Advertisement

Analysis of formability in conventional hole flanging of AA7075-O sheets: punch edge radius effect and limitations of the FLC

  • M. Borrego
  • D. Morales-Palma
  • A. J. Martínez-Donaire
  • G. Centeno
  • C. VallellanoEmail author
Original Research
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Hole flanges are commonly manufactured in mass production by conventional press-working. In an industrial context, the process limits are usually evaluated by means of the Limiting Forming Ratio (LFR), which defines the maximum attainable diameter of the flange related to the initial pre-cut hole. Nevertheless, the LFR does not provide enough information about material deformation, thickness distribution or the expected onset and type of failure. In this sense, a systematic investigation using the Forming Limit Diagram (FLD) is needed. Under these circumstances, the aim of this work is to provide a better understanding of the deformation process in conventional hole flanging, analysing the effect of the punch edge radius as well as the influence of the strain distribution along the hole flange on formability. An experimental campaign on 1.6 mm thickness AA7075 annealed sheet was completed using cylindrical punches with different profile radii. In addition, numerical modelling of the process using finite elements was developed. The results allow better understanding of the physical mechanisms governing material deformation and process formability in very ductile materials. In this regard, this research work contributes to the current state of the art in conventional hole flanging by establishing the modes of failure that prevail in the process and the influence of the bending induced by the tool radius in the flange formability. In addition, the limitations of using conventional FLD for providing a limiting threshold for the strain states attained in the flanges deformed with different punch profiles are also identified.

Keywords

Hole flanging Formability Forming limit diagram Necking Bending 

Notes

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Government throughout research project DPI2015–64047-R.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

M. Borrego has received research grant BES-2013-063796 from Spanish Government. The rest of authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Yamada Y, Koide M (1967) Analysis of the bore-expanding test by the incremental theory of plasticity. Int J Mech Sci 10:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson W, Chitkara NR, Minh HV (1977) Deformation modes and lip fracture during hole flanging of circular plates of anisotropic material. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 99(3):738–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang SC (1981) Large elasto-plastic strain analysis of flanged hole forming. Comput Struct 13(1-3):363–370CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levy BS, Van Tyne CJ (2008) Failure during sheared edge stretching. J Mater Eng Perform 17(6):842–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pathak N, Butcher C, Worswick M (2016) Assessment of the critical parameters influencing the edge Stretchability of advanced high-strength steel sheet. J Mater Eng Perform 25(11):4919–4932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumagai T, Saiki H (1998) Deformation analysis of hole flanging with ironing of thick sheet metals. Met Mater 4(4):711–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leu DK, Chen TC, Huang YM (1999) Influence of punch shape on the collar-drawing process of sheet steel. J Mater Process Technol 88(1-3):134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang YM, Chien TC (2001) Influence of the punch profile on the limitation of formability in the hole-flanging process. J Mater Process Technol 113(1-3):720–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang YM, Chien KH (2001) The formability limitation of the hole-flanging process. J Mater Process Technol 117(1-2):43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krichen A, Kacem A, Hbaieb M (2011) Blank-holding effect on the hole-flanging process of sheet aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol 211(4):619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kacem A, Krichen A, Manach PY (2014) Prediction of damage in the hole-flanging process using a physically based approach. Int J Damage Mech 24:840–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kacem A, Krichen A, Manach PY (2015) Finite element analysis of hole-flanging process with various anisotropy assumptions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1-4):11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soussi H., Masmoudi N., Krichen (2016). A. Analysis of geometrical parameters and occurrence of defects in the hole-flanging process on thin sheet metal, J Mater Process Technol 234: 228–242Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yoon JI, Jung J, Lee HH, Kim G-S, Kim HS (2016) Factors governing hole expansion ratio of steel sheets with smooth sheared edge. Met Mater Int 22(6):1009–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoon JI, Jung J, Kim JG, Sohn SS, Lee S, Kim HS (2017) Key factors of stretch-flangeability of sheet material. J Mater Sci 52(13):7808–7823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang K, Luo M, Wierzbicki T (2014) Experiments and modeling of edge fracture for an AHSS sheet. Int J Fract 187(2):245–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silva MB, Teixeira P, Reis A (2013) On the formability of hole-flanging by incremental sheet forming. J Mater Des Appl 227:91–99Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Montanari L, Cristino VA, Silva MB, Martins PAF (2013) On the relative performance of hole-flanging by incremental sheet forming and conventional press-working. Proc IMechE Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications, 1–11Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cristino VA, Silva MB, Martins PAF (2015) Hole-flanging of metals and polymers produced by single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Prod Technol 50(1):37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borrego M, Morales-Palma D, Martínez-Donaire AJ, Centeno G, Vallellano C (2016) Experimental study of hole-flanging by single-stage incremental sheet forming. J Mater Process Technol 237:320–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martínez-Donaire AJ, García-Lomas FJ, Vallellano C (2014) New approaches to detect the onset of localised necking in sheets under through-thickness strain gradients. Mater Des 57:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graf A, Hosford W (1994) The influence of strain-path changes on forming limit diagrams of Al 6111T4. Int J Mech Sci 36(10):897–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stoughton TB, Yoon JW (2012) Path independent forming limits in strain and stress spaces. Int J Solids Struct 49(25):3616–3625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barata da Rocha BF, Jalinier JM (1985) Prediction of the forming limit diagrams of anisotropic sheets in linear and non-linear loading. Mater Sci Eng 68(2):151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoshida K, Kuwabara T, Kuroda M (2007) Path-dependence of the forming limit stresses in a sheet metal. Int J Plast 23(3):361–384CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vallellano C, Morales D, García-Lomas FJ (2008) A study to predict failure in biaxially stretched sheets of aluminum alloy 2024-T3. Mater Manuf Process 23(3):303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vallellano C, Morales D, Martinez AJ, Garcia-Lomas FJ (2010) On the use of concave-side rule and critical-distance methods to predict the influence of bending on sheet-metal. Int J Mater Form 3 (suppl. 1(S1):1167–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luo M, Wierzbicki T (2010) Numerical failure analysis of a stretch-bending test on dual-phase steel sheets using a phenomenological fracture model. Int J Solids Struct 47(22-23):3084–3102CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morales-Palma D, Vallellano C, García-Lomas FJ (2013) Assessment of the effect of the through-thickness strain/stress gradient on the formability of stretch-bend metal sheets. Mater Des 50:798–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neuhauser FM, Terrazas O, Manopulo N, Hora P, Van Tyne C (2018) The bending dependency of forming limit diagrams. Int J Mater Form.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1452-1
  31. 31.
    Silva MB, Nielsen PS, Bay N, Martins PAF (2011) Failure mechanisms in single point incremental forming of metals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(9-12):893–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Centeno G, Bagudanch I, Martínez-Donaire AJ, García-Romeu ML, Vallellano C (2014) Critical analysis of necking and fracture limit strains and forming forces in single-point incremental forming. Mater Des 63:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morales-Palma D, Borrego M, Martínez-Donaire AJ, Centeno G, Vallellano C (2018) Optimization of hole-flanging by single point incremental forming in two stages. Materials 11(10):2029.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11102029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martínez-Donaire AJ, Borrego M, Morales-Palma D, Centeno G, Vallellano C (2019) Analysis of the influence of stress triaxiality on formability of hole-flanging by single-stage SPIF. Int J Mech Sci 151:76–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of SevillaSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations