Advertisement

The Effects of Practitioner-Delivered School-Based Mental Health on Aggression and Violence Victimization in Middle Schoolers

  • Antonio A. Morgan-LopezEmail author
  • Lissette M. Saavedra
  • Anna C. Yaros
  • James V. Trudeau
  • Alex Buben
Original Paper
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The negative consequences for victims and perpetrators of school violence are significant, multifaceted and, if left unchecked, can have personal costs that may last well into their adult lives. Universal violence preventive interventions may not be sufficiently effective in mitigating problems among middle school youth who exhibit risk of violent behavior. School-based mental health (SBMH) approaches show promise for reducing problems among the minority of youth responsible for violence perpetration, although the impact of teacher-delivered SBMH has been somewhat limited. The present study examines the impact of practitioner-delivered SBMH in middle school settings, with (a) a three-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing Expanded SBMH and Enhanced SBMH to Standard SBMH and (b) a separate quasi-experiment comparing the three SBMH arms in the RCT to a separate set of non-randomized, non-SBMH schools. SBMH schools who expanded their services saw decreases in aggressive behavior and victimization, across both study structures, that were either statistically significant, meaningful based on Cohen effect size conventions or both. These results suggest that the expansion of practitioner-delivered mental health services to youth who are at risk of violence perpetration, but would otherwise be ineligible for, or unable to afford, services achieves a significant impact on the larger school environment.

Keywords

School-based mental health Aggression Victimization Practitioners Middle school 

Notes

Funding

Funding for the project was provided by Grant Number 2015-CK-BX-0010 by the National Institute of Justice under the Comprehensive School Safety Initiative (James V. Trudeau, PI)

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The research was approved by an institutional review board. We warrant that the material contained in the manuscript represents original work, has not been published elsewhere and is not under concurrent consideration for publication elsewhere. Further, we have complied with the American Psychological Association Ethical Standards in the treatment of the participants.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. Aber, J. L., Brown, J. L., & Jones, S. M. (2003). Developmental trajectories toward violence in middle childhood: Course, demographic differences, and response to school-based intervention. Developmental Psychology,39(2), 324–348.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  3. Ballard, K. L., Sander, M. A., & Klimes-Dougan, B. (2014). School-related and social–emotional outcomes of providing mental health services in schools. Community Mental Health Journal,50(2), 145–149.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Batsche, G. (2014). Multi-tiered system of supports for inclusive schools. In Handbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practice (pp. 183–196).Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, N. S., Lozano, P., & Rivara, F. P. (2007). The effectiveness of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program in public middle schools: A controlled trial. Journal of Adolescent Health,40(3), 266–274.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). Translating research to practice in bullying prevention. American Psychologist,70(4), 322–332.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruns, E. J., Walrath, C., Glass-Siegel, M., & Weist, M. D. (2004). School-based mental health services in Baltimore: Association with school climate and special education referrals. Behavior Modification,28, 491–512.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,98(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costello, E. J., Angold, A., Burns, B. J., Stangl, D. K., Tweed, D. L., Erkanli, A., et al. (1996). The Great Smokey Mountains study of youth: Goals, design, methods and the prevalence of DSM-III-R disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry,53, 1129–1136.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowan, K. C., Vaillancourt, K., Rossen, E., & Pollitt, K. (2013). A framework for safe and successful schools [Brief]. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  11. DeRosa, R., Habib, M., Pelcovitz, D., Rathus, J., Sonnenklar, J., Ford, J., Sunday, S., Layne, C., Saltzman, W., Turnbull, A., & Labruna, V. (2006). Structured psychotherapy for adolescents responding to chronic stress (unpublished manual).Google Scholar
  12. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development,82(1), 405–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott, D. S., Hamburg, B. A., & Williams, K. R. (Eds.). (1998). Violence in American schools: A new perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fabelo, T., Thompson, M. D., Plotkin, M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks, M. P., & Booth, E. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.Google Scholar
  15. Farrell, A. D., Henry, D. B., & Bettencourt, A. (2013). Methodological challenges examining subgroup differences: Examples from universal school-based youth violence prevention trials. Prevention Science,14(2), 121–133.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrell, A. D., Sullivan, T. N., Esposito, L. E., Meyer, A. L., & Valois, R. F. (2005). A latent growth curve analysis of the structure of aggression, drug use, and delinquent behaviors and their interrelations over time in urban and rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence,15(2), 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feingold, A. (2009). Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychological Methods,14(1), 43–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feingold, A. (2015). Confidence interval estimation for standardized effect sizes in multilevel and latent growth modeling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,83(1), 157–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferguson, C. J., Miguel, C. S., Kilburn, J. C., Jr., & Sanchez, P. (2007). The effectiveness of school-based anti-bullying programs: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice Review,32(4), 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franklin, C., Kim, J. S., Beretvas, T. S., Zhang, A., Guz, S., Park, S., ... & Maynard, B. R. (2017). The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered by teachers in schools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review,20(3), 333–350.Google Scholar
  21. Frey, K. S., Nolen, S. B., Edstrom, L. V. S., & Hirschstein, M. K. (2005). Effects of a school-based social–emotional competence program: Linking children’s goals, attributions, and behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,26(2), 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greene, M. B. (2005). Reducing violence and aggression in schools. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,6(3), 236–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods,15(3), 234–249.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawker, D. S., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines,41(4), 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoagwood, K., & Erwin, H. D. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based mental health services for children: A 10-year research review. Journal of Child and Family Studies,6, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoagwood, K. E., Jensen, P. S., Acri, M. C., Olin, S. S., Lewandowski, R. E., & Herman, R. J. (2012). Outcome domains in child mental health research since 1996: Have they changed and why does it matter? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,51(12), 1241–1260.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist,70(4), 293–299.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Jagers, R. J., Morgan-Lopez, A. A., Flay, B. R., & Investigators, Aban Aya. (2009). The impact of age and type of intervention on youth violent behaviors. Journal of Primary Prevention,30(6), 642–658.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Hoglund, W. L., & Aber, J. L. (2010). A school-randomized clinical trial of an integrated social–emotional learning and literacy intervention: Impacts after 1 school year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,78, 829–842.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kazdin, A. E. (2015). Treatment as usual and routine care in research and clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review,42, 168–178.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Kwok, O. M., West, S. G., & Green, S. B. (2007). The impact of misspecifying the within-subject covariance structure in multiwave longitudinal multilevel models: A Monte Carlo study. Multivariate Behavioral Research,42(3), 557–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, F., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Landrum, M. B. (2013). Propensity score weighting with multilevel data. Statistics in Medicine,32, 3373–3387.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lilienfeld, S., Ritschel, L., Lynn, S., Cautin, R., & Latzman, R. (2013). Why many clinical psychologists are resistant to evidence-based practice: Root causes and constructive remedies. Clinical Psychology Review,33(7), 883–900.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Linehan, M. M. (2018). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Loeber, R., & Hay, D. (1997). Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology,48, 371–410.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. McCoy, C. E. (2017). Understanding the intention-to-treat principle in randomized controlled trials. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine,18(6), 1075–1078.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., & Isava, D. M. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly,23(1), 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,80, 124–134.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Orpinas, P., & Frankowski, R. (2001). The aggression scale: A self-report measure of aggressive behavior for young adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence,21(1), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orpinas, P., Parcel, G. S., McAlister, A., & Frankowski, R. (1995). Violence prevention in middle schools: A pilot evaluation. Journal of Adolescent Health,17(6), 360–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review,61, 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Portnow, S., Downer, J. T., & Brown, J. (2018). Reductions in aggressive behavior within the context of a universal, social emotional learning program: Classroom-and student-level mechanisms. Journal of School Psychology,68, 38–52.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Saavedra, L. M., Morgan-López, A. A., Yaros, A. C., Buben, A., & Trudeau, J. V. (2019). Provider resistance to evidence-based practice in schools: Why it happens and how to plan for it in evaluations (RTI Press Publication No. RB-0020-1905). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press.  https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2019.rb.0020.1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanchez, A. L., Cornacchio, D., Poznanski, B., Golik, A. M., Chou, T., & Comer, J. S. (2018). The effectiveness of school-based mental health services for elementary-aged children: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,57(3), 153–165.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  46. Sullivan, T. N., Farrell, A. D., & Kliewer, W. (2006). Peer victimization in early adolescence: Association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Development and Psychopathology,18(1), 119–137.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Sullivan, T. N., Helms, S. W., Bettencourt, A. F., Sutherland, K., Lotze, G. M., Mays, S., et al. (2012). A qualitative study of individual and peer factors related to effective nonviolent versus aggressive responses to problem situations among adolescents with high incidence disabilities. Behavioral Disorders,37(3), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trudeau, J. (2004). Safe schools/healthy students initiative: School violence and safety. Draft report submitted to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  49. Trudeau, J., Williams, J., Murray, S. (2010). Safe schools/healthy students initiative cross-site evaluation: Final report. Prepared for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  50. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology,7(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Guiding principles: A resource guide for improving school climate and discipline. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,33(2), S130–S143.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,37, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio A. Morgan-Lopez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lissette M. Saavedra
    • 1
  • Anna C. Yaros
    • 1
  • James V. Trudeau
    • 1
  • Alex Buben
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioral Health Research DivisionRTI InternationalResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations