Advertisement

Journal of Microbiology

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 93–100 | Cite as

Determination of protein phosphorylation by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

  • Chang-Ro LeeEmail author
  • Young-Ha Park
  • Huitae Min
  • Yeon-Ran Kim
  • Yeong-Jae SeokEmail author
Protocol
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Phosphorylation is the most important modification for protein regulation; it controls many signal transduction pathways in all organisms. While several tools to detect phosphorylated proteins have been developed to study a variety of basic cellular processes involving protein phosphorylation, these methods have several limitations. Many proteins exhibit a phosphorylation-dependent electrophoretic mobility shift (PDEMS) in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and the molecular mechanism responsible for this phenomenon has been elucidated recently. The method for detecting phosphorylated proteins can be simplified by the application of the PDEMS. Herein, we present a novel simple method to detect protein phosphorylation, which is based on the construction of a variant protein displaying a PDEMS. The PDEMS of proteins is caused by the distribution of negatively charged amino acids around the phosphorylation site, i.e. an electrophoretic mobility shift (EMS)-related motif (ΘX1-3ΘX1-3Θ, where Θ corresponds to an acidic or phosphorylated amino acid and X represents any amino acid). The EMS-related motif can be constructed by the introduction of a negative charge by phosphorylation; it results in the decreased binding of SDS to the proteins, consequently inducing the retardation of the mobility of the protein during SDS-PAGE. Based on these molecular analyses of the PDEMS, a protein with the EMSrelated motif is designed and used to determine the in vivo phosphorylation state of the protein. This method may be used as a general strategy to easily measure the ratio of protein phosphorylation in cells.

Keywords

protein phosphorylation electrophoretic mobility shift SDS-PAGE signal transduction protein kinase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alligand, B., Le Breton, M., Marquis, D., Vallette, F., and Fleury, F. 2017. Functional effects of diphosphomimetic mutations at cAblmediated phosphorylation sites on Rad51 recombinase activity. Biochimie 139, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahr, T., Luttmann, D., Marz, W., Rak, B., and Gorke, B. 2011. Insight into bacterial phosphotransferase system-mediated signaling by interspecies transplantation of a transcriptional regulator. J. Bacteriol. 193, 2013–2026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai, J., Zhao, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, C., Wang, Y., and Li, Z. 2013. Dualreadout fluorescent assay of protein kinase activity by use of TiO2-coated magnetic microspheres. Anal. Chem. 85, 4813–4821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, P. 2002a. The origins of protein phosphorylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, E127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, P. 2002b. Protein kinases—the major drug targets of the twenty-first century? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deutscher, J., Francke, C., and Postma, P.W. 2006. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 939–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodwin, R.A. and Gage, D.J. 2014. Biochemical characterization of a nitrogen-type phosphotransferase system reveals that enzyme EINtr integrates carbon and nitrogen signaling in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 196, 1901–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heckman, C.A., Pandey, P., Cayer, M.L., Biswas, T., Zhang, Z.Y., and Boudreau, N.S. 2017. The tumor promoter-activated protein kinase Cs are a system for regulating filopodia. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 74, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hogema, B.M., Arents, J.C., Bader, R., Eijkemans, K., Yoshida, H., Takahashi, H., Aiba, H., and Postma, P.W. 1998. Inducer exclusion in Escherichia coli by non-PTS substrates: the role of the PEP to pyruvate ratio in determining the phosphorylation state of enzyme IIAGlc. Mol. Microbiol. 30, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hultquist, D.E. 1968. The preparation and characterization of phosphorylated derivatives of histidine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 153, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Imbert, V., Rupec, R.A., Livolsi, A., Pahl, H.L., Traenckner, E.B., Mueller-Dieckmann, C., Farahifar, D., Rossi, B., Auberger, P., Baeuerle, P.A., et al. 1996. Tyrosine phosphorylation of IκB-a activates NF-κB without proteolytic degradation of IκB-α. Cell 86, 787–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Inagaki, M., Inagaki, N., Takahashi, T., and Takai, Y. 1997. Phosphorylation-dependent control of structures of intermediate filaments: a novel approach using site- and phosphorylation statespecific antibodies. J. Biochem. 121, 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inamori, K., Kyo, M., Nishiya, Y., Inoue, Y., Sonoda, T., Kinoshita, E., Koike, T., and Katayama, Y. 2005. Detection and quantification of on-chip phosphorylated peptides by surface plasmon resonance imaging techniques using a phosphate capture molecule. Anal. Chem. 77, 3979–3985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ji, L., Wu, J.H., Luo, Q., Li, X., Zheng, W., Zhai, G., Wang, F., Lu, S., Feng, Y.Q., Liu, J., et al. 2012. Quantitative mass spectrometry combined with separation and enrichment of phosphopeptides by titania coated magnetic mesoporous silica microspheres for screening of protein kinase inhibitors. Anal. Chem. 84, 2284–2291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaufmann, H., Bailey, J.E., and Fussenegger, M. 2001. Use of antibodies for detection of phosphorylated proteins separated by twodimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 1, 194–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kinoshita, E., Kinoshita-Kikuta, E., and Koike, T. 2009. Separation and detection of large phosphoproteins using Phos-tag SDSPAGE. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1513–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinoshita, E., Kinoshita-Kikuta, E., and Koike, T. 2017. Zn(II)-Phostag SDS-PAGE for separation and detection of a DNA damagerelated signaling large phosphoprotein. Methods Mol. Biol. 1599, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, V.M., Goedert, M., and Trojanowski, J.Q. 2001. Neurodegenerative tauopathies. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1121–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, J.K. and Kim, N.J. 2017. Recent advances in the inhibition of p38 MAPK as a potential strategy for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Molecules 22, 1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, C.R., Park, Y.H., Kim, M., Kim, Y.R., Park, S., Peterkofsky, A., and Seok, Y.J. 2013a. Reciprocal regulation of the autophosphorylation of enzyme INtr by glutamine and α-ketoglutarate in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 88, 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, C.R., Park, Y.H., Kim, Y.R., Peterkofsky, A., and Seok, Y.J. 2013b. Phosphorylation-dependent mobility shift of proteins on SDS-PAGE is due to decreased binding of SDS. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 34, 2063–2066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, T., Liu, D., and Wang, Z. 2009. Microarray-based Raman spectroscopic assay for kinase inhibition by gold nanoparticle probes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 24, 3335–3339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mann, M., Ong, S.E., Gronborg, M., Steen, H., Jensen, O.N., and Pandey, A. 2002. Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol. 20, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manning, G., Plowman, G.D., Hunter, T., and Sudarsanam, S. 2002. Evolution of protein kinase signaling from yeast to man. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mir, R.A., Bele, A., Mirza, S., Srivastava, S., Olou, A.A., Ammons, S.A., Kim, J.H., Gurumurthy, C.B., Qiu, F., Band, H., et al. 2015. A novel interaction of Ecdysoneless (ECD) protein with R2TP complex component RUVBL1 is required for the functional role of ECD in cell cycle progression. Mol. Cell Biol. 36, 886–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park, Y.H., Lee, C.R., Choe, M., and Seok, Y.J. 2013. HPr antagonizes the anti-σ70 activity of Rsd in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 21142–21147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Postma, P.W., Lengeler, J.W., and Jacobson, G.R. 1993. Phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate phosphotransferase systems of bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 57, 543–594.Google Scholar
  28. Rath, A., Glibowicka, M., Nadeau, V.G., Chen, G., and Deber, C.M. 2009. Detergent binding explains anomalous SDS-PAGE migration of membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1760–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ronneau, S., Petit, K., De Bolle, X., and Hallez, R. 2016. Phosphotransferase-dependent accumulation of (p)ppGpp in response to glutamine deprivation in Caulobacter crescentus. Nat. Commun. 7, 11423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sasanuma, H., Hirota, K., Fukuda, T., Kakusho, N., Kugou, K., Kawasaki, Y., Shibata, T., Masai, H., and Ohta, K. 2008. Cdc7-dependent phosphorylation of Mer2 facilitates initiation of yeast meiotic recombination. Genes Dev. 22, 398–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steiner, B., Mandelkow, E.M., Biernat, J., Gustke, N., Meyer, H.E., Schmidt, B., Mieskes, G., Soling, H.D., Drechsel, D., Kirschner, M.W., et al. 1990. Phosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein tau: identification of the site for Ca2+-calmodulin dependent kinase and relationship with tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer tangles. EMBO J. 9, 3539–3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takeda, H., Goshima, N., and Nomura, N. 2010. High-throughput kinase assay based on surface plasmon resonance. Methods Mol. Biol. 627, 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang, Z., Lee, J., Cossins, A.R., and Brust, M. 2005. Microarraybased detection of protein binding and functionality by gold nanoparticle probes. Anal. Chem. 77, 5770–5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, Z., Levy, R., Fernig, D.G., and Brust, M. 2006. Kinase-catalyzed modification of gold nanoparticles: a new approach to colorimetric kinase activity screening. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2214–2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Liang, R.P., Bai, J.M., and Qiu, J.D. 2013. Using graphene quantum dots as photoluminescent probes for protein kinase sensing. Anal. Chem. 85, 9148–9155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu, X., Liu, X., Nie, Z., Pan, Y., Guo, M., and Yao, S. 2011. Label-free fluorescent detection of protein kinase activity based on the aggregation behavior of unmodified quantum dots. Anal. Chem. 83, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoo, W., Yoon, H., Seok, Y.J., Lee, C.R., Lee, H.H., and Ryu, S. 2016. Fine-tuning of amino sugar homeostasis by EIIANtr in Salmonella Typhimurium. Sci. Rep. 6, 33055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao, Z., Zhou, X., and Xing, D. 2012. Highly sensitive protein kinase activity assay based on electrochemiluminescence nanoprobes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 31, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou, X.M., Liu, Y., Payne, G., Lutz, R.J., and Chittenden, T. 2000. Growth factors inactivate the cell death promoter BAD by phosphorylation of its BH3 domain on Ser155. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 25046–25051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhou, J., Xu, X., Liu, W., Liu, X., Nie, Z., Qing, M., Nie, L., and Yao, S. 2013. Graphene oxide-peptide nanocomplex as a versatile fluorescence probe of protein kinase activity based on phosphorylation protection against carboxypeptidase digestion. Anal. Chem. 85, 5746–5754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zschiedrich, C.P., Keidel, V., and Szurmant, H. 2016. Molecular mechanisms of two-component signal transduction. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 3752–3775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Microbiological Society of Korea and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesMyongji UniversityYonginRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.School of Biological Sciences and Institute of MicrobiologySeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Biophysics and Chemical BiologySeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations