Advertisement

Sports Engineering

, 22:7 | Cite as

Computation of the trajectory and attitude of arrows subject to background wind

  • Julio OrtizEmail author
  • Masato Ando
  • Kentaro Murayama
  • Takeshi Miyazaki
  • Hiroki Sugiura
Original Article

Abstract

In this work are performed numerical computations of the trajectory and attitude of archery arrows under the influence of background wind. The aerodynamic response of two commercial arrows with different mass is investigated. The maximum angle of attack increases to \(3.0^{\circ }\) under a uniform side-wind of \(3\,\hbox {ms}^{-1}\), if the arrow was shot with zero angle of attack and zero angular velocity. The maximum angle of attack can be reduced by two orders of magnitude by keeping the boundary layer laminar throughout the arrow’s flight if ideal initial conditions are achieved. The ratio of the drag force to the gravitational force plays a key role in determining the deviation in the trajectory. The radial deviation from the centre of the target for a uniform side-wind of \(3\,\hbox {ms}^{-1}\) was 0.34 m for the lighter arrow and 0.26 m for the heavier arrow at a distance of 70 m. The deviations decrease to 0.18 m and 0.12 m, for the lighter and the heavier arrow, respectively, if the boundary layers remain laminar. The heavier arrow shows a smaller deviation compared with the lighter arrow under identical background wind conditions. Keeping the arrow’s boundary layer laminar may reduce the wind drift significantly, regardless of the mass.

Keywords

Trajectory and attitude of an arrow Background wind Wind drift Numerical computation Laminar–turbulent transition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply grateful to Dr. Kubo of Japan Institute of Sports Sciences for his indispensable help providing the necessary facilities and equipment used in this research. This work is partially supported by Grant in Aid for Scientific Research (C) 18k03943.

References

  1. 1.
    Easton Technical Products (2012) 2012 Easton CatalogueGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gilat G, Subramaniam V (2014) Numerical methods for engineers and scientists: an introduction with applications using matlab. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hubbard M (1984) Optimal javelin trajectories. J Biomech 17(10):777–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelly HR (1954) A note on the laminar boundary layer on a circular cylinder in axial incompressible flow. J Aeronaut Sci 21:634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kooi BW, Sparenberg JA (1997) On the mechanics of the arrow: Archer’s paradox. J Eng Math 31:285–306MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miyazaki T, Matsumoto T, Ando R, Ortiz J, Sugiura H (2017) Indeterminacy of drag exerted on an arrow in free flight: arrow attitude and laminar-turbulent transition. Europhysics 38:6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miyazaki T, Mukaiyama K, Komori Y, Okawa K, Taguchi S, Sugiura H (2013) Aerodynamic properties of an archery arrow. Sports Eng 16(1):43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neda Y, Rajat M (2018) A computational approach for predicting plant canopy induced wind effects on the trajectory of golf shots. Sports Eng 21:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Okawa K, Taguchi S, Miyazaki T, Sugiura H (2013) Effect of fineness ratio on the aerodynamic properties of an arrow. Nagare (J Jpn Soc Fluid Mech: in Japanese) 32:449–456Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park J L, Hodge M, Al-Mulla S, Sherry M, Sheridan J (2011) Air flow around the point of an arrow. In: Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol, pp 1–6 (published online)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park JL (2011) Arrow behaviour in free flight. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol 225:241–252Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park JL (2011) Minimizing wind drift of an arrow. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Sports Eng Technol 226:52–60Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sawada H, Umezawa K, Yokozeki T, Watanabe A, Otsu T (2012) Wind tunnel test of Japanese arrows with the JAXA-60 cm magnetic suspension and balance system. Exp Fluids 53:451–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seban RA, Bond R (1951) Skin-friction and heat-transfer characteristics of a laminar boundary layer on a cylinder in axial incompressible flow. J Aeronaut Sci 18:671–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Sports Engineering Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Graduate School of Informatics and EngineeringUniversity of Electro-CommunicationsChofuJapan
  2. 2.JAXAChofuJapan

Personalised recommendations