At the beginning of these problems are mine process wastes produced in high quantities from mines every year. The waste material at 90% and the concentrate chromite at 10% are obtained in the chromite ore enrichment plants. This significant amount of waste creates pollution in nature visually and physically. The aim of the study is to determine the advantages of using foamed concrete as a building material, to reduce the production cost of foamed concrete, to produce alternative solutions for rehabilitation, and to eliminate environmental pollution. The chromite enrichment wastes obtained from Fethiye, Köyceğiz, Denizli and Burdur regions were used as aggregates in the production of foamed concrete. In this study, compressive strength experiments were carried out according to TS EN 1354, thermal conductivity experiments were carried out according to TS EN 12664. As a result, it has been observed that chromite waste (dunite) can be used in the production of foamed concrete under certain conditions.


Chromite Waste material Dunite Aggregate Foam concrete 


Funding information

This study was supported by Suleyman Demirel University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (SDU-BAP 4854-YL1-17).


  1. Akkurt I, Akyıldırım H, Mavi B, Kilincarslan S, Basyiğit C (2010) Photon attenuation coefficients of concrete includes barite in different rate, Ann. Nucl. Energy. 37–7(2010)910–914Google Scholar
  2. Akkurt I, Basyigit C, Kilincarslan S, Mavi B, Akkurt A (2006) Radiation shielding of concretes containing different aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 28(2):153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkurt I, Yıldırım H (2012) Radiation transmission of concrete including pumice for 662, 1173 and 1332 keV gamma rays. Nucl Eng Des 252(2012):163–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daş B, Arık F, Öztürk A, Altay O (2012) Chrome mining and effects from past and present on the mankind history, Batman University, International Participated Science and Culture Symposium, 18–20 April, Batman-TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  5. Davraz M, Kılınçarslan Ş, Koru M, Tuzlak F (2016) Investigation of relationships between ultrasonic pulse velocity and thermal conductivity coefficient in foam concretes. Acta Phys Pol A 130:469–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davraz M, Ceylan H, Kilincarslan S (2015) Mechanical performances of artificial aggregated lightweight concrete. Acta Phys Pol A 127:1246–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erol M, Genç A, Öveçoğlu A, Yücelen L, Küçükbayrak S, Taptik Y (2000) Characterization of a glass-ceramic produced from thermal power plant fly ashes. J Eur Ceram Soc 20:2209–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hacızade F, Avşar M, Yalçın Ş (2005) Status of ceramic based wastes in metallurgical factory. III. International Ceramic Glass Enamel, 17–19 October, Eskişehir-TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  9. Kilincarslan S, Akkurt I, Başyiğit C (2006) The effect of barite rate on the some physical and mechanical properties of concrete. Materials Sci Engineering A Volume 424 1-2(2006):83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kilincarslan S, Davraz M, Akça M (2018) The effect of pumice as aggregate on the mechanical and thermal properties of foam concrete. Arab J Geosci 11:289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mirdali, K.N., Çetin, S., (2005) Use of Mersin Kromsan plant waste in under glazing decoration. III. International participation ceramic glass enamel, glaze and paint Seminar, 17–19 Ekim, Eskişehir, p. 693–698Google Scholar
  12. Mirdali KN, İşler F (2008) Evaluation of chromite waste as a colorant in wall tile sequences. Ç.Ü Institute of Science and Technology 17-1:11–21Google Scholar
  13. Lakatos, A. (2017) Thermal conductivity of insulations approached from a new aspect Therm anal CalorimGoogle Scholar
  14. Oyman R, Özkan İ, (2005) Investigation of availability in waste Kiln floor coatings at Salihli Sart mine works. III. International Participation Ceramic Glass Enamel, Glaze and Paint Seminar, 17–19 October, Eskişehir, p.598–606Google Scholar
  15. Şölenay E, Çetiz H (2005) Evaluation of chromite ore processing waste in stoneware constructions at 1200o C. III. International Ceramic Glass Enamel, 17–19 October, Eskişehir-TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  16. Topateş, G., Üstündağ, C.B., Özay, Ö., Yıldız, M., Balba, A., (2005) Çan thermal power plant Flyer’s use in ceramic secrets. III. International participation ceramic glass enamel, glaze and paint Seminar, 17–19 October, Eskişehir, p. 593–597Google Scholar
  17. Yılmaz Ş, Toplan H, (2004) Fly ash based glazes and industrial applications. Ceramic Turkey Magazine, July–September, p.151–154Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringSuleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey
  2. 2.Graduate School of Natural and Applied SciencesSuleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey

Personalised recommendations