Ritual Mimicry: A Path to Concept Comprehension
Mimicry in the animal kingdom mostly consists of two major types: by appearance or by behaviour. Although these are not the only ones, they will be the main focus of this article. We will develop two purposes of behavioural mimicry in animal death rituals (what we have called “ritual mimicry”): how it helps understanding a complex concept, and how it teaches to manage intense emotions. We will first show how ritual mimicry is a logical step in the evolution of appearance mimicry and why it can be a major advantage for the species that are able to use it. We will give a brief explanation of the importance of the notion of semiosis in behavioural mimicry. In a few words, we will also describe what a ritual is, how to recognize it and what its different features are. Then, for the first purpose, we will show how understanding what death is, or at least, what it is not – not sleep, nor illness – is difficult. This process starts through mimicry, which raises awareness in the young that a major event is occurring. For the second purpose, we will show how mimicry helps the young learn ritual behaviours and gestures which help distressed adults with managing their emotions in these situations. As such, mimicry is also a way to learn this emotional behaviour management, enabling the young – and future adult – to be less distressed when confronted with loss.
KeywordsBiosemiotics Emotions Ritual Conceptual comprehension Behavioural mimicry
Paris-Sorbonne University and the STIH – Sens, Texte, Informatique, Histoire (Meaning, Text, Data processing and History) Laboratory. Thomas Broden, Georges Chapouthier and Timo Maran, for bringing part of the references to my acknowledgement. Many thanks to Pierre Ghislain for his review of the translation of this article.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Bateson, G. (1977). Vers une écologie de l’esprit (Vol. 1). Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
- Bateson, G. (1980). Vers une écologie de l’esprit (Vol. 2). Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
- Bateson, G. (1984). La nature et la pensée. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
- Berger, J. (2000). Bones in the snow. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), The smile of a dolphin (pp. 125–127). New York: Discovery Books.Google Scholar
- Brower, L. P. (1988). Mimicry and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- De Waal, F. (2016). Are we smart enough to understand how smart animals are? New-York: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
- Dukas, R. (1998). Evolutionary ecology of learning. In R. Dukas (Ed.), Cognitive ecology. The evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making (pp. 129–174). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Fedigan, L. M., & Fedigan, L. (1977). The social development of a handicapped infant in free-living troop of Japanese monkey. In S. Chevalier-Skolnikoff (Ed.), Primate Bio-Social Development: Biological, Social an Ecological Determinants (pp. 205–222). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
- Fouts, R., & Mills, S. T. (1998). L’école des chimpanzés: ce que les chimpanzés nous apprennent sur l’humanité. Paris: J. C. Lattès.Google Scholar
- Gobes, S. M. H., Jennings R. B. & Maeda R. K. (2017) The sensitive period for auditory-vocal learning in the zebra finch: Consequences of limited-model availability and multiple-tutor paradigms on song imitation. Behavioural processes, admitted online 23 jul. 2017, to be published. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.07.007.
- Goodall, J. (1989). Glossary of chimpanzee behaviors. Tucson: Jane Goodall Institute.Google Scholar
- Goodall, J. (1990). Through a window. My thirty years with the chimpanzees of Gombe. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Herzing, D. L. (2000). A trail of grief. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), The smile of a dolphin (pp. 138–139). New York: Discovery Books.Google Scholar
- Moss, C. (1989). La longue marche des éléphants. Paris: Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
- Pepperberg, I. (1999). Alex studies. Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrot. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1992). La Formation du symbole chez l’enfant. Imitation, jeu et rêves, image et représentation. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
- Rose, N. A. (2000). A death in the family. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), The smile of a dolphin (p. 144). New York: Discovery Books.Google Scholar
- Turovski, A. (2000). The semiotic of animal freedom: A zoologist’s attempt to perceive the semiotic aim of H. Hediger. Sign System Studies, 28, 380–387.Google Scholar