The landscape and biological diversity of salt-dome landscapes: specific features (Western Kazakhstan case study)

  • Kazhmurat AkhmedenovEmail author
Original Paper


Salt tectonics as a type of tectonic genesis has an important feature—while breaching the suprasalt rocks, salt diapirs transform the terrain structure by activating interaction between the components through the involvement in the terrain genesis of both the salt and the whole complex of deep geologic rocks that ended up on the surface. Geological anomalies, which salt-dome elevations essentially are, initiate an entire complex of other anomalies that interact and reciprocate. We have summarized the results of the field (2012–2017) and desktop studies on the natural resource potential of salt-dome landscapes. This paper presents the results of hydrochemical studies of the water of lakes Inder, Aralsor, and Shalkar, which are characterized by high mineralization and a slightly alkaline environment. Recommendations are made in regard to the creation of special conservation territories in the salt-dome landscapes of Western Kazakhstan.


Salt-dome tectonics Brine lakes Terrain Biological diversity Mineral sources Therapeutic mud Inder karst field Western Kazakhstan 



The research was carried out with the support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan grant No. 4036/GF4 “Analysis of the Socioeconomic Importance of Landscapes of Salt-dome Origin for the Republic of Kazakhstan.” I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to landscape researcher V.P. Petrishchev (Orenburg, Russia), speleologist I.V. Golovachev (Astrakhan, Russia), ornithologist Ye.V. Barbazyuk (Orenburg, Russia), and herpetologists A.G. Bakiev and R.G. Gorelov (Togliatti, Russia) for their cooperation in studying the salt-dome landscapes of Western Kazakhstan.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.


  1. Ahmed Z (2015) Determination and analysis of desertification process with satellite data Alsat-1 and Landsat in the Algerian steppe. Engin-g Geol for Soc-ty and Ter-ry 2:1847–1852Google Scholar
  2. Akhmedenov KM, Kurumbayev ASh (2004) The current state of desert steppes in the southwestern part of the West Kazakhstan region. WKSU J WKSU Ed and Publ Dep-t 3:134–138Google Scholar
  3. Akhmedenov KM, Zhumagaliyeva ZhN (2017) The caves on the Besshoki raising. Iss of Geogr and Geoecol Almaty 1:23–33Google Scholar
  4. Akhmedenov KM, Petrishchev VP, Abisheva SH, Bauedinova GK, Nugmanova MD (2015) The springs and saline muds of the salt-dome geosystems of Western Kazakhstan. Al-Farabi KNU J Geogr Almaty 2(41):424–429Google Scholar
  5. Akhmedenov KM, Petrishchev VP, Koshim AG (2016a) Inder—the landscape geosystem of salt-dome origin. Al-Farabi KNU J Geogr ser Almaty 1(42):5–9Google Scholar
  6. Akhmedenov KM, Abisheva SH, Petrishchev VP, Petrishcheva NV (2016b) A hydrochemical study of salt lakes in the Caspian depression. Quest of Geogr and Geoecol Almaty 1:57–63Google Scholar
  7. Ananyeva NB, Orlov NL, Khalikov RG, Davevsky IS, Ryabov SA, Baranov AV (2004) The atlas of reptiles in North Eurasia. Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. SpB, pp. 232Google Scholar
  8. Andreychuk VN, Voropay LI (1993) Karst landscape as a geosystem. Problems of studying karst landscapes. Permian, pp. 37–52Google Scholar
  9. Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Artaev ON, Bashmakov DI, Bezina OV et al (2014) Methods of field ecological studies: textbook. allowance. Mordov Publishing House. Univ, Saransk, p 412Google Scholar
  11. ASTER Global DEM Validation. Summary Report (2009) ASTER GDEM validation team: METI/ERSDAC, NASA/LPDAAC, USGS/EROS, pp. 28Google Scholar
  12. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 (2011) Summary of Validation Results, ASTER GDEM Validation TeamGoogle Scholar
  13. Autin WJ (2002) Landscape evolution of the five islands of South Louisiana: scientific policy and salt dome utilization and management. Geomorphology 47:227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barinova SS, Nevo E, Bragina TM (2011) Ecological assessment of wetland ecosystems of northern Kazakhstan on the basis of hydrochemistry and algal biodiversity. Acta Botan Croatica 70(2):215–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Belenitskaya GA (1998) Distribution pattern of hydrogen sulphide-bearing gas. Pet Geosci London 4:49–66Google Scholar
  16. Belenitskaya GA (2013a) The origin of Dead Sea salts, diapirs, and brines. Nature 8:28–37Google Scholar
  17. Belenitskaya GA (2013b) The life of salt-bearing depths of the Dead Sea and its counterparts. Nature 10:42–51Google Scholar
  18. Belenitskaya GA (2013c) The Dead Sea: geology, origin, myths. Part 3. Fluctuations of the brine level as a reflection of the life of salt-bearing depths of the Dead Sea and its counterparts. Space & Time 4(14):163–175Google Scholar
  19. Belik VP (2004) On the summer avifauna of the Lake Shalkar basin (non-passerines). Materials on the spread of birds in the Ural, Cis-Ural, and Western Siberia: collection of papers and correspondences. Yekaterinburg: Ural State University Publishing House, pp. 8–20Google Scholar
  20. Bella P (2000) Geoekologicky vyskum jaskynnych geosysetmov – priklady priestorovej a chorologickej struktury geosysetmov wybranych jaskyn na Slovensku. Sloven kras 38:67–92Google Scholar
  21. Bella P (2008) Jaskyne ako prirodne geosystetmy. Geoekologicky vyskum a enviromentalna ochrana. Liptovsky Mikulas, pp. 166Google Scholar
  22. Bentor YK (1961) Some geochemical aspects of the Dead Sea and the question of its age. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 25:239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bibby CJ, Collar NJ, Crosby MJ, Heath MF, Imboden C, Johnson TH, Long AJ, Stattersfeld AJ, Thirgood SJ (1992) Putting biodiversity on the map: priority areas for global conservation. International Counsel for Bird Preservation, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona, Lynx Edicions and BirdLife InternationalGoogle Scholar
  25. BirdLife International (2015a) European red list of birds. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. URL:
  26. BirdLife International (2015b). Aquila nipalensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e. T22696038A80351871. /IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T22696038A80351871.en
  27. Borkin LY, Litvinchuk SN (2015) Herpetological studies in Western Kazakhstan: P.S. Pallas and the modern age. In: Borkin LY, Golubev AV (eds) The Nature of Western Kazakhstan and Peter Simon Pallas (field studies of 2012). European House, Saint Petersburg, pp 53–79Google Scholar
  28. Bosak P, Jaros J, Spudil J, Sulovsky P, Vaclavek V (1998) Salt plugs in the eastern Zagros, Iran: results of regional geological reconnaissance. GeoLines (Praha) 7:3–174Google Scholar
  29. Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, de Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bykov AV, Bukhareva OA, Kolesnikov AV (2013) The impact of fires on the natural blackthorns in the lake depressions of the Caspian depression. Rus J of Forest Sc 2:31–37Google Scholar
  31. Christenhusz MJ, Govaerts R, David JC, Hall T, Borland K, Roberts PS et al (2013) Tiptoe through the tulips–cultural history, molecular phylogenetics and classification of Tulipa (Liliaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 172(3):280–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Collins EW (1982) Surfical evidence of tectonic activity and erosion rates, Palestine, Keechi, and Oakwood salt domes, East Texas. Geological Circular 82-3, Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin, p 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Combellas-Bigott RI, Galloway WE (2006) Depositional and structural evolution of the Middle Miocene depositional episode, East-Central Gulf of Mexico. AAPJ Bull 90(3):335–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Debelo PV (2002) Materials on the avifauna of Lake Shalkar (non-passerines). Materials on the spread of birds in the Ural, Cis-Ural, and Western Siberia: collection of papers and correspondences, Yekaterinburg: Ural State University Publishing House, pp. 108–126Google Scholar
  36. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD (2008) Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol 179:945–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Golovachev IV (2010) The karst and caves of the Bish-chokho elevation. Geol Geogr &Gbl Energy 2:87–98Google Scholar
  38. Green MJB, Paine J (1997) State of the world’s protected areas at the end of the 20th century. Paper presented at the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Seminar ‘Protected Areas in the 21st Century: from Islands to Networks’. Cambridge, World Conservation Monitoring CentreGoogle Scholar
  39. Hameed A, Khan MA (2011) Halophytes: biology and economic potentials. Karachi Univ J Sc 39:40–44Google Scholar
  40. Hannibal BK (2015) Botanical notes in the West Kazakhstan region on the trail of P.S. Pallas (May 1773-May 2012). In: Borkin LY, Golubev AV (eds) The nature of western Kazakhstan and Peter Simon Pallas (field studies of 2012). European House, Saint Petersburg, pp 33–44Google Scholar
  41. Heywood VH (1995) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Hilton-Taylor C (2000) IUCN red list of threatened species. The World Conservation Union.
  43. Hudec MR, Jackson MPF (2006) Advance of allochthonous salt sheets in passive margins and orogens. AAPG Bull 90(10):1535–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Identification and GAP analysis of key biodiversity areas: targets for comprehensive protected areas systems (2007) UICN Press, pp 116Google Scholar
  45. Jackson MPA, Seni SJ (1984) Atlas of salt domes in the East Texas basin. The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, p 102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jackson MPA, Talbot CJ (1991) A glossary of salt tectonics: Geological Circular 91-4. Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas, Austin, p 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jakal J (1986) Krasowa krajina ako specifcky prirodny geosystem. Slovensky kras 24:3–26Google Scholar
  48. Jantke K, Schleupner C, Schneider UA (2011) Gap analysis of European wetland species: priority regions for expanding the Natura 2000 network. Biodivers Conserv 20(3):581–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kadebskaya OI, Golovachev IV (2017) The characteristic of cryogen minerals from the Ledyanoy Paporotnik cave (Kazakhstan). Geol Geogr & Gbl Energy 1(64):88–98Google Scholar
  50. Kamei M, Nakagoshi N (2006) Geographic assessment of present protected areas in Japan for representativeness of Forest communities. Biodivers Conserv 15(14):4583–4600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Khalilova EA, Kotenko ST, Islammagomedova EA, Gasanov RZ, Abakarova AA, Aliverdieva DA (2017) Extremophilic microbial communities of saline soils and their diversity in the regions of the Caspian depression. Arid Ecosyst 7(2):116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Labutina IA, Baldina EA (2011) Use of remote sensing data for monitoring of PA ecosystems. Toolkit. M., pp. 88Google Scholar
  53. Marion JL, Leung YF, Nepal S (2006) Monitoring trail conditions: new methodological considerations. George W Forum 23(2):36–49Google Scholar
  54. Marusik YM, Kovblyuk MM (2011) Spiders (Arachnida, Aranei) of Siberia and Russian Far East. KMK Scientific Press Ltd., Moscow, p 311Google Scholar
  55. McBride BC (1998) The evolution of allochthonous salt along a megaregional profile across the Northern Gulf of Mexico Basin. AAPJ Bull 82(5):1037–1054Google Scholar
  56. McDonald EV, Bacon SN, Bassett SD, Amit R, Enzel Y, Minor TB et al (2016) Integrated terrain forecasting for military operations in deserts: geologic basis for rapid predictive mapping of soils and terrain features. In Military Geosciences and Desert Warfare. Springer, New York, pp. 353–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Megdiche-Ksouri W, Trabelsi N, Mkadmini K, Bourgoua S, Noumi A, Snoussi M, Barbria R, Tebourbi O, Ksouri R (2014) Artemisia campestris phenolic compounds have antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. Ind Crop Prod 63:104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mittermeier RA, Robles-Gil P, Mittermeier CG (eds) (1997) Megadiversity. Earth’s biologically wealthiest nations. CEMEX, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  59. Moreno JL, Millán A, Suarez ML, Vidal-Abarca MR, Velasco J (1997) Aquatic Coleoptera and Heteroptera assemblages in water bodiies from ephemeral coastal streams (“ramblas”) of South-Eastern Spain. Arch Hydrobiol 141:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nagenda H (2002) Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Appl Geogr 22:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neev D, Emery KO (1967) The Dead Sea depositional processes and environments of evaporates. JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  62. Nikolayev VA, Kopyl IV, Pichugina NV (1998) The landscape phenomenon of salt-dome tectonics in the semi-desert Lake Elton region. MSU Bull Ser Geogr 2:35–39Google Scholar
  63. Noreyka SY, Akhmedenov KM (2016) The study of the Little Bogdo salt dome revisited. Iss of Steppe Stud Orenburg 13:50–53Google Scholar
  64. Olson JS (1994) Global ecosystem framework-definitions: internal report. United States Geological Service, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  65. Oparin ML, Oparina OS, Mamayev AB, Ruban OA (2016) Detection of Haliaeetus leucoryphus during nesting in the Bokeyorda District, West Kazakhstan Region in spring of 2016. The Rus J of Ornitol 25(1305):2389–2395Google Scholar
  66. Pan-European biological and landscape diversity strategy, a vision for Europe's natural heritage (1996) Council of Europe/UNEP/European Centre for Nature Conservation. Amsterdam, pp. 50Google Scholar
  67. Pestov MV, Sarayev FA, Ageyev VS (2011) Newly discovered reptiles in the northern Caspian Sea region (Republic of Kazakhstan). Mdn Herpetol 11(3/4):192–195Google Scholar
  68. Petrishchev VP (2011a) Salt-dome terrain genesis: morphostructural peculiarities of geosystems and the consequences of their man-induced transformation. Yekaterinburg, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, p 310Google Scholar
  69. Petrishchev VP (2011b) On the concept of “salt-dome landscape”. Oren SU Bull 6:157–161Google Scholar
  70. Petrishchev VP (2012) The landscapes of salt domes. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishin, Saarbrücken, p 516Google Scholar
  71. Petrishchev VP, Chibilev AA, Akhmedenov KM, Ramazanov SK (2011) The formation features of landscapes in the Inderskii salt-dome area (Precaspian Hollow). Geogr Nat Resour 2:146–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Petrishchev VP, Noreyka SY, Petrishcheva NV, Akhmedenov KM (2015) The peculiarities of the components of landscape systems of salt-dome origin in the western part of the Caspian depression. Oren SU Bull Orenburg 6:189–198Google Scholar
  73. Petrishchev VP, Akhmedenov KM, Noreyka SY, Barbazyuk YV (2016) The landscapes of Inder salt domes as a key landscape and biological territory. Reg-l Envir Iss 5:58–63Google Scholar
  74. Petrishchev VP, Akhmedenov KM, Noreyka SYu (2017) Understudied landscapes of salt-dome origin in Western Kazakhstan. A University Complex as a Regional Center of Education, Science, and Culture. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Methodological Conference, Orenburg State University, pp. 1310–1319Google Scholar
  75. Pimm SI, Russell GJ, Gittelman JL, Brooks TM (1995) The future of biodiversity. Science 269:347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Platnick NI (2009) The word spider catalog, version 9.5. American Museum of Natural History.
  77. Ponomarev AV, Tsvetkov AS (2006) New and rare spiders of family Gnaphosidae (Aranei) from a southeast of Europe. Caucas entomol Bull 2(1):5–13Google Scholar
  78. Prishchepov AV, Radeloff VC, Dubinin M, Alcantara C (2014) The effect of Landsat ETM/ETM + image acquisition dates on the detection of agricultural land abandonment in Eastern Europe. Remote Sens Environ 126:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Reimers NF (1994) Ecology (theories, laws, rules, principles and hypotheses). Russia is young, Moscow, p 367Google Scholar
  80. Ryabitsev VK, Kovshar AF, Kovshar VA, Berezovikov NN (2014) A field guide to the birds of Kazakhstan. Almaty, pp. 512Google Scholar
  81. Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow R, Bloomfield J et al (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sarayev FA, Pestov MV (2010) On the cadaster of reptiles in the northern and northeastern parts of the Caspian Sea region. Herpetological studies in Kazakhstan and adjacent countries, collection of research papers. Almaty, ASBC-SOPK, pp. 174–193Google Scholar
  83. Schierhorn F, Müller DV, Beringer T (2013) Post-Soviet cropland abandonment and carbon sequestration in European Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 27(4):1175–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shabala S, Bose J, Hedrich R (2014) Salt bladders: do they matter? Trends Plant Sci 19:687–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Short TM, Black JA, Birge WJ (1991) Ecology of a saline stream: community responses to spatial gradients of environmental conditions. Hydrobiologia 226:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sytin AK (2015) Botanical and geographical observations in Western Kazakhstan based on the materials of the complex expedition on the route of P.S. Pallas in 2012. The nature of Western Kazakhstan and Peter Simon Pallas (field studies of 2012). Saint Petersburg, European House, pp. 45–52Google Scholar
  87. Szczerbak NN (2003) Guide of the reptiles of the eastern Palearctics. Krieger Publshing Co, Malabar, p 260Google Scholar
  88. Talbot C, Jackson M (1987) Salt tectonic. Sci Am 257:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. The Red List of Kazakhstan (1996) Animals. Part 1. Vertebrates, Almaty. Konzhyk 1:327Google Scholar
  90. Timms BV (1993) Saline lakes of the Paroo, inland New South Wales, Australia. Hydrobiologia 267:269–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. United States of America Geological Survey (n.d.) Internet resource of the US Geological Survey. [Online]
  92. Vareschi E (1987) Saline lake ecosystems. Ecol Stud 61:347–364Google Scholar
  93. Velasco J, Millán A, Hernández et al (2006) Response of biotic communities to salinity changes in a Mediterranean hypersaline stream. Murcia, Spain. Saline Systems 2.
  94. Ward JV (2002) Aquatic insect ecology, biology and habitat. Wiley, pp. 438Google Scholar
  95. Warren J (2006) Evaporites: sediments, resources and hydrocarbons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Williams WD (1998) Salinity as a determinant of the structure of biological communities in salt lakes. Hydrobiologia 381:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Williams WD (2002) Environmental threats to salts lakes and the likely status of inland saline ecosystems 2025. Environ Conserv 29:154–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yermolaev O, Avvakumova A (2012) Cartographic-geoinformational estimation of the spatio-temporal erosion dynamics of arable soils in forest-steppe landscapes of the Russian Plain. Proceedings of an IAHS International Commission on Continental Erosion Symposium held at the Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS-Chengdu, China, 11–15 October 2012. IAHS Publication, pp. 332–337Google Scholar
  99. Yermolaev OP, Usmanov BM, Muharamova SS (2015) The basin approach and mapping to the anthropogenic impact assessment on the east of the Russian plain. Int J Appl Eng Res 10(20):41178–41184Google Scholar
  100. Yip JY, Corlett RT, Dudgeon DA (2004) Fine-scale gap analysis of the existing protected area system in Hong Kong, China. Biodivers Conserv 13(5):943–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zak I, Bentor YK (1972) Some new data on the salt deposits of the Dead Sea area, Israel. Geol. of saline deposits. Proc. Hanover Symp., UNESCO. Earth Sci 7:137–144Google Scholar
  102. Zhu H (2013) Seismic structure of the European crust and upper mantle based on adjoint tomography (Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University)Google Scholar
  103. Zhuchkova VK, Rakovskaya EM (2004) Methods of complex physical and geographical studies. Textbook for university students. Moscow, Academy, p 368Google Scholar
  104. Zhukov MM (1945) The Pliocene and Quaternary history of the northern Caspian depression. USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House, Moscow, p 236Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Nature ManagementZhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical UniversityUralskKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations