Effect of laser surface treatment on surface and bonding properties of carbon fiber reinforced composites

  • Lei Liu
  • Xiaodong Liu
  • Liang KongEmail author
  • Min Wang
  • Peiyuan Hu
  • Daming Wang
Original Research


Carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) is widely used in the aerospace and automotive industries due to their light weight and high strength. The effective joining method of CFRP is bonding, and the surface state of CFRP is the main reason that affects the shear strength of the bonded joints. In order to improve the surface state of CFRP and shear strength, this paper systematically studied the effects of different power (80 W, 120 W, 180 W) laser treatment on the surface characteristics and bonding performance of CFRP and compared with the mechanical treatment (alcohol ultrasonic cleaned, sandpaper sanding). Four different adhesives were used in the adhesive joints, which were performed lap-shear tests. The SEM, XPS and contact angle measuring instrument were used to analyze the changes of physicochemical properties of CFRP after different surface treatment. The results showed that compared with alcohol cleaned and sandpaper sanding, 120 W laser treatment greatly improved the surface roughness of CFRP and formed micron-sized gaps. The water contact angle was reduced from 85° to 59.5°, and the surface energy increased from 25.6 mJ/m2 to 62.7 mJ/m2. The lap-shear results showed that the shear strength of the epoxy joints was improved after laser treatment, and the failure type was changed from interface failure to substrate failure. The polyurethane joint shear strength was not obviously improved and the combination failure of interface and cohesion was transformed into a pure interface failure after surface treatment.


CFRP Laser treatment Surface characteristics Epoxy adhesive Polyurethane adhesive 



The authors would like to acknowledge the support received through Huayu Automotive Body Components Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and SAIC Motor Corporation Limited (SAIC Motor), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (51871154).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Kelly G (2004) Joining of carbon fibre reinforced plastics for automotive applications. PhD Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Che D, Saxena I, Han P, Guo P, Ehmann KF (2014) Machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastics/polymers: a literature review. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(3):034001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen QF, Dai HP, Guo PZ (2016) The influence of surface treatment process on ILSS and interface morphology of carbon fiber/resin composites. Fiber Reinf Plast/Compos 3:60–64Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu LT (2013) Advance of study on moulding process for automobile carbon fiber composite. Tech Ecno Pet 1:59–62Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao YR, Hu P, Liang JC et al (2015) Application of carbon fiber composites in the automotive industry. Chin Synth Resin Plast 05:95–98Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anyfantis KN, Tsouvalis NG (2013) Loading and fracture response of CFRP-to-steel adhesively bonded joints with thick adherents – part I: experiments. Compos Struct 96:850–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teng JG, Yu T, Fernando D (2012) Strengthening of steel structures with fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Constr Steel Res 78:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao XL, Zhang L (2007) State of the art review on FRP strengthened steel structures. Eng Struct 29(8):1808–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hollaway LC, Teng JG (2008) Strengthening and rehabilitation of civil infrastructures using fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. Woodhead Publishing and Maney Publishing, EnglandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernando D, Teng JG, ASCE M, Yu T, Zhao XL, ASCE F (2013) Preparation and characterization of steel surfaces for adhesive bonding. J Compos Constr 17(6):04013012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaldivar RJ, Kim HI, Steckel GL, Patel D, Morgan BA, Nokes JP (2011) Surface preparation for adhesive bonding of polycyanurate-based fiber-reinforced composites using atmospheric plasma treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 120(2):921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rhee KY, Yang JH (2003) A study on the peel and shear strength of aluminum/CFRP composites surface-treated by plasma and ion assisted reaction method. Compos Sci Technol 63(1):33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rhee KY, Choi NS, Park SJ (2002) Surface treatment of CFRP composites by Ar+ irradiation to improve bonding strength between aluminum and CFRP composites. Polym Compos 23(6):1151–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noeske M, Degenhardt J, Strudthoff S, Lommatzsch U (2004) Plasma jet treatment of five polymers at atmospheric pressure: surface modifications and the relevance for adhesion. Int J Adhes Adhes 24(2):171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zaldivar RJ, Nokes JP, Patel DN, Morgan BA, Steckel G, Kim HI (2012) Effect of using oxygen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide as active gases in the atmospheric plasma treatment of fiber-reinforced polycyanurate composites. J Appl Polym Sci 125(4):2510–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Encinas N, Oakleyb BR, Belcherc MA, Blohowiakc KY, Dillinghamb RG, Abenojara J, Martínez MA (2014) Surface modification of aircraft used composites for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes 50:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hill JM, Karbashewski E, Lin A, Strobel M, Walzak MJ (1995) Effects of aging and washing on UV and ozone-treated poly (ethylene terephthalate) and polypropylene. J Adhes Sci Technol 9(12):1575:1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li H, Liang H, He F, Huang Y, Wan YZ (2009) Air dielectric barrier discharges plasma surface treatment of three-dimensional braided carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Surf Coat Technol 203(10–11):1317–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bénard Q, Fois M, Grisel M, Laurens P (2006) Surface treatment of carbon/epoxy and glass/epoxy composites with an excimer laser beam. Int J Adhes Adhes 26(7):543–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li N, Li YG, Jelonnek J, Link G, Gao J (2017) A new process control method for microwave curing of carbon fibre reinforced composites in aerospace applications. Compos Part B Eng 122:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palmieri FL, Belcher MA, Wohl CJ, Blohowiak KY, Connell JW (2016) Laser ablation surface preparation for adhesive bonding of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Adhes Adhes 68:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fischer F, Kreling S, Jäschke P, Frauenhofer M, Kracht D, Dilger K (2012) Laser surface pre-treatment of CFRP for adhesive bonding in consideration of the absorption behaviour. J Adhes 88(4–6):350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Biofibres HG (2000) Biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng 276–277(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amada S, Satoh A (2000) Fractal analysis of surfaces roughened by grit blasting. J Adhes Sci Technol 14(1):27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Packham DE (2006) Handbook of adhesion, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hollaway LC, Cadei J (2002) Progress in the technique of upgrading metallic structures with advanced polymer composites. Prog Struct Eng Mater 4(2(2002):131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Material Laser Processing and ModificationShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Huayu Automotive Body Components Technology (Shanghai) Co., LTDShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations