Efficacy of Dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIP) as Screening Test for Hb E: Revisited
- 1 Downloads
Hb E-beta thalassemia is a major public health problem in West Bengal, India and is the predominant symptom producing thalassemia in this part of the country. To search for an easy, reliable and cost effective screening method for HbE that can be used at the community level where more sophisticated methods are not readily available. And the DCIP test was performed for the purpose. Blood samples of 425 asymptomatic family members from 80 diagnosed cases of HbE beta Thalassemia patients were tested for Hb, RBC indices, DCIP test, HPLC, and in discordant cases confirmed by DNA mutation analysis. The present study shows DCIP screening test to have a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 96.39%, 97.43%, 96.39% and 97.43% respectively. It also shows a false positive rate and false negative rate in 2.56% and 4.6% cases respectively. The advantage with DCIP over HPLC is that it can be easily performed at the community level by a person with minimum technical skill, few samples (even a single sample) can be tested at time, at a low cost.
KeywordsHemoglobin E Screening test HPLC DCIP
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC).
Written consent taken from each patient and/or their legal guardians at the entry into the study.
- 1.Bain BJ (2006) Other significant hemoglobinopathies. In: Hemoglobinopathy diagnosis, vol 2/e, Blackwell Publishing, pp 191–213Google Scholar
- 2.Bain BJ, Wild BJ, Stephens AD, Phelan LA (2010) Common hemoglobins of major clinical importance. In: Variant hemoglobin’s: a guide to identification, vol 1/e, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 41–45Google Scholar
- 3.Kulapongs P, Sanguansermsri T, Mertz G, Tawarat S (1976) Dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIP) precipitation test: a new screening test for Hb E and H. Pediatr Soc Thail 15:1–7Google Scholar
- 5.Carrel RW, Kay R (1972) A simple method for the detection of unstable hemoglobins. Br J Hematol 23:615–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1972.tb07096.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Elles R, Old JM (1987) Laboratory procedures for DNA analysis. In: WHO training course in standard techniques and advances methodologies for the control of hereditary anemias. WHO, Herakleon, Greece, p 5Google Scholar
- 10.Chatterjea JB, Saha AK, Ray RN et al (1956) Electrophoretic analysis of haemoglobin in Cooley’s anaemia (thalassemia). Evidences of interaction of thalassemia gene with abnormal hemoglobin. Bull Calcutta Sch Trop Med 4:103–105Google Scholar
- 11.National task force study on Thalassemia-2005 (2008) Jai Vigyan S&T Mission project on community control of thalassemia syndromes: awareness, screening, genetic counseling and prevention, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, p 21Google Scholar
- 16.Balgir RS (1996) Genetic epidemiology of the three predominant abnormal hemoglobins in India. J Assoc Phys India 25:44–48Google Scholar
- 19.Prayongratana K, Polprasert C, Raungrongmorakot K, Tatone K, Santiwatanakul S (2008) Low cost combination of DCIP and MCV was better than that of DCIP and OF in the screening for hemoglobin E. J Med Assoc Thail 91:1499–1504Google Scholar
- 20.Jaiwang P, Meemungthum I, Wiwanitkit V (2007) Positive DCIP rates: a study on its incidence in laboratory. Chula Med J 51:101–104Google Scholar
- 21.Wilson JMG, Jungner G (1968) Principles and practice for screening for disease, WHO, Geneva, Pub Hlth Paper No. 34Google Scholar