Advertisement

Optimum clearance determination in blanking coarse-grained non-oriented electrical steel sheets: experiment and simulation

  • Ji He
  • Zhe Wang
  • Shuhui Li
  • Liang Dong
  • Xudong Cao
  • Weigang Zhang
Original Research
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Blanking process plays a critical role in the deterioration of magnetic properties of coarse-grained non-oriented electrical steel of motors. With the decrease of grain number in the thickness direction, the deformation behavior in blanking process becomes different and complex. In this paper, the high-grade non-oriented electrical steel is selected for blanking tests within the relative blanking clearance range. The results show that there exists an optimum clearance which leads to the high-quality sheared edge for the application. Nevertheless, the exact value of optimum clearance cannot be provided by experiments. Therefore, a novel Voronoi-based FE model is established to analyze the blanking deformation behaviors of individual grains. The flow stresses of surface and internal grains are identified through the widely applied surface layer theory. The proposed FE model is an appropriate prediction tool for simulating the blanking process of non-oriented electrical steel sheets. Meanwhile, through the new proposed model, an exact optimum clearance determination method is established. The proposed methodology predicts that the optimum clearance for the investigated sheet is 13.8%t, which is further verified by the experimental data.

Keywords

Coarse-grained non-oriented electrical steel Blanking Voronoi-based FE model Optimum clearance determination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505284) and New Faculty Fund (SMC) of University. The authors are grateful to Baosteel Company for providing experimental materials. Thanks to other colleagues for their help in this study too.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kurosakia Y, Mogi H (2008) Importance of punching and workability in non-oriented electrical steel sheets. J Magn Magn Mater 320(20):2474–2480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harstick HMS, Ritter M, Riehemann W (2014) Influence of punching and tool wear on the magnetic properties of nonoriented electrical steel. IEEE Trans Magn 50(4):1-4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2285243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hatanaka N, Yamaguchi K, Takakura N, Iizuka T (2003) Simulation of sheared edge formation process in blanking of sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol 140(1-3):628–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shim KH, Lee SK, Kang BS, Hwang SM (2004) Investigation on blanking of thin sheet metal using the ductile fracture criterion and its experimental verification. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1935–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tekiner Z, Nalbant M, Gürün H (2006) An experimental study for the effect of different clearances on burr, smooth-sheared and blanking force on aluminum sheet metal. Mater Des 27(10):1134–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Husson C, Correia JPM, Daridon L, Ahzi S (2008) Finite elements simulations of thin copper sheets blanking: study of blanking parameters on sheared edge quality. J Mater Process Technol 199(1-3):74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Subramonian S, Altan T, Ciocirlan B, Campbell C (2013) Optimum selection of variable punch-die clearance to improve tool life in blanking non-symmetric shapes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 75:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kals TA, Eckstein R (2000) Miniaturization in sheet metal working. J Mater Process Technol 103(1):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peng L, Liu F, Ni J, Lai X (2007) Size effects in thin sheet metal forming and its elastic-plastic constitutive model. Mater Des 28(5):1731–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu MW, Chan WL (2011) Geometry and grain size effects on the fracture behavior of sheet metal in micro-scale plastic deformation. Mater Des 32(10):4738–4746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ran JQ, Fu MW, Chan WL (2013) The influence of size effect on the ductile fracture in micro-scaled plastic deformation. Int J Plast 41:65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu J, Guo B, Wang C, Shan D (2012) Blanking clearance and grain size effects on micro deformation behavior and fracture in micro-blanking of brass foil. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 60:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao Z, Peng L, Yi P, Lai X (2015) Grain and geometry size effects on plastic deformation in roll-to-plate micro/meso-imprinting process. J Mater Process Technol 219:28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rahmaan T, Abedini A, Butcher C, Pathak N, Worswick MJ (2017) Investigation into the shear stress, localization and fracture behaviour of DP600 and AA5182-O sheet material alloys under elevated strain rates. Int J Impact Eng 108:303–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Armstrong RW (1982) The yield and flow stress dependence on polycrystal grain size. In: Baker TN, Petch NJ (eds) Yield, flow and fracture of polycrystals. (Appl. Sci. Publ., London, 1983) Ch. 1, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clausen B, Lorentzen T, Leffers T (1988) Self-consistent modeling of the plastic deformation of F.C.C. polycrystals and its implications for diffraction measurements of internal stresses. Acta Mater 46:3087–3098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cao TS (2015) Models for ductile damage and fracture prediction in cold bulk metal forming processes: a review. Int J Mater Form 10:1–33Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2010) Application of extended Mohr-coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. Int J Fract 161(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dong L, Li S, Yang B, Gao Y (2013) Application of MMC model on simulation of shearing process of thick hot-rolled high strength steel plate. AIP conference proceedings. AIP 1567(1):579–582Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saai A, Westermann I, Dumoulin S, Hopperstad OS (2016) Crystal plasticity finite element simulations of pure bending of aluminium alloy AA7108. Int J Mater Form 9(4):457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Illoul L, Lorong P, Chinesta F (2008) Study of the high speed blanking process with the C-NEM. Int J Mater Form 1(S1):1423–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brokken D, Brekelmans W, Baaijens F (1998) Numerical modelling of the metal blanking process. J Mater Process Technol 83(1-3):192-199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00062-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Faura F, García A, Estrems M (1998) Finite element analysis of optimum clearance in the blanking process. J Mater Process Technol 80-81:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baudouin P, De Wulf M, Kestens L, Houbaert Y (2003) The effect of the guillotine clearance on the magnetic properties of electrical steels. J Magn Magn Mater 256(1-3):32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji He
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhe Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuhui Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Liang Dong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xudong Cao
    • 3
  • Weigang Zhang
    • 4
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and VibrationShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-walled StructuresShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of Materials Science and EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration, Department of Engineering MechanicsShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations