Inverse tracking of an airborne pollutant source location in a residential apartment by joint simulation of CFD and a multizone model
- 13 Downloads
Prompt identification of an indoor air pollutant source location is important for the safety of building residents in gaseous contaminant leakage incidents. Using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method in such inverse modeling is time consuming, especially for naturally ventilated residential buildings, which have multiple rooms and require consideration both indoor and outdoor environments. This paper compares the results of the pollutant source location identification and the simulation time based on two different inverse modeling methods: the CFD method and joint modeling of the multizone and CFD methods, to discuss the consumption of the computing time, as well as the accuracy of the location identification result. An instantaneous airborne pollutant source is assumed in a typical residential apartment that utilizes natural ventilation. A CFD model with the computational domain of the whole apartment and surrounding environment is built, for which the adjoint probability method is applied to simulate the source location probability from limited sensor readings. Meanwhile, a multizone model of the apartment is built to simulate and identify the room in which the source is located using the adjoint probability method. The CFD method is applied to the identified room afterwards to identify the exact location of the source within that room. The joint simulation of CFD and the multizone model is verified by a scaled model experiment of the apartment. It is found that the joint simulation method can significantly reduce the computing time and provides a good alternative for real-time inverse tracking of the indoor airborne pollutant.
Keywordsmultizone model CFD indoor airborne pollutant adjoint probability method joint simulation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work is financially supported by National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 51508326).
- Cornacchiulo D, Bagtzoglou AC, Atmadja J (2002). Hydrologic inverse on using marching-jury backward beam equation and quasi reversibility methods. In: Proceedings of the 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, New York, USA.Google Scholar
- Ferry M (2002). New features of MIGAL solver. In: Proceedings of the International PHOENICS Users Conference, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- Gao Y, Chen Q (2003). Coupling of a multi-zone airflow analysis program with a computational fluid dynamics program for indoor air quality studies. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on HVAC, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
- Indian Standard (1987). IS: 875 (Part-3), Code of Practice for the Design Loads (other than earthquake) for Buildings and Structures—Wind Loads. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.Google Scholar
- Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsang AM, Switzer P, Behar JV, Hern SC, Engelmann WH (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal Exposure of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 11: 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Shao X, Ma X, Zhang Y, Cai H (2011). A numerical method to determine the steady state distribution of passive contaminant in generic ventilation systems. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 192: 139–149.Google Scholar
- Lin R (2003). Identification of groundwater contamination sources using probabilities conditioned on measured concentrations. PhD Thesis, University of Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
- Liu X (2008). Identification of indoor airborne contaminant sources with probability-based inverse modeling methods. PhD Thesis, University of Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
- Vukovic V, Srebric J (2007). Application of neural networks trained with multizone models for fast detection of pollutant source position in buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 113(2): 154–162.Google Scholar
- Zhai Z, Liu X (2017). Sensitivity analysis of the probability-based inverse modeling method for indoor contaminant tracking. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 12: 75–83.Google Scholar