Advertisement

Comparing predictions by existing explicit emission models to real world observations of formaldehyde emissions from solid materials

  • Christopher Just JohnstonEmail author
  • Toke Rammer Nielsen
  • Jørn Toftum
Research Article Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Existing general explicit mass transfer models for volatile organic compound emissions have been validated against experimental results from small test chambers. This study compared emission rates predicted by such models to observations from homes, large test chambers and full scale experiments. The comparison revealed that the examined explicit emission models could not simulate behaviour observed under real world conditions for the cases studied. It is hypothesised that the reasons for the observed discrepancies include that: (1) There is a shortage of detailed information on the actual physical conditions at the emitting surfaces under real world conditions. (2) The mathematics behind the explicit emission models does not allow such models to fully capture the dynamic behaviour of a system with varying temperature and relative humidity. (3) The assumption that change in the concentration in an emitting material is determined by diffusion alone, implicitly implying that generation is negligible, may not be valid outside small test chambers.

Keywords

volatile organic compound formaldehyde emissions mass transfer small test chambers building material 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jianyin Xiong, PhD, Distinguished Research Fellow, Director of the Institute of Thermal Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology for providing insight and expertise that greatly helped in our research. We would also like to thank Weihui Liang, PhD, Research Assistant Professor, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University and Professor Xudong Yang, PhD, Deputy Director of the Department of Building Science, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University for sharing their data on long term HCHO emissions (Fig. 6). Finally we want to thank Ásta Logadóttir, PhD, Senior Researcher, Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University and Professor Lars Gunnarsen, PhD, Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University for collecting and sharing the data on HCHO concentration levels in Danish homes (Fig. 5).

References

  1. Andersen I, Lundqvist GR, Mølhave L (1975). Indoor air pollution due to chipboard used as a construction material. Atmospheric Environment (1967), 9: 1121–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deng B, Kim CN (2004). An analytical model for VOCs emission from dry building materials. Atmospheric Environment, 38: 1173–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. European Union (2010). Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings. European Union.Google Scholar
  4. Guo Z (2013). A framework for modelling non-steady-state concentrations of semivolatile organic compounds indoors–I: Emissions from diffusional sources and sorption by interior surfaces. Indoor and Built Environment, 22: 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guyot G, Sherman MH, Walker IS (2018). Smart ventilation energy and indoor air quality performance in residential buildings: A review. Energy and Buildings, 165: 416–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haghighat F, Huang H, Lee CS (2005). Modeling approaches for indoor air VOC emissions from dry building materials—A review. ASHRAE Transactions, 111(1): 635–645.Google Scholar
  7. Hoetjer JJ, Koerts F (1986). A model for formaldehyde release from particleboard. In: Meyer B, Kottes Andrews BA, Reinhardt RM (eds), Formaldehyde Release from Wood Products. Washington DC: ACS Publications. pp. 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu H, Zhang Y, Wang X, Little JC (2007). An analytical mass transfer model for predicting VOC emissions from multi-layered building materials with convective surfaces on both sides. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 50: 2069–2077.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang H, Haghighat F (2002). Modelling of volatile organic compounds emission from dry building materials. Building and Environment, 37: 1349–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang S, Xiong J, Zhang Y (2013). A rapid and accurate method, ventilated chamber C-history method, of measuring the emission characteristic parameters of formaldehyde/VOCs in building materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 261: 542–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang S, Xiong J, Zhang Y (2015). Impact of temperature on the ratio of initial emittable concentration to total concentration for formaldehyde in building materials: Theoretical correlation and validation. Environmental Science & Technology, 49: 1537–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang S, Xiong J, Cai C, Xu W, Zhang Y (2016). Influence of humidity on the initial emittable concentration of formaldehyde and hexaldehyde in building materials: Experimental observation and correlation. Scientific Reports, 6: 23388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hult EL, Willem H, Price PN, Hotchi T, Russell ML, Singer BC (2015). Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure mitigation in US residences: In-home measurements of ventilation control and source control. Indoor Air, 25: 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IEA-EBC (2018). Indoor air quality design and control in low energy residential buildings. IEA-EBC Annex 68. Available at https://doi.org/www.iea-ebc-annex68.org/about_annex-68. Accessed 17 May 2018.Google Scholar
  15. Kleiber M, Joh R, Span R (2010). D3 properties of pure fluid substances. In: VDI Gesellschaft (ed), VDI Heat Atlas. Berlin: Springer. pp. 301–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee CS, Haghighat F, Ghaly WS (2005). A study on VOC source and sink behavior in porous building materials—Analytical model development and assessment. Indoor Air, 15: 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehmann WF (1987). Effect of ventilation and loading rates in large chamber testing of formaldehyde emissions from composite panels. Forest Products Journal 37: 31–37.Google Scholar
  18. Liang W, Yang S, Yang X (2015). Long-term formaldehyde emissions from medium-density fiberboard in a full-scale experimental room: mEission characteristics and the effects of temperature and humidity. Environmental Science & Technology, 49: 10349–10356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang W, Lv M, Yang X (2016a). The combined effects of temperature and humidity on initial emittable formaldehyde concentration of a medium-density fiberboard. Building and Environment, 98: 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liang W, Lv M, Yang X (2016b). An improved mass transfer model for simulating formaldehyde emissions from a medium-density fiberboard (MDF) in actual buildings. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air 2016, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
  21. Little JC, Hodgson AT, Gadgil AJ (1994). Modeling emissions of volatile organic compounds from new carpets. Atmospheric Environment, 28: 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu Z, Ye W, Little JC (2013). Predicting emissions of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds from building materials: A review. Building and Environment, 64: 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Logadóttir A, Gunnarsen L (2008). Formaldehydkoncentrationen i nybyggede huse i Danmark. The State Building Research Institute. (in Danish)Google Scholar
  24. Mao Y, Li Z, Zhang Y, He Y, Tao W (2018). A review of mass-transfer models and mechanistic studies of semi-volatile organic compounds in indoor environments. Indoor and Built Environment, 27: 1307–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Myers GE, Nagaoka M (1981). Emission of formaldehyde by particleboard: Effect of ventilation rate and loading on aircontamination levels. Forest Products Journal, 31: 39–44.Google Scholar
  26. Qian K, Zhang Y, Little JC, Wang X (2007). Dimensionless correlations to predict VOC emissions from dry building materials. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rackes A, Waring MS (2016). Do time-averaged, whole-building, effective volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions depend on the air exchange rate? A statistical analysis of trends for 46 VOCs in US offices. Indoor Air, 26: 642–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Salthammer T, Mentese S, Marutzky R (2010). Formaldehyde in the indoor environment. Chemical Reviews, 110: 2536–2572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang X, Zhang Y (2011). General analytical mass transfer model for VOC emissions from multi-layer dry building materials with internal chemical reactions. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56: 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wargocki P, Bischof W, Carrer P, Asimakopoulou M, de Oliveira Fernandes E, et al. (2013). HealthVent: Health-based Ventilation Guidelines for Europe. Final report. Lyngby, Denmark.Google Scholar
  31. Weschler CJ, Nazaroff WW (2008). Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor environments. Atmospheric Environment, 42: 9018–9040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. White FM (1988). Heat and Mass Transfer. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  33. Xiong J, Yao Y, Zhang Y (2011). C-history method: rapid measurement of the initial emittable concentration, diffusion and partition coefficients for formaldehyde and VOCs in building materials. Environmental Science & Technology, 45: 3584–3590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xiong J, Wei W, Huang S, Zhang Y (2013). Association between the emission rate and temperature for chemical pollutants in building materials: General correlation and understanding. Environmental Science & Technology, 47: 8540–8547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiong J, Yang T, Tan J, Li L, Ge Y (2015). Characterization of VOC emission from materials in vehicular environment at varied temperatures: correlation development and validation. PLoS One, 10: e0140081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiong J, Zhang P, Huang S, Zhang Y (2016). Comprehensive influence of environmental factors on the emission rate of formaldehyde and VOCs in building materials: Correlation development and exposure assessment. Environmental Research, 151: 734–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu Y, Zhang Y (2003). An improved mass transfer based model for analyzing VOC emissions from building materials. Atmospheric Environment, 37: 2497–2505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu J, Zhang J, Liu X, Gao Z (2012). Determination of partition and diffusion coefficients of formaldehyde in selected building materials and impact of relative humidity. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 62: 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang X, Chen Q, Zhang JS, Magee R, Zeng J, Shaw CY (2001). Numerical simulation of VOC emissions from dry materials. Building and Environment, 36: 1099–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang Y, Xiong J, Mo J, Gong M, Cao J (2016). Understanding and controlling airborne organic compounds in the indoor environment: Mass transfer analysis and applications. Indoor Air, 26: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang X, Cao J, Wei J, Zhang Y (2018). Improved C-history method for rapidly and accurately measuring the characteristic parameters of formaldehyde/VOCs emitted from building materials. Building and Environment, 143: 570–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zin TW, Cline D, Lehmann WF (1990). Long-term study of formaldehyde emission decay from particleboard. In: Proceedings of the Washington State University International Particleboard/composite Materials Series Symposium, Pullman, WA, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Just Johnston
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Toke Rammer Nielsen
    • 2
  • Jørn Toftum
    • 2
  1. 1.The NIRAS GroupLillerødDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringTechnical University of DenmarkBrovejDenmark

Personalised recommendations