Advertisement

Geoheritage

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 1043–1056 | Cite as

Geo-Singularity of the Valley-Fault of Teixidelo and Candidacy to Geopark of Cape Ortegal (NW Iberian Peninsula): Preliminary Assessment of Challenges and Perspectives

  • Jesús HoracioEmail author
  • Efrén Muñoz-Narciso
  • José M. Sierra-Pernas
  • Francisco Canosa
  • Augusto Pérez-Alberti
Case Report

Abstract

Recently, a project has been set in motion to declare the Cape Ortegal complex (NW Iberian Peninsula), a geological reference in Spain and Europe, as a geopark. This initial phase has the purpose of reflecting and discussing the benefits of creating a geopark as a tool to foment education in geodiversity, geotourism, and scientific debate. We define geo-singularities as those elements of a geopark that stand out the most to a tourist due to their processes, forms, compositions, or mere presence in situ, being able to do so in a scientific, spiritual or sensitive manner, among others. Geo-singularities are, therefore, of first-rate geotourism value. This case report focuses on the Teixidelo valley-fault geo-singularity, whose main attraction is the movement of its base (> 30 m in the last 70 years). We relied on field observations and literature review and benefited from discussions during conference workshops, meetings, and personal interviews with local associations, the local community, and municipal administrators. Thanks to this information, we were able to conduct our analysis towards the development of a collective reflection exercise about tourism on a global, regional, and local level, capable of providing insight to politicians and local organizations in the management of geotourism at the Cape Ortegal complex, as well as questioning if the geopark is a good strategy for the member municipalities. This analysis and collective interpretation allowed us to determine the potentialities, dangers, and challenges of the Teixidelo valley-fault as a geotourism asset in the framework of the Cape Ortegal complex. The current tourism situation, within a global context, is characterized by a significant increase in tourists who have experienced different geological assets. In many cases, this translated into a massification of places that were not prepared to receive so many tourists. We have identified two types of massification: projected (places that the Administration promotes without a proper management and protection plan) and another random one (the popularity of a place for a specific and unforeseeable reason). Geo-singularities are a strategic tool that can become a showcase piece for a geopark. The type of management strategy applied will largely determine the future geo-conservation of the geological values of the study area. Based on this, a first action plan was designed aimed at municipal governments and local associations. The reflections, approaches, and proposals carried out in this case report can be extrapolated to other territories, whether or not they are geoparks.

Keywords

Geopark Geo-singularity Geotourism SWOT analysis Galicia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Víctor Bouzas Blanco (author of Fig. 1), Ian C. Fuller, Alissa Jensen, and Jeremy Miller for their help.

Funding Information

The first author is a beneficiary of the post-doctoral fellowship named Programa de ayudas de apoyo a la etapa inicial de formación posdoctoral (2017) founded by the Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria de la Xunta de Galicia (Government of Galicia, Spain). The second author is a beneficiary of the pre-doctoral fellowship FPU 13/00168 founded by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport of Spain.

Supplementary material

12371_2019_349_MOESM1_ESM.bak (53 kb)
ESM 1 (BAK 52 kb)

References

  1. Ábalos B, Azcárraga J, Gil Ibarguchi JI, Mendia M & Puelles P (2000) Mapa geológico del Complejo de Cabo Ortegal (NO de España)Google Scholar
  2. Appreciating physical landscapes: three hundred years of geotourism (2016) Geological SocietyGoogle Scholar
  3. Arán-Ferreiro D, Macías F, de Anta RC, Pérez-Alberti A, Otero XL, Verde-Vilanova JR, Pérez-Llaguno C, Saiz-Rubio R, Díez E, Bolaños-Guerrón D & Macías-García F (2014) Complejo Básico-Ultrabásico de Capelada-Cabo Ortegal. Andavira EditorialGoogle Scholar
  4. Arenas R (1988) Evolución petrológica y geoquímica de la unidad alóctona inferior del complejo metamórfico básico-ultrabásico de Cabo Ortegal (Unidad de Moeche) y del Silúrico parautoctono, Cadena Hercínica Ibérica (NW de España). Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza, Conde de Fenosa, Corpus Geologicum GallaeciaeGoogle Scholar
  5. Avances y retos en la conservación del Patrimonio Geológico en España. Actas de la IX Reunión Nacional de la Comisión de Patrimonio Geológico (Sociedad Geológica de España), (2011)Google Scholar
  6. Azcárraga J (2000) Evolución tectónica y metamórfica de los mantos inferiores de grado alto y alta presión del complejo de Cabo Ortegal. Nova TerraGoogle Scholar
  7. Benito-Calvo A, Pérez-González A, Magri O, Meza P (2009) Assessing regional geodiversity: the Iberian Peninsula. Earth Surf Process Landf 34:1433–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 4:45–63Google Scholar
  9. Burek C (2012) The role of LGAPs (Local Geodiversity Action Plans) and Welsh RIGS as local drivers for geoconservation within geotourism in wales. Geoheritage 4(1):45–63Google Scholar
  10. Canosa F (2014) Proyecto de creación del “Xeoparque do Cabo Ortegal” (Geoparque del Cabo Ortegal)Google Scholar
  11. Canosa F (2015) Guía geológica de siete georutas en el Concello de Cedeira. Concello de CedeiraGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen A, Lu Y, Ng YCY (2015) In: role of tourism earth-science in tourism development. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. Cocean G, Cocean P (2017) An assessment of gorges for purposes of identifying geomorphosites of geotourism value in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Geoheritage 9:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa-Casais M, Caetano-Alves MI, Blanco-Chao R (2015) Assessment and management of the geomorphological heritage of Monte Pindo (NW Spain): a landscape as a symbol of identity. Sustainability 7:7049–7085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crofts R (2014) Promoting geodiversity: learning lessons from biodiversity. Proc Geol Assoc 125:263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dowling RK, Newsome D (2010) Global geotourism perspectives. Goodfellow Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Duque-Lucas LC, Elizaga-Muñoz E & Vidal-Romaní JR (1983) Instituto Geológico y Minero de EspañaGoogle Scholar
  18. Farsani NT, Coelho COA, Costa CMM, Amrikazemi A (2014) Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage 6:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernández-Martínez E, Castaño de Luis R (2011) Avances y retos en la conservación del Patrimonio Geológico en España. Actas de la IX Reunión Nacional de la Comisión de Patrimonio Geológico (Sociedad Geológica de España). Universidad de LeónGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Álvarez J (2009) Lugares, paisajes y políticas de memoria: una lectura geográfica. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles:175–202Google Scholar
  21. Global Geotourism Perspectives (2010) Goodfellow PublishersGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray M (2008) Geodiversity: developing the paradigm. Proc Geol Assoc 119:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henriques MH, dos Reis RP, Brilha J, Mota T (2011) Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage 3:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hjort J, Heikkinen RK, Luoto M (2012) Inclusion of explicit measures of geodiversity improve biodiversity models in a boreal landscape. Biodivers Conserv 21:3487–3506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horacio J, Muñoz-Narciso E, Sierra-Pernas JM, Canosa F, Pérez-Alberti A (2016) Dinámica geomorfológica del frente costero del valle de Teixidelo (NO Península Ibérica) entre 1945 y 2014. Revista Geográfica del Sur 7:34–46Google Scholar
  26. Hose TA (2016a) Appreciating physical landscapes: Three hundred years of Geotourism. Geol. J.  https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.2852
  27. Hose TA (2016b) Geoheritage and geotourism: a European perspective. Boydell PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Hose TA, Marković SB, Komac B, Zorn M (2011) Geotourism – a short introduction. Acta geographica Slovenica 51:339–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jorgenson J, Nickerson N (2016) Geotourism and sustainability as a business mindset. J Hosp Mark Manag 25:270–290Google Scholar
  30. Julia E (2017) The contribution of the geotourism to the sustainable development: The role of geoethics. Arch & Anthropol Open Acc 1(3).  https://doi.org/10.31031/AAOA.2017.01.000511
  31. Kubalíková L, Kirchner K (2016) Geosite and geomorphosite assessment as a tool for geoconservation and geotourism purposes: a case study from Vizovická vrchovina highland (eastern part of the Czech Republic). Geoheritage 8:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lahuerta-Mouriño F & Lucas-Domínguez N (1990) Itinerario xeolóxico no norte de Galicia. Diputación de LugoGoogle Scholar
  33. Marcos A, Farias P, Galán G, Fernández FJ & Llana-Fúnez S (2002) In: Variscan-Appalachian dynamics: the building of the late Paleozoic basement. Geological Society of America, pp 143–162Google Scholar
  34. Martínez-Catalán JR, Hatcher RD, Arenas R & Díaz García F (2002) Variscan- Appalachian dynamics: the building of the late Paleozoic basement. Geological Society of America 305pGoogle Scholar
  35. Martínez-Catalán JR, Arenas R, Abati J, Sánchez Martínez S, Díaz García F, Fernández Suárez J, González Cuadra P, Castiñeiras P, Gómez Barreiro J, Díez Montes A, González Clavijo E, Rubio Pascual FJ, Andonaegui P, Jeffries TE, Alcock JE, Díez Fernández R, López Carmona A (2010) Geología del Complejo de Cabo Ortegal y de las unidades relacionadas del basamento de Galicia. Guía de campo. Concello de CariñoGoogle Scholar
  36. Martínez-Graña AM, Goy JL, Cimarra CA (2013) A virtual tour of geological heritage: valourising geodiversity using Google Earth and QR code. Comput Geosci 61:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martínez-Graña AM, Serrano L, González-Delgado JA, Dabrio CJ, Legoinha P (2017) Sustainable geotourism using digital technologies along a rural georoute in Monsagro (Salamanca, Spain). Int J Digital Earth 10:121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendía MS (2000) Petrología de la unidad eclogítica del Complejo de Cabo Ortegal (NW de España). Nova Terra, p 424Google Scholar
  39. Migoń P, Pijet-Migoń E (2017) Viewpoint geosites — values, conservation and management issues. Proc Geol Assoc 128:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mikhailenko AV, Nazarenko OV, Ruban DA, Zayats PP (2017) Aesthetics-based classification of geological structures in outcrops for geotourism purposes: a tentative proposal. Geologos 23:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Monterrubio, S.; Lunar, R. & Oyarzun, R.(1992). Mineralizaciones de cromo-platinoides y oro en los complejos polimetamórficos de Galicia. Laboratorio Xeolóxico de Laxe. Serie Nova TerraGoogle Scholar
  42. Motte E, McInnes R (2019) Using artistic imagery to improve understanding of coastal landscape changes on the Rance Estuary (French Channel Coast). GeoheritageGoogle Scholar
  43. Musila W, Todt H, Uster D, Dalitz H (2005) Is geodiversity correlated to biodiversity? A case study of the relationship between spatial heterogeneity of soil resources and tree diversity in a Western Kenyan Rainforest. Springer, US, pp 405–414Google Scholar
  44. Newsome D, Dowling R (2010) Geotourism: the tourism of geology and landscape. Goodfellow Publishers LimitedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ólafsdóttir R, Dowling R (2014) Geotourism and geoparks---a tool for geoconservation and rural development in vulnerable environments: a case study from Iceland. Geoheritage 6:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ollero A (2017) Hidrogeomorfología y geodiversidad: el patrimonio fluvial. Ríos: hidrogeomorfología, problemática, rehabilitación. In: Ayuntamiento de ZaragozaGoogle Scholar
  47. Puelles P (2004) Deformación, Metamorfismo y Exhumación de las Granulitas de Alta Presión de La Bacariza (Complejo de Cabo Ortegal, No España)Google Scholar
  48. Pulido-Fernández M, Largar Timón D & García Marín R (2011) El geoturismo como estrategia de desarrollo en áreas rurales deprimidas: propuestas de geoparque Villuercas, Ibores, Jara (Extremadura). Boletín de la A.G.E., pp 485–497Google Scholar
  49. Reynard E (2008) Scientific research and tourist promotion of geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Din Quat 31:225–230Google Scholar
  50. Ruban DA (2016) Representation of geologic time in the global geopark network: a web-page study. Tourism Management Perspectives 20:204–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Santos I, Henriques R, Mariano G, Pereira DI (2018) Methodologies to represent and promote the geoheritage using unmanned aerial vehicles, multimedia technologies, and augmented reality. Geoheritage 10:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Serrano Cañadas E & Ruiz Flaño P (2007) Geodiversidad: concepto, evaluación y aplicación territorial. El caso de Tiermes Caracena (Soria). Boletín de la AGE, pp 79–98Google Scholar
  53. Świerkosz K, Koźma J, Reczyńska K, Halama M (2017) Muskau arch geopark in Poland (Central Europe)---is it possible to integrate geoconservation and geoeducation into biodiversity conservation? Geoheritage 9:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verde-Vilanova JR (2009) Influencia de los factores de formación y uso del suelo en las propiedades ándicas, formas y mecanismos de estabilización de carbono en suelos del noroeste de la Península Ibérica. Universidade de Santiago de CompostelaGoogle Scholar
  55. Višnić T, Spasojević B, Vujičić M (2016) The potential for geotourism development on the Srem Loess Plateau based on a preliminary Geosite Assessment Model (GAM). Geoheritage 8:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walliss J, Kok K (2014) New interpretative strategies for geotourism: an exploration of two Australian mining sites. J Tour Cult Chang 12:33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wójtowicz B (2011) The possibility of development of tourism and education in areas of geological parks based on the opinion of students of geography UJK in Kielce. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, pp 133–140Google Scholar
  58. Zgłobicki W, Baran-Zgłobicka B (2013) Geomorphological heritage as a tourist attraction. A case study in Lubelskie Province, SE Poland. Geoheritage 5:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesús Horacio
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Efrén Muñoz-Narciso
    • 3
  • José M. Sierra-Pernas
    • 4
  • Francisco Canosa
    • 5
  • Augusto Pérez-Alberti
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  2. 2.Laboratory of Environmental Technology (Institute of Technological Research)University of Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Environment and Soil Sciences (DMACS)Universitat de LleidaLleidaSpain
  4. 4.Asociación de Veciñas e Veciños de CouzadoiroOrtigueira (A Coruña)Spain
  5. 5.Amigos do Parque Xeolóxico do Cabo OrtegalViveiro (Lugo)Spain

Personalised recommendations