Utility of Cardiac Computed Tomography in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
- 72 Downloads
Purpose of Review
The number of left ventricular assist device implants has increased significantly in the last decade. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) optimization, trouble-shooting complications, and surgical planning require a multi-modality imaging approach. Echocardiography remains the imaging modality of choice, particularly for physiological evaluation but accurate anatomical evaluation of the entirety of the LVAD is often challenging if not impossible. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) offers additional information that is valuable in taking care of these complex patients. The purpose of this review is to understand the nuances of LVAD imaging and areas where CCT can aid LVAD evaluation and management.
CCT has a well-established role in trouble-shooting complications particularly inflow and outflow cannula-related anatomic complications from suction and kinking. Even though the literature is scarce, there is evolving data to suggest that adverse inflow and outflow cannula positions may result in unfavorable outcomes. There is more interest in novel mechanisms of device implantation and planning for which data set from CCT is ideal. Functional evaluation of the right ventricle with CCT is becoming more sophisticated and maybe particularly useful in this patient population. Development in CCT technology has helped minimize safety concerns and improved image quality with reduction in LVAD-related artifacts.
CCT is an important adjunct modality to echocardiography for patients with LVAD. Information obtained from CCT may help our understanding of LVAD and in turn help reduce and managed LVAD-related complications.
KeywordsCardiac computed tomography Left ventricular assist device Surgical planning LVAD complications Safety Artifact reduction
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Chang is recipient of a Houston Methodist –Siemens Research Collaborative Grant.
Dr. Ramirez Giraldo is an employee of Siemens HealthCare.
All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major Importance
- 4.Horton SC, Khodaverdian R, Chatelain P, McIntosh ML, Horne BD, Muhlestein JB, et al. Left ventricular assist device malfunction: an approach to diagnosis by echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1435–40.Google Scholar
- 7.Chrysant GS, Phancao AA, Horstmanshof DA, Jones S, Long JW. Clinical utility of imaging left ventricular assist devices with 320 row multidetector computed tomography. ASAIO J 2018, 1.Google Scholar
- 13.•• Acharya D, Aryal S, Loyaga-Rendon R, Pamboukian SV, Tallaj J, Kirklin JK, Holman WL, Singh S. The use of computed tomography in preoperative planning for Heartware left ventricular assist device placement. ASAIO J. 2018. Novel use of CCT for pre-operative planning of HVAD. Google Scholar
- 17.Teigen LM, John R, Kuchnia AJ, Nagel EM, Earthman CP, Kealhofer J, et al. Preoperative pectoralis muscle quantity and attenuation by computed tomography are novel and powerful predictors of mortality after left ventricular assist device implantation. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10:e004069. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004069.
- 19.•• Sorensen EN, Kon ZN, Feller ED, Pham SM, Griffith BP. Quantitative assessment of inflow malposition in two continuous-flow left ventricular-assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; . Important study delineating the affects of inflow cannula position and relation with outcomes. Google Scholar
- 20.Sacks J, Gonzalez-Stawinski GV, Hall S, Lima B, MacHannaford J, Dockery W, et al. Utility of cardiac computed tomography for inflow cannula patency assessment and prediction of clinical outcome in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21:590–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Garcia-Alvarez A, Fernandez-Friera L, Lau JF, Sawit ST, Mirelis JG, Castillo JG, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular function and post-operative findings using cardiac computed tomography in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:896–903.Google Scholar
- 31.Dell'Aquila AM, Avramovic N, Mastrobuoni S, Motekallemi A, Wisniewski K, Scherer M, Sindermann JR, Wenning C. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for improving diagnosis of infection in patients on CF-LVAD: longing for more insightsEur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; .Google Scholar
- 32.Kanapinn P, Burchert W, Korperich H, Korfer J. (18)F-FDG PET/CT-imaging of left ventricular assist device infection: a retrospective quantitative intrapatient analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 2018.Google Scholar
- 37.Iizuka K, Nishinaka T, Ichihara Y, Miyamoto T, Yamazaki K. Outflow graft anastomosis site design could be correlated to aortic valve regurgitation under left ventricular assist device support. J Artif Organs 2017.Google Scholar
- 43.•• Secchi F, De Cecco CN, Spearman JV, Silverman JR, Ebersberger U, Sardanelli F, et al. Monoenergetic extrapolation of cardiac dual energy CT for artifact reduction. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:413–8. Artifact reduction using dual-energy CT based reconstruction of virtual monoenergetic images CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.•• Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelriess M. Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys. 2012;39:1904–16 Important articles regarding artifact reduction for better quality imaging; which is particularly relevant in patients with LVAS. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, Desai MY, Mamuya W, Thomson L, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar