Efficacy of Endovenous Laser Treatment Combined with Sclerosing Foam in Treating Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities
This study aims to investigate the efficacy of incision-free endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) combined with sclerosing foam in treating varicose veins of the lower extremities.
A total of 140 patients (186 limbs) who underwent laser closure of the great saphenous vein + injection sclerotherapy were included in the present study. Preoperative information, intraoperative conditions, duration of the operation, and length of hospital stay were recorded in detail. During the 6-month follow-up, the closure of the trunk and branches of the great saphenous vein, postoperative pain, the recovery of ulcer and dermatitis, and postoperative complications were traced.
All patients were treated with laser closure of the great saphenous vein and lauromacrogol injection. Twenty-six stage C6 limbs (lower extremity with ulcer) healed within 6 months, and the postoperative subjective pain disappeared after 1 month. In six patients, pigmentation in the surgical site did not completely disappear at 6 months after the operation. Saphenous nerve injury was found in five patients within 3 months after the operation, and all healed at 6 months after the operation.
EVLT combined with sclerosing foam is effective for treating varicose great saphenous veins.
This study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (registration number: ChiCTR1900021409).
KeywordsComplication Endovenous laser Foam sclerotherapy Surgery Varicose veins of lower extremity (VVLE)
We thank the participants of the study.
No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article. The article processing charges were funded by the authors.
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Zhao-Xuan Liu, Pei-Ming Guo, Ling-Ling Zhang, Meng-Jie Shi, Rui-Hua Wang and Qing-Yi Meng have nothing to disclose.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Ji’nan Central Hospital of Shandong University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- 2.Nesbitt C, Bedenis R, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7(7):CD005624.Google Scholar
- 3.Tassie E, Scotland G, Brittenden J, Cotton SC, Elders A, Campbell MK, Campbell B, Gough M, Burr JM, Ramsay CR, CLASS study team. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation or surgery as treatment for primary varicose veins from the randomized CLASS trial. Br J Surg. 2014;101(12):1532–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Lawaetz M, Serup J, Lawaetz B, Bjoern L, Blemings A, Eklof B, Rasmussen L. Comparison of endovenous radiofrequency ablation, laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Extended 5-year follow-up of a RCT. Int Angiol. 2017;36(3):281.Google Scholar
- 9.Starodubtsev V, Lukyanenko M, Karpenko A, Ignatenko P. Endovenous laser ablation in patients with severe primary chronic venous insufficiency. Int Angiol. 2017;36(4):368.Google Scholar
- 18.Tessari L. Nouvelle technique d’obtention de la sclero-mousse. Phlebologie. 2000;53:129.Google Scholar
- 23.Orsini C, Brotto M. Immediate pathologic effects on the vein wall of foam sclerotherapy. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:1250–4.Google Scholar