Advertisement

Sugar Tech

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 83–92 | Cite as

Temperature and Relative Humidity Effects on Sugarcane Flowering Ability and Pollen Viability Under Natural and Seminatural Conditions

  • Farrag F. B. Abu-EllailEmail author
  • Per H. McCord
Research Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Flowering of sugarcane genotypes is important for the breeding program, but flowering is highly affected by environmental conditions. Field experiments were conducted at Sugarcane Field Station (26.52°N and 80.36°W), Canal Point, Florida, USA, during the 2015–2016 season, to explore the flowering behavior of 12 sugarcane genotypes under natural and seminatural environments concerning the effects of temperature and % relative humidity on the pollen viability to find out the best stable ones in flowering to be used in the breeding program. There were critical 57 days under the natural condition with a night temperature of ≤ 20 °C during the sensitive floral tip and full emergence period. This led to a reduction in pollen viability percentage and % pollen germination percentages. Moreover, the flowering intensity was very much reduced. On another hand, there were no appreciable differences in relative humidity % in the same floral stages. The total flowering plants decreased under natural compared with seminatural conditions. The results showed that the tested genotypes varied significantly in all traits. The interaction of genotypes × treatments interaction had a significant effect on most studied traits. Most of the Houma cane genotypes such as HO11-512, HOCP12-643, and HOCP01-517 showed stable flowering and % pollen viability than CP genotypes and L ones (CPO4-1935, CPO8-2506, L11-187, and L09-112) under both conditions. The study suggests the genotypes are stable in flowering to use them in the breeding program.

Keywords

Flowering Natural and seminatural Pollen viability Relative humidity Sugarcane Temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. Jack Comstock and Dr. Duli Zhao for providing the facilities and encouragement to carry out this study. We are very thankful to Biological Science, Technician, Moaiad Kanaan and also to Biological Science, Technician, Kay McCorkle for their help in collecting the meteorological data. Special thanks is due to Dr. Abdullah El-Shafai for his help and suggestions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Araldi, R., F.M.L. Silva, E.O. Ono, and J.D. Rodrigues. 2010. Flowering in sugarcane. Ciencia Rural 40(3): 694–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arceneaux, G. 1965. Flowering of sugarcane. Proceedings ISSCT 12: 780–784.Google Scholar
  3. Berding, N. 1981. Improved flowering and pollen fertility in sugarcane under increased night temperature. Crop Science 21: 863–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berding, N. 1995. Improving flowering through breeding: Progress and prospects. Proceedings of Queensland Sugar Technologies Association 17: 162–171.Google Scholar
  5. Berding, N., R.S. Pendrigh, and V. Dunne. 2000. Can flowering in sugarcane be optimized by use of differential declinations for the initiation and development phases. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 27: 699–711.Google Scholar
  6. Brett, P.G.C. 1951. Flowering and pollen fertility in relation to sugarcane breeding in Natal. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 7: 43–56.Google Scholar
  7. Brett, P.G.C. 1974. Early experiments in artificial induction of flowering at Mount Edgecombe. Proceedings of South African Sugar Technologists Association 48: 78–81.Google Scholar
  8. Brett, P.G.C., and R.L. Harding. 1974. Artificial induction of flowering in Natal. Proceedings International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 15: 55–66.Google Scholar
  9. Clements, H.F., and M. Awada. 1967. Experiments on the artificial induction of flowering in sugarcane. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 12: 795–812.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, R.E. 1962. Control of flowering and the use of pollen storage as technique in a sugarcane breeding program. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 11: 533–540.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, R.E. 1969. Physiology of flowering in sugarcane. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 13: 992–1000.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, E., and J.G. Paxton. 1979. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on the rate of elongation of sugarcane leaf sheaths. Proceedings of South African Sugar Technologists Association 53: 163–164.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, T.O., J.F. Van Breemen, and G. Arceneaux. 1967. Flowering of sugarcane in relation to maximum temperature during the induction period. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 12: 790–794.Google Scholar
  14. Gomez, K.A., and A.A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agriculture Research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Gosnell, J.M. 1973. Some factors affecting flowering in sugarcane. Proceedings of South African Sugar Technologists Association 47: 144–147.Google Scholar
  16. Horsley, T., and M. Zhou. 2013. Effect of photoperiod treatments on pollen viability and flowering at the South African Sugarcane Research Institute. Proceedings of South African Sugar Technologists Association 86: 286–290.Google Scholar
  17. Julien, M.H.R. 1973. Physiology of flowering in Saccharum. I: Daylength control of floral initiation and development in S. spontaneum L. Journal of Experimental Botany 4: 549–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnamurthi, M. 1977. The sugarcane pollen. In Congress of International Society of Sugarcane, Technologists, Brazil. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists Impress, Braszil, Vol. 16, 157–164.Google Scholar
  19. LaBorde, C.M., K.A. Gravois, and K.P. Bischoff. 2001. Photoperiod and crossing in the Louisiana “L” sugarcane variety development program. Sugarcane Research Annual Progress Report, LSU Agric. Exp. Stn., Baton Rouge, LA, 6–18.Google Scholar
  20. LaBorde, C., C. Kimbeng, K. Gravois, and K. Bischoff. 2014. Temperature effects on sugarcane tassel production under artificial photoperiod regimes. Journal of American Society Sugarcane Technologists 34: 33–43.Google Scholar
  21. Loch, D.S., B.G. Cook, and G.L. Harvey. 1999. Location of seed crops: Grasses. In Forage Seed Production 2: Tropical and Subtropical Species, ed. D.S. Loch and J.E. Ferguson, 113–128. New York, NY: CABI Publ.Google Scholar
  22. Midmore, D.J. 1980. Effects of photoperiod on flowering and fertility of sugarcane (Saccharum Spp.). Field Crops Research 3: 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moore, P.H. 1974. Investigation on the flowering of Saccharurm. II Number of spindle leaves and date of induction. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 14: 7–16.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, P.H. 1987. Physiology and control of flowering. In Copersucar’s International Sugarcane Breeding Workshop, 103–127.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, P.H., and N. Berding. 2014. Flowering in sugarcane. In Chapter 15: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology, 379–409. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  26. Moore, P.H., and K.J. Nuss. 1987. Flowering and flower synchronization. In Sugarcane Improvement through Breeding, ed. D.J. Heinz, 102–127. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. Nuss, K.J. 1979. Factors influencing the numbers of seedlings obtained from sugarcane crosses. Proceedings of South African Sugar Technologists Association 53: 167–169.Google Scholar
  28. Nuss, K.J. 1980. Effect of photoperiod and temperature on initiation and development of flowers in sugarcane. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 17: 486–493.Google Scholar
  29. Nuss, K.J., and N. Berding. 1999. Planned recombination in sugarcane breeding: Artificial initiation of flowering in sugarcane in subtropical and tropical conditions. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 23: 202–205.Google Scholar
  30. Nuss, K.J., and P.G.C. Brett. 1977. Artificial induction of flowering in a sugarcane breeding programme. Proceedings of South African Genetics Society Congress 6: 54–64.Google Scholar
  31. Paliatseas, E.D. 1962. Further studies on flowering of sugar cane in Louisiana. In Congress of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, Proceedings, Vol. 11, 805–814. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  32. Paliatseas, E.D. 1976. Factors affecting the seed set of sugarcane. Journal of American Society Sugarcane Technologists 6: 18. (Abstract).Google Scholar
  33. Paliatseas, E.D., and S.J.P. Chilton. 1956. The induction of the emergence of the inflorescence of sugarcane. Proceedings International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 9: 657–664.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, H.A. 1984. Factors influencing cane flowering. In Sugarcane, ed. F. Blackburn, 76–79. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  35. Waller, R.A., and D.B. Duncan. 1969. A bay rules for the symmetric multiple comparison problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64: 1484–1503.Google Scholar
  36. Zhou, M. 2013. Conventional sugarcane breeding in South Africa: Progress and future prospects. American Journal of Plant Sciences 4: 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Breeding and Genetics DepartmentSugar Crops Research Institute, ARCGizaEgypt
  2. 2.USDA-ARSCanal PointUSA

Personalised recommendations