, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 231–236 | Cite as

Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: one stage or two stages?

  • A. BiazzoEmail author
  • F. Masia
  • F. Verde
Original Article



Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) may be performed as one- or two-stage procedure. Previous reports suggest that UKA provides a more rapid functional recovery than total knee arthroplasty. However, little data exist on whether bilateral UKA can be performed without increasing the perioperative risk compared with unilateral cases.


We retrospectively compared 51 patients treated between January 2014 and March 2017 with single-stage UKA (group A) with 51 patients who underwent unilateral procedure (group B) to evaluate perioperative complications. We noted no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age and body mass index.


Patients who underwent single-stage bilateral UKA had longer operating room time with respect to single procedure (93.2 min vs. 50.7 min). However, the bilateral group had a shorter cumulative operating room time (93.2 min) compared to the unilateral group (101.5 min) with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Average hemoglobin loss at discharge was 3.1 points for group A and 2.4 for group B, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).


Our results demonstrated that bilateral simultaneous UKA does not increase the risk for perioperative complications. Total blood loss at discharge is statistically higher in bilateral UKA rather than unilateral UKA; however, cumulative hemoglobin loss is statistically lower in bilateral group. Patients can benefit from a single hospital admission and anesthetic time, while the shorter total inpatient stay and lower blood loss can reduce hospital costs in cases of bilateral surgery.

Level of evidence IV

Retrospective study.


Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Bilateral Soft-tissue sparing surgery Two-stage UKA 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Meehan JP, Danielsen B, Tancredi DJ, Kim S, Jamali AA, White RH (2011) A population-based comparison of the incidence of adverse outcomes after simultaneous-bilateral and staged-bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(23):2203–2213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sayeed SA, Sayeed YA, Barnes SA, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT (2011) The risk of subsequent joint arthroplasty after primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty, a 10-year study. J Arthroplast 26(6):842–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berend KR, Morris MJ, Skeels MD, Lombardi AD Jr, Adams JB (2010) Perioperative complications of simultaneous versus staged unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:168–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen JY, Lo NN, Jiang L, Chong HC, Tay DK, Chin PL et al (2013) Simultaneous versus staged bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95(6):788–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macario A, Schilling P, Rubio R, Goodman S (2003) Economics of one-stage versus two-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reuben JD, Meyers SJ, Cox DD, Elliott M, Watson M, Shim SD (1998) Cost comparison between bilateral simultaneous, staged, and unilateral total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 13(2):172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levy YD, Hardwick ME, Copp SN, Rosen AS, Colwell CW Jr. (2012) Thrombosis incidence in unilateral vs. simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with compression device prophylaxis. J Arthroplast 28(3):474–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    March LM, Cross M, Tribe KL, Lapsley HM, Courtenay BG, Cross MJ et al (2004) Patient costs and outcomes following bilateral and unilateral total knee joint replacement surgery for OA. Osteoarthr Cartil 12(5):400–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Memtsoudis SG, Ma Y, González Della Valle A, Mazumdar M, Gaber-Baylis LK, MacKenzie CR et al (2009) Perioperative out- comes after unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Anesthesiology 111(6):1206–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend M (2003) Simultaneous bilateral, staged bilateral, and unilateral total knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(8):1532–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Cheney NA (2009) Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1450–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C (2009) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard UC (2005) Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Memtsoudis SG, Besculides MC, Reid S, Gaber-Baylis LK, Gonzalez Della Valle A (2009) Trends in bilateral total knee arthroplasties: 153,259 discharges between 1990 and 2004. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(6):1568–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Severson EP, Mariani EM, Bourne MH (2009) Bilateral total knee arthroplasty in patients 70 years and older. Orthopedics 32(5):316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forster MC, Bauze AJ, Bailie AG, Falworth MS, Oakeshott RD (2006) A retrospective comparative study of bilateral total knee replacement staged at a one-week interval. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(8):1006–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim YH, Choi YW, Kim JS (2009) Simultaneous bilateral sequential total knee replacement is as safe as unilateral total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stanley D, Stockley I, Getty CJ (1990) Simultaneous or staged bilateral total knee replacements in rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(5):772–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hooper GJ, Hooper NM, Rothwell AG, Hobbs T (2009) Bilateral total joint arthroplasty: the early results from the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Arthroplasty 24(8):1174–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chan WC, Musonda P, Cooper AS, Glasgow MM, Donell ST, Walton NP (2009) One-stage versus two-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of immediate post-operative complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(10):1305–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Akhtar KS, Somashekar N, Willis-Owen CA, Houlihan-Burne DG (2014) Clinical outcomes of bilateral single-stage unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(1):310–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ma T, Tu YH, Xue HM, Wen T, Cai MW (2015) Clinical outcomes and risks of single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty viaOxford Phase III. Chin Med J (Engl) 5;128(21):2861–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Romagnoli S, Zacchetti S, Perazzo P, Verde F, Banfi G, Viganò M (2015) Onsets of complications and revisions are not increased after simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in comparison with unilateral procedures. Int Orthop 39(5):871–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic DepartmentHumanitas GavazzeniBergamoItaly

Personalised recommendations