Histogram analysis of quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters on DCE-MRI: correlations with prognostic factors and molecular subtypes in breast cancer
- 132 Downloads
Breast cancer heterogeneity influences poor prognoses thorough therapy resistance. This study quantitatively evaluated intratumoral heterogeneity through a histogram analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) pharmacokinetic parameters, and determined correlations with prognostic factors and molecular subtypes.
We retrospectively investigated 101 invasive ductal breast cancers from 99 women who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI between July 2012 and November 2014. Pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, kep, and ve) were obtained by the Tofts model. For each parameter, the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, skewness, and kurtosis values of tumor were calculated, and prognostic factors and subtypes associations were assessed.
The mean of ve was lower in cancers with high Ki-67 than in cancers with low Ki-67 (P = 0.002). The coefficient of variation of ve was higher in cancers with estrogen receptor negativity than in cancers with estrogen receptor positivity (P < 0.001). The coefficient of variation of ve was also higher in cancers with high Ki-67 than in cancers with low Ki-67 (P < 0.001). The skewness of ve was higher in cancers with high nuclear grade than in cancers with low nuclear grade (P = 0.006). Triple-negative cancers showed higher ve coefficient of variation than did those with luminal A (P < 0.001) and B (P = 0.006).
Various ve parameters correlated with breast cancer prognostic factors and molecular subtypes.
KeywordsBrest cancer Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Histogram analysis Pharmacokinetic modeling
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Goede V, Fleckenstein G, Dietrich M, Osmers RG, Kuhn W, Augustin HG. Prognostic value of angiogenesis in mammary tumors. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:2199–202.Google Scholar
- 9.Drisis S, Metens T, Ignatiadis M, Stathopoulos K, Chao SL, Lemort M. Quantitative DCE-MRI for prediction of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: the impact of breast cancer subtypes on the diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1474–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Shekhar MP, Werdell J, Santner SJ, Pauley RJ, Tait L. Breast stroma plays a dominant regulatory role in breast epithelial growth and differentiation: implications for tumor development and progression. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1320–6.Google Scholar
- 37.Othman AE, Falkner F, Kessler DE, Martirosian P, Weiss J, Kruck S, et al. Comparison of different population-averaged arterial-input-functions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: effects on pharmacokinetic parameters and their diagnostic performance. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34:496–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Heye T, Davenport MS, Horvath JJ, Feuerlein S, Breault SR, Bashir MR, et al. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions. Radiology. 2013;266:801–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar