Evaluating groundwater for its probable mutagenicity and genotoxicity using in vitro bioanalytical tools
- 155 Downloads
The present study entails the investigation of mutagenic and genotoxic effect of groundwater samples collected from twenty four different locations of Malwa region (India) using in vitro bioassays, viz. Ames fluctuation test (with/without exogenous metabolic activation) using Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 strains, Vibrio harveyi bioluminescence assay using V. harveyi A16 strain (a dim luxE mutant), plasmid nicking assay, and comet assay. It was observed that the water samples of all the sites of study area demonstrated mutagenic activity on both strains of S. typhimurium. The different sampling periods caused variation in genotoxic intensity with summer samples showing higher mutagenicity values and, therefore, more genotoxic as compared to winter samples. However, V. harveyi bioluminescence assay was found to be comparatively less sensitive for genotoxicity screening of water samples. In plasmid nicking assay, 42% samples collected during summer were found to induce genotoxicity by increasing the level of DNA damage. To further establish the level of primary DNA damage, the alkaline version of comet assay was performed with human lymphocytes. No significant increase in DNA damage was seen as compared to negative control. Our results highlighted the significance of using more than one bioassay to evaluate the genotoxicity of water samples in different seasons. These results also demonstrate the need for further biological studies in this area for the detection of potentially genotoxic contaminants providing useful data in risk assessment.
KeywordsGenotoxicity Groundwater Malwa region Comet assay Ames fluctuation test Vibrio harveyi bioluminescence assay
The authors are thankful to UPE (under the university with potential for excellence) and University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi for providing financial assistance to carry out this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animals rights
Human and animal subjects were not involved in this study. In order to carry out comet assay, blood was obtained from healthy donors by venipuncture by a pathologist at the Guru Nanak Dev University dispensary for which approval was obtained from the ethical committee.
- Bajwa BS, Kumar S, Singh S, Sahoo SK, Tripathi RM (2015) Uranium and other heavy toxic elements distribution in the drinking water samples of SW-Punjab, India. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 10:1–9Google Scholar
- Bianchi E, Goldoni A, Trintinaglia L, Lessing G, Silva CEM, Nascimento CA, Ziulkoski AL, Spilki FR, Silva LB (2013) Evaluation of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of water samples from the Sinos river basin, southern Brazil. Braz J Biol 75(2):S68–S74Google Scholar
- BIS (1991) Specification for drinking water ISI: 10500Google Scholar
- Halder A (2009) Premature greying of hairs, premature ageing and predisposition to cancer in Jajjal, Punjab: a preliminary observation. J Clin Diagn Res 1(6):577–580Google Scholar
- Lah B, Žinko B, Narat M, Marinšek-Logar R (2005) Monitoring of genotoxicity in drinking water using in vitro comet assay and Ames test. Food Technol Biotechnol 43(2):139–146Google Scholar
- Manzano BC, Roberto MM, Hoshina MM, Menegario AA, Marin-Morales MA (2015) Evaluation of the genotoxicity of waters impacted by domestic and industrial effluents of a highly industrialized region of São Paulo State, Brazil, by the comet assay in HTC cells. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:1399–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Podgórska B, Węgrzyn G (2006) A modified Vibrio harveyi mutagenicity assay based on bioluminescence induction. Appl Microbiol 42:578–582Google Scholar
- Podgórska B, Węgrzyn G (2007) The use of marine bacteria in mutagenicity assays. Pol J Microbiol 56(4):227–231Google Scholar
- Vabre P, Gatimel N, Moreau J, Gayrard V, Picard-Hagen N, Parinaud J, Leandri RD (2017) Environmental pollutants, a possible etiology for premature ovarian insufficiency: a narrative review of animal and human data. Environ Health 16:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0242-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar