Advertisement

Journal of Hematopathology

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 171–175 | Cite as

Pediatric composite nodal marginal zone lymphoma and classical Hodgkin lymphoma

  • Shanxiang ZhangEmail author
  • Kristin Post
  • Liang Cheng
Case Report
  • 152 Downloads

Keywords

Mantle Cell Lymphoma Malt Lymphoma Marginal Zone Lymphoma Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Lambda Light Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Introduction

Composite lymphoma is defined as different types of lymphoma occurring simultaneously in the same tissue or mass [1, 2]. Composite classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are uncommon. The reported NHLs in composite lymphoma are most commonly B cell lymphoma, including diffuse large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Composite lymphoma with CHL and MZL is rare and has never been reported in pediatric population [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Here, we report a composite lymphoma composed of nodal MZL and CHL in a previously healthy teenage boy.

Case history

A 15-year-old previously healthy boy initially presented with a left supraclavicular mass. An ultrasound-guided needle core biopsy performed at an outside institution was reported as chronic lymphadenitis with immunophenotypically unremarkable T cells and polyclonal B cells detected by concurrent flow cytometric analysis (FCA). No treatment was offered. The mass subsequently grew. An excisional biopsy of the enlarged left cervical lymph node performed 3 months after the initial biopsy showed reactive follicular hyperplasia. During this period, the patient started to develop fever, body aches, decreased appetite, and body weight loss of 10 to 15 lb. The patient was referred to our institute and a computed tomographic scan showed significantly enlarged left cervical, supraclavicular, axillary, and superior mediastinal lymph nodes. There was no disease in the orbits, sinuses, nasal cavity, pharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx and larynx, thyroid, salivary glands, abdomen, liver, or spleen. An excisional biopsy of the left supraclavicular lymph node was performed in our institute approximately 5 months after the initial needle biopsy. A diagnosis of composite lymphoma was rendered. The previous two biopsies were also reviewed in our institute. While confirming the diagnosis of the second biopsy, a diagnosis of atypical lymphoid proliferation concerning for Hodgkin lymphoma was rendered for the first biopsy. A staging bone marrow biopsy showed no evidence of lymphoma. The patient was treated with ABVE-PC per protocol AHOD0031 (doxorubicin hydrochloride, bleomycin, vincristine sulfate, etoposide, prednisone, cyclophosphamide) for classical Hodgkin lymphoma followed by radiation therapy (2,100 cGy). The patient has been in remission for 8 months at the time of last follow-up.

Materials and methods

Clinical information and the results of FCA were collected from the medical records. Immunohistochemical stains were performed using the prediluted, ready-to-use antibodies (CD5, 4C7; CD10, 56C6; CD15, Carb-3: CD20, L26; CD30, Ber-H2; CD43, DF-T1; CD45/RB, 2B11 + PD7/26; CD138, MI15; cyclin D1, EP12; IgD, code TR517; kappa light chain, code IR506; lambda light chain, code IR507; and Ki-67, MIB-1) from Dako (Carpinteria, CA), anti-LEF1 (clone: EPR2029Y, 1:100, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA) with a Dako Autostainer Plus instrument following the manufacturer’s protocols.

Results

The excised mass measuring 6.5 × 5.3 × 2.5 cm was divided for FCA and histologic evaluation. FCA revealed a distinct monoclonal B cell population with expression of CD19, CD20, CD22, CD5 (partial), and surface kappa light chain. The monoclonal B cells were negative for CD10 and FMC-7 (Fig. 1). The expression of CD23 was equivocal due to suboptimal stain. The histologic sections showed near complete effacement of the nodal architecture by a proliferation of small atypical lymphoid cells (Fig. 2a, b) adjacent to areas with a nodular cellular proliferation divided by thick fibrosing bands (Fig. 3a). The small atypical lymphoid cells were positive by immunohistochemical stains (IHC) for CD20 and negative for CD5, LEF-1, CD10, CD43, cyclin D1, and IgD. CD21 stain revealed focally expanded and disrupted follicular dendritic cell meshworks. Ki-67 stain highlighted residual germinal centers and relatively high proliferation in the marginal zone, imparting a targetoid pattern (Fig. 2c–f). There were scattered polyclonal plasma cells as shown by IHC for CD138 and kappa and lambda light chains. The morphology and the presence of monoclonal B cell population without expression of CD5 (by IHC), CD10, cyclin D1, and LEF-1 support the diagnosis of marginal zone lymphoma over a small lymphocytic lymphoma and other types of B cell lymphoma. The nodular areas comprised of scattered, large atypical, mostly mononuclear, rarely binuclear, and multinuclear cells with prominent eosinophilic nucleoli and abundant clear cytoplasm in the background of small lymphocytes, histiocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils (Fig. 3b). The large atypical cells were weakly positive for PAX-5 (Fig. 3c) and positive for CD30 (Fig. 3d) and CD15 (Fig. 3e). They were negative for CD45RB, CD20, OCT.2, and BOB.1 (Fig. 3f). In situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNAs (EBER) was positive in the large atypical cells (Fig. 3g).
Fig. 1

A distinct kappa-restricted CD5+ (partial), CD10− monoclonal B cell population detected by flow cytometric analysis

Fig. 2

Morphologic and immunophenotypical features of marginal zone lymphoma component. ab Hematoxylin and eosin, a ×40 and b ×400. cg Immunohistochemistry, ×100: c CD20, d CD5, e LEF-1, f CD21, and g Ki-67

Fig. 3

Morphologic and immunophenotypical features of classical Hodgkin lymphoma component. ab Hematoxylin and eosin, a ×100 and b ×500. cf Immunohistochemistry, ×200: c PAX-5, d CD30, e CD15, and f OCT.2. g In situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNAs

Discussion

Pediatric nodal MZL is a rare entity with distinctive clinical and morphological features. It typically occurs in young males and presents as an asymptomatic, localized cervical lymphadenopathy (stage I). Disruption of residual follicles morphologically resembling progressive transformation of germinal centers is seen in approximately two-thirds of the cases. Majority of the reported cases were shown to be clonal by molecular study for B cell receptor (BCR) gene rearrangement, though 5–10 % of cases showed the presence of clonal B cell population only by immunophenotyping. The prognosis for pediatric nodal MZL is excellent even without any systemic treatment [12, 14, 15]. A close differential diagnosis is atypical marginal zone hyperplasia with monotypic immunoglobulin expression (aMZH). To date, aMZH has only been reported in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue with a monotypic lambda chain expression [16, 17]. The MZL in the current case involved supraclavicular lymph node and showed a kappa chain restriction by FCA. Though the molecular study for BCR gene rearrangement failed to detect a clonal BCR rearrangement (data not shown), the clinical presentation and kappa chain restriction in the B cell population supports the diagnosis of MZL over aMZH.

Composite CHL and MZL have been rarely reported in adults and elder population. They most commonly involve extranodal tissues, such as the stomach, lung, and thyroid [9, 10, 11, 13]. CHL has been proposed, in portion of the cases, as a progression of MZL, particularly in composite CHL and extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma). The involved MALT lymphomas tended to be t(11;18)(q21; q21) negative. EBV infection may pathogenically contribute to this progression [13, 18, 19]. In this report, we described a unique case of composite CHL and nodal MZL in a previously healthy child. EBV was detected in the CHL component but not in MZL. As there was suspicion of CHL at the time of first biopsy, the CHL less likely developed as a consequence of progression of the MZL. Could this case represent an exceedingly rare event of CHL and MZL developing independently by chance or there is some unknown factor which may contribute to the development of both CHL and MZL? Additional studies including cytogenetic analysis, array comparative genomic hybridization, and whole exome sequencing may provide some insight into this question, though they would require physical separation of CHL from MZL components.

This composite lymphoma case also illustrated elegantly the importance of adequate sampling in the diagnosis of lymphoma, particularly composite lymphoma. The first needle biopsy most likely sampled the area of CHL, though not enough material was obtained for a definitive diagnosis. Expectedly, the FCA showed a polyclonal B cell population. The second excisional biopsy of the enlarged lymph node from the same anatomic site showed a reactive lymphadenopathy. No evidence of either CHL or MZL was identified, though the sample was reviewed together with the current biopsy specimen. The coexistence of both benign and neoplastic lymph nodes in the same anatomic site is suggestive of some common factors contributing to the development of lymphoid hyperplasia, MZL, and CHL.

In summary, this is the first report, to the best of our knowledge, of a pediatric composite CHL and MZL. The findings of reactive follicular hyperplasia, CHL, and MZL in the contiguous lymph nodes before any treatment indicate that they may share some common pathogenic pathways. This unusual case also stresses the importance of adequate sampling in the workup of lymphoma, especially when there is a discrepancy between the tissue diagnosis and clinical presentation.

References

  1. 1.
    Hicks EB, Rappaport H, Winter WJ (1956) Follicular lymphoma; a re-evaluation of its position in the scheme of malignant lymphoma, based on a survey of 253 cases. Cancer 9(4):792–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim H, Hendrickson R, Dorfman RF (1977) Composite lymphoma. Cancer 40(3):959–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim H (1993) Composite lymphoma and related disorders. Am J Clin Pathol 99(4):445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayes SJ et al (2006) Composite mantle-cell lymphoma and classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Histopathology 48(5):621–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oka K et al (2010) Coexistence of primary pulmonary Hodgkin lymphoma and gastric MALT lymphoma associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection: a case report. Pathol Int 60(7):520–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rathnam K et al (2011) Composite Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a rare case. J Cancer Res Ther 7(4):484–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang HW et al (2013) Composite diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the stomach: case report and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 19(37):6304–6309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu G et al (2011) Composite lymphoma in the anterior mediastinum: a case report and review of the literature. Diagn Pathol 6:60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elmahy H, Hawley I, Beard J (2007) Composite splenic marginal zone lymphoma and classic Hodgkin lymphoma—an unusual combination. Int J Lab Hematol 29(6):461–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harada S et al (2008) Classical Hodgkin lymphoma concurrently evolving in a patient with marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of the spleen. Ann Diagn Pathol 12(3):212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oka K et al (2012) Concurrent gastric MALT and Hodgkin lymphoma: a case report. Int J Surg Pathol 20(2):201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taddesse-Heath L et al (2003) Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma in children and young adults. Am J Surg Pathol 27(4):522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zettl A et al (2005) Composite marginal zone B-cell lymphoma and classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a clinicopathological study of 12 cases. Histopathology 46(2):217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gitelson E et al (2010) Pediatric nodal marginal zone lymphoma may develop in the adult population. Leuk Lymphoma 51(1):89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rizzo KA et al (2010) Marginal zone lymphomas in children and the young adult population; characterization of genetic aberrations by FISH and RT-PCR. Mod Pathol: Off J U S Can Acad Pathol 23(6):866–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Attygalle AD et al (2004) Atypical marginal zone hyperplasia of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue: a reactive condition of childhood showing immunoglobulin lambda light-chain restriction. Blood 104(10):3343–3348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaur P, Levy NB (2012) Atypical marginal zone hyperplasia of tonsil with immunoglobulin light chain restriction. Am J Hematol 87(4):424–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kingma DW et al (1994) Epstein-Barr virus is infrequently identified in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas associated with Hodgkin’s disease. Am J Surg Pathol 18(1):48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Momose H et al (1992) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma with Reed-Sternberg-like cells and possible transformation to Hodgkin’s disease. Am J Surg Pathol 16(9):859–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineIndiana UniversityIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations