Advertisement

Integration of multi-product supply chain network design and assembly line balancing

  • Reza RamezanianEmail author
  • Sadjad Khalesi
Original Paper
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

In the supply chain design problems, optimization is usually done without any attention to performance and efficiency of each part of chain. On the other hand, in Assembly Line Balancing (ALB) problems, the objective of the problems is to optimize with regard to the situation of assemblers, while in this set of problems, concentration on some factors such as how to provide raw materials and also sending final products to customers are very important. Since optimal decisions in each problem will affect the other decisions, it is required to study these two matters at the same time; otherwise, the validity of the results will be reduced. In this paper, the problem of integration of multi-product Supply Chain Network designing and ALB are addressed. A Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming model is proposed to formulate the studied problem. The model is solved by using GAMS in the form of a numerical example given in small size. Finally, Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) as two well-known meta-heuristic algorithms are applied to solve the model with larger dimensions. The computational results show efficiency of the ICA compared with GA. Moreover, after decomposing the integrated mode into two sub problems (ALB problem and Supply Chain Network Design problem), it is shown that optimum cost value of integrated mode is better than total cost functions of two sub-problems separately.

Keywords

Supply chain network design Assembly line balancing problem Integrated framework Mathematical modeling Meta-heuristic algorithms 

Notes

References

  1. Alptekinoğlu A, Tang CS (2005) A model for analyzing multi-channel distribution systems. Eur J Oper Res 163(3):802–824Google Scholar
  2. Altiparmak F, Gen M, Lin L, Paksoy T (2006) A genetic algorithm approach for multi-objective optimization of supply chain networks. Comput Ind Eng 51:196–215Google Scholar
  3. Altiparmak F, Gen M, Lin L, Karaoglan I (2009) A steady-state genetic algorithm for multi-product supply chain network design. Comput Ind Eng 56(2):521–537Google Scholar
  4. Andrésa C, Mirallesa C, Pastor R (2008) Balancing and scheduling tasks in assembly lines with sequence-dependent setup times. Eur J Oper Res 187:1212–1223Google Scholar
  5. Arani HV, Torabi S (2018) Integrated material-financial supply chain master planning under mixed uncertainty. Inf Sci 423:96–114Google Scholar
  6. Azad N, Davoudpour H (2013) Designing a stochastic distribution network model under risk. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(1–4):23–40Google Scholar
  7. Azad N, Saharidis GKD, Davoudpour H, Malekly H, Yektamaram SA (2013) Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: an improved Benders decomposition approach. Ann Oper Res 210(1):125–163Google Scholar
  8. Azad N, Davoudpour H, Saharidis GKD, Shiripour M (2014) A new model to mitigating random disruption risks of facility and transportation in supply chain network design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9–12):1757–1774Google Scholar
  9. Azaron A, Brown K, Tarim S, Modarres M (2008) A multi-objective stochastic programming approach for supply chain design considering risk. Int J Prod Econ 116:129–138Google Scholar
  10. Bagher M, Zandieh M, Farsijani H (2011) Balancing of stochastic U-type assembly lines: an imperialist competitive algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(1–4):271–285Google Scholar
  11. Balaman ŞY, Matopoulos A, Wright DG, Scott J (2018) Integrated optimization of sustainable supply chains and transportation networks for multi technology bio-based production: a decision support system based on fuzzy ε-constraint method. J Clean Prod 172:2594–2617Google Scholar
  12. Beamon BM (1998a) Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods. Int J Prod Econ 55:281–294Google Scholar
  13. Beamon BM (1998b) Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods. Int J Prod Econ 55(3):281–294Google Scholar
  14. Chan FT, Chung S, Wadhwa S (2005) A hybrid genetic algorithm for production and distribution. Omega 33(4):345–355Google Scholar
  15. Chatzikontidou A, Longinidis P, Tsiakis P, Georgiadis MC (2017) Flexible supply chain network design under uncertainty. Chem Eng Res Des 128:290–305Google Scholar
  16. Che Z-G, Che Z, Hsu T (2009) Cooperator selection and industry assignment in supply chain network with line balancing technology. Expert Syst App 36:10381–10387Google Scholar
  17. Chen C-L, Lee W-C (2004) Multi-objective optimization of multi-echelon supply chain networks with uncertain product demands and prices. Comput Chem Eng 28:1131–1144Google Scholar
  18. Dasci A, Verter V (2001) A continuous model for production–distribution system design. Eur J Oper Res 129(2):287–298Google Scholar
  19. Diabat A, Richard J-PP (2015) An integrated supply chain problem: a nested lagrangian relaxation approach. Ann Oper Res 229(1):303–323Google Scholar
  20. Eskigun E, Uzsoy R, Preckel PV, Beaujon G, Krishnan S, Tew JD (2005) Outbound supply chain network design with mode selection, lead times and capacitated vehicle distribution centers. Eur J Oper Res 165(1):182–206Google Scholar
  21. Farahani M, Shavandi H, Rahmani D (2017) A location-inventory model considering a strategy to mitigate disruption risk in supply chain by substitutable products. Comput Ind Eng 108:213–224Google Scholar
  22. Govindan K, Fattahi M, Keyvanshokooh E (2017) Supply chain network design under uncertainty: a comprehensive review and future research directions. Eur J Oper Res 263(1):108–141Google Scholar
  23. Grossmann IE, Kravanja Z (1995) Mixed-integer nonlinear programming techniques for process systems engineering. Comput Chem Eng 19:189–204Google Scholar
  24. Guillén-Gosálbez G, Grossmann IE (2008) Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. AIChE J 55(1):99–121Google Scholar
  25. Gumus AT, Guneri AF, Keles S (2009) Supply chain network design using an integrated neuro-fuzzy and MILP approach: a comparative design study. Expert Syst Appl 36:12570–12577Google Scholar
  26. Haddadsisakht A, Ryan SM (2018) Closed-loop supply chain network design with multiple transportation modes under stochastic demand and uncertain carbon tax. Int J Prod Econ 195:118–131Google Scholar
  27. Hall NG, Potts CN (2003) Supply chain scheduling: batching and delivery. Oper Res 51:566–584Google Scholar
  28. Hwang H-S (2002) Design of supply-chain logistics system considering service level. Comput Ind Eng 43(1–2):283–297Google Scholar
  29. Jayaraman V, Pirkulb H (2001) Planning and coordination of production and distribution facilities for multiple commodities. Eur J Oper Res 133(2):394–408Google Scholar
  30. Koç Ç (2016) An evolutionary algorithm for supply chain network design with assembly line balancing. Neural Comput Appl 28(11):1–13Google Scholar
  31. Korpela J, Lehmusvaara A (1999) A customer oriented approach to warehouse network evaluation and design. Int J Prod Econ 59(1–3):135–146Google Scholar
  32. Li Q, Savachkin A (2016) Reliable distribution networks design with nonlinear fortification function. Int J Syst Sci 47(4):805–813Google Scholar
  33. Li Q, Zeng B, Savachkin A (2013) Reliable facility location design under disruptions. Comput Oper Res 40(4):901–909Google Scholar
  34. Lia M, Tang Q, Zheng Q, Xia X, Floudas C (2017) Rules-based heuristic approach for the U-shaped assembly line balancing problem. Appl Math Model 48:423–439Google Scholar
  35. Marufuzzaman M, Eksioglu SD, Li X, Wang J (2014) Analyzing the impact of intermodal-related risk to the design and management of biofuel supply chain. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 69:122–145Google Scholar
  36. Mawandiya BK, JhaJitesh JK, Thakkar J (2018) Optimal production-inventory policy for closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing under random demand and return. Oper Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0398-x Google Scholar
  37. Melachrinoudis E, Messac A, Min H (2005) Consolidating a warehouse network: a physical programming approach. Int J Prod Econ 97(1):1–17Google Scholar
  38. Miranda PA, Garrido RA (2004) Incorporating inventory control decisions into a strategic distribution network design model with stochastic demand. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 40(3):183–207Google Scholar
  39. Mohammadi M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Rostami H (2011) A multi-objective imperialist competitive algorithm for a capacitated hub covering location problem. Int J Ind Eng Comput 2(3):671–688Google Scholar
  40. Mokashi S, Kokossis A (2003) Application of dispersion algorithms to supply chain optimisation. Comput Chem Eng 27(7):927–949Google Scholar
  41. Moon C, Lee YH, Jeong CS, Yun Y (2008) Integrated process planning and scheduling in a supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 54:1048–1061Google Scholar
  42. Moreira MCO, Pastor R, Costac AM, Miralles C (2017) The multi-objective assembly line worker integration and balancing problem of type-2. Comput Oper Res 82:114–125Google Scholar
  43. Nourmohammadi A, Zandiehb M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2013a) An imperialist competitive algorithm for multi-objective U-type assembly line design. J Comput Sci 4(5):393–400Google Scholar
  44. Nourmohammadi A, Zandiehb M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2013b) An imperialist competitive algorithm for multi-objective U-type assembly line design. J Comput Sci 4:393–400Google Scholar
  45. Nozick L (2001) The fixed charge facility location problem with coverage restrictions. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 37(4):281–296Google Scholar
  46. Ozceylan E, Paksoy T (2014) Fuzzy mathematical programming approaches for reverse supply chain optimization with disassembly line balancing problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(4):1969–1985Google Scholar
  47. Özceylan E, Paksoy T (2013) Reverse supply chain optimisation with disassembly line balancing. Int J Prod Res 51(20):5985–6001Google Scholar
  48. Paksoy T, Özceylan E (2012) Supply chain optimisation with U-type assembly line balancing. Int J Prod Res 50:5085–5105Google Scholar
  49. Paksoy T, Özceylan E, Gökçen H (2012) Supply chain optimisation with assembly line balancing. Int J Prod Res 50(11):3115–3136Google Scholar
  50. Pereira J, Vilà M (2016) A new model for supply chain network design with integrated assembly line balancing decisions. Int J Prod Res 54(9):2653–2669Google Scholar
  51. Petridis K (2015) Optimal design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under normally distributed demand. Ann Oper Res 227(1):63–91Google Scholar
  52. Rafiei H, Safaei F, Rabbani M (2018) Integrated production-distribution planning problem in a competition-based four-echelon supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 119:85–99Google Scholar
  53. Rahmani D, Mahoodian V (2018) Strategic and operational supply chain network design to reduce carbon emission considering reliability and robustness. J Clean Prod 149:607–620Google Scholar
  54. Ramezani M, Bashiri M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2013) A robust design for a closed-loop supply chain network under an uncertain environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(5–8):825–843Google Scholar
  55. Ramezanian R, Ezzatpanah A (2015) Modeling and solving multi-objective mixed-model assembly line balancing and worker assignment problem. Comput Ind Eng 87:74–80Google Scholar
  56. Romeijn HE, Shub J, Teo C-P (2007) Designing two-echelon supply networks. Eur J Oper Res 178(2):449–462Google Scholar
  57. Rostami M, Bagherpour M (2017) A lagrangian relaxation algorithm for facility location of resource-constrained decentralized multi-project scheduling problems. Oper Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0358-x Google Scholar
  58. Sabri EH, Beamon BM (2000) A multi-objective approach to simultaneous strategic and operational planning in supply chain design. Omega 28(5):581–598Google Scholar
  59. Shiripour S, Mahdavi I, Amiri-Aref M, Mohammadnia-Otaghsaraa M, Mahdavi-Amiri N (2012) Multi-facility location problems in the presence of a probabilistic line barrier: a mixed integer quadratic programming model. Int J Prod Res 50:3988–4008Google Scholar
  60. Shu J, Teo C-P, Shen Z-JM (2005) Stochastic transportation-inventory network design problem. Oper Res 53(1):48–60Google Scholar
  61. Soleimani H, Govindan K, Saghafi H, Jafari H (2017) Fuzzy multi-objective sustainable and green closed-loop supply chain network design. Comput Ind Eng 109:191–203Google Scholar
  62. Stindt D, Sahamie R (2014) Review of research on closed loop supply chain management in the process industry. Flex Serv Manuf J 26(1–2):268–293Google Scholar
  63. Syam SS (2002) A model and methodologies for the location problem with logistical components. Comput Oper Res 29(9):1173–1193Google Scholar
  64. Syarif A, Yun Y, Gen M (2002) Study on multi-stage logistic chain network: a spanning tree-based genetic algorithm approach. Comput Ind Eng 43(1–2):299–314Google Scholar
  65. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Gholipour-Kanani Y, Shahramifar M (2013) A multi-objective imperialist competitive algorithm for a capacitated single-allocation hub location problem. Int J Eng 26:605–620Google Scholar
  66. Wang B, Guan Z, Li D, Zhang C, Chen L (2014) Two-sided assembly line balancing with operator number and task constraints: a hybrid imperialist competitive algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(5–8):791–805Google Scholar
  67. Yolmeh A, Salehi N (2015) An outer approximation method for an integration of supply chain network designing and assembly line balancing under uncertainty. Comput Ind Eng 83:297–306Google Scholar
  68. Yongheng J, Rodriguez MA, Harjunkoski I, Grossmann IE (2014) Optimal supply chain design and management over a multi-period horizon under demand uncertainty. Part II: a Lagrangean decomposition algorithm. Comput Chem Eng 62:211–224Google Scholar
  69. Zarandi MHF, Sisakht AH, Davari S (2011) Design of a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) model using an interactive fuzzy goal programming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(5–8):809–821Google Scholar
  70. Zokaee S, Jabbarzadeh A, Fahimnia B, Sadjadi SJ (2017) Robust supply chain network design: an optimization model with real world application. Ann Oper Res 257(1–2):15–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringK. N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations