Advertisement

Locating unmanned aircraft systems for multiple missions under different weather conditions

  • Danışment VuralEmail author
  • Robert F. Dell
  • Erkan Kose
Original Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Motivated by the increasing civilian use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), this paper considers the simultaneous location and routing of UAVs for multiple missions and different weather conditions. We include modeling and computational experience inspired by requirements for air surveillance by the Turkish government’s public agencies. We model these demands in multiple mission areas and consider the impact of different weather conditions on the ability to employ UAVs from different geographic locations. We formulate the problem as a two-stage stochastic integer linear program with recourse and get an optimal solution for realistic test instances in a reasonable amount of time using decomposition by weather and mission combinations. We also introduce an optimization-based heuristic with bounds based on our decomposition for larger test instances.

Keywords

Unmanned aircraft systems Location routing problem Stochastic integer linear program with recourse Optimization-based heuristic 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C110 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author wishes to thank Naval Postgraduate School’s staff for their hospitality during his visit. A visit that was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [Grant Number 2219]. This support is gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful to the referees for their valuable suggestions.

References

  1. Agatz N, Bouman P, Schmidt M (2015) Optimization approaches for the traveling salesman problem with drone, Tech. Rep., 2015Google Scholar
  2. Alighanbari M, Kuwata Y, How JP (2003, June) Coordination and control of multiple UAVs with timing constraints and loitering. In: American control conference, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003. IEEE, vol 6, pp 5311–5316Google Scholar
  3. Bone E, Bolkcom C (2003, April) Unmanned aerial vehicles: background and issues for congress. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalamagkidis K, Valavanis KP, Piegl LA (2011) On integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system: issues, challenges, operational restrictions, certification, and recommendations, vol 54. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorling K, Heinrichs J, Messier GG, Magierowski S (2017) Vehicle routing problems for drone delivery. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 47(1):70–85Google Scholar
  6. Drexl M, Schneider M (2015) A survey of variants and extensions of the location-routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 241(2):283–308Google Scholar
  7. Eglese R, Bektas T (2014) Green vehicle routing. Vehicle Routing: Probl Methods Appl 18:437Google Scholar
  8. Evers L, Dollevoet T, Barros AI, Monsuur H (2014) Robust UAV mission planning. Ann Oper Res 222(1):293–315Google Scholar
  9. GAMS, General Algebraic Modeling System, GAMS Development Corporation, www.gams.com. Last accessed 21 May 2017
  10. Geng L, Zhang YF, Wang J, Fuh JY, Teo SH (2014) Cooperative mission planning with multiple UAVs in realistic environments. Unmanned Syst 2(01):73–86Google Scholar
  11. Gunnarsson H, Rönnqvist M, Carlsson D (2006) A combined terminal location and ship routing problem. J Oper Res Soc 57(8):928–938Google Scholar
  12. Ha QM, Deville Y, Pham QD, Hà MH (2015) Heuristic methods for the traveling salesman problem with drone. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.08764
  13. Hausamann D, Zirnig W, Schreier G, Strobl P (2005) Monitoring of gas pipelines-a civil UAV application. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 77(5):352–360Google Scholar
  14. Herwitz SR, Johnson LF, Dunagan SE, Higgins RG, Sullivan DV, Zheng J, Slye RE et al (2004) Imaging from an unmanned aerial vehicle: agricultural surveillance and decision support. Comput Electron Agric 44(1):49–61Google Scholar
  15. Hong I, Kuby M, Murray AT (2018) A range-restricted recharging station coverage model for drone delivery service planning. Transp Res C 90:198–212Google Scholar
  16. Karakaya M (2014) UAV route planning for maximum target coverage. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.2906
  17. Karaman S, Frazzoli E (2011) Linear temporal logic vehicle routing with applications to multi-UAV mission planning. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 21(12):1372–1395Google Scholar
  18. Lopes RB, Ferreira C, Santos BS, Barreto S (2013) A taxonomical analysis, current methods and objectives on location-routing problems. Int Trans Oper Res 20(6):795–822Google Scholar
  19. Mufalli F, Batta R, Nagi R (2012) Simultaneous sensor selection and routing of unmanned aerial vehicles for complex mission plans. Comput Oper Res 39(11):2787–2799Google Scholar
  20. Murray CC, Chu AG (2015) The flying sidekick traveling salesman problem: optimization of drone-assisted parcel delivery. Transp Res C: Emerg Technol 54:86–109Google Scholar
  21. Nagy G, Salhi S (2007) Location-routing: issues, models and methods. Eur J Oper Res 177(2):649–672Google Scholar
  22. Perboli G, Tadei R, Vigo D (2011) The two-echelon capacitated vehicle routing problem: models and math-based heuristics. Transp Sci 45(3):364–380Google Scholar
  23. Pohl AJ, Lamont GB (2008, December). Multi-objective UAV mission planning using evolutionary computation. In: Proceedings of the 40th conference on winter simulation, pp 1268–1279Google Scholar
  24. Prodhon C, Prins C (2014) A survey of recent research on location-routing problems. Eur J Oper Res 238(1):1–17Google Scholar
  25. Salhi S, Nagy G (1999) Consistency and robustness in location-routing. Stud Locat Anal 13:3–19Google Scholar
  26. Salhi S, Rand GK (1989) The effect of ignoring routes when locating depots. Eur J Oper Res 39(2):150–156Google Scholar
  27. Samanlioglu F (2013) A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 226(2):332–340Google Scholar
  28. Sarıçiçek İ, Akkuş Y (2015) Unmanned aerial vehicle hub-location and routing for monitoring geographic borders. Appl Math Model 39(14):3939–3953Google Scholar
  29. Shetty VK, Sudit M, Nagi R (2008) Priority-based assignment and routing of a fleet of unmanned combat aerial vehicles. Comput Oper Res 35(6):1813–1828Google Scholar
  30. Shuai B, Zhao J (2011) Multi-objective 0–1 linear programming model for combined location–routing problem in hazardous waste logistics system. J Southwest Jiaotong Univ 46(2):326–332Google Scholar
  31. Solomon MM (1987) Algorithms for the vehicle routing and scheduling problems with time window constraints. Oper Res 35(2):254–265Google Scholar
  32. Toth P, Vigo D (2001, January) An overview of vehicle routing problems. In: The vehicle routing problem. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  33. Tsiligirides T (1984) Heuristic methods applied to orienteering. J Oper Res Soc 35(9):797–809Google Scholar
  34. TSPLIB, http://comopt.ifi.uniheidelberg.de/software/TSPLIB95. Last accessed 15 Feb 2017
  35. Vachtsevanos GJ, Valavanis KP (2015) Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Wasner M, Zäpfel G (2004) An integrated multi-depot hub-location vehicle routing model for network planning of parcel service. Int J Prod Econ 90(3):403–419Google Scholar
  37. Weinstein AL, Schumacher C (2007, January) UAV scheduling via the vehicle routing problem with time windows. In: Proceedings of AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace 2007 conference and exhibit, Rohnert Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu K, Budhiraja AK, Tokekar P (2017) Algorithms for routing of unmanned aerial vehicles with mobile recharging stations and for package delivery. arXivpreprint arXiv:1704.00079

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danışment Vural
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert F. Dell
    • 2
  • Erkan Kose
    • 3
  1. 1.Turkish Land ForcesAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Naval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA
  3. 3.Nuh Naci Yagan UniversityKayseriTurkey

Personalised recommendations