Advertisement

Early Precambrian tectono-thermal events: coupled U–Pb–Hf of detrital zircons from Jiao–Liao–Ji Belt, North China Craton

  • Zhuang Li
  • Jie Li
  • Bin Chen
Original Paper

Abstract

The Dashiqiao Formation on the Liaodong Peninsula constitutes an important component within the Jiao–Liao–Ji Belt, North China Craton. It is composed dominantly of dolomitic marbles intercalated with minor carbonaceous slates and mica schists, hosting one of the largest magnesite deposits on Earth. This study presents zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images and U–Pb–Hf isotope data, as well as single-mineral geochemical data for the staurolite–garnet–mica schist from the Dashiqiao Formation, in order to constrain its protolith age and provenance, and further to discuss the early Precambrian tectono-thermal events of the North China Craton. U–Pb isotopic dating using the LA–ICP–MS method on detrital zircons from the schist preserves at least three age populations ranging in age from 2.99 to 2.02 Ga, and grains as old as ca 4087 Ma. The dominant Neoarchean detrital zircons were most probably sourced from the basement within the Longgang and Nangrim blocks, while the minor Mesoarchean zircons were only sourced from the Longgang Block. The subordinate middle Paleoproterozoic zircons are consistent with ages of the regionally distributed coeval Liaoji granites and volcanics within the Jiao–Liao–Ji Belt. Zircon U–Pb dating yields a metamorphic age of 1930 Ma for the sample, interpreted to represent the peak stage of epidote amphibolite facies metamorphism. Thus, the depositional age for the protolith of the schist was proposed in the period between 2.01 and 1.93 Ga. LA–MC–ICP–MS Lu–Hf isotopic data show that all Archean (2.45–2.55) detrital zircons possess positive εHf(t) values from + 0.7 to + 7.5 with juvenile depleted mantle model ages, suggesting a significant crustal growth event during the Neoarchean in the North China Craton. The Paleoproterozoic detrital zircons possess variable εHf(t) values (− 5.5–+ 8.3) and depleted mantle model ages from Mesoarchean to Paleoproterozoic. The zircons with negative εHf(t) values implies the Mesoarchean to Neoarchean crust undergoing a recycling event in the period 2.40–2.01 Ga, while those with positive εHf(t) value suggest some indication of juvenile addition to the crust during the Paleoproterozoic. Using regional geological and new detrital zricon U–Pb–Hf isotopic data, the early Precambrian tectono-thermal events can be subdivided into the following episodes: Mesoarchean, late Neoarchean, middle Paleoproterozoic, and late Paleoproterozoic times.

Keywords

U–Pb age Hf isotope Early Precambrian Multiple tectono-thermal events North China Craton 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The final version of the paper benefited from the constructive comments and careful corrections of the Journal Editor Prof. Abdullah M. Al-Amr and two journal reviewers. Dr. Yan Zhan of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is thanked for his perceptive suggestions and careful corrections on preparing the manuscript for this paper. We are grateful to Dr. Zhiwei Wang of Hebei GEO University for his involvement in the analysis work and Dr. Chaoyang Wang of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences for his help in the preparation of the figures.

Funding information

This work was funded by the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (Grant Number: 2462017YJRC032), the Science Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing (Grant Number: PRP/indep-4-1702), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (Grant Number: 2012CB416603), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers: 41430207 and 90914001).

Supplementary material

12517_2018_3791_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (36 kb)
Supplementary Table S1 (XLSX 35 kb)

References

  1. Andersen T (2002) Correction of common lead in U–Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb. Chem Geol 192:59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amelin Y, Lee DC, Halliday AN (2000) Early–middle Archaean crustal evolution deduced from Lu–Hf and U–Pb isotopic studies of single zircon grains. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:4205–4225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amelin Y (2005) Meteorite phosphates show constant 176Lu decay rate since 4557 million years ago. Science 310:839–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belousova EA, Griffin WL, O’Reilly SY, Fisher NI (2002) Igneous zircon: trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type. Contrib Mineral Petrol 143:602–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blichert-Toft J, Albarède F (1997) The Lu-Hf isotope geochemistry of chondrites and the evolution of the mantle-crust system. Earth Planet Sci Lett 148 243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cawood PA, Hawkesworth CJ, Dhuime B (2012) Detrital zircon record and tectonic setting. Geology 40:875–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen JS, An MG, Duan M, Liu M, Li B, Yang F, Li W, Xing DH (2017) The age of the Dashiqiao Formation in Liaohe group: constraints from LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb dating of acidic volcanic rocks. Geol Resour 26:105–110 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  8. Chu NC, Taylor RN, Chavagnac V, Nesbitt RW, Boella RM, Milton JA, German CR, Bayon G, Burton K (2002) Hf isotope ratio analysis using multi–collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: an evaluation of isobaric interference corrections. J Anal At Spectrom 17:1567–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corfu F, Hanchar JM, Hoskin PWO, Kinny P (2003) Zircon. Rev Mineral Geochem 53:469–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grant ML, Wilde SA, Wu F, Yang J (2009) The application of zircon cathodolumi-nescence imaging, Th–U–Pb chemistry and U–Pb ages in interpreting discretemagmatic and high-grade metamorphic events in the North China Craton at the Archean/Proterozoic boundary. Chem Geol 261:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffin WL, Pearson NJ, Belousova EA, Jackson SE, van Achterbergh E, O'Reilly SY (2000) The Hf isotope composition of cratonic mantle: LA–MC–ICP MS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffin WL, Belousova EA, Shee SR, Pearson NJ, O'Reilly SY (2004) Archean crustal evolution in the northern Yilgarn craton: U–Pb and Hf-isotope evidence from detrital zircons. Precambrian Res 131:231–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holdaway MJ (2000) Application of new experimental and garnet Margules data to the garnet–biotite geothermometer. Am Mineral 85:881–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hou KJ, Li YH, Zou TR, Qu XM, Shi YR, Xie GQ (2007) Laser ablation–MC–ICP–MS technique for Hf isotope microanalysis of zircon and its geological applications. Acta Petrol Sin 23:2595–2604 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Jackson SE, Pearson NJ, Griffin WL, Belousova EA (2004) The application of laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry to in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology. Chem Geol 211:47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li SZ, Zhao GC (2007) SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology of the Liaoji granitoids: constraints on the evolution of the Paleoproterozoic Jiao–Liao–Ji belt in the Eastern Block of the North China Craton. Precambrian Res 158:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Z, Chen B (2014) Geochronology and geochemistry of the Paleoproterozoic meta-basalts from the Jiao–Liao–Ji Belt, North China Craton: Implications for petrogenesis and tectonic setting. Precambrian Res. 255:653–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Z, Wei CJ (2017) Two types of Neoarchean basalts from Qingyuan greenstone belt, North China Craton: Petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Precambrian Res. 292:175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Z, Chen B (2018) Lithotectonic elements of Archean basement on the Liaodong Peninsula and its vicinity, North China Craton, China. Front Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0708-x
  20. Li Z, Chen B, Wei CJ, Wang CX, Han W (2015) Provenance and tectonic setting of the Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks from the Liaohe Group, Jiao–Liao–Ji Belt, North China Craton: insights from detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology, whole–rock Sm–Nd isotopes, and geochemistry. J Asian Earth Sci. 111:711–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Z, Chen B, Wang JL (2016a) Geochronological framework and geodynamic implications of mafic magmatism in the Liaodong peninsula and adjacent regions, North China Craton. Acta Geol Sin Engl Ed 90:138–153Google Scholar
  22. Li Z, Chen B, Wei CJ (2016b) Hadean detrital zircon in the North China Craton. J Miner Petrol Sci 111:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Z, Chen B, Wei CJ (2017) Is the Paleoproterozoic Jiao–Liao–Ji Belt Belt (North China Craton) a rift. Int J Earth Sci 106:355–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu DY, Nutman AP, Compston W, Wu JS, Shen QH (1992) Remnants of ≥3800Ma crust in the Chinese part of the Sino-Korean Craton. Geology 20:339–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu J, Liu ZH, Zhao C, Wang CJ, Peng YB (2017) Petrogenesis and zircon LA–ICP–MS U–Pb dating of newly discovered Mesoarchean gneiss on the northern margin of the North China Craton. Int Geol Rev 59:1575–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu XP, Wu FY, Guo JH, Wilde SA, Yang JH, Liu XM, Zhang XO (2006) Zircon U–Pb geochronological constraints on the Paleoproterozoic crustal evolution of the Eastern Block in the North China Craton. Precambrian Res 146:138–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ludwig KR (2003) ISOPLOT 3: a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronological Center Spec Public 4:74Google Scholar
  28. Meng E, Liu FL, Liu JH, Liu PH, Cui Y, Liu CH, Yang H, Wang F, Shi JR, Kong QB, Lian TH (2013) Zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopic constraints on Archean crustal evolution in the Liaonan Complex of northeast China. Lithos 177:164–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meng E, Liu FL, Liu PH, Liu CH, Yang H, Wang F, Shi JR, Cai J (2014) Petrogenesis and tectonic significance of Paleoproterozoic meta–mafic rocks from central Liaodong Peninsula, northeast China: Evidence from zircon U–Pb dating and in situ Lu–Hf isotopes, and whole-rock geochemistry. Precambrian Res 247:92–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Payne JL, McInerney DJ, Barovich KM, Kirkland CL, Pearson NJ, Hand M (2016) Strengths and limitations of zircon Lu-Hf and O isotopes in modelling crustal growth. Lithos 248–251:175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scherer EE, Munker C, Mezger K (2001) Calibration of the lutetium–hafnium clock. Science 293:683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Song B, Nutman AP, Liu DY, Wu JS (1996) 3800–2500 Ma crust in the Anshan area of Liaoning Province, northeastern China. Precambrian Res. 78:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang HS, Wu G, Lai Y (2009) The C–O isotope geochemistry and genesis of the Dashiqiao magnesite deposit, Liaoning Province, NE China. Acta Petrol Sin 25:455–467 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  34. Vavra G, Schmid R, Gebauer D (1999) Internal morphology, habit and U–Th–Pb microanalysis of amphibolite-to-granulite facies zircons: geochronology of the Ivrea Zone (Southern Alps). Contrib Mineral Petrol 134:380–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wan YS, Song B, Yang C, Liu DY (2005) Geochemical characteristics of Archaean basement in the Fushun–Qingyuan area, northern Liaoning Province and its geological significance. Geological Rev. 51:128–137 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  36. Wan YS, Song B, Liu DY, Wilde SA, Wu JS, Shi YR, Yin XY, Zhou HY (2006) SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology of Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the North China Craton: evidence for a major Late Paleoproterozoic tectonothermal event. Precambrian Res. 149:249–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wan YS, Dong CY, Liu DY, Kröner A, Yang CH, Wang W, Du LL, Xie HQ, Ma MZ (2012) Zircon ages and geochemistry of late Neoarchean syenogranites in the North China Craton: A review. Precambrian Res. 222–223:265–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang HC, Lu SN, Chu H, Xiang ZQ, Zhang CJ, Liu H (2011) Zirocn U–Pb age and tectonic setting of meta-basalts of Liaohe Group in Helan area, Liaoyang, Liaoning Province. J Jilin Univ Earth Sci Ed 41:1321–1334 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  39. Wang XP, Peng P, Wang C, Yang SY, Söderlun U, Su XD (2017) Nature of three episodes of Paleoproterozoic magmatism (2180 Ma, 2115 Ma and 1890 Ma) in the Liaoji belt, North China with implications for tectonic evolution. Precambrian Res. 298:252–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu CM, Zhang J, Ren LD (2004) Empirical garnet–biotite–plagioclase–quartz (GBPQ) geobarometry in medium- to high-grade metapelites. Lithos 78:319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu FY, Yang JH, Liu XM, Li TS, Xie LW, Yang YH (2005) Hf isotopes of the 3.8 Ga zircons in eastern Hebei Province, China: implications for early crustal evolution of the North China Craton. Chin Sci Bull 50:2473–2480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu FY, Yang YH, Xie LW, Yang JH, Xu P (2006) Hf isotopic compositions of the standard zircons and baddeleyites used in U–Pb geochronology. Chem Geol 234:105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu ML, Lin SF, Wan YS, Gao JF (2016) Crustal evolution of the Eastern Block in the North China Craton: Constraints from zircon U–Pb geochronology and Lu–Hf isotopes of the Northern Liaoning Complex. Precambrian Res. 275:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang JH, Wu FY, Wilde SA, Xie LW, Yang YH, Liu XM (2006) Tracing magma mixing in granite genesis: In situ U-Pb dating and Hf-isotope analysis of zircons. Contrib Mineral Petrol 153:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang JH, Wu FY, Wilde SA, Zhao GC (2008) Petrogenesis and geodynamics of Late Archean magmatism in eastern Hebei, eastern North China Craton: geochronological, geochemical and Nd–Hf isotopic evidence. Precambrian Res. 167:125–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yuan HL, Gao S, Liu XM, Li HM, Günther D, Wu FZ (2004) Accurate U–Pb age and trace element determinations of zircon by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Geostand Newslett 28:353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yuan LL, Zhang XH, Zhai MG (2015) Two episodes of Paleoproterozoic mafic intrusions from Liaoning province, North China Craton: petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Precambrian Res. 264:119–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhai MG, Santosh M (2011) The early Precambrian odyssey of North China Craton: a synoptic overview. Gondwana Res. 20:6–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhai MG, Santosh M (2013) Metallogeny of the North China Craton: link with secular changes in the evolving Earth. Gondwana Res. 24:275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang SH, Zhao Y, Santosh M (2012) Mid-Mesoproterozoic bimodal magmatic rocks in the northern North China Craton: implications for magmatism related to breakup of the Columbia supercontinent. Precambrian Res. 222–223:339–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao GC, Sun M, Wilde SA, Li SZ (2005) Late Archean to Paleoproterozoic evolution of the North China Craton: key issues revisited. Precambrian Res. 136:177–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao GC, Zhai MG (2013) Lithotectonic elements of Precambrian basement in the North China Craton: review and tectonic implications. Gondwana Res. 23:1207–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao GC (2014) Precambrian evolution of the North China Craton. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and ProspectingChina University of Petroleum (Beijing)BeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of GeosciencesChina University of Petroleum (Beijing)BeijingChina
  3. 3.The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, School of Earth and Space SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  5. 5.Department of Earth and Space SciencesSouthern University of Science and TechnologyShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations