Advertisement

Historical evaluation of hydrological and water quality changes of southern Kuwait groundwater system

  • Khaled Hadi
  • Umayadoss Saravana Kumar
  • Mohammed Al-Senafy
  • Amitabha Mukhopadhyay
Original Paper
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Groundwater constitutes an important natural resource in Kuwait and thus requires effective management policies based on a sound knowledge of its flow, recharge, and factors affecting the quality of the water. An assessment of the flow and water quality changes of the southern Kuwait groundwaters over the past decades was made based on the available hydrogeological, hydrochemical, pumping and tracer tests, and environmental isotopes data. The predevelopment potentiometric surface of the Dammam aquifer was higher than that of the Kuwait Group aquifer. The Dammam groundwater is old and no recharge occurred in Kuwait during pre-development times. The Kuwait Group aquifer was recharged mainly by an upward leakage from the Dammam aquifer, with local recharge largely restricted to the Dibdibba depressions. The continuous groundwater pumping has resulted in the reversal of flow direction. The salinity of the Dammam aquifer at Al-Shegaya and Umm-Gudair has been relatively stable since 1960, whereas the Kuwait Group aquifer has a stable to freshening trend.

Keywords

Hydrogeology Hydrochemistry Inverse modeling Pumping and tracer tests Environmental isotopes Groundwater ages 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research and the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) for funding the project. The authors express their gratitude to their colleagues (Mr. Asim Al-Khalid, Mr. Khaled Al-Fahad, Mr. Bandar Al-Salman, Ms. Ruby Crasta, and Ms. Sushma Bangera) for their help at various stages of the investigation. The support received from consultant Dr. Robert Maliva, M/s. Schlumberger Water Services during the execution of the study is sincerely acknowledged. Thanks are also due to Dr. Robert Maliva for language correction of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aggarwal P, Bossaha A (2005) H2O Know-how. IAEA Document, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Awadi E, Mukhopadhyay A, Al-Senafy MN (1998) Geology and hydrogeology of the Dammam Formation in Kuwait. Hydrogeol J 6(2):302–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alhumoud JM, Al-Ruwaih FM, Al-Dhafeeri ZM (2010) Groundwater quality analysis of limestone aquifer of Al-Sulaibiya field, Kuwait. Desalination 254(1):58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Rashed MF (1994) Modeling of the Shegaya, Sulaibiya and Umm Gudair fields in Kuwait. International Journal of Water Resources Development 10(1):39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Ruwaih FM, Ben-Essa SA (2004) Hydrogeological and hydrochemical study of the Al-Shagya Field F, Kuwait. Bull Eng Geol Environ 63:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Ruwaih FM, Qabazard HA (2005) Aquifer characteristics and water quality of Miocene-Pliocene sediments, Kuwait. Bull Eng Geol Environ 64:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Ruwaih FM, Hadi KM, Shehata M (2007) Geological, geochemical, and hydrogeological investigations of Miocene-Pliocene aquifer, Kuwait. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research 12(3):95–107Google Scholar
  8. Alsharhan AS, Rizk ZA, Nairin AEM, Bakhit DW, Alhajari SA (2001) Hydrogeology of an arid region: the Arabian Gulf and adjoining areas. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Al-Sulaimi JS, Al-Ruwaih FM (2004) Geological, structural and geochemical aspects of the main aquifer systems in Kuwait. Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering 31(1):149–174Google Scholar
  10. Amer A, Torrent H, Seaber PR (1992) Assessment of groundwater resources in Kuwait using remote sensing technology, vol 1: Main Report", Report No. KISR4038. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, KuwaitGoogle Scholar
  11. Axelsson G, Björnsson G, Montalvo F (2005) Quantitative interpretation of tracer test data. World Geothermal Congress proceedings 2005, Antalya, Turkey, April 2005, 24–29Google Scholar
  12. Bhandary H, Al-Senafy M, Marzouk F (2015) Usage of carbon isotopes in characterizing groundwater age, flow direction, flow velocity and recharge area. Procedia Environ Sci 25:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bockelmann A, Zamfirescu D, Ptak T, Grathwohl P, Teutsch G (2003) Quantification of mass fluxes and natural attenuation rates at an industrial site with a limited monitoring network: a case study. J Contam Hydrol 60:97–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carleton GB, Welty C, Buxton HT (1999) Design and analysis of tracer tests to determine effective porosity and dispersivity in fractured sedimentary rocks. Newark Basin, New Jersey U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  15. Fadlelmawla A, Al-Otaibi M (2005) Analysis of the water resources status in Kuwait. Water Resour Manag 19(5):555–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fedlelmawla K, Hadi K, Zouari K, Kulkarni KM (2008) Hydrochemical investigation of recharge and subsequent salinization processes at Al-Raudhatain depression in Kuwait. Hydrological Sciences 53(1):204–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glynn PD, Plummer NL (2005) Geochemistry and the understanding of ground-water system. Hydrogeol J 13:263–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hadi KM, Al-Ruwaih FM (2008) Goechemical evolution of the fresh groundwater in Kuwait desert. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research 13(3):37–45Google Scholar
  19. Hadi K, Saravana Kumar U, Al-Senafy M, Bhandary H (2016a) Environmental isotope systematics of the groundwater system of southern Kuwait. Environmental Earth Sciences 75(14):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hadi K, Saravana Kumar U, Al-Senafy M, Mukhopadhyay A, Al-Khalid A, Al-Fahad K, Bhandary H (2016b) Multi-well and multi-tracer tests to characterize the groundwater aquifers in southern Kuwait. Environ Earth Sci 75(20):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harden HS, Chanton JP, Rose JB, John DE, Hooks ME (2003) Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride, fluorescein and Rhodamine dyes and the bacteriophage PRD-1 in tracing subsurface flow. J Hydrol 277(1):100–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunta RJ, Coplen TB, Haas NL, Saada DA, Borchardt MA (2005) Investigating surface water–well interaction using stable isotope ratios of water. J Hydrol 302(1):154–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee JM, Kim JW, Cheon JW, Yi MJ, Lee KK (2003) Combined performance of pumping and tracer tests: a case study. Geosci J 7(3):237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazurek M, Jakob A, Bossart P (2003) Solute transport in crystalline rocks at Äsp-geological basis and model calibration. J Contam Hydrol 61:157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mook WG (2001) Environmental isotopes in the hydrological cycle: principals and applications. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Mukhopadhyay A (1995) Distribution of transmissivity in the Dammam limestone formation, Kuwait. Ground Water 33(5):801–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mukhopadhyay A, Al-Sulaimi J, Barrat JM (1994) Numerical modeling of ground-water resource management options in Kuwait. Ground Water 32(6):917–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mukhopadhyay A, Al-Sulaimi J, Al-Awadi E, Al-Ruwaih F (1996) An overview of the tertiary geology and hydrogeology of the northern part of the Arabian Gulf region with special reference to Kuwait. Earth Sci Rev 40(3–4):259–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (1999) PHREEQC (Version 2)—a computer program for speciation, batch reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations: U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-42549Google Scholar
  30. Pearson FJ (1992) Effects of parameter uncertainty in modeling 14C in groundwater. In: Taylor R, Long A, Kra R (eds) Radiocarbon after four decades: an interdisciplinary perspective. Springer-Verlag, NewYork, pp 262–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ptak T, Piepenbrink M, Martac E (2004) Tracer tests for the investigation of heterogeneous porous media and stochastic modelling of flow and transport: a review of some recent developments. J Hydrol 294(1):22–163Google Scholar
  32. Rose PE, Mella M, Kasteler C, Johnson SD (2004) The estimation of reservoir pore volume from tracer data. 29th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering proceedings, Stanford University, U.S.A. January 31 to February 02, 2004, M. 330–338Google Scholar
  33. Saleh A, Al-Ruwaih F, Shehata M (1999) Hydrochemical processes operating within the main aquifers of Kuwait. J Arid Environ 42(3):195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanford WE, Cook PG, Dighton JC (2002) Analysis of a vertical dipole tracer test in a highly fractured rock. Groundwater 40:535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sanford WE, Plumemr LN, McAda DP, Bexfiled LM, Anderholm SK (2004) Use of environmental tracers to estimate parameters for a pre-development-ground-water-flow model of the Middle Rio Grande Basin, New Mexico US Geol Surv Water Resou Invest Rep 03–4286. 102 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Saravana Kumar U (2013) Using isotope techniques to evaluate groundwater hydrology (KUW 7001). End-of-mission report (KUW 7001 02), IAEA, Vienna. 19pGoogle Scholar
  37. Sayed SAS, Al-Ruwaih FM (1995) Relationship among hydraulic characteristics of the Dammam aquifer and wells in Kuwait. Hydrogeol J 3(1):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schlumberger Water Services (SWS) Memo (2016) Consultancy services for tracer studies in Kuwait—technical memo on conceptual hydrogeological model and historical flow and transport change evaluation for southern Kuwait (sites T-11 and T-12). Kuwait, 33pGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh MJ, Davis D, Somashekar RK, Prakash KL, Shivanna K (2010) Environmental isotopes investigation in groundwater of Challaghatta valley, Bangalore: a case study. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 4(4):226–233Google Scholar
  40. Vandenbohede A, Lebbe L (2003) Combined interpretations of pumping and tracer tests: theoretical considerations and illustration with a field test. J Hydrol 277:134–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yeh HF, Lin HI, Lee CH, Hsu KC, Wu CS (2014) Identifying seasonal groundwater recharge using environmental stable isotopes. Water 2014(6):2849–2861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhu C (2005) In-situ feldspar dissolution rates in an aquifer. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69(6):1435–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khaled Hadi
    • 1
  • Umayadoss Saravana Kumar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mohammed Al-Senafy
    • 1
  • Amitabha Mukhopadhyay
    • 1
  1. 1.Water Research CenterKuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR)SafatKuwait
  2. 2.Isotope Hydrology SectionInternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations