Advertisement

Geoheritage

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Evaluation and Geopark Perspective of the Geoheritage Resources in Chiang Mai Area, Northern Thailand

  • Vimoltip SingtuenEmail author
  • Elżbieta Gałka
  • Burapha Phajuy
  • Krit Won-In
Original Article

Abstract

Chiang Mai is located in the northern part of Thailand and is known as the most famous Thai Lanna cultural area. Based on its inventory, characterization, classification, and assessment, Chiang Mai has many outstanding landforms such as mountains, gorges, and waterfalls, as well as cliffs, river, and hot springs. There is also an old quarry, which could be suitably developed to geosites as well as geopark. This area can be divided into seven main geosites based on their location, identity, rock type, morphology, and geologic phenomena, including Doi Suthep Mountain, Ob Khan Gorge, Muang On Cave, San Kamphaeng Hot Springs, Mae Kampong Waterfall, Grand Canyon Chiang Mai, and Mae Ping River. There is significant geodiversity in the region, which has evolved since the Pre-Cambrian (> 550 million years ago) to Quaternary (recent) periods. The national park always protects and preserves the biodiversity in the area, which includes many species of both flora and fauna, especially in the Mae Sa-Kog Ma Huai Khok Ma Biosphere Reserve. Prepared by scientists as well as the local guides, there are many basic geology and botany training courses for both students and general people. Furthermore, Thai Lanna and the hill tribe people in Chiang Mai have a culture and historical identity that is exhibited by temples and archaeological sites such as Doi Suthep Temple, Wiang Kum Kam Historic Site, and the Great Wall of Chiang Mai. The main goal of geotourism research is to evaluate the potential of geotourism and georesources in the context of geopark establishment. Understanding by the local people concerning the value and origin of their geologic monuments as well as the geopark concept is also significant. In addition, there are local as well as national advantages, especially for sustainable development.

Keywords

Evaluation Geopark Geoheritage Geodiversity Chiang Mai Thailand 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks the authorities of the National Park and local people in Chiang Mai Province for their obligingness. Thanks to Ms. Pimpawee Sittipan, Ms. Ratchadakorn Chumkhiao, and Mr. Jakratorn Kaewpradit for their help in field observation. The UNESCO/POLAND Co-Sponsored Fellowships Programme in Engineering cycle 2018A supported the fund for research practicing in the Department of General Geology and Geotourism at Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environment Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland. Furthermore, thanks to the Department of Geological Sciences, Chiang Mai University, for supporting experiences and data in geo-education of the first and third authors.

References

  1. Barber AJ, Ridd MF, Crow MJ (2011) The origin, movement, and assembly of the pre-Tertiary tectonic units of Thailand. In: Ridd MF, Barber AJ, Crow MJ (eds) The Geology of Thailand. Geological Society, London, pp 507–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr SM, Charusiri P (2011) Volcanic rocks, Chapter 15. In: Ridd MF, Barber AJ, Crow MJ (eds) The geology of Thailand. The Geological Society of London, London, pp 415–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barr SM, Ratanasathien B, Breen D, Ramingwong T, Sertsrivanit S (1979) Hot springs and geothermal gradients in northern Thailand. Geothermics 8:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr SM, Tantisukrit C, Yaowanoiyothin W, MacDonald AS (1990) Petrology and tectonic implications of Upper Paleozoic volcanic rocks of the Chiang Mai belt, northern Thailand. J SE Asian Earth Sci 4:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum F, Braun EV, Hess A, Kock KE (1981) Geologic map of northern Thailand. Department of Mineral Resources Thailand, Chiang MaiGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckinsale RD (1981) Granite magmatism in the tin belt of Southeast Asia. Shiva Publishing, ChandigarhGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckinsale RD, Suensilpong S, Nakapadungrat S, Walsh JN (1979) Geochronology and geochemistry of granite magmatism in Thailand in relation to a plate tectonic model. Geol Soc Lond J 136:529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boomgaard P (2006) Southeast Asia: an environmental history. ABC-CLIO, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  9. Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8:119–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139- CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brilha J, Reynard E (2017) Geoheritage and geoconservation: the challenges. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage, 1st edn. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam, pp 433–438Google Scholar
  11. Brocx M, Semeniuk V (2007) Geoheritage and geoconservation—history, definition, scope, and scale. J R Soc West Aust 90:53–80Google Scholar
  12. Bunopas S (1992) Regional stratigraphic correlation in Thailand. In: Piancharoen C (ed) Proceedings of a National Conference on Geologic Resources of Thailand: Potential for Future Development. Bangkok, pp 189-208Google Scholar
  13. DMR (2007) Geologic map of Chiang Mai Province. Department of Mineral Resources Thailand, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  14. Đurović P, Đurović M (2010) Inventory of geoheritage sites – the base of geotourism development in Montenegro. Geogr Pannon 14:126–132.  https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1004126D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farsani NT, Coelho COA, Costa CMM, Amrikazemi A (2014) Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage 6:185–192.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0099-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardiner NJ, Roberts NMW, Morley CK, Searle MP, Whitehouse MJ (2016) Did Oligocene crustal thickening precede basin development in northern Thailand? A geochronological reassessment of Doi Inthanon and Doi Suthep. Lithos 240–243:69–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2015.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray M (2005) Geodiversity and geoconservation: what, why, and how? George Wright Forum 22:4–12Google Scholar
  19. Gray M (2008) Geodiversity: developing the paradigm. Proc Geol Assoc 119:287–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7878(08)80307-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gray M (2011) Other nature: geodiversity and geosystem services. Environ Conserv 38:271–274.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gray M (2013) Geodiversity, valuing and conserving abiotic nature. Wiley-Black-well, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. GSA (2012) Geoheritage. GSA Position Statement, Geological Society of America, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  23. Harbottle-Johnson G (2002) Wieng Kum Kam, Atlantis of Lanna: a history and visitors guide. Santipab Print, Chiang MaiGoogle Scholar
  24. Hess A, Koch K E (1979) Geologic map of Northern Thailand 1:250000, sheet 4 (Chiang Dao): Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinz E A, Liberty L M, Wood S H, Singharajawarapan F S, Udphuay S, Paiyarom A, Shragge J (2010) Student-based archaeological geophysics in northern Thailand, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp 3848–3852Google Scholar
  26. Hose TA (1995) Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environ Int 10:16–17Google Scholar
  27. Hose TA (2000) European geotourism—geological interpretation and geoconservation promotion for tourists. In: Barretino D, Wimbledon WP, Gallego E (eds) Geological heritage: its conservation and management. Instituto Tecnologico Geominero de Espana, Madrid, pp 127–146Google Scholar
  28. Hutchison CS (1983) Multiple Mesozoic Sn-W-Sb granitoids of Southeast Asia. Geol Soc Am Memoir 159:35–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (1984) The pre-feasibility study for the San Kamphaeng geothermal development project in the Kingdom of Thailand, Technical Report (the 1st and 2nd phase study), (unpublished report), 29: 232Google Scholar
  30. Kaewmanee P (2013) Petrography of Permian limestone of Wat Tum Mueang On, Tambon Ban Sahakorn, Mae On District, Chiang Mai Province (in Thai). Dissertation, Chiang Mai UniversityGoogle Scholar
  31. Leopold LB, Wolman MG (1957) River channel patterns: braided, meandering, and straight, 30 U.S. Geol Surv Prof Pap 282:39–85Google Scholar
  32. Macdonald AS, Barr SM, Miller BV, Reynolds PH, Rhodes BP, Yokart B (2010) P–T–t constraints on the development of the Doi Inthanon metamorphic core complex domain and implications for the evolution of the western gneiss belt, northern Thailand. J Asian Earth Sci 37:82–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2009.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Margane A, Tatong T (1999) Aspects of the hydrogeology of the Chiang Mai-Lamphun basin, 5 Thailand that are important for the groundwater management. Z Angew Geol 45:188–197Google Scholar
  34. Morley CK (2007) Variations in late Cenozoic–recent strike-slip and oblique-extensional geometries, within Indochina: the influence of pre-existing fabrics. J Struct Geol 29:36–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morley CK (2009a) Evolution from an oblique subduction back-arc mobile belt to a highly oblique collisional margin: the Cenozoic tectonic development of Thailand and eastern Myanmar. Geol Soc Lond 318:373–403.  https://doi.org/10.1144/SP318.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morley CK (2009b) Geometry and evolution of low-angle normal faults (LANF) within a Cenozoic high-angle rift system, Thailand: implications for sedimentology and the mechanisms of LANF development. Tectonics.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moufti MR, Nemeth K (2017) Geoheritage values of a mature monogenetic volcanic field in intra-continental settings: Harrat Khaybar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Springer International Publishing, AG SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  38. Nathan S (1976) Reconnaissance survey of the geothermal resources of northern Thailand: stage 1 reports (exploration). unpublished report from Kingston Reynolds Thom & Allardice, Ltd, AuklandGoogle Scholar
  39. Nazaruddin DA (2015) Systematic studies of geoheritage in Jeli District, Kelantan, Malaysia. Geoheritage. 9:19–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0173-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nemeth K, Wu J, Sun C, Liu J (2017) Update on the volcanic geoheritage values of the Pliocene to Quaternary Arxan-Chaihe Volcanic Field, Inner Mongolia, China. Geoheritage 9:279–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0224-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newsome D, Dowling RK (2010) Geotourism: the tourism of geology and landscape. Goodfellow Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Newsome D, Dowling R (2017) Geoheritage and geotourism. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage, 1st edn. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam, pp 305–321Google Scholar
  43. Newsome D, Dowling R, Leung YF (2012) The nature and management of geotourism: a case study of two established iconic geotourism destinations. Tour Manag Perspect 2:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2011.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ng S, Wood SF, Ziegler AD (2014) Ancient floods, modern hazards: the Ping River, paleofloods and the ‘lost city’ of Wiang Kum Kam. Nat Hazards.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1426-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nid SH (1989) The contemporary Thai City as an environmental adaptation. In: Culture and environment in Thailand: a symposium of the Siam Society. Siam Society, Bangkok, pp 371–392Google Scholar
  46. Ongsakul S (2005) History of Lanna. Silkworm Books, Chiang MaiGoogle Scholar
  47. Petcharat A (2013) Study of radiolaria in upper part of chert section for age and depositional environment at Wat Tum Mueang On, Tambon Ban Sahakorn, Mae On District, Chiang Mai Province (in Thai). Dissertation, Chiang Mai UniversityGoogle Scholar
  48. Pinmuangthong N (2012) Paleontological study of radiolaria in chert outcrop at Wat Tum Mueang On, Tambon Ban Sahakorn, Mae On District, Chiang Mai Province (in Thai). Dissertation, Chiang Mai UniversityGoogle Scholar
  49. ProGEO (The European Association for the Conservation of the Geological Heritage) (2011) Conserving our shared geoheritage—a protocol on geoconservation principles, sustainable site use, management, field work, fossil and mineral collecting. http://www.progeo.se/progeo-protocol-definitions-20110915.pdf. Accessed on 23 June 2016
  50. Ramingwong T, Ratansthathien S, Sertsrivanit S (1978) Geothermal resources of northern Thailand: hydrogeologic considerations. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Geology and Mineral Resources of Southeast Asia, 239-251Google Scholar
  51. Ramingwong T, Lerdthusnee S, Chuaviroj S, Lertsrimongkol S (1982) Geothermal exploration drilling in Thailand, Unpublished manuscript from an unknown Conference proceeding, 321-327Google Scholar
  52. Ramingwong T, Lertsrimongkol S, Asnachinda P, Praserdvigai S (2000) Update on Thailand geothermal energy research and development. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Kyushu-Tohoku, pp 377–386Google Scholar
  53. Ratanasthien B, Ramingwong T (1982) The intrusion of thermal water into domestic groundwater system in the areas of San Kamphaeng and Lamphun. Annual Technical Meeting, 1981, Department of Geological Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, pp 137-147Google Scholar
  54. Rerkasem B, Rerkasem K (1995) The Mae Sa-Kog Ma Biosphere Reserve Thailand, South-South Cooperation Programme on Environmentally Sound Socio-Economic Development in the Humid Tropics. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  55. Rhodes BP, Conejo R, Benchawan T, Titus S, Lawson R (2005) Paleocurrents and provenance of the Mae Rim Formation, Northern Thailand: implications for tectonic evolution of the Chiang Mai basin. J Geol Soc Lond 162:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Santos WFS, de Souza Carvalho I, Brilha J, Leonardi G (2016) Inventory and assessment of palaeontological sites in the Sousa basin (Paraiba, Brazil): preliminary study to evaluate the potential of the area to become a geopark. Geoheritage 8:315–332.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0165-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shahhoseini H, Modabberi S, Shahabi M (2017) Study of factors influencing the attitude of local people toward geotourism development in Qeshm National Geopark, Iran. Geoheritage 9:3–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0171-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singhwachiraworakul P, Jintasakul P, Grote P, Thungprue P (2017) UNESCO Global Geoparks: a new management tools for sustainable development and Satun Aspiring UNESCO Global Geopark. In Arlai Ph (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Multidisciplinary Approaches on UN Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs). Bangkok, pp 8-16Google Scholar
  59. Singtuen M, Won-In K (2017) Geotourism and sustainable development perspectives of the Khao Phra Wihan National Park on the southern edge of the Khorat Plateau, Thailand. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environment, Agriculture, Biology and Natural Sciences (EABNS-2017). Bangkok, pp 35-41Google Scholar
  60. Singtuen V, Won-In K (2018a) An assessment of the potential island for geotourism value in Ko Kham Undersea Park, Chonburi, Gulf of Thailand. Proceedings of the “Regional Geoheritage Conference 2018” with the theme “Geoheritages for People”. Khonkaen, pp 11-18Google Scholar
  61. Singtuen V, Won-In K (2018b) Geodiversity and geoconservation of the Chaiyaphum region in Thailand for sustainable geotourism planning. Geoj Tour Geosites 22:548–560.  https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.22223-310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singtuen V, Won-In K (2018c) Preliminary geotourism study in ancient Khmer civilization area, Buriram Province, Northeastern Thailand. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication 8:538–1544.  https://doi.org/10.7456/1080SSE/206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thomas MF (2006) New keywords in the geosciences – some conceptual and scientific issues. Rev Inst Geol 37:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-929X.20160001
  64. Upton D R, Bristow C S, Hurford A J, Carter A (1997) Tertiary tectonic denudation in northwestern Thailand: provisional results from apatite fission-track analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Stratigraphy and Tectonic Evolution of Southeast Asia and the South Pacific, pp 421–431Google Scholar
  65. Velechovsky M, Sinthusan A, Pitragool S (1987) Geological aspects of the burial by blood of the ancient city of Wiang Kum Kam, Chiang Mai, Thailand, Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University, Center for the Promotion of Arts and Culture, unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  66. Won-In K, Singtuen V (2018) Geoheritage conservation for sustainable geotourism in Petrified Wood Forest Park, Tak Province, Thailand. TOJDAC 8:1532–1537.  https://doi.org/10.7456/1080SSE/205
  67. Wood SH, Singharajwarapan FS (2014) Geothermal systems of Northern Thailand and their association with faults active during the Quaternary. GRC Trans 38:607–615Google Scholar
  68. Wood SH, Ziegler AD (2007) Floodplain sediment from a 30-year-recurrence flood in 2005 of the Ping River in northern Thailand. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 4:3839–3868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wood S H, Liberty L M, Singharajwarapan F S, Bundarnsin T, Rothwell E (2004) Feasibility of gradient magnetometer surveys of buried brick structures at 13th century Wiang Kum Kam, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand, International conference on applied geophysics, pp 22–30Google Scholar
  70. Yokart B, Barr S, Williams-Jones A, Macdonald A (2003) Late-stage alteration and tin–tungsten mineralization in the Khuntan Batholith, northern Thailand. J Asian Earth Sci 21:999–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of ScienceKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of General Geology and Geotourism, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental ProtectionAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakówPoland
  3. 3.Department of Geological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations