Advertisement

Geoheritage

pp 1–17 | Cite as

Geomorphosites Assessment Methods: Comparative Analysis and Typology

  • Vanessa Costa MucivunaEmail author
  • Emmanuel Reynard
  • Maria da Glória Motta Garcia
Original Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the increase in geoconservation studies, several methods of qualitative and quantitative assessment of geosites have been published since the 1990s. However, the criteria and parameters used in the methods are often unclear and ambiguous. Thus, the aims of this study were to analyse how methods of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of geomorphological heritage developed and to compare them. The analysis resulted in a typology of the works published until now. A literature review was conducted based on three criteria, the papers had to be (i) written in English, (ii) published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and (iii) include at least one of the following keywords in the title: geomorphological heritage, geomorphological site and geomorphosite. Based on these criteria, 71 papers were analysed. Five categories are proposed: (i) application of previous methods, (ii) creation of new methods, (iii) application of previous methods combined with new methods, (iv) comparison of methods and (v) no description of method. The outcomes show that the qualitative evaluation should be more systematic and explicit according to the criteria applied and the main purpose of the evaluation. Quantitative methods should focus on reducing weaknesses associated with the overlapping and lack of clarity of some criteria. The proposed typology allowed us to summarise the papers published so far and to highlight the need to focus on improving existing methods rather than proposing new ones.

Keywords

Geoconservation Geomorphological heritage Assessment Inventory Typology Criteria 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to National Council for Science and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq) for the doctoral scholarship (Process n. 141970/2017-0) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the mobility scholarship (PSDE Process 88881.189352/2018-01) granted to the first author, and the Institute of Geography and Sustainability of University of Lausanne for their provided support. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the manuscript and to Daphne Goodfellow for the improvement of the English manuscript

References

  1. Albă CD (2016) Geomorphosites with touristic value in the central-southern part of Parâng Mountains. Forum Geografic 15(1):109–115.  https://doi.org/10.5775/fg.2016.054.i Google Scholar
  2. Alexandrowicz Z, Kozlowski S (1999) From selected geosites to geodiversity conservation - polish example of modern framework. In: Barettino D, Vallejo M, Gallego E (eds) Towards the balanced management and conservation of the geological heritage in the new millennium. Sociedad Geológica de España, Madrid, pp 40–44Google Scholar
  3. Artugyan L (2017) Geomorphosites assessment in karst terrains: Anina karst region (Banat Mountains, Romania). Geoheritage 9(2):153–162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0188-x Google Scholar
  4. Avanzini M, Carton A, Seppi R, Tomasoni R (2005) Geomorphosites in Trentino: a first census. Il Quaternario 18(1):63–78Google Scholar
  5. Bollati I, Pelfini M, Pellegrini L (2012) A geomorphosites selection method for educational purposes: a case study in Trebbia Valley (Emilia Romagna, Italy). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 35:23–35.  https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2012.35.3 Google Scholar
  6. Bollati I, Smiraglia C, Pelfini M (2013) Assessment and selection of geomorphosites and trails in the Miage glacier area (Western Italian Alps). Environ Manag 51:951–967.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9995-2 Google Scholar
  7. Bollati I, Leonelli G, Vezzola L, Pelfini M (2015) The role of ecological value in geomorphosite assessment for the debris-covered Miage glacier (Western Italian Alpes) based on a review of 2.5 centuries of scientific study. Geoheritage 7(2):119–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0111-2 Google Scholar
  8. Bosson JB, Reynard E (2012) Geomorphological heritage, conservation and promotion in high-alpine protected areas. Eco Mont 4(1):13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-4-1s13 Google Scholar
  9. Bouzekraoui H, Barakat A, Touhami F, Mouaddine A, El Youssi M (2018) Inventory and assessment of geomorphosites for geotourism development: a case study of Aït Bou Oulli Valley (central high-atlas, Morocco). Area 50(3):331–343.  https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12380 Google Scholar
  10. Brilha J (2005) Património geológico e geoconservação: a conservação da natureza na sua vertente geológica. Palimage Editores, ViseuGoogle Scholar
  11. Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8(2):119–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3 Google Scholar
  12. Brilha J (2018) Geoheritage: inventories and evaluation. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: assessment, protection and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 69–86Google Scholar
  13. Brilha J, Pereira P (2014) Património geológico de Portugal como bases para ações de conservação da natureza e ordenamento do território. Comunicações geológicas 101(3):1211–1213Google Scholar
  14. Brilha J, Alcalá L, Almeida A, AraÚjo A, Azeredo A, Azevedo MR, Barriga F, Brum da Silveira A, Cabral J, Cachão M, Caetano P, Cobus A, Coke C, Couto H, Crispim J, Cunha PP, Dias R, Duarte LV, Dória A, Falé P, Ferreira N, Ferreira Soares A, Fonseca P, Galopim de Carvalho A, Gonçalves R, Granja H, Henriques MH, Kullberg JC, Kullberg MC, Legoinha P, Lima A, Lima E, Lopes L, Madeira J, Marques JF, Martins A, Martins R, Matos J, Medina J, Miranda R, Monteiro C, Moreira M, Moura D, Neto Carvalho C, Noronha F, Nunes JC, Oliveira JT, Pais J, Pena dos Reis R, Pereira D, Pereira P, Pereira Z, Piçarra J, Pimentel N, Pinto de Jesus A, Prada S, Prego A, Ramalho L, Ramalho M, Ramalho R, Relvas J, Ribeiro A, Ribeiro MA, Rocha R, Sá A, Santos V, Sant’Ovaia H, Sequeira A, Sousa M, Terrinha P, Valle Aguado B, Vaz N (2010) O inventário nacional do património geológico: abordagem metodológica e resultados. E-Terra 18(1):1–4Google Scholar
  15. Brilha J, Pereira P, Pereira D, Henriques R (2013) Geossítios de relevância nacional e internacional em Portugal continental. In: Magalhães MR (ed) Estrutura ecológica nacional - uma proposta de delimitação e regulamentação. ISAPres, Lisboa, pp 169–176Google Scholar
  16. Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2005) Geosite evaluation; can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario 18(1):293–306Google Scholar
  17. Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2009) Direct and parametric methods for the assessment of geosites and geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, Munchen, pp 73–88Google Scholar
  18. Bruschi VM, Cendrero A, Cuesta Albertos JA (2011) A statistical approach to the validation and optimization of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geoheritage 3(3):131–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0038-9 Google Scholar
  19. Carcavilla L, Durán JJ, Garcia-Cortés A, López-Martinez J (2009) Geological heritage and geoconservation in Spain: past, present, and future. Geoheritage 1(2–4):75–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-009-0006-9 Google Scholar
  20. Clivaz M, Reynard E (2018) How to integrate invisible geomorphosites in an inventory: a case study in the Rhone River valley (Switzerland). Geoheritage 10(4):527–541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0222-7 Google Scholar
  21. Cocean G (2011) Munţii Trascău: relief. Geomorfosituri, Turism. Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca Google Scholar
  22. Cocean G (2012) The Arieşului gorge, a complex geomorphosite in the Apuseni Mountains. Geographia Napocensis 4(1):43–48Google Scholar
  23. Cocean G, Cocean P (2017) An assessment of gorges for purposes of identifying geomorphosites of geotourism value in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Geoheritage 9(1):71–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0180-5 Google Scholar
  24. Comănescu L, Dobre R (2009) Inventorying, evaluating and tourism valuating the geomorphosites from the central sector of the Ceahlău national park. GeoJ Tour Geosites 3(1):86–96Google Scholar
  25. Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2010) Analysis of some representative geomorphosites in the Bucegi Mountains: between scientific evaluation and tourist perception. Area 42(4):406–416.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00937.x Google Scholar
  26. Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2009) Inventorying and evaluation of geomorphosites in the Bucegi Mountains. Forum Geografic 8(8):38–43Google Scholar
  27. Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2011) Evaluation of geomorphosites in Vistea Valley (Fagaras Mountains-Carpathians, Romania). Int J Phys Sci 6(5):1161–1168.  https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS10.384 Google Scholar
  28. Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2012) The evaluation of geomorphosites from the Ponoare protected area. Forum Geografic 11(1):54–61.  https://doi.org/10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2012.037.i Google Scholar
  29. Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Stănoiu G (2017) Geomorphosites and geotourism in Bucharest city center (Romania). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3):51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0029 Google Scholar
  30. Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario 18(1):307–313Google Scholar
  31. Coratza P, Hobléa F (2018) The specificities of geomorphological heritage. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: assessment, protection and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–106Google Scholar
  32. Coratza P, Bruschi VM, Piacentini D, Saliba D, Soldati M (2011) Recognition and assessment of geomorphosites in Malta at the Il-Majjistral nature and history park. Geoheritage 3(3):175–185.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0034-0 Google Scholar
  33. Coratza P, Galve JP, Soldati M, Tonelli C (2012) Recognition and assessment of sinkholes as geosites: lessons from the island of Gozo (Malta). Quaestiones Geographica 31(1):25–35Google Scholar
  34. Costa FL (2011) Volcanic geomorphosites assessment of the last eruption, on April to May 1995, within the natural park of Fogo Island, Cape Verde. GeoJ Tour Geosites 8(2):167–177Google Scholar
  35. Costa-Casais M, Alves MIC, Blanco-Chao R (2015) Assessment and management of the geomorphological heritage of Monte Pindo (NW Spain): a landscape as a symbol of identity. Sustainability 7:7049–7085.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067049 Google Scholar
  36. Costamagna A (2005) A geomorphosites inventory in Central Piemonte (NW Italy): first results. Il Quaternario 18(1):23–37Google Scholar
  37. De Waele J, Melis MT (2009) Geomorphology and geomorphological heritage of the Ifrane-Azrou region (middle atlas, Morocco). Environ Geol 58(3):587–599.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1533-4
  38. De Waele J, Di Gregorio F, Gasmi N, Melis MT, Talbi M (2005a) Geomorphosites of Tozeur region (south-West Tunisia). Il Quaternario 18(1):223–232Google Scholar
  39. De Waele J, Di Gregorio F, Pala A (2005b) Karst geomorphosites of Monte Albo (north-East Sardinia). Il Quaternario 18(1):145–153Google Scholar
  40. De Wever P, Alterio I, Egoroff G, Cornée A, Bobrowsky P, Collin G, Duranthon F, Hill W, Lalanne A, Page K (2015) Geoheritage, a national inventory in France. Geoheritage 7(3):205–247.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0151-2 Google Scholar
  41. Del Monte M, Fredi P, Pica A, Vergari F (2013) Geosites within Rome city center (Italy): a mixture of cultural and geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 36:241–257.  https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2013.36.20 Google Scholar
  42. Diligenti A, Nesci O, Savelli D (2005) Geomorphosites in the landscape of Monti del Furlo (northern Marche Apennines). Il Quaternario 18(1):203–211Google Scholar
  43. Dóniz-Páez J, Becerra-Ramírez R, González-Cárdenas E, Guillén-Martín C, Escobar-Lahoz E (2011) Geomorphosites and geotourism in volcanic landscape: the example of la Corona Del Lajial cinder cone (El Hierro, Canary Islands, Spain). GeoJ Tour Geosites 8(2):185–197Google Scholar
  44. Ellis N (2008) A history of the geological conservation review. In: Burek CV, Prosser CD (eds) The history of Geoconservation. Geological Society, London, pp 123–135Google Scholar
  45. Erhartič B (2010) Geomorphosites assessment. Acta Geographica Slovenica 50(2):295–319.  https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS50206 Google Scholar
  46. Feuillet T, Sourp E (2011) Geomorphological heritage of the Pyrenees national park (France): assessment, clustering, and promotion of geomorphosites. Geoheritage 3(3):151–162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0020-y Google Scholar
  47. Fuertes-Gutiérrez I, Fernández-Martínez E (2010) Geosites inventory in the Leon province (northwestern Spain): a tool to introduce geoheritage into regional environmental management. Geoheritage 2(1–2):57–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y Google Scholar
  48. Garcia MGM, Brilha J, Lima FF, Vargas JC, Pérez-Aguillar A, Alves A, Campana GAC, Duleba W, Faleiros FM, Fernandes LA, Fierz MSM, Garcia MJ, Janasi VA, Martins L, Raposo MIB, Ricardi-Branco F, Ross JLS, Sallum Filho W, Souza CRG, Bernardes-de-Oliveira MEC, Neves BBB, Campos Neto MC, Christofoletti SR, Henrique-Pinto R, Lobo HAS, Machado R, Passarelli CR, Perinotto JAJ, Ribeiro RR, Shimada H (2018) The inventory of geological heritage of the state of São Paulo, Brazil: methodological basis, results and perspectives. Geoheritage 10(2):239–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0215-y
  49. García-Cortés A, Rábano I, Locutura J, Bellido F, Fernández-Gianotti J, Martín-Serrano A, Quesada C, Barnolas A, Durán JJ (2001) First Spanish contribution to the Geosites project: list of the geological frameworks established by consensus. Episodes 24(2):79–92Google Scholar
  50. García-Cortéz A, Carcavilla UL (2009) Documento metodológico para la elaboración del inventario español de lugares de interés geológico (IELIG), version 12. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, MadridGoogle Scholar
  51. Gavrilă I, Anghel T (2013) Geomorphosites inventory in the Măcin Mountains (south-eastern Romania). GeoJ Tour Geosites 11(1):42–53Google Scholar
  52. Geremia F, Massoli-Novelli R (2005) Coastal geomorphosites of the isles of Lipari and Stromboli (Aeolian Islands, Italy): new potential for geo-tourism. Il Quaternario 18(1):233–244Google Scholar
  53. Giusti C, Calvet M (2010) L’inventaire des géomorphosites en France et le problème de la complexité scalaire. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 16(2):223–244.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7947 Google Scholar
  54. González-Trueba JJ, Cañadas ES (2008) Geomorphological heritage assessment in natural protected areas. Application in the Picos de Europe national park. Boletín de la AGE 47:397–399Google Scholar
  55. Grandgirard V (1995) Méthode pour la réalisation d’un inventaire de géotopes géomorphologiques. UKPIK Cahiers de l’Institut de Géographie de l’Université de Fribourg 10:121–137Google Scholar
  56. Grandgirard V (1996) Gestion du patrimoine naturel, l’inventarie des géotopes géomorphologiques du Canton de Fribourg. Rapport de recherche de l’Institut de Géographie de l’Université de Fribourg 8:181–195Google Scholar
  57. Grandgirard V (1999a) Switzerland - the inventory of geotopes of national significance. In: Barenttino D, Vallejo M, Gallego E (eds) Towards the balanced management and conservation of the geological heritage in the new millenium. Sociedade Geológica de España, Madrid, pp 234–236Google Scholar
  58. Grandgirard V (1999b) L’evaluation des géotopes. Geol Insubr 4(1):59–66Google Scholar
  59. Gregori L, Melelli L, Rapicetta S, Taramelli A (2005) The main geomorphosites in Umbria. Il Quaternario 18(1):93–101Google Scholar
  60. Henriques MH, Reis RP, Brilha J, Mota T (2011) Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage 3(2):117–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0039-8 Google Scholar
  61. Hooke JM (1994) Strategies for conserving and sustaining dynamic geomorphological sites. In: O’Halloran D, Green C, Harley M, Knill J (eds) Geological and landscape conservation. Geological Society, London, pp 191–195Google Scholar
  62. Ilinca V, Comănescu L (2011) Aspects concerning some of the geomorphosites with tourist value from Vâlcea county (Romania). GeoJ Tour Geosites 7(1):22–32Google Scholar
  63. Jurj MA (2016) The geomorphosites of Roşia Montană. Geographia Napocensis 10(1):95–101Google Scholar
  64. Kerguillec R, Sellier D (2015) Selection of geomorphosites in the Rondane national park (Central Norway): landforms and popularization. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 21(2):131–144.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.11012 Google Scholar
  65. Kirchner K, Kubalíková L (2011) Evaluation of geoheritage in the Western part of National Park Podyjí, Czech Republic. Rev Geomorfologie 13:49–56 Google Scholar
  66. Kubalíková L (2012) Koncepce geomorphosites v kontextu ochrany neživé přírody. Technická univerzita v Liberci. Liberec. 100 p Google Scholar
  67. Kubalíková L (2013) Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech J Tour 2:80–104Google Scholar
  68. Kubalíková L, Kirchner K (2016) Geosite and geomorphosite assessment as a tool for geoconservation and geotourism purposes: a case study from Vizovická́ vrchovina Highland (eastern part of the Czech Republic). Geoheritage 8(1):5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0143-2 Google Scholar
  69. Lima FF, Brilha JB, Salamuni E (2010) Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage 2(3–4):91–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0014-9 Google Scholar
  70. Maghsoudi M, Rahmati M (2018) Geomorphosites assessment of Lorestan province in Iran by comparing of Zouros and Comanescu’s methods (case study: Poldokhtar area, Iran). GeoJ Tour Geosites 21(1):226–238.  https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.21118-283 Google Scholar
  71. Martini G (ed) (1994) Actes du premier symposium international sur la protection du patrimoine géologique, Digne-les-Bains, 11-16 juin 1991. Société Géologique de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  72. Massoli-Novelli R (2005) The main geomorphosites of the Egadi Islands (Sicily, Italy). Il Quaternario 18(1):137–143Google Scholar
  73. Mauerhofer L, Reynard E, Asrat A, Hurni H (2018) Contribution of a geomorphosite inventory to the geoheritage knowledge in developing countries: the case of the Simien Mountains national park, Ethiopia. Geoheritage 10(4):559–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0234-3 Google Scholar
  74. Neches IM (2013) From geomorphosite evaluation to geotourism interpretation. Case study: the Sphinx of Romania’s southern Carpathians. GeoJ Tour Geosites 12(2):145–162Google Scholar
  75. Nedelea A, Comănescu L, Marin M (2010) Petrographical relief on the southern slope of the Făgăraş Mountains (the Argeş Basin, Romania) – premiss for identification of geomorphosites. GeoJ Tour Geosites 5(1):33–43Google Scholar
  76. Nesci O, Savelli D, Diligenti A, Marinangeli D (2005) Geomorphological sites in the northern Marche (Italy). Examples from autochthon anticline ridges and from Val Marecchia allochthon. Il Quaternario 18(1):79–91Google Scholar
  77. Niculiţă M, Mărgărint MC (2018) Landslides and fortified settlements as valuable cultural geomorphosites and geoheritage sites in the Moldavian plateau, north-eastern Romania. Geoheritage 10(4):613–634.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0261-0 Google Scholar
  78. O’Halloran D, Green C, Harley M, Stanley M, Knill J (1994) (eds) Geological and landscape conservation. The Geological Society, London Google Scholar
  79. Orrù P, Panizza V, Ulzega A (2005) Submerged geomorphosites in the marine protected areas of Sardinia (Italy): assessment and improvement. Il Quaternario 18(1):167–174Google Scholar
  80. Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull (suppl Bd) 46:4–6Google Scholar
  81. Panizza M, Piacente S (1993) Geomorphological assets evaluation. Z NF Geomorph Suppl Bd 87:13–18Google Scholar
  82. Pellegrini L, Boni P, Vercesi P, Carton A, Laureti L, Zucca F, De Vita S (2005) The geomorphosites in Lombardy. Il Quaternario 18(1):39–61Google Scholar
  83. Pellitero R, González-Amuchastegui MJ, Ruiz-Flaño P, Serrano E (2011) Geodiversity and geomorphosite assessment applied to a natural protect area: the Ebro and Rudron gorges natural park (Spain). Geoheritage 3(3):163–174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0022-9 Google Scholar
  84. Pereira P (2006) Património geomorfológico: conceptualização, avaliação e divulgação. Aplicação ao Parque Natural de Montesinho. Ph.D. thesis, University of MinhoGoogle Scholar
  85. Pereira LS (2017) Potential geomorphosites as locals of geotouristic interest: case of municipality of João Pessoa, Paraíba state (Brazilian NE). GeoJ Tour Geosites 19(1):7–21Google Scholar
  86. Pereira AC, Martins BMSC (2016) Interactions between geomorphological heritage and cultural landscape of Serra do Alvão: the perspective of cultural geomorphology. Vegueta: Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia 16:437–459Google Scholar
  87. Pereira P, Pereira D (2010) Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 16(2):215–222.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7942 Google Scholar
  88. Pereira P, Pereira D, Alves MIC (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho natural park. Geogr Helv 62(3):159–168Google Scholar
  89. Pérez-Umaña D, Quesada-Román A, Rojas JCJ, Zamorano-Orozco JJ, Dóniz-Páez J, Becerra-Ramírez R (2019) Comparative analysis of geomorphosites in volcanoes of Costa Rica. Mexico and Spain Geoheritage 11(2):545–559.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0313-0
  90. Pica A, Vergari F, Fredi P, Del Monte M (2016) The Aeterna Urbs geomorphological heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage 8(1):31–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0150-3 Google Scholar
  91. Pica A, Luberti GM, Vergari F, Fredi P, Del Monte M (2017) Contribution for an urban geomorphoheritage assessment method: proposal from three geomorphosites in Rome (Italy). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3):21–36.  https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0030 Google Scholar
  92. Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3):189–196.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.350 Google Scholar
  93. Reynard E (2009a) Geomorphosites: definition and characteristics. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, Munchen, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  94. Reynard E (2009b) The assessment of geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, Munchen, pp 63–71Google Scholar
  95. Reynard E (2013) The revision of the Swiss inventory of Geosites (2006-2012). Geophys Res Abstr 15:3568Google Scholar
  96. Reynard E, Brilha J (2018) Geoheritage: a multidisciplinary and applied research topic. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: assessment, protection and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–9Google Scholar
  97. Reynard E, Coratza P (2013) Scientific research on geomorphosites: a review of the activities of the IAG working group on geomorphosites over the last twelve years. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 36(1):159–168.  https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2013.36.13 Google Scholar
  98. Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):148–158Google Scholar
  99. Reynard E, Perret A, Bussard J, Grangier L, Marin S (2016) Integrated approach for the inventory and management of geomorphological heritage at the regional scale. Geoheritage 8(1):43–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0153-0
  100. Reynard E, Pica A, Coratza C (2017) Urban geomorphological heritage. An overview. Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3):7–20.  https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0022 Google Scholar
  101. Rivas V, Rix K, Francés E, Cendero A, Brunsden D (1997) Geomorphological indicators for environmental impact assessment: consumable and non-consumable geomorphological resources. Geomorphology 18:169–182Google Scholar
  102. Rypl J, Kirchner K, Dvořáčková S (2016) Geomorphological inventory as a toll for proclaiming geomorphosite (a case study of Mt. Myslivna in the Novohradské hory Mts.-Czech Republic). Geoheritage 8(4):393–400.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0169-5 Google Scholar
  103. Rypl J, Kirchner K, Ryplová R (2019) Contribution to the assessment of geomorphosites in the Czech Republic (a case study of the north-eastern part of the Novohradské Mountains). Geoheritage 11(2):427–439.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0293-0
  104. Safarabadi A, Shahzeidi SS (2018) Tourism silence in geomorphosites: a case study of Ali-Sadr cave (Hamadan, Iran). GeoJ Tour Geosites 21(1):49–60Google Scholar
  105. Sellier D (2010) L’analyse intégrée du relief et la sélection déductive des géomorphosites: application à la Charente-Maritime (France). Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 16(2):199–214.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7931 Google Scholar
  106. Sellier D (2016) A deductive method for the selection of geomorphosites: application to Mont Ventoux (Provence, France). Geoheritage 8(1):15–29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0144-1 Google Scholar
  107. Serrano E, González-Trueba JJ (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa national park (Spain). Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3):197–208.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.364 Google Scholar
  108. Sharples C (2002) Concepts and principles of geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Services website, http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/geoconservation.pdf
  109. Warowna J, Zgłobicki W, Gajek G, Telecka M, Kołodyńska-Gawrysiak R, Zieliński P (2014) Geomorphosite assessment in the proposed geopark Vistula River gap (E Poland). Quaestiones Geographicae 33(3):173–180Google Scholar
  110. Wimbledon WAP (1996) Geosites-a new conservation initiative. Episodes 19(3):87–88Google Scholar
  111. Wimbledon WAP, Benton MJ, Bevins RE, Black GP, Bridgland DR, Cleal CJ, Cooper RG, May VJ (1995) The development of a methodology for the selection of British geological sites for geoconservation: part 1. Mod Geol 20:159–202Google Scholar
  112. Wimbledon WAP, Andersen S, Cleal CJ, Cowie JW, Erikstad L, Gonggrijp GP, Johansson CE, Karis LO, Suominen V (1999) Geological world heritage: GEOSITES- a global comparative site inventory to enable prioritisation for conservation. Memorie Descritive della Carta Geologica d'Italia 54:45–60Google Scholar
  113. Zgłobicki W, Baran-Zgłobicka B (2013) Geomorphological heritage as a tourist attraction. A case study in Lubelskie province, SE Poland. Geoheritage 5(2):137–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-013-0076-6
  114. Zgłobicki W, Poesen J, Coher M, Del Monte M, García-Ruiz JM, Ionita I, Niascu L, Machová Z, Martín-Duque JF, Nadal-Romero E, Pica A, Rey F, Solé-Benet A, Stankoviansky M, Stolz C, Torri D, Soms J, Vergari F (2018) The potential of permanent gullies in Europe as geomorphosites. Geoheritage 11(2):217–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0252-1
  115. Zouros N (2005) Assessment, protection, and promotion of geomorphological sites in the Aegean area, Greece. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3):227–234.  https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.398 Google Scholar
  116. Zouros N (2007) Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. Case study of the Lesvos Island - coastal geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):169–180Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GeoHereditas, Institute of GeosciencesUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Geography and SustainabilityGéopolis, University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations