Advertisement

Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis complicated with severe stricture requiring surgical resection

  • Yusuke Onozato
  • Yu SasakiEmail author
  • Yasuhiko Abe
  • Takao Yaoita
  • Makoto Yagi
  • Naoko Mizumoto
  • Masakuni Shoji
  • Takashi Kon
  • Shoichi Nishise
  • Yoshiyuki Ueno
Case Report
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis (EIPD) is an uncommon benign disorder leading to esophageal strictures. The etiology remains unknown; however, anti-fungal treatments or endoscopic balloon dilation can improve early esophageal strictures and these rarely require surgical treatment. We report a case of a 46-year-old male with a 6 cm-long esophageal stricture due to EIPD, which did not improve following treatment with an anti-fungal agent, eventually causing aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, we performed a thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy, and his symptoms were improved after surgery. This case suggests that a surgical treatment should be considered in patients with extensive, severe strictures attributable to EIPD.

Keywords

Esophageal stenosis Esophagectomy Anti-fungal agents Candida Endoscopic balloon dilatation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest for this article.

Human rights

All procedures followed have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Mendl K, McKay JM, Tanner CH. Intramural diverticulosis of the oesophagus and Rokitansky-Aschoff Sinuses in the gall-bladder. Br J Radiol. 1960;33:496–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levine MS, Moolten DN, Herlinger H, et al. Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis: a reevaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:1165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tyberg A. A treatment option for esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis. ACG Case Rep J. 2014;1(3):134–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiba T, Iijima K, Koike T, et al. A case of severe esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis whose symptoms were ameliorated by oral administration of anti-fungal medicine. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2012;6:103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guccion JG, Ortega LG. Trichomoniasis complicating esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis: diagnosis by transmission electron microscopy. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1996;20:101–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murakami M, Tsuchiya K, Ichikawa H, et al. Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis associated with esophageal perforation. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:702–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thibodeau MP, Brigand C, Ferraro P, et al. Esophagectomy for complications of esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:178–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsuboi J, Tajika M, Nakamura T, et al. Endoscopic features of short-term progression of esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis. Endoscopy. 2010;42:E92–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu SM, Wu HH, Chang KK, Tseng LJ, Han SC, Mo LR. Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis complicated with stricture. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010;109:241–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koyama S, Watanabe M, Iijima T. Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis (diffuse type). J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:644–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Plavsic BM, Chen MY, Gelfand DW, et al. Intramural pseudodiverticulosis of the esophagus detected on barium esophagograms: increased prevalence in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1381–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Gastroenterology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of MedicineYamagata UniversityYamagataJapan
  2. 2.Division of EndoscopyYamagata University HospitalYamagataJapan

Personalised recommendations