Advertisement

Building Simulation

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 141–151 | Cite as

Flow field around a surface-mounted cubic building with louver blinds

  • Fujian Jiang
  • Zhengrong LiEmail author
  • Qun Zhao
  • Qiuhua Tao
  • Yanping Yuan
  • Shunyao Lu
Research Article Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Louver blinds are commonly used in building designs to avoid excessive solar radiation in an indoor environment, particularly for buildings with highly glazed facades. However, little attention has been given to their impact on flow field and pressure distribution around a building, which is crucial for predicting convective heat transfer, pollutant dispersion, and indoor ventilation. Therefore, the present study combined a wind-tunnel experiment with computational fluid dynamics simulations to study a wind velocity profile, flow field patterns, and surface pressure around a cubic building with louver blinds. The louver blinds move windward flow separation in an upward direction and extend the recirculation region of a roof; moreover, some subvortices are generated between the two adjacent louver slats. Louver angle φ, installing distance W, and slat width B severely affect the generation of subvortices between slats and a conical vortex on the roof. Subsequently, blinds with different φ, W, and B exhibit different pressure distributions on the windward surface and top surface of a building.

Keywords

flow field louver blinds wind-tunnel experiment computational fluid dynamics wind pressure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51578385).

References

  1. Argiriou AA, Balaras CA, Lykoudis SP (2002). Single-sided ventilation of buildings through shaded large openings. Energy, 27: 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASHRAE (2009). ASHRAE Handbook: Fundamentals (SI). Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  3. ANSYS (2013). ANSYS Fluent 14.0: Theory Guide. Canonsburg, USA: ANSYS Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Braun AL, Awruch AM (2009). Aerodynamic and aeroelastic analyses on the CAARC standard tall building model using numerical simulation. Computers & Structures, 87: 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castro IP, Robins AG (1977). The flow around a surface-mounted cube in uniform and turbulent streams. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 79: 307–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chand I, Bhargava PK, Krishak NLV (1998). Effect of balconies on ventilation inducing aeromotive force on low-rise buildings. Building and Environment, 33: 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins M, Tasnim S, Wright J (2009). Numerical analysis of convective heat transfer in fenestration with between-the-glass louvered shades. Building and Environment, 44: 2185–2192.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuevas C, Fissore A, Fonseca N (2010). Natural convection at an indoor glazing surface with different window blinds. Energy and Buildings, 42: 1685–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cui PY, Li Z, Tao WQ (2014). Investigation of Re-independence of turbulent flow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyon using numerical wind tunnel (NWT) models. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 79: 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cui PY, Li Z, Tao WQ (2016). Buoyancy flows and pollutant dispersion through different scale urban areas: CFD simulations and windtunnel measurements. Building and Environment, 104: 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalal R, Naylor D, Roeleveld D (2009). A CFD study of convection in a double glazed window with an enclosed pleated blind. Energy and Buildings, 41: 1256–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen H, Carissimo B (2007). Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. COST Action 732: Quality Assurance and Improvement of Microscale Meteorological Models. Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  13. Hien WN, Istiadji AD A (2003). Effects of external shading devices on daylighting and natural ventilation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Edinhoven, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  14. Hu J, Xuan HB, Kwok KCS, Zhang Y, Yu Y (2018). Study of wind flow over a 6 m cube using improved delayed detached Eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 179: 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang S, Li QS, Xu S (2007). Numerical evaluation of wind effects on a tall steel building by CFD. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63: 612–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang P, Tao L, Gu M, Quan Y (2018). Experimental study of wind loads on gable roofs of low-rise buildings with overhangs. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 12: 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimura I, Hosoda T (2003). A non-linear k–ε model with realizability for prediction of flows around bluff bodies. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 42: 813–837.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Koffi J, El Mankibi M, Gourdon E, Issoglio R (2015). Assessment of single-sided ventilation with acoustic shutters on windows. Building Simulation, 8: 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee DS, Kim SJ, Cho YH, Jo JH (2015). Experimental study for wind pressure loss rate through exterior venetian blind in cross ventilation. Energy and Buildings, 107: 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levitan ML, Mehta KC, Vann WP, Holmes JD (1991). Field measurements of pressures on the Texas tech building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 38: 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li L, Qu M, Peng S (2016). Performance evaluation of building integrated solar thermal shading system: Building energy consumption and daylight provision. Energy and Buildings, 113: 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Machin AD, Naylor D, Harrison SJ, Oosthuizen PH (1998). Experimental study of free convection at an indoor glazing surface with a venetian blind. HVAC & R Research, 4: 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinuzzi R, Tropea C (1993). The flow around surface-mounted, prismatic obstacles placed in a fully developed channel flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 115: 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montazeri H, Blocken B (2013). CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: Validation and sensitivity analysis. Building and Environment, 60: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mu D, Gao NP, Zhu T (2016). Wind tunnel tests of inter-flat pollutant transmission characteristics in a rectangular multi-storey residential building, part A: Effect of wind direction. Building and Environment, 108: 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murakami S, Kato S, Akabayashi S, Mizutani K, Kim Y (1991). Wind tunnel test on velocity-pressure field of cross-ventilation with open windows. ASHRAE Transactions, 97(1): 525–538.Google Scholar
  27. Nakamura H, Igarashi T, Tsutsui T (2001). Local heat transfer around a wall-mounted cube in the turbulent boundary layer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 44: 3385–3395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Obasaju ED (1992). Measurement of forces and base overturning moments on the CAARC tall building model in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 40: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Sullivan PD, Kolokotroni M (2017). A field study of wind dominant single sided ventilation through a narrow slotted architectural louvre system. Energy and Buildings, 138: 733–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palmero-Marrero AI, Oliveira AC (2010). Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements. Applied Energy, 87: 2040–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards PJ, Hoxey RP (2001). Unsteady flow on the sides of a 6m cube. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 90: 1855–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richards PJ, Hoxey RP, Connell B D, Lander DP (2007). Wind-tunnel modelling of the Silsoe Cube. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95: 1384–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shih T-H, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995). A new k–ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers and Fluids, 24: 227–238.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Stathopoulos T, Zhu X (1988). Wind pressures on building with appurtenances. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 31: 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tominaga Y, Mochida A,, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawa T (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 1749–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsuchiya M, Murakami S, Mochida A, Kondo K, Ishida Y (1997). Development of a new k-ε model for flow and pressure fields around bluff body. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 67–68: 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uribe D, Bustamante W, Vera S (2018). Potential of perforated exterior louvers to improve the comfort and energy performance of an office. Building Simulation, 11: 695–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vera S, Uribe D, Bustamante W, Molina G (2016). Optimization of a fixed exterior complex fenestration system considering visual comfort and energy performance criteria. Building and Environment, 113: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolfshtein M (1969). The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 12: 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeng Z, Li X, Li C, Zhu Y (2012). Modeling ventilation in naturally ventilated double-skin facade with a venetian blind. Building and Environment, 57: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang Z, Bejan A, Lage JL (1991). Natural convection in a vertical enclosure with internal permeable screen. Journal of Heat transfer, 113: 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fujian Jiang
    • 1
  • Zhengrong Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qun Zhao
    • 2
  • Qiuhua Tao
    • 3
  • Yanping Yuan
    • 4
  • Shunyao Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.College of Architectural and Urban PlanningTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.College of Mechanical EngineeringJimei UniversityXiamenChina
  4. 4.School of Mechanical EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations