Advertisement

The Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Dairy Products

  • Fehmi Görkem ÜçtuğEmail author
Review Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

Dairy products such as processed milk, cheese, yoghurt and butter are produced and consumed globally. While having several dietary and economic benefits, their production and consumption also have many environmental impacts of various nature. In this study, a comprehensive review of studies that focus on the life cycle environmental impact analysis of dairy products has been conducted. A total of 31 studies that satisfy certain filtering criteria have been analysed, covering 6 different products and 17 different impacts. Cheese was observed as the most widely studied dairy product whereas global warming potential was the most commonly calculated impact, as it appeared in all 31 of the reviewed studies. The contributions of different stages (raw milk production, factory processes, storage and use, transportation, waste treatment) have been investigated. For many impacts, raw milk production was found to be the main contributor regardless of the product type. Fertiliser use, agricultural material production and use and on-site emissions were the main drivers associated with the raw milk production stage, leading to several impacts such as global warming potential, acidification and eutrophication. As far as the production processes are concerned, energy use emerged as the main cause of environmental footprint. Transportation, storage/use and waste treatment were found to have slightly significant to negligible contributions to almost all the impacts except for ozone layer depletion. Butter appeared as the dairy product with the highest environmental footprint, followed by cheese. The most common recommendations in order to reduce the environmental footprint of dairy products were as follows: using more energy-efficient equipment for production, optimising transportation routes and using more environmentally friendly vehicles, modifying the feed content for the farm animals, and using renewable energy sources.

Keywords

Dairy industry Energy use Environmental footprint Sustainability 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Arcand Y, Maxime D, Zareifard R (2012) LCA of processed food. In: Boye J, Arcand Y (eds) Green technologies in food production and processing. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacenetti J, Bava L, Schievano A, Zucali M (2018) Whey protein concentrate (WPC) production: environmental impact assessment. J Food Eng 224:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldini C, Bava L, Zucali M, Guarino M (2018) Milk production life cycle assessment: a comparison between estimated and measured emission inventory for manure handling. Sci Total Environ 625:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldini C, Gardoni D, Guarino M (2017) A critical review of the recent evolution of life cycle assessment applied to milk production. J Clean Prod 140:421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartl K, Gomez C, Nemecek T (2011) Life cycle assessment of milk produced in two smallholder dairy systems in the highlands and the coast of Peru. J Clean Prod 19:1494–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bava L, Bacenetti J, Gislon G, Pellegrino L, D’Incecco P, Sandrucci A, Tamburini A, Fiala M, Zucali M (2018) Impact assessment of traditional food manufacturing: the case of Grana Padano cheese. Sci Total Environ 626:1200–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berlin J, Sonesson U, Tillman A (2008) Product chain actors’ potential for greening the product life cycle: the case of the Swedish postfarm milk chain. J Ind Ecol 12(1):95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bolaji B, Huan Z (2013) Ozone depletion and global warming: case for the use of natural refrigerant - a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boye J, Arcand Y (2013) Current trends in green technologies in food production and processing. Food Eng Rev 5:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canellada F, Laca A, Laca A, Díaz M (2018) Environmental impact of cheese production: a case study of a small-scale factory in southern Europe and global overview of carbon footprint. Sci Total Environ 635:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cardoso B, Lamas F, Gaspar A, Ribeiro J (2017) Refrigerants used in the Portuguese food industry: current states. Int J Refrig 83:60–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cederberg C, Flysjö A (2004) Life cycle assessment of 23 dairy farms in South-Western Sweden. [Online] Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:943030/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 13 7 2018
  13. 13.
    Challis C, Tierney M, Todd A, Wilson E (2017) Human factors in dairy industry process control for energy reduction. J Clean Prod 168:1319–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen W et al (2018) Life cycle assessment of gold production in China. J Clean Prod 143-150:179Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cucek L, Klemes J, Kravanja Z (2012) A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J Clean Prod 34:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dairy Australia (2015) Australia dairy industry in focus 2015, southbank: Dairy Australia LimitedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalla Riva A, Burek J, Kim D, Thoma G, Cassandro M, de Marchi M (2017) Environmental life cycle assessment of Italian mozzarella cheese: hotspots and improvement opportunities. J Dairy Sci 100:7933–7952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dalla Riva A, Burek J, Kim D, Thoma G, Cassandro M, de Marchi M (2018) The environmental analysis of asiago PDO cheese: a case study from farm gate to plant gate. Ital J Anim Sci 17(1):250–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Demeter R, Meuwissen M, Oude Lansink A, Van Arendonk J (2009) Scenarios for a future dairy chain in the Netherlands. NJAS-Wagen J Life Sc 56:301–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Depping V, Grunow M, van Middelaar C, Dumpler J (2017) Integrating environmental impact assessment into new product development and processing-technology selection: milk concentrates as substitutes for milk powders. J Clean Prod 149:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Djekic I, Miocinovic J, Tomasevic I, Smigic N, Tomic N (2014) Environmental life-cycle assessment of various dairy products. J Clean Prod 68:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doublet G, Jungbluth N, Stucki M, Schori S (2013) Life cycle assessment of Romanian beef and dairy products. ESU Services, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duan J, Cheng Z, Bi J, Xu Y (2018) Residue behavior of organochlorine pesticides during the production process of yogurt and cheese. Food Chem 245:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dvarioniene J, Kruopiene J, Stankeviciene J (2012) Application of cleaner technologies in milk processing industry to improve the environmental efficiency. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14:1037–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    EU Joint Research Center (2008) Environmental improvement potentials of meat and dairy products. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, SpainGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fantin V, Buttol P, Pergreffi R, Masoni P (2012) Life cycle assessment of Italian high quality milk production. A comparison with an EPD study. J Clean Prod 28:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    FAO (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    FAO (2015) Empowering women in Afghanistan: reducing gender gaps through integrated dairy schemes. [Online] Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4585e.pdf. Accessed 9 7 2018
  29. 29.
    FAO (2016) The global dairy sector: facts. [Online] Available at: https://www.fil-idf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/FAO-Global-Facts-1.pdf. Accessed 9 7 2018
  30. 30.
    Finnegan W, Goggins J, Clifford E, Zhan X (2017) Environmental impacts of milk powder and butter manufactured in the Republic of Ireland. Sci Total Environ 579:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Ledgard S (2011) How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foley J et al (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    González-García S, Castanheira E, Dias A, Arroja L (2013a) Environmental life cycle assessment of a dairy product: the yoghurt. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:796–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    González-García S, Castanheira E, Dias A, Arroja L (2013c) Using life cycle assessment methodology to assess UHT milk production in Portugal. Sci Total Environ 442:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    González-García S, Castanheira E, Dias A, Arroja L (2013d) Environmental performance of a Portuguese mature cheese-making dairy mill. J Clean Prod 41:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    González-García S, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, Arroja L (2013b) Environmental life cycle assessment of a Galician cheese: San Simon da Costa. J Clean Prod 52:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    GOV.UK (2018) Statistical data set: structure of the agricultural industry in England and the UK at June. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hermansen J, Nguyen T (2012) LCA and the agri-food chain. In: Boye J, Arcand Y (eds) Green technologies in food production and processing. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hospido A, Moreira M, Feijoo G (2003) Simplified life cycle assessment of Galician milk production. Int Dairy J 13:783–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    IBISWorld (2018) Dairy product production - China market research report. [Online] Available at: https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-trends/international/china-market-research-reports/manufacturing/food/dairy-product-production.html. Accessed 9 7 2018
  41. 41.
    International Dairy Federation (2009) Environmental / ecological impact of the dairy sector: literature review for dairy products for an inventory of key issues - list of environmental initiatives and influences on the dairy sector. International Dairy Federation, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    International Dairy Federation (2016) The world dairy situation 2016. [Online] Available at: https://www.idfa.org/docs/default-source/d-news/world-dairy-situationsample.pdf. Accessed 21 6 2018
  43. 43.
    Iribarren D, Hospido A, Moreira M, Feijoo G (2011) Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. Sci Total Environ 409:1786–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ismaeel W (2018) Midpoint and endpoint impact categories in green building rating systems. J Clean Prod 182:783–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    ISO (2006a) ISO 14040-environmental management - life cycle assessment – principles and framework. International Standards Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    ISO (2006b) ISO 14044 - environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Keller R, Jungbluth N, Eggenberger S (2016) Milk processing – life cycle assessment of a detailed dairy model and recommendations for the allocation to single products. ESU Services, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kim D, Thoma G, Nutter D, Milani F, Ulrich R, Norris G (2013) Life cycle assessment of cheese and whey production in the USA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1019–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kim D et al. (2014) Life cycle assessment of cheese manufacturing in the United States. San Francisco, 9th international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sectorGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul J, Bernstad A, Niero M, Gentil E, Hauschild MZ, Christensen TH (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems part I: lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manag 34:573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    McDaniel C, Cardwell D, Moeller R, Gray G (2014) Humans and cattle: a review of bovine zoonoses. Vector Borne Zoonotic Diseases 14(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Meneses M, Pasqualino J, Castells F (2012) Environmental assessment of the milk life cycle: the effect of packaging selection and the variability of milk production data. J Environ Manag 107:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Meul M, van Middelaar CE, de Boer IJM, van Passel S, Fremaut D, Haesaert G (2014) Potential of life cycle assessment to support environmental decision making at commercial. Agric Syst 131:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mondello G, Salomone R, Neri E, Patrizi N, Bastianoni S, Lanuzza F (2018) Environmental hot-spots and improvement scenarios for Tuscan “Pecorino” cheese using life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 195:810–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mottet A, de Haan C, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Opio C, Gerber P (2017) Livestock: on our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security 14:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Munir M, W Y, Young B (2014) Can exergy be a useful tool for the dairy industry? Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 33:1129–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nigri E, Barros E, Rocha S, Filho E (2014) Assessing environmental impacts using a comparative LCA of industrial and artisanal production processes: “Minas Cheese” case. Food Sci Technol 34(3):522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nilsson K, Flysjö A, Davis J, Sim S, Unger N, Bell S (2010) Comparative life cycle assessment of margarine and butter consumed in the UK, Germany and France. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:916–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Renzulli PA, Castellani V, Sala S (2017) Environmental impacts of food consumption in Europe. J Clean Prod 140:753–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Noya IG-GS et al (2018) Environmental and water sustainability of milk production in Northeast Spain. Sci Total Environ 616-617:1317–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Omore A et al (2004) Employment generation through small scale dairy marketing and processing: experiences from Kenya, Bangladesh and Ghana. FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND HEALTH, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Palmieri N, Bonaventura Forleo M, Salimei E (2017) Environmental impacts of a dairy cheese chain including whey feeding: an Italian case study. J Clean Prod 140:881–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pan W, Li K, Teng Y (2018) Rethinking system boundaries of the life cycle carbon emissions of buildings. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rafiee S, Khoshnevisan B, Mohammadi I, Aghbashlo M, mousazadeh H, Clark S (2016) Sustainability evaluation of pasteurized milk production with a life cycle assessment approach: an Iranian case study. Sci Total Environ 562:614–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rotz C, Montes F, Chianese D (2010) The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment. J Dairy Sci 93:1266–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Santos H Jr, Maranduba H, Neto J, Rodrigues L (2017) Life cycle assessment of cheese production process in a small-sized dairy industry in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:3470–3482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Soltanali H, Emadi B, Rohani A, Khojastehpour M, Nikkhah A (2015) Life cycle assessment modeling of milk production in Iran. Information Processing in Agriculture 2(2):101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Soneson U, Berlin J (2003) Environmental impact of future milk supply chains in Sweden: a scenario study. J Clean Prod 11:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Stylianou K et al (2016) A life cycle assessment framework combining nutritional and environmental health impacts of diet: a case study on milk. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:734–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sutariya S, Huppertz T, Patel H (2017) Influence of milk pre-heating conditions on casein-whey protein interactions and skim milk concentrate viscosity. Int Dairy J 69:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Tan A, Nutter D & Milani F (2011) GHG emissions and energy use from a multi-product dairy processing plant. Fayetteville, ASME Early Career Technical ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Thomassen M, Dalgaard R, Heijungs R, de Boer I (2008) Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    United Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals. [Online] Available at: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/economic-growth/. Accessed 9 7 2018
  74. 74.
    Vagnoni E, Franca A, Porqueddu C, Duce P (2017) Environmental profile of Sardinian sheep milk cheese supply chain: a comparison between two contrasting dairy systems. J Clean Prod 165:1078–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    van der Werf H, Kanyarushoki C, Corson M (2009) An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 90:3643–3652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    van Middelaar C, Berentsen P, Dolman M, de Boer I (2011) Eco-efficiency in the production chain of Dutch semi-hard cheese. Livest Sci 139:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Vasilaki V, Katsou E, Pons S, Colon J (2016) Water and carbon footprint of selected dairy products: a case study in Catalonia. J Clean Prod 139:504–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wang X, Ledgard S, Luo J, Guo Y, Zhao Z, Guo L, Liu S, Zhang N, Duan X, Ma L (2018) Environmental impacts and resource use of milk production on the North China Plain, based on life cycle assessment. Sci Total Environ 625:486–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Weidema B, Pizzol M, Schmidt J, Thoma G (2018) Attributional or consequential life cycle assessment: a matter of social responsibility. J Clean Prod 174:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Westenhöfer J (2013) Energy density and cost of foods in Germany. Ernaehrungs Umschau International 60(3):30–35Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Woldegebriel D, Udo H, Viets T, van der Harst E, Potting J (2017) Environmental impact of milk production across an intensification gradient in Ethiopia. Livest Sci 206:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Yan M & Holden N (2018) Life cycle assessment of multi-product dairy processing using Irish butter and milk powders as an example. J Clean Prod (accepted manuscript)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yan M, Humphreys J, Holden N (2011) An evaluation of life cycle assessment of European milk production. J Environ Manag 92:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    York L, Heffernan C, Rymer C (2018) A systematic review of policy approaches to dairy sector greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction. J Clean Prod 172:2216–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food EngineeringIzmir University of EconomicsBalçova – IzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations