Advertisement

Exposure Assessment of Rayong Oil Spill Cleanup Workers

  • Thammasin Ingviya
  • Chanthip Intawong
  • Salahaddhin Abubaker
  • Paul T. StricklandEmail author
Original Paper
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

In July of 2013, a pipeline connecting an offshore oil platform to a tanker caused crude oil to spill into the Sea of Rayong off the coast of Thailand. The resulting oil slick, estimated to be between 50 and 190 m3 (336–1200 barrels), washed ashore 1 day later on the island of Samet. We conducted a study to quantify internal dose of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and benzene in 1262 oil spill cleanup workers, and to examine factors related to their dose. Frozen stored urine samples (n = 1343) collected from the workers during the 1 month cleanup period were used to measure the concentration of 1-hydroxypyrene-glucuronide (1-OHPG), cotinine and creatinine. Data from questionnaires and urinary trans,trans-muconic acid (t,t-MA), a benzene metabolite, measured previously as part of a worker health surveillance plan, were linked with the laboratory data. The internal dose of urinary 1-OHPG was highest in individuals who worked during the first 3 days of cleanup work (median 0.97 pmol/ml) and was 66.7% lower (median 0.32 pmol/ml) among individuals who worked in the final week of the study (days 21–28). After adjusting for age, cotinine and creatinine by regression analysis, the decline in urinary 1-OHPG concentration with days of cleanup remained significant (P-trend < 0.001). A decreasing trend by days of cleanup was also observed for detectable urinary t,t-MA percentage (P-trend < 0.001). Rayong oil spill cleanup workers exhibited evidence of elevated levels of PAH and benzene exposure during the early weeks of cleanup, compared to near background levels 4 weeks after cleanup began. Long-term health monitoring of oil spill cleanup workers is advised.

Keywords

Oil spill Cleanup Exposure PAHs Benzene Biomarkers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Johns Hopkins NIOSH Education and Research Center [T42 OH008428] through a pilot project grant, and funding from the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University [REC 57-278-07-1]. We would like to acknowledge the assistance and support of Dr. Pornchai Sithisarakul, Dr. Pitchaya Phakthongsuk, Dr. Chantana Padungtod, Dr. Chanon Kongkamol and Dr. Sunthorn Rheanpumikankit, during the course of this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Supplementary material

12403_2019_320_MOESM1_ESM.docx (494 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 494 kb)

References

  1. Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour Mona S M (2016) A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egypt J Petrol 25(1):107–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011 Google Scholar
  2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (1995) Toxicological profile for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In: Chemical sampling information, 369. Online: U.S. Department of Healthand Human Services. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp69.pdf
  3. Aguilera F, Mendez J, Pasaro E, Laffon B (2010) Review on the effects of exposure to spilled oils on human health. J Appl Toxicol 30(4):291–301.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1521 Google Scholar
  4. Alegbeleye OO, Opeolu BO, Jackson VA (2017) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a critical review of environmental occurrence and bioremediation. Environ Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0896-2 Google Scholar
  5. Altman DG, Royston P (2006) The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ 332(7549):1080.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080 Google Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) (2015) Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals. Department of Health and Human Services, pp 1–1095Google Scholar
  7. Chanvaivit S, Navasumrit P, Hunsonti P, Autrup H, Ruchirawat M (2007) Exposure assessment of benzene in thai workers, DNA-repair capacity and influence of genetic polymorphisms. Mutat Res 626:79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.09.007 Google Scholar
  8. Cheong HK, Ha M, Lee JS, Kwon H, Ha EH, Hong YC, Choi Y et al (2011) Hebei spirit oil spill exposure and subjective symptoms in residents participating in clean-up activities. Environ Health Toxicol 26:e2011007.  https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.2011.26.e2011007 Google Scholar
  9. D’Andrea MA, Reddy GK (2014) Health risks associated with crude oil spill exposure. Am J Med 127(9):886 e9-13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.04.035 Google Scholar
  10. Ehrenhauser FS, Avij P, Shu X, Dugas V, Woodson I, Liyana-Arachchi T, Zhang Z, Hung FR, Valsaraj KT (2013) Bubble bursting as an aerosol generation mechanism during an oil spill in the deep-sea environment: laboratory experimental demonstration of the transport pathway. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00390F Google Scholar
  11. Gunier RB, Reynolds P, Hurley SE, Yerabati S, Hertz A, Strickland P, Horn-Ross PL (2006) Estimating exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a comparison of survey, biological monitoring, and geographic information system-based methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15:1376–1381.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0799 Google Scholar
  12. Ha M, Kwon H, Cheong HK, Lim S, Yoo SJ, Kim EJ, Park SG, Lee J, Chung BC (2012) Urinary metabolites before and after cleanup and subjective symptoms in volunteer participants in cleanup of the hebei spirit oil spill. Sci Total Environ 429(July):167–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.036 Google Scholar
  13. Intawong C, Sithisarankul P (2015) Interlaboratory comparison for urinary trans,trans-muconic acid testing in Rayong Province. Thammasat Med J 15(3):363–376Google Scholar
  14. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1983) IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans, vol 32. Polynuclear aromatic compounds: part 1. Chemical, environmental and experimental data. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonsGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang D, Rothman N, Cho SH, Lim HS, Kwon HJ, Kim SM, Schwartz B, Strickland PT (1995) Association of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (estimated from job category) with concentration of 1-hydroxypyrene glucuronide in urine from workers at a steel plant. Occup Environ Med 52(9):593–599Google Scholar
  16. Laemun N, Mutsuji D, Samana K, Srisang J, Saipang T (2014) Lessons from oil spill incident, Rayong, fiscal year 2014. Environmental medicine section. Thai Bureau of occupational and environmental health report, p 67Google Scholar
  17. Laffon B, Pasaro E, Valdiglesias V (2016) Effects of exposure to oil spills on human health: updated review. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 19(3–4):105–128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2016.1168730 Google Scholar
  18. Lee SM, Ha M, Kim EJ, Jeong WC, Hur J, Park SG, Kwon H et al (2009) The effects of wearing protective devices among residents and volunteers participating in the cleanup of the hebei spirit oil spill. J Prev Med Public Health 42(2):89–95.  https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.2.89 Google Scholar
  19. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 Google Scholar
  20. Melikian AA, Prahalad AK, Secker-Walker RH (1994) Comparison of the levels of the urinary benzene metabolite trans,trans-muconic acid in smokers and nonsmokers, and the effects of pregnancy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 3(3):239–244Google Scholar
  21. Murphy D, Gemmell B, Vaccari L, Li C, Bacosa H, Evans M, Gemmell C, Harvey T, Jalali M, Niepa TH (2016) An in-depth survey of the oil spill literature since 1968: long term trends and changes since deepwater horizon. Mar Pollut Bull 113(1–2):371–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.028 Google Scholar
  22. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (1999) Petroleum refinining process. In: OSHA technical manual (OTM). U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_iv/otm_iv_2.html
  23. PTT Global Chemical (2013) Summary of PTTGC oil spill incident and execution. http://www.pttgc-oilspill.com/Uploads/Document/20130802-PTTGC-PROGRESS-EN.pdf
  24. Panalaks T (1976) Determination and identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoked and charcoal-broiled food products by high pressure liquid chromatography and gas chromatography. J Environ Sci Health B 11(4):299–315.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601237609372045 Google Scholar
  25. Petchpoung K, Kaojarern S, Yoovathaworn K, Sura T, Sirivarasai J (2011) The influence of metabolic gene polymorphisms on urinary 1-hydroxypyrene concentration in thai bus drivers. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 31:160–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2010.10.006 Google Scholar
  26. Radhakrishna Rao C (1948) Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with applications to problems of estimation. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 44:50–57.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100023987 Google Scholar
  27. Rheanpumikankit S, Chanthip I, Naiyana P (2015) Health surveillance for oil spill responders, Praw Bay, Samet Island, Rayong Province. J Prapokklao Hosp Clin Med Educ Center 32(3):229–243Google Scholar
  28. Rothman N, Poirier MC, Baser ME, Hansen JA, Gentile C, Bowman ED, Strickland PT (1990) Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in peripheral white blood cells during consumption of charcoal-broiled beef. Carcinogenesis 11(7):1241–1243Google Scholar
  29. Shimada T, Fujii-Kuriyama Y (2004) Metabolic activation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to carcinogens by cytochromes P450 1A1 and 1B1. Cancer Sci 95(1):1–6Google Scholar
  30. Sithisarankul P, Chanthip I (2015) preliminary report of health effects among oil spill cleanup workers and volunteers, Thaliand, 2013. J Health Res 3(29):197–201Google Scholar
  31. SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification (2002) Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 4(2):149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200210123581 Google Scholar
  32. Strickland PT, Kang D, Bowman ED, Fitzwilliam A, Downing TE, Rothman N, Groopman JD, Weston A (1994) Identification of 1-hydroxypyrene glucuronide as a major pyrene metabolite in human urine by synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Carcinogenesis 15(3):483–487Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Coast Guard (2010) U.S. geological survey: deepwater horizon MC252 gulf incident oil budget. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, p 10Google Scholar
  34. Weaver VM, Buckley T, Groopman JD (2000) Lack of specificity of trans,trans-muconic acid as a benzene biomarker after ingestion of sorbic acid-preserved foods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 9(7):749–755Google Scholar
  35. Zielinska-Danch W, Wardas W, Sobczak A, Szoltysek-Boldys I (2007) Estimation of urinary cotinine cut-off points distinguishing non-smokers, passive and active smokers. Biomarkers 12(5):484–496.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13547500701421341 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health and EngineeringJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family Medicine and Preventive MedicinePrince of Songkla UniversitySongkhlaThailand
  3. 3.Air Pollution and Health Effect Research CenterPrince of Songkla UniversitySongkhlaThailand
  4. 4.Occupational Medicine DepartmentRayong HospitalRayongThailand

Personalised recommendations