Numerical study on the effect of elevator movement on pressure difference between vestibule and living room in high-rise buildings
- 51 Downloads
In this study, we experimentally and numerically investigated the effect of elevator movement on the pressure difference between vestibule and living room regulated by the smoke control system in a high-rise building. The elevator and smoke control systems using supplied pressure dampers are considered one of the most important systems for safe evacuation. However, the pressure field and flow rate are strongly disrupted by elevator movement. Thus, they can affect the performance of smoke control systems and hinder evacuation. The experimental results of this study are used to validate the results of the numerical study when elevator is moving at low speed or is stationary. Then, the effect of elevator movement on the pressure difference between the vestibule and living room, which is controlled by the smoke control system, is investigated numerically using ANSYS CFX. The elevator speed is increased from 10 to 70 m/s, corresponding to the real elevator speed increase of 1.5 to 10 m/s based on Reynolds similarity. It is found that the higher the elevator speed, the greater the pressure difference between the vestibule and living room. This shows that the airflow rate should be actively changed by considering the location of the elevator and its speed. The empirical correlation between elevator movement and pressure difference is derived.
Keywordselevator movement high-rise building pressure difference smoke control system
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Research Scholarship Grants in 2017.
- Averill J, Mileti D, Peacock R, Kuligowski E, Groner N, Proulx G, Reneke P, Nelson H (2005). Federal building and fire safety investigation of the world trade center disaster—Occupant behavior, egress and emergency communications. NIST NCSTAR 1–7. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Black WZ (2011). Computer modeling of stairwell pressurization to control smoke movement during a high-rise fire. ASHRAE Transactions, 117: 786–800.Google Scholar
- Bukowski R (2008). Status of the Use of Elevators in Fires. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.Google Scholar
- England JP, Young SA (1999). Report of the performance of a solid core timber door in a fire test using a standard heating regime. Warrington Fire Research (Aust) Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
- Howkins R (2000). In the Event of Fire—Use Elevators. In: Proceedings of ELEVCON 2000.Google Scholar
- Klote JH (1991). Design Manual for Smoke Control System, NISTIR 4551. Building and fire research laboratory. National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google Scholar
- Klote JH, Milke JA (2002). Principles of smoke management. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating. Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
- NFPA (2000). NFPA 92A: Recommended Practice for Smoke control Systems. Quincy, MA, USA: National Fire Protection Association.Google Scholar
- NFSC (2015). NFSC 501: Fire Safety Standard Codes for Smoke Control System. Ministry of Public Safety and Security, Korea.Google Scholar
- Proulx G, Johnson P, Heyes E, Hedman G, Averill J, Pauls J, McColl D (2009). The use of elevators for egress: Discussion Panel. In: Proceedings of Human Behaviour in Fire Conference.Google Scholar
- Wang Y, Gao F (2004). Tests of stairwell pressurization systems for smoke control in a high-rise building. ASHRAE Transactions, 110(1): 185–193.Google Scholar