International Journal of Material Forming

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 97–111 | Cite as

Experimental characterization and analysis of fiber orientations in hemispherical thermostamping for unidirectional thermoplastic composites

  • Kai LiuEmail author
  • Boming Zhang
  • Xiangyu Xu
  • Jinrui Ye
Original Research


Nowadays there is seldom literature concerning in-plane fiber orientation variations in the thickness direction for composites after thermostamping. In present work, cross-section microscopy observations were carried out to characterize fiber orientations at different positions and in different plies for thermoformed unidirectional reinforced thermoplastic composite hemispheres. It is found that there is no fiber angle change in the thickness direction near the vertex; fiber angles of medial plies are lower than that of lateral plies in the middle region; fiber angles decrease from the outside ply to the inside ply on the hemisphere edge. Thermostamping simulations were performed and a constitutive model was applied with fiber reorientations considered. It is shown that embedding fiber reorientations and non-uniform temperature field of the blank into the constitutive model has an important influence on fiber orientations in simulation. The average condition of fiber orientations could be reasonably forecasted at different positions. Simulation shows agreements with experiments on distribution trends of in-plane fiber orientation variations through the thickness near the vertex and on the hemisphere edge. However, simulation failed to describe a distribution feature of in-plane fiber orientation variation through the thickness: fiber angles in medial plies are smaller than that in lateral plies.


Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs) Directional orientation Process Simulation Optical microscopy 



This work was supported by the National Civil Aircraft Research Program (MJZ-2014-F-13).


This study was funded by the National Civil Aircraft Research Program (MJZ-2014-F-13).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Wang P, Hamila N, Boisse P (2013) Thermoforming simulation of multilayer composites with continuous fibres and thermoplastic matrix. Compos Part B-Eng 52:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hou M (1996) Stamp forming of fabric-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Polym Compos 17:596–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haanappel SP, Thije RHWT, Sachs U, Rietman B, Akkerman R (2014) Formability analyses of uni-directional and textile reinforced thermoplastics. Compos Part A-Appl S 56:80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadighi M, Rabizadeh E (2008) Effects of laminate sequencing on thermoforming of thermoplastic matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 201:725–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Machado M, Fischlschweiger M, Major Z (2016) A rate-dependent non-orthogonal constitutive model for describing shear behaviour of woven reinforced thermoplastic composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 80:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lomov SV, Ivanov DS (2008) Full-field strain measurements for validation of meso-FE analysis of textile composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 39:1218–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pazmino J, Carvelli V, Lomov SV, Mieghem BV, Lava P (2014) 3D digital image correlation measurements during shaping of a non-crimp 3D orthogonal woven E-glass reinforcement. Int J Mater Form 7:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vanclooster K, Lomov SV, Willems A, Verpoest I (2007) Measurement of local deformations on thermoformed composite parts under different process conditions. International Esaform Conference on Material Forming, American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 907:1058–1063.
  9. 9.
    Badel P, Vidal-Sallé E, Maire E, Boisse P (2009) Simulation and tomography analysis of textile composite reinforcement deformation at the mesoscopic scale. Int J Mater Form 2:189–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pazmino J, Carvelli V, Lomov SV (2014) Micro-CT analysis of the internal deformed geometry of a non-crimp 3D orthogonal weave E-glass composite reinforcement. Compos Part B-Eng 65:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naouar N, Vidal-Sallé E, Schneider J, Maire E, Boisse P (2014) Meso-scale FE analyses of textile composite reinforcement deformation based on X-ray computed tomography. Compos Struct 116:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hofstee J, Boer HD (2000) Elastic stiffness analysis of a thermoformed plain-weave fabric composite. Part I: geometry. Compos Sci Technol 60:1041–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chang SH, Sutcliffe MPF, Sharma SB (2004) Microscopic investigation of tow geometry changes in a woven prepreg material during draping and consolidation. Compos Sci Technol 64:1701–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abbassi F, Elfaleh I, Mistou S, Zghal A, Fazzini M, Djilali T (2011) Experimental and numerical investigations of a thermoplastic composite (carbon/PPS) thermoforming. Struct Control Hlth 18:769–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dörr D, Joppich T, Schirmaier F, Mosthaf T, Kärger L, Henning F (2016) A method for validation of finite element forming simulation on basis of a pointwise comparison of distance and curvature. International Esaform Conference on Material Forming. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 1769:515–537.
  16. 16.
    Cao J, Xue P, Peng XQ, Krishnan N (2003) An approach in modeling the temperature effect in thermo-stamping of woven composites. Compos Struct 61:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harrison P, Gomes R, Curado-Correia N (2013) Press forming a 0/90 cross-ply advanced thermoplastic composite using the double-dome benchmark geometry. Compos Part A-Appl S 54:56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harrison P, Yu WR, Long AC (2011) Rate dependent modelling of the forming behavior of viscous textile composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 42:1719–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hübner M, Rocher JE, Allaoui S, Hivet G, Gereke T, Cherif C (2016) Simulation-based investigations on the drape behavior of 3D woven fabrics made of commingled yarns. Int J Mater Form 9:591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang P, Hamila N, Boisse P, Chaudet P, Lesueur D (2015) Thermo-mechanical behavior of stretch-broken carbon fiber and thermoplastic resin composites during manufacturing. Polym Compos 36:694–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peng XQ, Cao J (2005) A continuum mechanics-based non-orthogonal constitutive model for woven composite fabrics. Compos Part A-Appl S 36:859–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Badel P, Vidal-Sallé E, Boisse P (2008) Large deformation analysis of fibrous materials using rate constitutive equations. Comput Struct 86:1164–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lessard H, Lebrun G, Benkaddour A, Pham XT (2015) Influence of process parameters on the thermostamping of a [0/90]12 carbon/polyether ether ketone laminate. Compos Part A-Appl S 70:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peng XQ, Ding F (2011) Validation of a non-orthogonal constitutive model for woven composite fabrics via hemispherical stamping simulation. Compos Part A-Appl S 42:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yin H, Peng X, Du T, Guo Z (2014) Draping of plain woven carbon fabrics over a double-curvature mold. Compos Sci Technol 92:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peng X, Rehman ZU (2011) Textile composite double dome stamping simulation using a non-orthogonal constitutive model. Compos Sci Technol 71:1075–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guzman-Maldonado E, Hamila N, Boisse P, Bikard J (2015) Thermomechanical analysis, modelling and simulation of the forming of pre-impregnated thermoplastics composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 78:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dörr D, Schirmaier FJ, Henning F, Kärger L (2017) A viscoelastic approach for modeling bending behavior in Finite Element forming simulation of continuously fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 94:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guzman-Maldonado E, Hamila N, Naouar N, Moulin G, Boisse P (2016) Simulation of thermoplastic prepreg thermoforming based on a visco-hyperelastic model and a thermal homogenization. Mater Design 93:431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations